Adoption Over the Years Johns Hopkins University Matthew Marcetich Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Institute for Clinical and Translational.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VCOM Conflict of Interest Policy Overview of Financial Conflict of Interest Related to Research December 4, 2013.
Advertisements

REDCap Treatment Randomization Module
Good Practices in Data Management (e.g. Redcap) Presented by Diantha Howard, CCTS Biomedical Informatics December 2012.
Monthly Webinar Upgrading to caTissue Plus caTissue Training Monthly Webinars Trainer: Srikanth Adiga & Poornima Govindrao |
Jim Potter Malcolm Brock Biospecimen Collection and Processing.
The Veterans Affairs Central Biorepository and MVP Highlights Mary T
The IndianaCTSI Biorepository is committed to serving the repository needs for CTSI investigators. The core will tailor specimen management to the needs.
Biospecimen Banking has Evolved Highly Complex Informatics Requirements
YOUR LOGO HERE YOUR LOGO HERE Amy Brink Comparing caTissue Plus to caTissue 1.3.6A Amy Brink March 5 th, 2014.
Presented by, Aarti Vaishnav, MS CRIC Director. We are a team of 13 full time programmers and about 10 part time students.
Key Considerations for Report Generation & Customization Richard Wzorek Director, Production IT Confidential © Almac Group 2012.
REDCap at UVM Presented by Diantha Howard, CCTS Biomedical Informatics
UCLA Digital Library UC Digital Library Forum August 5, 2002 UCLA Digital Library Presenter: Curtis Fornadley Senior Programmer/Analyst.
Ken Quinn Research Applications Administrator Information Technology Roswell Park Cancer Institute Christine O’Connell Sr. Director Laboratory Research.
Groupware to Support Distributed & Collocated Software Engineering Student Group Projects Sarah Drummond RISE Dept. Computer Science University of Durham.
Form Builder: Hopkins-wide Data Collection Tool for Research Projects
REDCap Overview Institute for Clinical and Translational Science Neil Nuehring Jesteny Pascual Daniel Hingtgen
CaTissue customizations at Indiana University and Regenstrief Institute.
User Group 2015 Version 5 Features & Infrastructure Enhancements.
Welcome to Philly Code Camp Russ Basiura SharePoint Consultant RJB Technical Consulting
REDCap Overview Institute for Clinical and Translational Science Heath Davis Fred McClurg Brian Finley.
ICTR Data Manager Interest Group Meeting April 15, 2011 Results from Data Manager’s Survey Kerry Stewart, Ed.D., FAHA, FAACVPR, FACSM, FSGC Professor,
Clinical Registries Needs and Solutions Dr. Peter Greene, CMIO Diana Gumas, IT Director 1.
CaTissue Suite 2.0 Scope Detail TBPT Workspace call May 23, 2011.
Johns Hopkins Technology Transfer 1 Translational Biomedical Research: Moving Discovery from Academic Centers to the Community Translational Biomedical.
Biorepository Software Selection University of Michigan 31-Aug-2012 Frank Manion, Chief Information Officer Paul McGhee, Lead Business Analyst Cancer Center.
Using Technology to Strengthen Human Subject Protections Patricia Scannell Director, IRB Washington University School of Medicine.
Conducting a Study Safely and Efficiently at Johns Hopkins Daniel E Ford, MD, MPH Vice Dean for Clinical Investigation July 20, 2010.
CCHMC’s Biobanking Software – James Morgan April 3, 2014 B iomaterial T racking & M anagement B iomaterial T racking & M anagement.
OnCore Roll Out April 8, 2011.
1 Clinical Research Management System (CRMS) IT Overview August 2011 Diana Gumas – Director of Clinical and Clinical Research IT.
Using the Open Metadata Registry (openMDR) to create Data Sharing Interfaces October 14 th, 2010 David Ervin & Rakesh Dhaval, Center for IT Innovations.
Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine Cancer Center Administration Database.
Informatics for the Neuroimaging Research Enterprise Dan Marcus Washington University NITRC Enhancement Grantee Meeting Monday, June 30, 2008.
The Portal to Texas History: Harnessing Technology to Enable Collaboration with Small Museums and Libraries CNI, December 6, 2005 Cathy Nelson Hartman.
Integrated Data Management System for the Biorepository.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
NCI Clinical Trials Reporting Program CTRP User Meeting July 6, 2011 Gene Kraus CTRP Program Director.
REDCap Overview Institute for Clinical and Translational Science Fred McClurg Neil Nuehring.
REDCap Overview Institute for Clinical and Translational Science Heath Davis Fred McClurg Brian Finley.
Topics Covered IT infrastructure Supporting local users
NCI Clinical Trials Reporting Program CTRP User Meeting October 6, 2010.
CTRP User Call May 1, 2013 Gene Kraus CTRP Program Director.
0 eCPIC User Training: v6.4 Webinars – Overview of Significant Changes July 2014 These training materials are owned by the Federal Government. They can.
Monthly End User Call 8 Oct 2014.
WELCOME TO OSCON 2014 Srikanth Adiga, Lead - OpenSpecimen Krishagni Solutions (India)
NCI Clinical Trials Reporting Program CTRP User Meeting May 4, 2011.
OpenSpecimen Monthly Community Call Krishagni Solutions (India)
May 2007 CTMS / Imaging Interoperability Scenarios March 2009.
Research Tools Brought to you by the Clinical and Translational Science Institute Presented by: Terri Shkuda Systems Analyst Research Informatics The Penn.
CaTissue Suite 1.2 TPBT Face to Face Michelle Lee, MBA, Ph.D. Ian Fore, D. Phil. December, 2009.
CaTissue Suite 1.2 TPBT Face to Face Michelle Lee, MBA, Ph.D. Ian Fore, D. Phil. December, 2009.
Scribe Technical Workshop Adapter for OLE DB Import-Export Wizard September 13, 2007.
CAE 1.2 Andrew Pople University of Pittsburgh 7/19/2006.
CBI Incident Reporting System Caroline Gill PT MHM Betty Wills RN PhD CHCA 2014.
Webinar on Introduction to OpenSpecimen Presenters: Amy Brink (Washington University) Poornima Govindrao (Krishagni Solutions)
Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network Data Management and Coordinating Center (RDCRN DMCC) Rosalie Holland LDN Investigator Meeting at WORLDSymposium.
EGI NA3 – Web site training services University of Edinburgh (0.25 funded FTE)
REDCap General Overview
Tissue Collection & Banking Facility
Janice Kung & Thane Chambers
Core C – Statistics and Data Management
Stephanie Oppenheimer, MS SUCCESS Center Erica Ellington, CRA, CHRC
Emory Research Laboratory Information Management System ( LIMS)
Business Model and Administration Governance
of Pathology Specimens for the VA Precision Oncology Program
University of Kansas Medical Center, Medical Informatics Division
seriss myEVS portal for the EVS 2017 survey
Status, Data Transfer and Processing
UAB Tissue Biorepository
Presentation transcript:

Adoption Over the Years Johns Hopkins University Matthew Marcetich Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR)

Acknowledgements Dan Ford – Vice Dean for Clinical Research Mark Donowitz – GI Hopkins Conte PI/PD Jim Potter – GI TREC PI/PD Diana Gumas – IT Director Pam Murray – IT Manager Joe DiMaggio – IT Manager Bob Lange – Software Engineer Jen Parks – Software Engineer Matthew Marcetich – Domain Support

About Johns Hopkins Support for OpenSpecimen from JHU ICTR Dan Ford: JHU SOM Vice Dean for Clinical Research Service provided to JHU SOM Investigators Current biobanking landscape Freezerworks StarLims LabMatrix MDLogix MS Excel, MS Access

Overview caTissue v1.2 Pilot – GI Translational Research Enhancement Core (TREC) caTissue Plus v3.0 Upgrade OpenSpecimen v1.0 Upgrade (in Progress)

Timeline August – October, 2014: OS v1.0 Regression Testing September, 2011: caTissue v1.2 pilot July, 2013: Upgrade to caTissue Plus v3.0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 caTissue v1.2 Pilot caTissue Plus v3.0 OS v1.0 Pre September, 2011: JHU GI Biobank involved with caTissue since Persistent Systems

caTissue v1.2 Pilot GI Translational Research Enhancement Core (TREC) Specific Aims of the TREC To support center members with all aspects of biospecimen collection including harvest, annotation, processing, storage, management, distribution, and ethical use. To ensure that all specimens collected are of the highest quality through strict adherence to the latest Best Practices and Standard Operating Procedures. To enhance the value of specimens for current and future research through annotation of pertinent preclinical (research) and clinical data. Jim Potter, jpotter@jhmi.edu

caTissue v1.2 Pilot, Continued GI Translational Research Enhancement Core (TREC) Specific Aims of the TREC To ensure that the PI has primary ownership over all tissues directly related to his/her active study. To provide fair and impartial access to specimens owned by the GI-TREC to Core Center investigators. To educate and guide investigators conducting translational research requiring patient registries and associated databases (REDCap, CRMS, and i2b2 (Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside). Jim Potter, jpotter@jhmi.edu

Best Practices and SOPs User meets with TREC to discuss collection Hypothesis GI TREC Workflow Best Practices and SOPs caTissue/OS User meets with TREC to discuss collection Collection Protocol created on QA server Example: use of sitagliptin to block DPP-4 for GLP1 assay Collection Protocol amended and finalized with TREC Final Collection Protocol created in Prod Specimen collection and storage begins

GI TREC: Specimen Collection Factors Purpose of the Biorepository (Hypothesis Driven) Best Practices/SOPs The Scientific Foundation for Research ISBER (International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories) Consent Governance / Oversight Funding Support Hardware Software/Audit/Security (21 CFR part 11) Enterprise Biomedical Informatics Systems Personnel (FTE) Jim Potter, jpotter@jhmi.edu

caTissue v1.2 Pilot, Continued First Two TREC Studies – Bulk Upload Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) 10,000 specimens, 305 participants Longitudinal study (0-8yr), all specimens collected Freezer reorganization 3 months Snehil Gupta

caTissue v1.2 Pilot, Continued Legacy Study: Barrett’s Esophagus 3,500 specimens, 400 participants Ongoing recruitment and specimen collection Dynamic Extension Forms Participant Questionnaire Specimen Pathology 6 months Strength of dynamic extensions and queries, need for better approach of surgical pathology data

Query Application: Barrett’s Esophagus Study

caTissue v1.2 Pilot: Summary September, 2011 to August, 2013 6 studies, 20,000 specimens Breadth of users To date (GI TREC): Five major grants: R01, K08, ADA, ABMRF, ACS 72 publications Collaborations: GIM, Peds Allergy

caTissue Plus v3.0 Upgrade Significant improvements in usability Quicker response from UI in general Improved Query module Creation of Event Points from Participant Page August, 2013 to present Regression Testing Major Bulk Upload: 70k specimens

caTissue Plus v3.0 Upgrade, Continued Organizing Queries by Folder, Sharing Queries

caTissue Plus v3.0 Upgrade, Continued Indexed Queries

OS v1.0 Upgrade Three rounds of regression testing August – October, 2014 In use on JHU’s Development environment Go-Live Q1 2015 Show of hands… Who has upgraded to OS v1.0? Who plans to upgrade? Maybe?

OS v1.0 Upgrade, Continued Description Priority Reported Resolved   Description Priority Reported Resolved Verified Issue 1 Received Dates and Collection Dates were swapped for one collection protocol High 9/25/14 10/2/14 10/6/14 Issue 2 Error message when using Create Parent Specimen bulk upload template 8/29/14 9/25/14 Issue 3 Unable to edit the specimen label format within saved CP Medium 8/29/14 9/1/14 Comment Query results exported from Production (Plus v3.0) have a different format than those from Development (OS v1.0). 9/26/14 - Krishagni offered to implement an option to toggle between query layouts in OS v1.1 TBD sql queries appear to be more robust than Audit Report UI (new feature in OS v1.0) n/a

Work in Progress Surgical Pathology Reports Simplified Data Entry Screen Potential Use of SPREC codes “Standard Preanalytical Code” (ISBER) Show how specimen was collected Annotate quality of specimen Increase User Base across JHU SOM

Lessons Learned caTissue v1.2 Plus v3.0 OpenSpecimen v1.0 Pros   caTissue v1.2 Plus v3.0 OpenSpecimen v1.0 Pros Dynamic extensions Robust advanced queries Improved advanced query module Improved UI response time Subtle UI improvements in storage module Less training time for advanced queries Revamped dynamic extensions Flexible changes to collection protocols REST APIs "Cons" High leaning curve for advanced queries Buggy Relatively slow UI response Similar "feel" to caTissue v1.2 Some bugs TBD :)

Summary caTissue v1.2  Plus v3.0  OS v1.0 Team Effort Use of “stock” code   As of December 4, 2014 Users 155 Collection Protocols 13 Specimens 94,835 Groups 5 Participants 5,725 Prospective New Users/Groups

Any Questions? Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Institute for Clinical and Translational Research Jim Potter (Faculty Adviser) jpotter@jhmi.edu Pam Murray (Manager) pmurray@jhmi.edu Bob Lange (Developer) rlangea@jhmi.edu Matthew Marcetich (Domain Support) mmarcet1@jhmi.edu