Coherent oscillations in superconducting flux qubit without microwave pulse S. Poletto 1, J. Lisenfeld 1, A. Lukashenko 1 M.G. Castellano 2, F. Chiarello.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MQC Macroscopic Quantum Coherence Carlo Cosmelli, G. Diambrini Palazzi
Advertisements

Technische Universität München Status report on SADC feature extraction.
RF SQUID Metamaterials For Fast Tuning
The Toffoli gate & Error Correction
Three-qubit quantum error correction with superconducting circuits
SPEC, CEA Saclay (France),
Superconducting qubits
Technological issues of superconducting charge qubits Oleg Astafiev Tsuyoshi Yamamoto Yasunobu Nakamura Jaw-Shen Tsai Dmitri Averin NEC Tsukuba - SUNY.
Superinductor with Tunable Non-Linearity M.E. Gershenson M.T. Bell, I.A. Sadovskyy, L.B. Ioffe, and A.Yu. Kitaev * Department of Physics and Astronomy,
Samansa Maneshi, Jalani Kanem, Chao Zhuang, Matthew Partlow Aephraim Steinberg Department of Physics, Center for Quantum Information and Quantum Control,
Suppressing decoherence and heating with quantum bang-bang controls David Vitali and Paolo Tombesi Dip. di Matematica e Fisica and Unità INFM, Università.
Scaling up a Josephson Junction Quantum Computer Basic elements of quantum computer have been demonstrated 4-5 qubit algorithms within reach 8-10 likely.
Novel HTS QUBIT based on anomalous current phase relation S.A. Charlebois a, T. Lindström a, A.Ya. Tzalenchuk b, Z. Ivanov a, T. Claeson a a Dep. of Microtechnology.
D-Wave Systems Inc. THE QUANTUM COMPUTING COMPANY TM A.M. Zagoskin (D-Wave Systems and UBC) Tunable coupling of superconducting qubits Quantum Mechanics.
Holonomic quantum computation in decoherence-free subspaces Lian-Ao Wu Center for Quantum Information and Quantum Control In collaboration with Polao Zanardi.
LPS Quantum computing lunchtime seminar Friday Oct. 22, 1999.
Simple quantum algorithms with an electron in a Penning Trap David Vitali, Giacomo Ciaramicoli, Irene Marzoli, and Paolo Tombesi Dip. di Matematica e.
Status of Experiments on Charge- and Flux- Entanglements October 18, 2002, Workshop on Quantum Information Science 中央研究院 物理研究所 陳啟東.
Josephson Junctions, What are they?
Quantenelektronik 1 Application of the impedance measurement technique for demonstration of an adiabatic quantum algorithm. M. Grajcar, Institute for Physical.
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME Xiangning Luo EE 698A Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Notre Dame Superconducting Devices for Quantum Computation.
Error-correcting the IBM qubit error-correcting the IBM qubit panos aliferis IBM.
SQUID Based Quantum Bits James McNulty. What’s a SQUID? Superconducting Quantum Interference Device.
Advanced Semiconductor Devices Y-BRANCH SWITCH (YBS) Anubhav Khandelwal.
Schrödinger’s Elephants & Quantum Slide Rules A.M. Zagoskin (FRS RIKEN & UBC) S. Savel’ev (FRS RIKEN & Loughborough U.) F. Nori (FRS RIKEN & U. of Michigan)
Coherence and decoherence in Josephson junction qubits Yasunobu Nakamura, Fumiki Yoshihara, Khalil Harrabi Antti Niskanen, JawShen Tsai NEC Fundamental.

Superconducting Qubits Kyle Garton Physics C191 Fall 2009.
Single atom lasing of a dressed flux qubit
Dressed state amplification by a superconducting qubit E. Il‘ichev, Outline Introduction: Qubit-resonator system Parametric amplification Quantum amplifier.
Quantum computation with solid state devices - “Theoretical aspects of superconducting qubits” Quantum Computers, Algorithms and Chaos, Varenna 5-15 July.
Paraty - II Quantum Information Workshop 11/09/2009 Fault-Tolerant Computing with Biased-Noise Superconducting Qubits Frederico Brito Collaborators: P.
Quantum systems for information technology, ETHZ
Matt Reed Yale University Boston, MA - February 28, 2012
V. Brosco1, R. Fazio2 , F. W. J. Hekking3, J. P. Pekola4
Non-linear driving and Entanglement of a quantum bit with a quantum readout Irinel Chiorescu Delft University of Technology.
A deterministic source of entangled photons David Vitali, Giacomo Ciaramicoli, and Paolo Tombesi Dip. di Matematica e Fisica and Unità INFM, Università.
Quantum Computing Preethika Kumar
Two Level Systems and Kondo-like traps as possible sources of decoherence in superconducting qubits Lara Faoro and Lev Ioffe Rutgers University (USA)
Talbot effect in X-Ray Waveguides I. Bukreeva 1,2, A. Cedola 1, A. Sorrentino 1  F. Scarinci 1, M. Ilie 1, M. Fratini 1, and S. Lagomarsino 1 1 Istituto.
Noise and decoherence in the Josephson Charge Qubits Oleg Astafiev, Yuri Pashkin, Tsuyoshi Yamamoto, Yasunobu Nakamura, Jaw-Shen Tsai RIKEN Frontier Research.
DC-squid for measurements on a Josephson persistent-current qubit Applied Physics Quantum Transport Group Alexander ter Haar May 2000 Supervisors: Ir.
Adiabatic Quantum Computation with Noisy Qubits M.H.S. Amin D-Wave Systems Inc., Vancouver, Canada.
Panos aliferis IBM Jan. 09 quantum computing hardware with highly biased noise.
Measuring Quantum Coherence in the Cooper-Pair Box
Charge pumping in mesoscopic systems coupled to a superconducting lead
Non classical correlations of two interacting qubits coupled to independent reservoirs R. Migliore CNR-INFM, Research Unit CNISM of Palermo Dipartimento.
The rf-SQUID Quantum Bit
Chapter 10 Wave Motion Chapter Opening 10.1 What are waves? 10.2 Types of waves 10.3 Description of wave 10.4 Motion of particles in waves 10.5 Describing.
Adiabatic quantum computer (AQC) Andrii Rudavskyi Supervisor: prof. Petra Rudolf.
Thermodynamics and Transport in Iron-based superconductors Maxim G. Vavilov, University of Wisconsin-Madison, DMR Recent discovery of novel iron-pnictide.
|| Quantum Systems for Information Technology FS2016 Quantum feedback control Moritz Businger & Max Melchner
Quantum dynamics in nano Josephson junctions Equipe cohérence quantique CNRS – Université Joseph Fourier Institut Néel GRENOBLE Wiebke Guichard Olivier.
Intro to Quantum Algorithms SUNY Polytechnic Institute Chen-Fu Chiang Fall 2015.
Chao Zhuang, Samansa Maneshi, XiaoXian Liu, Ardavan Darabi, Chris Paul, Luciano Cruz, and Aephraim Steinberg Department of Physics, Center for Quantum.
Institute for Photonics and Nanotechnologies
QUANTUM TRANSITIONS WITHIN THE FUNCTIONAL INTEGRATION REAL FUNCTIONAL
Superconducting Qubits
Cliffor Benjamín Compeán Jasso UASLP
Coherent interactions at a distance provide a powerful tool for quantum simulation and computation. The most common approach to realize an effective long-distance.
Outline Device & setup Initialization and read out
Design and Realization of Decoherence-Free
The Materials Computation Center. Duane D. Johnson and Richard M
Superconducting qubit for quantum thermodynamics experiments
Adiabatic Quantum Computation in Superconducting Circuit
Precision cosmology, status and perspectives
A near–quantum-limited Josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier
Entangling Atoms with Optical Frequency Combs
Optical-phase conjugation in difference-frequency generation
Dynamics of a superconducting qubit coupled to quantum two-level systems in its environment Robert Johansson (RIKEN, The Institute of Physical and Chemical.
Presentation transcript:

Coherent oscillations in superconducting flux qubit without microwave pulse S. Poletto 1, J. Lisenfeld 1, A. Lukashenko 1 M.G. Castellano 2, F. Chiarello 2, C. Cosmelli 3, P. Carelli 4, A.V. Ustinov 1 1 Physikalisches Institut III, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg - Germany 2 Istituto di Fotonica e Nanotecnologie del CNR – Italy 3 INFN and Università di Roma “la Sapienza” - Italy 4 Università degli Studi dell’Aquila - Italy

EuroSQIPS.Poletto2 Outline Circuit description Observation of coherent oscillations without microwaves Theoretical interpretation Summary and conclusions

Circuit description

EuroSQIPS.Poletto4 For Φ x = Φ 0 /2 the potential is a symmetric double well Fully controllable system Qubit parameters Circuit description

EuroSQIPS.Poletto5 100  m Flux bias  c flux bias  x junctions Readout SQUID 1/100 coupling The system is fully gradiometric, realized in Nb, designed by IFN-CNR, fabricated by Hypres (100 A/cm 2 ) Circuit description

Coherent oscillations without microwaves

EuroSQIPS.Poletto7 Main idea (energy potential view) Coherent oscillations without microwaves system preparationevolutionreadout Population of the ground and exited states is determined by the potential symmetry and barrier modulation rate ? ? E0E0 E1E1 E2E2

EuroSQIPS.Poletto8 Main idea (fluxes view) ? ? cc xx Readout Coherent oscillations without microwaves

EuroSQIPS.Poletto9 Experimental results Oscillations for preparation of the left |L  and right |R  states cc Frequency changes depending on pulse amplitude Coherent oscillations without microwaves

Theoretical interpretation

EuroSQIPS.Poletto11 Symmetric double-well potential (Φ x = Φ 0 /2 )  description in the base {|L , |R  } It is possible to describe the system in the energy base {|0 , |1  } as well |L  |R  |0  |1  Theoretical interpretation

EuroSQIPS.Poletto12 |0  |1  ? expected oscillation frequency of up to 35 GHz Theoretical interpretation

EuroSQIPS.Poletto13 Frequency dependence on pulse amplitude (  Φ c ) Green dots: experimental data Blue line: theoretical curve Theoretical interpretation

EuroSQIPS.Poletto14 Theoretical interpretation Note: In the case of asymmetric potential one should take into account a non-adiabatic population of the states {|0 , |1  }

Conclusions

EuroSQIPS.Poletto16 Summary and conclusions Oscillations are obtained without using microwave pulses Due to large energy level spacing the system can evolve at high temperature (up to h /k B  1.1K) High frequency of coherent oscillations (up to 35 GHz) allow for high speed quantum gates A qubit coherence time of ~ 500 ns should be sufficient to implement an error correction algorithm ( required ~10 4 operations during the coherence time. See e.g.: arXiv:quant-ph/ ) Advantages of the demonstrated approach