Particle identification in ECAL Alexander Artamonov, Yuri Kharlov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting 14-17.10.2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements Sufficient data for Energy Flow algorithm development Provide data for calorimeter tracking algorithms  Help setting.
Jin Huang Los Alamos National Lab.  Cited from March collaboration Meeting EC group Internal Communication Jin Huang 2 Preshower ID power drop significantly.
April 19th, 2010Philippe Doublet (LAL) Hadronic showers in the SiW ECAL (with 2008 FNAL data) Philippe Doublet.
The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.
P. Gay Energy flow session1 Analytic Energy Flow F. Chandez P. Gay S. Monteil CALICE Coll.
Carbon ion fragmentation study for medical applications Protons (hadrons in general) especially suitable for deep-sited tumors (brain, neck base, prostate)
Calorimeter1 Understanding the Performance of CMS Calorimeter Seema Sharma,TIFR (On behalf of CMS HCAL)
1 Study of the Tail Catcher Muon Tracker (TCMT) Scintillator Strips and Leakage with Simulated Coil Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE.
Testbeam Requirements for LC Calorimetry S. R. Magill for the Calorimetry Working Group Physics/Detector Goals for LC Calorimetry E-flow implications for.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Particle Identification in the NA48 Experiment Using Neural Networks L. Litov University of Sofia.
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
PFA Development – Definitions and Preparation 0) Generate some events w/G4 in proper format 1)Check Sampling Fractions ECAL, HCAL separately How? Photons,
Jun 27, 2005S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation 1 Ckov1 Simulation and Performance Steve Kahn June 27, 2005 MICE Collaboration PID Meeting.
Status of calorimeter simulations Mikhail Prokudin, ITEP.
TOF (and Global) PID F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003.
Evaluation of G4 Releases in CMS (Sub-detector Studies) Software used Electrons in Tracker Photons in the Electromagnetic Calorimeter Pions in the Calorimeter.
Progress with the Development of Energy Flow Algorithms at Argonne José Repond for Steve Kuhlmann and Steve Magill Argonne National Laboratory Linear Collider.
Medium heavy Λ hyper nuclear spectroscopic experiment by the (e,e’K + ) reaction Graduate school of science, Tohoku University Toshiyuki Gogami for HES-HKS.
GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell Indiana University Detector Review, October 2004.
Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
Status of straw-tube tracker V.Peshekhonov, D.Peshekhonov, A.Zinchenko JINR, Dubna V.Tikhomirov P.N.Lebedev Physics Institute, Moscow Presented on the.
Experience With CBM Muon Simulation Partha Pratim Bhaduri.
Status of GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell September 10, 2004.
1 Lead glass simulations Eliane Epple, TU Munich Kirill Lapidus, INR Moscow Collaboration Meeting XXI March 2010 GSI.
Tracking, PID and primary vertex reconstruction in the ITS Elisabetta Crescio-INFN Torino.
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
R&D Studies of a Lead-Scintillating Fiber Calorimeter as a STAR Forward Detector Prashanth Shanmuganathan (for FCal group at STAR)  Physics and R&D goals.
Positional and Angular Resolution of the CALICE Pre-Prototype ECAL Hakan Yilmaz.
ECAL PID1 Particle identification in ECAL Yuri Kharlov, Alexander Artamonov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
Feasibility Study of Forward Calorimeter in ALICE experiment Sanjib Muhuri Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre Kolkata.
Hadron production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV analysis of data from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 for high resolution tracking (Runge-Kutta tracks) Pavel Tlustý,
13 July 2005 ACFA8 Gamma Finding procedure for Realistic PFA T.Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.), M-C. Chang(Tohoku Univ.), K.Fujii(KEK), A.Miyamoto(KEK), S.Yamashita(ICEPP),
Masterclass Introduction to hands-on Exercise Aim of the exercise  Identify electrons, muons, neutrinos in the ATLAS detector  Types of Events.
Evgeny Kryshen (PNPI) Mikhail Ryzhinskiy (SPbSPU) Vladimir Nikulin (PNPI) Detailed geometry of MUCH detector in cbmroot Outline Motivation Realistic module.
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
ECAL software development Yuri Kharlov IHEP Protvino.
Particle Identification with TRD Prashant Shukla Institute of Physics University of Heidelberg Presentation at International Workshop on TRD 27 th September.
Particle Identification. Particle identification: an important task for nuclear and particle physics Usually it requires the combination of informations.
Status of the hadronic cross section (small angle) Federico Nguyen February 22 nd 2005  the 2002 data sample and available MC sets  trigger efficiency.
Preliminary Measurement of the Ke3 Form Factor f + (t) M. Antonelli, M. Dreucci, C. Gatti Introduction: Form Factor Parametrization Fitting Function and.
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for hadrons and jets Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration.
J/ψ simulations: background studies and first results using a compact RICH detector Alla Maevskaya INR RAS Moscow CBM Collaboration meeting September 2007.
Hadron production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV analysis of data from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 for high resolution tracking (Runge-Kutta tracks) Pavel Tlustý,
Neutron Identification with ECAL  Sergey Kiselev, ITEP Moscow, for the ECAL group  Motivation  Input info  Signal parameters  Preshower – 1 GeV/c.
Study of Calorimeter performance using the LC full simulator The 8th ACFA Workshop Yoshihiro Yamaguchi (Tsukuba U.) M. -C. Chang (RCNS, Tohoku U.) K. Fujii.
V. Pozdnyakov Direct photon and photon-jet measurement capability of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC Valery Pozdnyakov (JINR, Dubna) on behalf of the HI.
CKOV1 design status 1. Generation of muon and pion beam files 2. PID performances with water radiator 3. Does it help with fluorocarbon FC72 ? 4. Conclusion.
TOF detector in PHENIX experiment PHENIX time-of-flight counter The PHENIX time-of-flight (TOF) counter serves as a particle identification device for.
N_TOF EAR-1 Simulations The “γ-flash” A. Tsinganis (CERN/NTUA), C. Guerrero (CERN), V. Vlachoudis (CERN) n_TOF Annual Collaboration Meeting Lisbon, December.
Parameterization of EMC response for
The Transition Radiation Detector for the PAMELA Experiment
Measurement of track length and time-of-flight hypothesis
Event “zero-time” determination with TOF detector
IHEP group Shashlyk activity towards TDR
The reconstruction method for GLD PFA
Physics Validation of LHC Simulations
Testing Geant4 with a simplified calorimeter setup
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Detector Optimization using Particle Flow Algorithm
Michele Faucci Giannelli
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Status of CEPC HCAL Optimization Study in Simulation LIU Bing On behalf the CEPC Calorimeter working group.
Steve Magill Steve Kuhlmann ANL/SLAC Motivation
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements
Presentation transcript:

Particle identification in ECAL Alexander Artamonov, Yuri Kharlov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting

PID in CBM In CBM, the particle identification (PID) is realized in TOF, TRD, RICH and ECAL The main object of ECAL PID is to discriminate photons and e+- from other particles The ECAL PID is based mainly on an investigation of transverse shower shape analysis A subject of this study is to perform the ECAL PID by using just longitudinal shower shape analysis The most simple case has been studied when ECAL module consists of 2 longitudinal segments This case is very close to the current design of ECAL, since it consists of preshower and ECAL modules Method used is to analyse 2D plot, namely an energy deposition in the 1 st segment of ECAL module versus an energy deposition in the whole ECAL module PID in ECAL

Photon can be identified in ECAL by several methods:  Track matching with ECAL cluster  Time of flight measured by ECAL  Lateral shower shape  Longitudinal shower profile PID in ECAL

Framework – cbmroot as a new detector module segcal 1 ECAL module with 160 layers (Pb 0.7 mm + Sci 1.0 mm)‏ 20 longitudinal segments, each one consists of 8 layers Effective radiation length of the ECAL module: cm Total radiation length of the ECAL module: 20.4 X0 A single primary particle (photon, muon, pion, kaon, proton, neutron, antineutron and Lambda(1115)) with energies 1, 2, 3,..., 23, 24, 25 GeV Simulation model PID in ECAL

Various combinations of segment thickness: 1 X0 (in 1 st segment) + 19 X0 (in 2 nd segment)‏ 2 X0 (in 1 st segment) + 18 X0 (in 2 nd segment)‏ 3 X0 (in 1 st segment) + 17 X0 (in 2 nd segment)‏ 4 X0 (in 1 st segment) + 16 X0 (in 2 nd segment)‏ 5 X0 (in 1 st segment) + 15 X0 (in 2 nd segment)‏ 6 X0 (in 1 st segment) + 14 X0 (in 2 nd segment)‏ 7 X0 (in 1 st segment) + 13 X0 (in 2 nd segment)‏ 8 X0 (in 1 st segment) + 12 X0 (in 2 nd segment)‏ 9 X0 (in 1 st segment) + 11 X0 (in 2 nd segment)‏ 10 X0 (in 1 st segment) + 10 X0 (in 2 nd segment)‏ 11 X0 (in 1 st segment) + 9 X0 (in 2 nd segment)‏ 12 X0 (in 1 st segment) + 8 X0 (in 2 nd segment)‏ 13 X0 (in 1 st segment) + 7 X0 (in 2 nd segment)‏ 14 X0 (in 1 st segment) + 6 X0 (in 2 nd segment)‏ 15 X0 (in 1 st segment) + 5 X0 (in 2 nd segment)‏ 16 X0 (in 1 st segment) + 4 X0 (in 2 nd segment)‏ 17 X0 (in 1 st segment) + 3 X0 (in 2 nd segment)‏ ‏18 X0 (in 1 st segment) + 2 X0 (in 2 nd segment)‏ ‏19 X0 (in 1 st segment) + 1 X0 (in 2 nd segment)‏ Particle identification is based on relation between the total energy and the energy in the first segment: E 1 vs E tot PID in ECAL

ECAL energy resolution as a function of photon energy. Energy resolution PID in ECAL

The energy deposition in the whole module caused by 2 GeV photon and 1,2,3,4 GeV/c neutron Neutron contamination to photon spectrum: 1D case PID in ECAL

The energy deposition in the 1st segment versus the full energy deposition. Black points correspond to 2 GeV photons, red points correspond to 1 GeV/c neutrons. Segmentation: 10 X0 (1st segment) + 10 X0 (2nd segment) Neutron contamination to photon spectrum 2D case PID in ECAL

The energy deposition in the 1st segment versus the energy deposition in the whole module. The same plot but with one additional population originated from 2 GeV/c neutrons (blue points) Neutron contamination to photon spectrum 2D case PID in ECAL

The energy deposition in the 1st segment versus the energy deposition in the whole module. The same plot but with one additional population originated from 3 GeV/c neutrons (green points) Neutron contamination to photon spectrum 2D case PID in ECAL

The energy deposition in the 1st segment versus the energy deposition in the whole module. The same plot but with one additional population originated from 4 GeV/c neutrons (magenta points) Neutron contamination to photon spectrum 2D case PID in ECAL

Probabilities for neutron to fake 2 GeV photon. This plot corresponds to the following segment structure: 10X0+10X PID in ECAL

Probabilities for neutron to fake 2 GeV photon (red curve), 3 GeV photon (green curve) and 4 GeV photon (blue curve). Segment structure: 10X0+10X PID in ECAL

Probabilities for neutron to fake 2 GeV photon (red curve), 3 GeV photon (green curve), 4 GeV photon (blue curve), 5 GeV photon (yellow curve), 6 GeV photon (magenta curve), 7 GeV photon (cyan curve) and 8 GeV photon (deep green curve). Segment structure: 10X0+10X PID in ECAL

Probabilities for neutron to fake 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,..., 23, 24 and 25 GeV photons. Segment structure: 10X0+10X PID in ECAL

Probabilities for neutron to fake 2 GeV photon in module with 2 segments 10X0+10X0 (red curve) and the whole module (black curve) PID in ECAL

Probabilities for neutron to fake 4 GeV photon in module with 2 segments 10X0+10X0 (red curve) and the whole module (black curve) PID in ECAL

Probabilities for neutron to fake 10 GeV photon in module with 2 segments 10X0+10X0 (red curve) and the whole module (black curve) PID in ECAL

Expected behaviour of probability for neutron with momentum P [GeV/c] to fake, for example, 2 GeV photon (where P > 2 GeV) To obtain a probability for neutron with ANY momentum to fake the 2 GeV photon, one needs to use the following convolution integral: Expected behaviour of the probability for neutron with ANY momentum to fake the 2 GeV photon PID in ECAL

Momentum distribution for various particle species from UrQMD PID in ECAL

Definition of convolution integral PID in ECAL

Probabilities for neutron with any momentum to fake photon with a given energy in module with 2 segments 10X0+10X0 (red curve) and the whole module (black curve) Integral contamination of photon spectrum by neutrons PID in ECAL

Ratio of probabilities for neutron with any momentum to fake photon with a given energy 1-segmented modules vs 2-segmented one PID in ECAL

Probabilities and their ratios for neutron with any momentum to fake photon with a given energy for various segment thickness PID in ECAL

Probabilities and their ratios for neutron with any momentum to fake photon with a given energy for various segment thickness PID in ECAL

Probabilities and their ratios for K 0 L and proton with any momentum to fake photon with a given energy PID in ECAL

Probabilities and their ratios for  (1115) and antineutron with any momentum to fake photon with a given energy PID in ECAL

Probabilities and their ratios for  + and  - with any momentum to fake photon with a given energy PID in ECAL

The 1 st practical realization of the well known procedure for performing the ECAL PID in the 1D case (whole ECAL module) and the 2D case (ECAL module with 2 segments) were done The probabilities for hadrons and muons of various momenta P to fake a photon of various energies E were obtained. For example, in the segment structure 14X0+6X0, 5 GeV photon can be faked by 5.3e-03 of 6 GeV/c neutrons, by 2.9e-02 of 6 GeV/c K0L, by 4.8e-02 of 6 GeV/c antineutrons, by 5.1e-03 of 6 GeV/c Lambda(1115), by 4.7e-02 of 6 GeV/c pi-, by 3.4e-02 of 6 GeV/c pi+, by 5.4e-03 of 6 GeV/c protons, by 6.0e-05 of 7 GeV/c muons The probabilities for hadrons of ANY momenta P (integrated over momenta of the hadrons) to fake a photon of various energies E were obtained. For example, in the segment structure 14X 0 +6X 0, 5 GeV photon can be faked by 9.1  of neutrons, 1.7  of K 0 L, 3.5  of antineutrons, 1.5  of Lambda(1115), 1.2  of  -, 9.8  of  +, 8.8  of protons PID has been studied for 19 combinations of segment thickness. The most optimum segment combinations are 14X 0 +6X 0 and 15X 0 +5X 0. Conclusion PID in ECAL