Procedure for GPS Height Transformation within a Small Local Area

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Scheduled for HYPACK 2011 Release
Advertisements

Site Calibration for 3D GPS Operations
Best Practices for Real-Time GNSS Network Administration Webinar July 31, pm ET RTK/RTN Precision vs. Accuracy & Occupation Time Mark L. Armstrong,
Geodetic Surveying B SVY3107 Coordinate Transformations.
VIIth International Scientific and Technical Conference From Imagery to Map: Digital Photogrammetric Technologies ADS40 imagery processing using PHOTOMOD:
Alabama Height Modernization Project, NAD 83(2011), and GEOID 12 in Alabama Overview of Height Modernization Project Overview of Height Modernization.
LINDA MORGAN PRINCIPAL CONSULTANT – SPATIAL POSITIONING WESTERN AUSTRALIA SURVEYING CONFERENCE 2013 Geodetic Stuff You Need to Know: Datums, Standards.
MGA Concepts and Grid Calculations
Refinements to the North American Datum of 1983 Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National Adjustment of 2011 Dr. Neil D. Weston Chief, Spatial Reference.
Map Projections (1/2) Francisco Olivera, Ph.D., P.E. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin.
Geographic Datums Y X Z The National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) and the Defense Mapping School Reviewed by:____________ Date:_________ Objective:
Datum Transformation and Coordinate Conversion. Cartesian Coordinate System Y Z X Ellipsoid sized a & f WGS -84 is Earth Centered Earth Fixed; Origin.
GTECH 201 Session 08 GPS.
EMSE 3123 Math and Science in Education
Des Éléments Importants des Systèmes de Référence et de la Géodésie au CERN Mark Jones EN\MEF-SU.
Permanent GPS Stations in Israel as Basis for
Conversion from Latitude/Longitude to Cartesian Coordinates
Department of Land Surveying and Geo-informatics, PolyU A Review on Hong Kong Coordinate Systems Cadastre and Boundary Survey
GPS Accuracy Testing Using: “RTK” (Real Time Kinematic) & “One Step Transformations” (Site Calibrations)
NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey USGG2009 & GEOID09: New geoid height models for surveying/GIS ACSM-MARLS-UCLS-WFPS Conference FEB 2009 Salt Lake.
Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey, NOAA
Permanent GPS Stations and their Influence on the Geodetic Surveys in Israel Gershon Steinberg Survey of Israel 1 Lincoln St. Tel-Aviv 65220, Israel Gilad.
GEODETIC INFRASTRUCTURE Walter Volkmann Manager of Technical Operations L. D. Bradley Land Surveyors Gainesville, Florida.
Hong Kong Satellite Positioning Reference Station Network (SatRef) Presented by : Ben LI, LS/G(HK&Is.)
Mission Planning and SP1. Outline of Session n Standards n Errors n Planning n Network Design n Adjustment.
Harry Williams, Cartography
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 10:30-12:00 Room
SU 4100 GEODETIC POSITIONING Instructor: Indra Wijayratne.
Geography 370 Locating Positions on the Earth
Presented by: Leila Hernandez Dennis Manglicmot GMAT 9205 Fundamentals of Geo-positioning.
Numerical Methods Part: Simpson Rule For Integration.
Geocentric Datum of Australia Geocentric Datum of Australia (GDA) Peter Todd Project Manager GDA Implementation ICSM Matt Higgins Technical Manager GDA.
? Geodetski Inštitut Slovenije SLOVENIAN GPS NETWORK SIGNAL: SLOVENIA-GEODESY-NAVIGATION- LOCATION Dalibor RADOVAN Geodetic Institute of Slovenia Ljubljana.
Lecture 18: Vertical Datums and a little Linear Regression GISC March 2009 For Geoid96.
B ≥ 4 H & V, KNOWN & TRUSTED POINTS? B LOCALIZATION RESIDUALS-OUTLIERS? B DO ANY PASSIVE MARKS NEED TO BE HELD? RT BASE WITHIN CALIBRATION (QUALITY TIE.
MD : ATIKUL ISLAM JUNIOR INSTRACTOR DEPT. OF. CIVIL SUB: surveying3 SUB CODE : 6452 MOB:
A comparison of the ability of artificial neural network and polynomial fitting was carried out in order to model the horizontal deformation field. It.
Feedback on the New Datums Reference Frames 2015 Geospatial Summit April 14, 2015 Amar Nayegandhi Dewberry Consultants LLC.
National Geodetic Survey – Continuously Operating Reference Stations & Online Positioning User Service (CORS & OPUS) William Stone Southwest Region (UT,
Point Radius Method Uncertainty and Best Practices.
PRS92 Bonifacia Daet Sylvia Esperanza
Evaluating Aircraft Positioning Methods for Airborne Gravimetry: Results from GRAV-D’s “Kinematic GPS Processing Challenge” Theresa M. Damiani, Andria.
What does Height Really Mean?. How We Measure Height Heights are generally measured against one of two different reference frames (datums). 1.Gravity.
GRAV-D Part II : Examining airborne gravity processing assumptions with an aim towards producing a better gravimetric geoid Theresa Diehl*, Sandra Preaux,
PROJECT GEODESY.
OUTLINE:  definition and history  three major models  how are reference shapes used  geodetic systems G EODESY.
Geography 70  Basic Geodesy  Map Projections  Coordinate Systems  Scale Locating Positions on the Earth.
Revolution in Earth Measurement Traditional Surveying uses benchmarks as reference points Global Positioning uses fixed GPS receivers as reference points.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 02 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Map projections and datums
ST236 Site Calibrations with Trimble GNSS
Point Radius Method Uncertainty and Best Practices.
Sampling Design and Analysis MTH 494 Lecture-21 Ossam Chohan Assistant Professor CIIT Abbottabad.
Satellite geodesy (ge-2112) Introduction E. Schrama.
Or : Why doesn’t my GPS elevation agree with other measurements of elevation?
Geodetic Applications of GNSS within the United States Dr. Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey NOS/NOAA Silver Spring, Maryland USA Munich Satellite.
Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick 2/20/2016 K. Cove 1 Carrier Phase Differential.
RTK TIDES.
GPS Site Calibration Objectives  Explain the Co-ordinate systems used in GPS Surveying.  Explain what a calibration is.  Explain the 5 main process.
Nic Donnelly – Geodetic Data Analyst 5 March 2008 Vertical Datum Issues in New Zealand.
Geodetic Control and Datums Where is it? How Accurately can we map it?
This represents the most probable value of the measured variable. The more readings you take, the more accurate result you will get.
Company LOGO Technology and Application of Laser Tracker in Large Space Measurement Yang Fan, Li Guangyun, Fan Baixing IWAA2014 in Beijing, China Zhengzhou.
Towards the Establishment of New Coordinates System in Palestinian
Permanent GPS Stations and their Influence on the
Height and Transformations
Map scales A scale drawing is a drawing in which all dimensions have been reduced in exactly the same proportion. For example, if a model boat is made.
SVY207: Lecture 16 GPS Field Procedures and Computations
DIVISION 8 - SURVEYING AND MAPPING REVISIONS EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2006
What is a scale? Scale is the ratio of the size of objects on a map compared to their size in the real world. 4 cm:1 km For example on a map with the scale.
Presentation transcript:

Procedure for GPS Height Transformation within a Small Local Area SatRef - Knowledge Sharing Platform Procedure for GPS Height Transformation within a Small Local Area JAMES WONG, LS/G(NT)

SatRef - Knowledge Sharing Platform Purposes of this briefing To share the knowledge of how to create a Localized Height Transformation Parameter File for the transformation of GPS surveyed ellipsoidal height to HKPD Height in a small area. To release the height model data set for the creation of the Localized Height Transformation Parameter File.

Relationship between Ellipsoidal Height (GPS Height) and Orthometric Height (Local Height)

Current Problems The existing 7-Parameter Set published by the Geodetic Survey Section of SMO is used for the datum transformation between ITRF96 and HK1980 Geodetic Datums. It is not used for transformation between the GPS surveyed ellipsoidal height and orthometric height (local height). Hence, the problem is how to transform the GPS surveyed ellipsoidal height to orthometric height for the determination of the local height for various applications. Actually, there is no high accuracy Geoid Model of Hong Kong for the determination of geoid-ellipsoid separation for the GPS height transformation.

Height Model Data Set Height Model Data

Which approach to use This question is almost impossible to answer since the approach used will depend totally on local conditions and information. If you wish to keep the GPS measurements totally homogenous and the information about the local map projection is available, the Classical 3D approach would be the most suitable. If you are unsure of the local height information but the position information is accurate and you wish to keep the GPS measurements homogenous in position, then the Stepwise approach may be the most suitable. For cases where there is no information regarding the ellipsoid and/or map projection and/or you wish to force the GPS measurements to tie in with local existing control then the One-Step approach may be the most suitable. Alternatively if a large number of common points are available and a more accurate approximation is required the Interpolation approach can be used. The Two-Step approach also treats position and height information separately which allows for position only control points to be used as well. Compared to the One-Step approach, information regarding the ellipsoid and map projection has to be known. The advantage is that this approach can be used for larger areas than the One-Step.

Two Step This transformation approach works by treating the height and position transformation separately. For the position transformation the WGS 84 coordinates are first transformed using a Classical 3D pre-transformation to obtain preliminary local cartesian coordinates. These are projected onto a preliminary grid using the specified ellipsoid and map projection. Then the 2 shifts, the rotation and the scale factor of a Classical 2D transformation are calculated to transform the preliminary to the “real” local coordinates. The position transformation requires knowledge of the local map projection and the local ellipsoid. However, as the distortions of the map projection are taken into account, Two Step transformations can be used for larger areas than One Step transformations. The height transformation is a single dimension height approximation.

Two Step Advantages: Errors in local heights do not affect the position transformation The points used for determining the position and height transformation do not necessarily have to be the same points. The distortions of the map projection are taken into account which enables you to use this kind of transformation for larger areas. Disadvantage: Knowledge of the local projection and local ellipsoid are required.

Establishing Transformation Relationship using Leica LGO V3.0

Data Set (ITRF96 Geodetic Coordinates)

Data Set (HK80 Grid Coordinates + Height above HKPD)

Datum and Map Function

Datum and Map Function

Datum and Map Function

Datum and Map Function

Datum and Map Function

Datum and Map Function

Two Step – Transformation Report

Two Step – Transformation Report

Two Step – Transformation Report

Two Step – Transformation Report

Final Product : A Localized Height Transformation Parameter File A localized height transformation parameter file called “GPSTRF.DAT” or “TRFSET.DAT” is produced by Leica LGO V3.0/ SKI-Pro V3.0. Users can import the finalized transformation parameter file into the Leica LGO/ SKIPro software for coordinates transformation in office. Users can also import the finalized transformation parameter file into the Leica GPS receivers for carrying out RTK/ DGPS surveys in real-time on site.

Example Establishment of a Height Transformation Relationship for Kowloon Area

Example: Height Model of Kowloon Area

Data Set (10 control points used) Two Step – Transformation Report

Checking Point Distribution for Testing of the Finalized Height Transformation Relationship (Total no. of points = 22)

Conclusions Average difference in Height above HKPD = 1 cm Maximum difference in Height above HKPD = 4 cm The height differences depends on the GPS measurement accuracy and the height transformation accuracy. The height transformation accuracy is about 2 cm in this small area. (i.e. 11 km x 12 km area)

Remarks This procedure is suitable for establishing GPS height transformation relationship within the small local area, say 15 km x 15 km area. Checking points should be provided to test the transformation accuracy. The number of control points of the height model data set will be increased if resources are permitted. The accuracy of the control points will be improved as far as possible. A Geoid Model should be eventually produced for providing the territory-wide solution of the geoid-ellipsoid separation for GPS height transformation.

Thank you !!