Presentation to the Joint Legislative Audit Committee May 9, 2002 Air Quality Benefits of Wisconsin’s Motor Vehicle Inspection Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SIP Development Process Overview For the Great Smoky Mountain National Park Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe,
Advertisements

Fine Particle Health Impacts and the Need for Control Measures in New Jersey Kenneth Fradkin, US EPA Region 2 Air Programs Branch Hearing of the New Jersey.
Ozone Early Action Compacts Clearing the Air in Tennessee Prepared by the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation for the Tennessee Pollution.
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Centralina Nonattainment Area Elected Officials and City and County Managers and Planners.
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Triangle Area Mayors and County Commission Board Chairs Donnie Redmond April 7, 2005.
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Centralina Council of Governments Donnie Redmond July 13, 2005.
SIP Development Process Overview For Rocky Mount Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe, NCDAQ Mike Abraczinskas, NCDAQ.
SIP Development Process Overview For Metrolina Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe, NCDAQ Mike Abraczinskas, NCDAQ.
SIP Development Process Overview For Hickory Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe, NCDAQ Mike Abraczinskas, NCDAQ.
SIP Development Process Overview For Triad Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe, NCDAQ Mike Abraczinskas, NCDAQ Eddie.
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Triangle Area Mayors and County Commission Board Chairs Donnie Redmond August 11,
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Granville County Board of Commissioners Donnie Redmond July 5, 2005.
Clean Smokestacks Act Benefits Update Division of Air Quality March 17, /17/2010.
Clean Smokestacks Act North Carolina Mercury and CO2 Workshop April , 2004 Brock Nicholson, P.E. Deputy Director N.C. Division of Air Quality.
New Source Review (NSR) Program Basics
1 Proposed Rulemaking to Implement Provisions of the Federal Clean Air Interstate Rule Environmental Quality Board Meeting Harrisburg, PA February 20,
Chicago, Illinois Clean Air Interstate Rule - CAIR.
Airport Air Quality: Health Effects Michael T. Kleinman University of California, Irvine.
Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) Reducing Regional Transport of Emissions and Helping States Achieve the PM2.5 and Ozone NAAQS Beth Murray Clean Air Markets.
1 Driving Factors: Driving Factors: How Transportation Policy Affects Health Environmental Defense National Alliance for Nutrition and Activity Surface.
EPA’s New Fine Particle Standard & Metropolitan Washington Region Sunil Kumar MWAQC, December 18, 2012 MWCOG Item #3.
Southern Environmental Law Center Georgia Air Summit May 4, 2006.
1 Vehicle Emissions Testing Program Legislative Audit Bureau May 2002.
How meeting the 2007 Standard & Reducing Variable Emissions will Help Attain the Hour Standard? Guy Donaldson EPA.
Transportation and Air Quality in the Treasure Valley.
Air Pollution Control Board October 1, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management We Protect.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
Transportation & Air Quality Planning AMPO MPO Educational Series November 8,
Minnesota Air Quality and Attainment Status Frank Kohlasch Kari Palmer Statewide Travel Demand Coordinating Committee Meeting October 14, 2010.
Environmental Health: Risk Assessment and Risk Management Michael Brody, PhD Senior Environmental Scientist 2 December 2011 Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Air Quality Planning, Metro. Washington, DC-MD-VA Joan Rohlfs, Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG October 27, 2005.
Air Quality and Conformity Issues James M. Shrouds, Director Office of Natural and Human Environment Federal Highway Administration AASHTO SCOE Meeting.
Transportation-related Air Pollutants Health Effects and Risk Linda Tombras Smith, PhD Chief, Health and Exposure Assessment Branch Research Division October.
GA EPD Air Protection Branch AWMA Southern Section August 2015.
Improving Life, One Breath at a Time LUNG-USA Terry Hargrove Director of Community Relations.
Improving Life, One Breath at a Time 800-LUNGUSA
Truck Idle Reduction and CMAQ Shawn Seals Office of Air Quality Air Innovations Conference Chicago, Illinois August 12, 2004.
Energy Law, Fall 2010 Natashia Holmes
EPA’s New Air Quality Standards. Topics The Revised Standards Our Current Readings Benefits Versus Costs Conformity – What Is It? Sources of Our Air Pollution.
Planning for Clean Air and Conformity: Connecting the SIP to the Transportation System Jeff Riley Houston, TX May 30, 2007.
Indiana Department of Environmental Management 2013 Fine Particles (PM 2.5 ) Summary Report Office of Air Quality (800)
Transit Connections 2013 The Value of Transit Transit: It’s Personal Amy Fitch University of Nevada, Reno Julie D. Hunter Washoe County Health District.
1 PM2.5 Redesignation Request for the Metropolitan Washington,D.C. Region Joan Rohlfs Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG.
Clean Air Act and New Source Review Permits EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park NC March
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Current Status of Air Quality Laura Boothe North Carolina Division of Air Quality MCIC Workshops March 2012.
The Clean Air Act First Clean Air Act passed in 1967: 1970 Amendments established current relationship between states and federal government and required.
Environmental Quality Board Harrisburg, PA October 16, 2007 Thomas K. Fidler, Deputy Secretary Office of Waste, Air and Radiation Management Feasibility.
Indiana Department of Environmental Management 2009 Fine Particles (PM 2.5 ) Summary Report Office of Air Quality.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Briefing for NTAA EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards April 17, 2007.
Missoula Air Quality Conformity Analysis Required by Federal and Montana Clean Air Act – Transportation-specific air quality requirements enacted in Federal.
State Implementation Plans Could Rule Your Life or why NAAQS Are Important Chuck Sams R9 Air Quality Program Manager.
Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Air Quality (800) Fine Particles (PM 2.5 ) Summary Report.
Health Effects of Air Pollution
Clean Diesel Engine Implementation Workshop Panel on Other Perspectives Chicago, August 7, 2003.
State Implementation Plan for 8-Hour Ozone in San Diego Planning and Technical Support Division May 24, 2007 San Diego.
Automobiles Ely Hienrich, Mikey Saltzgaber, and Campbell Smith.
Fine Particles in the Air: Taking Action, Improving Health Presentation at STAPPA/ALAPCO Meeting Coeur d'Alene, Idaho Tom Curran, EPA Office of Air Quality.
Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Air Quality (800) Fine Particles (PM 2.5 ) Summary.
EPA Proposed Ground-level Ozone (O 3 ) NAAQS Rich McAllister National Tribal Air Association Policy Advisory Committee Hobbs Straus Dean & Walker.
Retrofitting Transit Buses to Reduce Air Emissions Kim Perrotta, Air Quality Coordinator, Ontario Public Health Association CUTA Conference 2003.
CHOOSE CLEAN AIR FOR CALIFORNIA RALPH JOHN DI LIBERO, MD 135 TH LACMA PRESIDENT.
PROPOSED FINE PARTICULATE ATTAINMENT/ NONATTAINMENT DESIGNATION RECOMMENDATIONS This proposal is available on the DEP Website at
Lessons Learned from HSIP & CMAQ
Cross-State Air Pollution Rule
Maryland's Air Quality: Nitrogen Reductions and the Healthy Air Act
Why Are We Pushing for More Federal Rules to Reduce Regional NOx and SO2? NACAA Meeting May 17, 2010.
Air Pollutants and Their Sources
Ground-level Ozone (O3)
CAIR Update WESTAR October 2, 2008.
DOGM Collaborative Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Presentation to the Joint Legislative Audit Committee May 9, 2002 Air Quality Benefits of Wisconsin’s Motor Vehicle Inspection Program

I/M Air Quality Benefits u Ozone u VOC, NOx, & CO u Carbon Monoxide u Fine Particles u VOC & NOx u Other Toxic Compounds u Benzene, 1,3 Butadiene, Xylene, Toluene

Health Effects u Ozone u Decreased Lung Function u Change in Lung Structure (Lung Scarring) u Degraded Immune System u Triggers Asthma Attacks

Health Effects u Fine Particles u Premature Death u Increased Respiratory Disease u Decreased Lund Function u Changes to Lung Structure

Health Effects u CO u Heart Attacks u Study by Dr. Robert Morris from the Medical College of Wisconsin - Amer. Jour. Pub. Health u Other Toxic Substances u Benzene, 1,3 Butadiene, Xylene, Toluene u Leukemia, Lung Cancer

Health Effects - Cost/Benefit u 4 to 1 Ratio - Health Benefit to Air Quality Program Cost u March 19 - White Office of Management and Budget u British Study - 12, ,500 Deaths Annually - Mostly from Motor Vehicles

I/M Regulatory Benefit u 15% Plan u ~20 tons/day out of 51 tons/day u 9% Plan u ~24 tons/day out of 82 tons/day u Attainment Demonstration Rate of Progress u ~40 tons/day out of 163 tons/day u Redesignation Request u Conformity

I/M Clean Air Act Requirements u Severe Ozone Nonattainment Areas u Milwaukee - Low Enhanced I/M u Performance Standard u State Flexibility to Design Program u Important to Leave a Safety Margin in Program Design u Moderate Nonattainment Areas u Sheboygan u Relatively Low Hurdle

Sheboygan County I/M Program u Difference from Low-Enhanced Program in Milwaukee u Repair Cost Waiver $200 and $75 v. $450 u Policy Decision u More Emission Reduction u Cheaper u Easier to Manage u More Flexibility for Motorists

Contribution to Ozone Formation - VOC

Contribution to Ozone Formation - NOx

Future Considerations u 8-Hour Ozone Standard u March 26, 2002, DC Circuit Court Ruling u Some Additional Legal Hurdles u EPA to Develop an Implementation Plan u 2004 or 2005 Nonattainment Designations u Opportunity to Reduce Design Value  Lower Classification  Avoid Nonattainment Designation

Future Considerations u Fine Particles u March 26, 2002, DC Circuit Court Ruling u EPA to Develop an Implementation Plan u 2004 or 2005 Nonattainment Designations u Continue Attainment Status

Current Fine Particle Monitoring

I/M Program Evaluation u Joint DOT and DNR Evaluation u Comprehensive I/M Program Evaluation  Efficiencies, Improvements & Cost Savings u Stakeholder Input u Completed by December 31, 2002 u Report to the Natural Resources Board and the Legislature

Presentation to the Joint Legislative Audit Committee May 9, 2002 Air Quality Benefits of Wisconsin’s Motor Vehicle Inspection Program