Indiana State Department of Health Immunization Program June 17 th, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meaningful Use and Health Information Exchange
Advertisements

Georgia Department of Community Health
Dedicated to Hope, Healing and Recovery 0 Dec 2009 Interim/Proposed Rules Meaningful Use, Quality Reporting & Interoperability Standards January 10, 2010.
Connecting with the Texas Immunization Registry via HL7 Format Understand How to send HL7 Immunization Information to the Texas Immunization Registry.
Vendor Orientation Meaningful Use Informatics Division.
Presenting on behalf of the Stage 2 MU PH Reporting Requirements Task Force.
MU Stage 2 and ICD-10: Regulatory Update Dr. Denise W. Hines, PMP, FHIMSS Director-Outreach & Education GA HIT Regional Extension Center.
Meaningful Use Update: How to Prepare Dr. Denise W. Hines, PMP, FHIMSS Director-Outreach & Education GA HIT Regional Extension Center.
OVERVIEW CAH and Rural Hospitals August Goals and Objectives Collaborate with Statewide Partners Competent Technical Teams Work Collaboratively.
ARRA Meaningful Use Update Mount Auburn Hospital Information Systems Update March 2011.
The Immunization Provider’s Toolbox: Immunization Interfaces with State IIS Cecile Town, MPH IHS Immunization Program Division of Epidemiology & Disease.
Health and Wellness for all Arizonans azdhs.gov Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS) & Meaningful Use Sara Imholte Arizona Department of Health.
Quality Measures Vendor Tiger Team January 30, 2014.
Module 5 – Creating the HL7 Message OBJECTIVES Describe the purpose and function of the BYIM software Describe what information RPMS sends to IIS Locate.
Stage 1 Meaningful Use & Reportable Lab Results
Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Presented by Jessica Kahn, MPH Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Center for Medicaid, CHIP, and Survey.
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
Implementing the American Reinvestment & Recovery Act of 2009.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Proposed Rule
Purdue Research Foundation © MU Hot Topics for January 2015.
Meaningful Use Jacqueline L. Candelaria ABQ Area Program Analyst April 25, 2012.
Sanjeev Tandon, MD, MS Public Health and Electronic Health Records Meaningful Use Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services Public.
PQRS NYeC Practice Quality Resources & Registry June 8, 2015.
MEANINGFUL USE UPDATE 2014 Mark Huang, M.D. Chief Medical Information Officer Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Associate Professor Department of PM.
EHR Update CPSP Annual Meeting November 7, 2012 Mary Wieg, NC III Program Standards Branch Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Division.
PR’s Journey Towards Electronic Health Records Adoption & Meaningful Use PRESENTATION TO PR HIT SUMMIT Antonio Fernandez Regional Extension Center for.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 5, 2013.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
Moderator Kevin Larsen, MD Medical Director, Meaningful Use Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Washington, D.C. Using.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Saeed A. Khan MD, MBA, FACP © CureMD Healthcare ACOs and Requirements for Reporting Quality Measures Meaningful Use Are you still missing out? © CureMD.
INFLUENCE OF MEANINGFUL USE AMONG HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS Neely Duffey, Olivia Mire, Mallory Murphy, and Dana Sizemore.
NWH TRANSITION OF CARE DOCUMENT FOR MU STAGE 2 JUNE 6, 2014.
Prepared by: Health Technology Services Regional Extension Center A division of Mountain-Pacific Quality Health.
1 EHR Incentive Program Registration & Attestation Tips for the Eligible Professionals Marlene Hodges & Denise Warren June 8, 2011.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
CMS Proposed Changes for Meaningful Use in Mark Segal, Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs, GE Healthcare IT May 1, 2015.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program For Eligible Professionals Overview of the Proposed 2015 Modification Rule Kim Davis-Allen Outreach Coordinator
Universal Adoption of the EHR What is Meaningful Use and why should it be important to me?
Meaningful Use Presentation for Fall Faculty Meeting October 24, 2014.
Indiana State Department of Health Meaningful Use Chris Mickens, CTCO March 16, 2012.
Medicaid HIT Program Jon Barley, Ph.D., Chief Bureau of Health Services Research Office of Ohio Health Plans
Discussion with BEACON Council ODJFS/OHP Medicaid Provider Incentive Program.
Making better healthcare possible ® Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Changing Seasons of Healthcare Conference WV-HFMA/WV-HIMSS September 27, 2012.
Component 11: Configuring EHRs Unit 2: Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Lecture 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
Unit 1b: Health Care Quality and Meaningful Use Introduction to QI and HIT This material was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department.
Stage 2 Meaningful Use Improve Population and Public Health 1.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Population and Public Health – Subgroup 4 Art Davidson, Chair September 11, 2012.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Jason McNamara Technical Director for Health IT.
Component 3-Terminology in Healthcare and Public Health Settings Unit 15-Overview/ Introduction to the EHR This material was developed by The University.
Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Terminology in Health Care and Public Health Settings Unit 15 Overview / Introduction to the EHR.
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
Health IT Policy Committee Meeting November 4, 2014 Data Analytics Update 1.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Updates eHealth Services and Support September 24, 2014 Today’s presenter: Nicole Bennett, Provider Enrollment and Verification.
Final Rule Regarding EHR Certification Flexibility for 2014 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager Thomas Bennett, Client.
IIS Project and Contact Management Systems (CMS): An Efficient Comprehensive Management Approach to IIS Recruitment, Training and EHR Integration IIS Community.
Understanding Vendor Offerings Maximizing the benefit of your HL7 abilities Brandy Altstadter March 7, 2006.
Meaningful Use Syndromic Surveillance DHSC March 3, 2016.
MAPIR 5.7 Walk-Through Vermont Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program May 25, 2016.
Implementation of Electronic Health Records at Choctaw General Hospital Lisa Sims November 12, 2012.
EHR Incentive Program 2017 Program Requirements
Immunization Registry
EHR Incentive Program 2017 Program Requirements
EHR Incentive Program 2018 Program Requirements
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #10 – Public Health Reporting Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 21, 2016 Today’s presenter:
OCC Fall Users’ Group Meeting MIPS/MU
Ensuring Meaningful Use of your IIS: The Kansas Perspective
Presentation transcript:

Indiana State Department of Health Immunization Program June 17 th, 2014

 Stage 1 Meaningful Use  Stage 2 and ongoing submission  VFC Providers requirements versus Stage 2  Meaningful Use Registration Web Portal ◦ Do I need to setup all of my facilities?  Sending data to CHIRP – Transport Layers  Troubleshooting  When does Meaningful Use end?  Question and Solutions

 Meaningful use is using certified electronic health record (EHR) technology to:  Improve quality, safety, efficiency, and reduce health disparities  Engage patients and family  Improve care coordination, and population and public health  Maintain privacy and security of patient health information  Ultimately, it is hoped that the meaningful use compliance will result in: ◦ Better clinical outcomes ◦ Improved population health outcomes ◦ Increased transparency and efficiency ◦ Empowered individuals ◦ More robust research data on health systems Meaningful use sets specific objectives that eligible professionals (EPs) and hospitals must achieve to qualify for Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Incentive Programs. Source: HealthIT.gov

 Core Objective – Public Health Reporting ◦ Stage 1 – maybe optional ◦ Stage 2 - required  Indiana State Department of Health is the Public Health Authority for the State of Indiana  Accept, validate, document provider attestments for Stage 1 and Stage 2

 Children and Hoosier’s Immunization Registry Program  Began in September 2002 as state wide IIS  Prior to CHIRP Indiana used ImmTime  Over 4,000 providers and 8,000 users  ~42,000 HL7 messages accepted each day  Accepts HL7 2.0 through VXU type messages ◦ All valid messages received will create an ACK response  Connected to all Indiana HIEs

CHIRP, CHIRP, CHIRP MU, MU, MU ACK, ACK, ACK

ISDHIndiana State Department of Health PHAPublic Health Authority MUMeaningful Use MU(X)Usually MU1 or MU2, referring to the stage of Meaningful Use HL7Health Level-7, a healthcare message standard developed by Health Level Seven International VXUVaccine Update/Add HL7 Message type, can be or message VXQVaccine Query Message, used with message QPBVaccine Query Message, used with message HIEHealth Information Exchange ACKAcknowledgement response for VXU message submitted And many more… Common terms that pop during a Meaningful Use call/

 HL7 VXU ◦ Required fields - 8 ◦ VXU, VXQ and ADT  Test messages  Accepted versus failed message  Onetime and ongoing  Additional year attestments  Began in 2011 ◦ First CHIRP Meaningful Use Attestment February 2011

 HL7 VXU message ◦ Required fields – 42  New segments for ◦ OBX – required and optional ◦ RXR ◦ NK1 and PID patient guardian  Testing requirements for Stage 2 ◦ Message approval prior to submitting to production ◦ 30 day suggested timing by the ONC  Ongoing Submission – 90 days? ◦ Does it need to be done during attestment ◦ What if there is an error

MSH|^~\&|EMR_VENDOR|SENDING_FAC|CHIRP|OR| ||VX U^V04^VXU_V04| |P|2.5.1|||AL| PID|1||123456^^^^MR||TEST_PATIENT^CHIRP^^^^^L|| |F|| ^Undefined Race^CDCREC|||||EN||VAR|||||UN^Unknown^99USI||||||||N PD1||||""||||U|||01^No Reminder^HL70215|N| ||Y^Advanced Directive Code - Y|A| | PV1||||||||||MED RXA|0|1| | |03^MMR^CVX|0.5|mL^milliliter^UC UM||00^New Immunization Record^NIP001|ABC123^RABBIT^BUNNY^^^^^^TEST|1234ABC^^^CHIRP TEST FACILITY|||| ||AB^Abbott Laboratories^MVX|||CP|A RXR|SUBQ^^HL70162|LD^LEFT DELTOID^HL70163||^SUBCUTANEOUS OBX|1|CE| ^Vaccine funding program eligibility category^LN|1|V01||||||F||| |||VXC40^Eligibility captured at the immunization level^CDCPHINVS OBX|2|CE| ^vaccine type^LN|2|||||||F OBX|3|TS| ^Date vaccine information statement published^LN|2| ||||||F OBX|4|TS| ^Date vaccine information statement presented^LN|2| ||||||

 Provider registers each physical location with ISDH via Meaningful Use Portal  Providers registers each location to CHIRP via the Provider Enrollment Agreement  HL7 user account setup for testing  Provider or vendor submits messages to CHIRP review and approval ◦ Recommend contacting CHIRP after submission for review  Provider moves messages into production ◦ Ongoing 90 day clock begins

 New VFC policy requirement including use of VFC codes and lot numbers in HL7 message ◦ PV1 Codes ◦ OBX Codes  What fields do I need to send to make sure my lot inventory will decrement  If I am sending the new MU2 message do I meet the VFC policy? ◦ that meet VFC requirements vs  July 31 st – VFC policy date

 MU Message ◦ OBX segment with V0 VFC eligibility code ◦ OBX segment with lot number funding source ◦ RXA segment with complete lot number, manufacturer, and administering facility (RXA.11)  Existing Message ◦ PV1 segment with V0 VFC eligibility code, code is located in PV1.20 placement ◦ All messages with a valid VFC code, i.e. V02 (Medicaid) will be assumed Public Supplied by CHIRP ◦ RXA segment with complete lot number, manufacturer, and administering facility (RXA.11)

 Only Stage 2 are required to register ◦ Stage 1 is optional registration  All providers need to register  Each physical location to be attested should register ◦ We do not recommend registering each provider  Providers may register for Immunization, Synrdomic, and ELR attestments  confirmation once registration is complete

Provider Group Indiana PG Hosp Indy PN West PG Hosp Warsaw PG Hosp Muncie PG Physician’s Network PN North PN Indy PN Main PN South PN East Dr. Jones Smith, MD Dr. Jones Smith, MD Dr. Jones Smith, MD Specialist Team PA Rogers NP Wishka PA Rogers NP Wishka PA Rogers NP Wishka PA Rogers NP Wishka

PG Hosp Indy PN West PG Hosp Warsaw PG Hosp Muncie PN North PN Indy PN Main PN South PN East

 Providers can register for their Stage 2 Meaningful Use Attestment at anytime  ISDH recommends registering 30 days prior to the start of your 90 day attestment window  Providers must register by their 60 th day of attestment time period ◦ Registering later shortens the window to test and move interface into production  90 day ongoing and 90 day attestment window do not need to match up

 Submitting from your HIE ◦ HIE will act as a pass through ◦ Meets Stage 2 transport layer  Connecting to CHIRP directly ◦ HTTPS Post/SOAP connection  Standard created by CDC and used by most Immunization Information Systems ◦ Message sent using secured SSL certificate  Sent from your EMR/EHR Cloud Vendor ◦ Uses HTTPS connection Only connections that support bidirectional messages can be used

 OBX Segments ◦ All administered messages should include VIS data in OBX ◦ VFC providers need to include VFC eligibility for all administered patient records 0 through18 years of age  Historical vaccines ◦ Contains fewer details but still need to meet minimums including patient data and facility ◦ When in doubt, do not submit historical data  Sending via Cloud EMR ◦ Each provider needs to register and attest individually ◦ Cloud EMR will only need to test initial messages

 Stage 2 Year 1 Attestments ◦ 90 day ongoing submission of data to PHA  Stage 2 Year 2 Attestments ◦ 365 day ongoing submission of data to PHA  Stage 3 – 2016 ◦ Improving quality, safety, and efficiency, leading to improved health outcomes ◦ Decision support for national high-priority conditions  CHIRP forecast included in message response ◦ Patient access to self-management tools  MyVaxIndiana

 Accept, validate, document provider attestments for Stage 1 and Stage 2  Official documents of Meaningful Use status can be downloaded from ISDH Meaningful Use Portal

Please feel free to ask any questions Raymond Epps Cameron Minich CHIRP Contacts Meaningful Use

CHIRP Web page ISDH Meaningful Use Portal spx Indiana Immunization Coalition