Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
• A look at current models for m-s junctions (old business)
Advertisements

Record Values of Electron Beam Polarization and Quantum Efficiency for Semiconductor Photocathodes Yu.A.Mamaev St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University.
ECE 874: Physical Electronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
ECE : Nanoelectronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
ECE : Nanoelectronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
ECE 875: Electronic Devices Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
Course code: EE4209 Md. Nur Kutubul Alam Department of EEE KUET High Electron Mobility Transistor (HEMT)
ECE 875: Electronic Devices
ECE 480 – Introduction to Nanotechnology Emre Yengel Department of Electrical and Communication Engineering Fall 2014.
Studies of Minority Carrier Recombination Mechanisms in Beryllium Doped GaAs for Optimal High Speed LED Performance An Phuoc Doan Department of Electrical.
Advanced Semiconductor Physics ~ Dr. Jena University of Notre Dame Department of Electrical Engineering SIZE DEPENDENT TRANSPORT IN DOPED NANOWIRES Qin.
Electron Scattering Length - Mean Free Path – le - Avg. distance between scattering Si - ~ 5nm; GaAs - ~ 100 nm Electrical Resistance is closely related.
Computational Solid State Physics 計算物性学特論 5回
ECE 875: Electronic Devices Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
LW4 Lecture Week 4-1 Heterojunctions Fabrication and characterization of p-n junctions 1.
Strained Silicon MOSFET R Jie-Ying Wei Department of Electrical Engineering and Graduate Institute of Electronics Engineering National Taiwan University,
ENE 311 Lecture 9.
Grace Xing---EE30357 (Semiconductors II: Devices) 1 EE 30357: Semiconductors II: Devices Lecture Note #19 (02/27/09) MOS Field Effect Transistors Grace.
ECE 875: Electronic Devices Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
ECE : Nanoelectronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
ECE : Nanoelectronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
ECE 875: Electronic Devices Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
ECE 875: Electronic Devices Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
Heterostructures & Optoelectronic Devices
Heterojunctions -Two different semiconductor materials that have different energy band gapes are used to form a junction -Will introduce a discontinuity.
Modeling of an interface between two solids Ashcroft and Mermin Ch. 18 Sze Ch Review Chapter by Tersoff.
Advisor: Prof. Yen-Kuang Kuo
ECE 875: Electronic Devices Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
ECE 875: Electronic Devices Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
ECE : Nanoelectronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
1 Prof. Ming-Jer Chen Department of Electronics Engineering National Chiao-Tung University September 15, 2014 September 15, 2014 DEE4521 Semiconductor.
ECE 875: Electronic Devices
ECE 875: Electronic Devices Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
ELECTRONICS II VLSI DESIGN Fall 2013
ECE : Nanoelectronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
MOS Device Physics and Designs Chap. 3 Instructor: Pei-Wen Li Dept. of E. E. NCU 1 Chap 3. P-N junction  P-N junction Formation  Step PN Junction  Fermi.
ECE 875: Electronic Devices Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
ECE 874: Physical Electronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
4.12 Modification of Bandstructure: Alloys and Heterostructures Since essentially all the electronic and optical properties of semiconductor devices are.
ECE 875: Electronic Devices Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
Nanophysics II Michael Hietschold Solid Surfaces Analysis Group & Electron Microscopy Laboratory Institute of Physics Portland State University, May 2005.
ECE 875: Electronic Devices
ECE 874: Physical Electronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
ECE : Nanoelectronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
ECE : Nanoelectronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
ECE : Nanoelectronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
ECE 875: Electronic Devices Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
Lecture 1: Introduction DEE Spring
ACADEMIC AND SCIENTIFIC WORK ROBERTO PINEDA GÓMEZ
ECE 875: Electronic Devices
QUANTUM-EFFECT DEVICES (QED)
Chapter 14. MS Contacts and Practical Contact Considerations
Today’s objectives- Semiconductors and Integrated Circuits
A p-n junction is not a device
The Two-Dimensional Electron Gas (2DEG)
Strained Silicon MOSFET
Lecture 15 OUTLINE The MOS Capacitor Energy band diagrams
ECE 874: Physical Electronics
ECE 874: Physical Electronics
ECE 874: Physical Electronics
ECE 874: Physical Electronics
Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering
Lecture 15 OUTLINE The MOS Capacitor Energy band diagrams
ECE 874: Physical Electronics
ECE 875: Electronic Devices
ECE 874: Physical Electronics
ECE 874: Physical Electronics
ECE 874: Physical Electronics
Evac Evac 1 1 qc1 = 4.07 eV qfs1 = eV qc2 = 3.63 eV qfs2
ECE 875: Electronic Devices
Presentation transcript:

ECE 802-604: Nanoelectronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University ayresv@msu.edu

Lecture 02, 03 Sep 13 In Chapter 01 in Datta: Two dimensional electron gas (2-DEG) DEG goes down, mobility goes up Define mobility (and momentum relaxation) One dimensional electron gas (1-DEG) Special Schrödinger eqn (Con E) that accommodates: Confinement to create 1-DEG Useful external B-field Experimental measure for mobility VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Lecture 02, 03 Sep 13 Two dimensional electron gas (2-DEG): Datta example: GaAs-Al0.3Ga0.7As heterostructure HEMT VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

MOSFET Sze VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

HEMT IOP Science website; Tunnelling- and barrier-injection transit-time mechanisms of terahertz plasma instability in high-electron mobility transistors 2002 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 17 1168 VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

For both, the channel is a 2-DEG that is created electronically by band-bending MOSFET 2 x yBp = VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

For both, the channel is a 2-DEG that is created electronically by band-bending HEMT VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Example: Find the correct energy band-bending diagram for a HEMT made from the following heterojunction. p-type GaAs Heavily doped n-type Al0.3Ga0.7As Moderately doped EC2 EF2 EC1 Eg1 = 1.424 eV Eg2 = 1.798 eV EF1 EV1 EV2 VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

p-type GaAs Heavily doped n-type Al0.3Ga0.7As Moderately doped EC2 EF2 EC1 Eg1 = 1.424 eV Eg2 = 1.798 eV EF1 EV1 EV2 VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Evac Evac qc1 qfm1 qc2 qfm2 EC2 EF2 EC1 Eg1 Eg2 EF1 EV1 EV2 VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Electron affinities qc for GaAs and AlxGa1-xAs can be found on Ioffe Evac Evac qc1 qfm1 qc2 qfm2 EC2 EF2 EC1 Eg1 Eg2 EF1 EV1 EV2 VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

True for all junctions: align Fermi energy levels: EF1 = EF2. This brings Evac along too since electron affinities can’t change VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Put in Junction J, nearer to the more heavily doped side: VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Join Evac smoothly: J VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Anderson Model: Use qc1 “measuring stick” to put in EC1: J VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Use qc1 “measuring stick” to put in EC1: J VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Result so far: EC1 band-bending: J VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Use qc2 “measuring stick” to put in EC2: J VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Use qc2 “measuring stick” to put in EC2: J VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Results so far: EC1 and EC2 band-bending: J VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Put in straight piece connector: J DEC VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

(for this heterojunction combination): Keeping the electron affinities correct resulted in a triangular quantum well in EC (for this heterojunction combination): J DEC In this region: a triangular quantum well has developed in the conduction band VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Use the energy bandgap Eg1 “measuring stick” to relate EC1 and EV1: J DEC VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Use the energy bandgap Eg1 “measuring stick” to relate EC1 and EV1: J DEC VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Result: band-bending for EV1: J DEC VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Use the energy bandgap Eg2 “measuring stick” to put in EV2: J DEC VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Use the energy bandgap Eg2 “measuring stick” to put in EV2: J VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Results: band-bending for EV1 and EV2: J DEC VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Put in straight piece connector: J DEC DEV Note: for this heterojunction: DEC > DEV VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Put in straight piece connector: J DEC DEV DEC = D(electron affinities) = qc2 – qc1 (Anderson model) DEV = ( E2 – E1 ) - DEC => DEgap = DEC + DEV VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Put in straight piece connector: J DEC DEV “The difference in the energy bandgaps is accommodated by amount DEC in the conduction band and amount DEV in the valence band.” VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

NO quantum well for holes J DEC DEV NO quantum well in EV NO quantum well for holes VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Correct band-bending diagram: J DEC DEV VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Is the Example the same as the example in Datta? HEMT VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

No. The L-R orientation is trivial but the starting materials are different Our example Datta example VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Orientation is trivial. The smaller bandgap material is always “1” Our example Datta example VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

HEMT Physical region In this region: a triangular quantum well has developed in the conduction band. 2-DEG Allowed energy levels VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Example: Which dimension (axis) is quantized? z Which dimensions form the 2-DEG? x and y Physical region In this region: a triangular quantum well has developed in the conduction band. 2-DEG Allowed energy levels VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Example: Which dimension is quantized? Which dimensions form the 2-DEG? Physical region In this region: a triangular quantum well has developed in the conduction band. 2-DEG Allowed energy levels VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Example: approximate the real well by a one dimensional triangular well in z ∞ Using information from ECE874 Pierret problem 2.7 (next page), evaluate the quantized part of the energy of an electron that occupies the 1st energy level VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

U(z) = az z VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

n = ? m = ? a = ? VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

m = meff for conduction band e- in GaAs. At 300K this is 0.067 m0 n = 0 for 1st m = meff for conduction band e- in GaAs. At 300K this is 0.067 m0 a = ? VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Your model for a = asymmetry ? U(z) = 3/2 z U(z) = 1 z z VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

D. L. Mathine, G. N. Maracas, D. S. Gerber, R. Droopad, R. J D. L. Mathine, G. N. Maracas, D. S. Gerber, R. Droopad, R. J. Graham, and M. R. McCartney. Characterization of an AlGaAs/GaAs asymmetric triangular quantum well grown by a digital alloy approximation. J. Appl. Phys. 75, 4551 (1994) An asymmetric triangular quantum well was grown by molecular‐beam epitaxy using a digital alloy composition grading method. A high‐resolution electron micrograph (HREM), a computational model, and room‐temperature photoluminescence were used to extract the spatial compositional dependence of the quantum well. The HREM micrograph intensity profile was used to determine the shape of the quantum well. A Fourier series method for solving the BenDaniel–Duke Hamiltonian [D. J. BenDaniel and C. B. Duke, Phys. Rev. 152, 683 (1966)] was then used to calculate the bound energy states within the envelope function scheme for the measured well shape. These calculations were compared to the E11h, E11l, and E22l transitions in the room‐temperature photoluminescence and provided a self‐consistent compositional profile for the quantum well. A comparison of energy levels with a linearly graded well is also presented VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13

Jin Xiao (金晓), Zhang Hong (张红), Zhou Rongxiu (周荣秀) and Jin Zhao (金钊) Jin Xiao (金晓), Zhang Hong (张红), Zhou Rongxiu (周荣秀) and Jin Zhao (金钊). Interface roughness scattering in an AlGaAs/GaAs triangle quantum well and square quantum well. Journal of Semiconductors Volume 34 072004, 2013 We have theoretically studied the mobility limited by interface roughness scattering on two-dimensional electrons gas (2DEG) at a single heterointerface (triangle-shaped quantum well). Our results indicate that, like the interface roughness scattering in a square quantum well, the roughness scattering at the AlxGa1−xAs/GaAs heterointerface can be characterized by parameters of roughness height Δ and lateral Λ, and in addition by electric field F. A comparison of two mobilities limited by the interface roughness scattering between the present result and a square well in the same condition is given VM Ayres, ECE802-604, F13