EVital Records Initiative What we learned and what comes next.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meaningful Use and Health Information Exchange
Advertisements

Manatt manatt | phelps | phillips New York State Health Information Technology Summit Initiative Overview and Update Rachel Block, Project Director United.
Dedicated to Hope, Healing and Recovery 0 Dec 2009 Interim/Proposed Rules Meaningful Use, Quality Reporting & Interoperability Standards January 10, 2010.
Continuity of Change: Where We Have Come From, Where We Are Going New Orleans, LA June 5 th – 9 th, 2011 The Future Role of Vital Records’ Systems An Overview.
Functional Requirements and Health IT Standards Considerations for STAGE 3 Meaningful Use for Long-Term and Post-Acute Care (LTPAC) Update to the HITPC.
A Plan for a Sustainable Community Behavioral Health Information Network Western States Health-e Connection Summit & Trade Show September 10, 2013.
Supporting National e-Health Roadmaps WHO-ITU-WB joint effort WSIS C7 e-Health Facilitation Meeting 13 th May 2010 Hani Eskandar ICT Applications, ITU.
Meaningful Use Basics.  Demographics  Active Medication List  Active Allergy List  Vitals  Smoking Status  Problem List  Computerized Physician/Provider.
BUILDING INTEROPERABILITY STANDARDS FOR VITAL RECORDS Public Health Data Standards Consortium 2012 Annual Business Meeting November 9, 2012 Michelle Williamson,
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
EPA Plans for Moving Forward with Electronic Reporting David Hindin, US EPA May 31, 2012 General Session for the Exchange Network National Meeting Philadelphia,
Overview of Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Presentation to HIT Steering Committee May 24, 2012.
Mark Schoenbaum, Office of Rural Health & Primary Care The Minnesota e-Health Initiative e-Health Initiative Smart Health.
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1 The Electronic Health Record.
Proposed Meaningful Use Criteria for Stage 2 and 3 John D. Halamka.
Meaningful Use, Standards and Certification Under HITECH—Implications for Public Health InfoLinks Community of Practice January 14, 2010 Bill Brand, MPH,
Hetty Khan Health Informatics Scientist Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) August 7, 2012 Developing.
EMRs, EHRs, PHRs, questions and answers
Chapter 2 Electronic Health Records
Linette T Scott, MD, MPH Chief Medical Information Officer, DHCS “Population Health” HIMSS NCal Educational Program, Sacramento, CA| February 4, 2014.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Use Case 16 Care Theme: Maternal & Newborn Health Use Case: Vital Registration and Care Coordination for Newborn Hearing Screening Primary Goal: Demonstrates.
Us Case 5 Delivery Coordination with Vital Records Update, Hearing Screening & Quality Monitoring to Aid Early Pediatric Care Care Theme: Maternal & Newborn.
Extending Our Reach Through Partnerships June 2-6, 2013 Phoenix, Arizona.
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
Antonio Vega Health IT Advisor June 10 th, 2015 Patient Portal.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.
Saeed A. Khan MD, MBA, FACP © CureMD Healthcare ACOs and Requirements for Reporting Quality Measures Meaningful Use Are you still missing out? © CureMD.
EHRS as a Tool to Improve BP Control 1.Brief history of OQIUN, CCI. Began 1999 using data cards. Started working with multiple practice sites using different.
Provider Reporting from the Electronic Health Record Division of Informatics, Information Technology and Telecommunications NYC Department of Health and.
DHIN Customer Profile Webinar September 25, 2009 Better Communication for Better Healthcare Gina B. Perez, MPA DHIN Executive Director Advances in Management,
INFLUENCE OF MEANINGFUL USE AMONG HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS Neely Duffey, Olivia Mire, Mallory Murphy, and Dana Sizemore.
Accelerating Recovery Information Technology Maturity Index Presented by: Stephen A. Wood, FHIMSS HealthCare Perspective, LLC.
Universal Adoption of the EHR What is Meaningful Use and why should it be important to me?
Meaningful Use Presentation for Fall Faculty Meeting October 24, 2014.
Kory Schnoor IDPH Office of Health IT. The Iowa e-Health vision is for: a healthier Iowa through the use and exchange of electronic health information.
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Pilots Proposal CCITI NY 01/27/2014.
INTRODUCTION TO THE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD CHAPTER 1.
Understanding the Vital Records Functional Profile (VRFP) Hetty Khan Health Informatics Specialist Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National.
Making better healthcare possible ® Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Changing Seasons of Healthcare Conference WV-HFMA/WV-HIMSS September 27, 2012.
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use: A View from a Healthcare System Pamela McNutt Sr. VP & CIO Methodist Health System Chair, College of Health Information.
Understanding the PHFP - Vital Records Domain Hetty Khan Health Informatics Specialist Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health.
Unit 1b: Health Care Quality and Meaningful Use Introduction to QI and HIT This material was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department.
NM Health Information Collaborative Using Clinical Health Information Exchange to Improve Population Health September 27, 2007 New Mexico Experience
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
Query Health Vendor Advisory Meeting 12/15/2011. Agenda Provide Overview of Query Health Seek Guidance and Feedback on Integration Approaches.
Us Case 5 Vital Registration and Care Coordination for Newborn Hearing Screening Care Theme: Maternal & Newborn Health Use Case 16 Interoperability Showcase.
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014Slide 1 NAPHSIS ANNUAL MEETING | Seattle | June 8-11, 2014 VITAL RECORDS: A CULTURE OF QUALITY Minnesota eBirth Records Project.
Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
A health department-led initiative to advance and monitor the statewide HIT infrastructure to support public and population health in Minnesota Karen Soderberg.
Terminology in Health Care and Public Health Settings Unit 15 Overview / Introduction to the EHR.
Memphis, TN Thomas Duarte, Executive Director, MSeHA.
Creating an Interoperable Learning Health System for a Healthy Nation Jon White, M.D. Acting Deputy National Coordinator Office of the National Coordinator.
Page 1 Advancing health and wellness through information technology Arizona Health-e Connection: Health Information Technology & Exchange in Arizona September.
Final Rule Regarding EHR Certification Flexibility for 2014 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager Thomas Bennett, Client.
Patient Engagement Today’s presenter:
Terminology in Healthcare and Public Health Settings Electronic Health Records Lecture a – Introduction to the EHR This material Comp3_Unit15 was developed.
ImmuNet 1 Maryland’s Immunization Information System.
Health Information Exchange: Alaska’s Health Pipeline Alaska Bar Association Health Law Section February 2, 2012 Carolyn Heyman-Layne.
Meaningful Use and Value-Based Care GI Resident Business Module 10/9/13 Meaningful Use 2013 Maryanne Berry.
California Successes Engagement & Collaboration –Regional HIEs functioning and expanding for 25 years –25 organizations using Epic’s HIE solutions, many.
The Value of Performance Benchmarking
Rural Health Summit June 11, 2010.
Electronic Health Record Update
Electronic Health Record Update
Health Information Exchange for Eligible Clinicians 2019
Presentation transcript:

eVital Records Initiative What we learned and what comes next

Today’s objectives 0 Healthcare & informatics key terms 0 Project description 0 Our findings 0 Next steps

Collaboration 0 Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) 0 National Association for Public Health & Information Systems 0 MDH – Office of Vital Records 0 MDH – Office of Health Information Technology 0 MN.IT – MN office of Information Technology 0 Allina Health 0 Essentia Health 0 Unity Hospital September, 2012 – April, 2014

eVital Records hypothesis Electronically exchange data from the EHR to MR&C This interoperability would: 0 Be more efficient 0 Improve accuracy of data 0 Be more secure 0 Reduce filing delays

First step: Assessment What is the current state of birth registration? 0 Follow process at one hospital 0 Document each step Special thanks to Unity Hospital

Current hospital birth registration process

Initial assessment: current status 0 Inefficient process 0 Manual data entry/transcription 0 Multiple data sources 0 State unable to assess data quality/validity 0 Exposure to extra patient health information

Informatics learning 0 Healthcare Informatics = using technology to improve patient health 0 Interface = a link/where things connect or intersect 0 Interoperability = useful interaction or movement

How? When? Who? The eVital Records Project considered 0 EHR is compiled throughout the patient stay 0 When should the data move? 0 How to make the data useful? 0 What data should transfer?

Our solution: form manager 0 Utilize a form manager to package information 0 Birth registrar will review & forward 0 Filled form sends data to birth record

Informatics learning 3 Needs for interoperability: 0 Standards 0 Data must exist before it can move 0 Ability to send / Ability to accept data

Multiple systems Multiple stand-alone systems 0 Viewed through “portals” 0 Data transcription 0 Scanning as images

Next Step: Test & Demonstrate Proof of Concept demonstrated to several audiences 0  30% data mapped 0 Form Manager received & sent 0 Vital record populated

Positive Feedback Great idea! Innovative! Extend to other things Send everything this way Think about bi-directionality How soon can we implement?

More informatics learning 0 Meaningful Use = an incentive program for electronic health record implementation 0 Payments & fines 0 Rolled out in stages 0 HL7 = Standards 0 Methods 0 Data sets 0 Language

New problem: non-discrete data 0 EHR created for clinician ease of use 0 Narratives 0 “Smart phrases”

What about demographic data? Some things are not in EHR: 0 Mother’s education, place of birth, race 0 Father’s information 0 Child’s name What or who is data source?

Unanswered questions 0 What about updates to EHR? 0 Corrections 0 Lab values, etc. 0 What about bi-directional exchange? 0 Name changes 0 Who owns the data? 0 Right to share it 0 Right to correct it

Competing Resources: 0 Facilities must comply with MU 0 Facilities also converting other systems 0 ICD 9 becomes ICD 10 0 Innovation takes $$ and time 0 MDH has resource conflicts, too

Will it happen? Absolutely OUR VISION: 0 Mother’s worksheet becomes a tablet or kiosk 0 Birth registrar counsels parents re: registration 0 Birth registrar reviews computer form 0 Birth registrar combines demographic record with medical record and submits birth record Birth registrar becomes a specialized duty

Now is not the time eVital records is still (slightly) ahead of its time 0 Other priorities at facilities 0 Other priorities at MDH 0 Lack of federal standards / mandates / funds 0 EHR data availability

Our recommendations 0 Align policies 0 Seek support from ONC 0 Continue expanding & testing 0 Develop informatics-savvy 0 Vital records offices 0 Stakeholders

What does this mean to you? 0 Short term: continue the great work 0 Long term: 0 Improved prenatal clinic to hospital communication 0 Increased structured data in EHR 0 Technology advances for parents’ reporting of demographic data 0 Specialized birth registrars

In summary The eVital Records project is complete 0 Tested electronic exchange of data from EHR to MR&C 0 Documented current process 0 Proposed future process 0 Noted potential barriers

Thank you! eVital Records Initiative