The MSC Process in Geant4

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basic Nuclear Properties
Advertisements

GEANT Simulation of RCS Vahe Mamyan Hall A Analysis Workshop December 10, 2003.
Advanced Neutron Spectrometer (ANS) Geant4 Simulations
Simulation of Neutrino Factory beam and quasielastic scattering off electrons in the near detector Yordan Karadzhov University of Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski”
Use of G EANT 4 in CMS AIHENP’99 Crete, April 1999 Véronique Lefébure CERN EP/CMC.
Transfer FAS UAS SAINT-PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS Introduction Physical basis Molecular dynamics Temperature and thermostat Numerical.
Ion Beam Analysis techniques:
Geant4 Low Energy Polarized Compton Processes Gerardo Depaola * Francesco Longo + Francesco Longo + * National University of Córdoba (Argentina) + University.
Pedro Arce Point detector scoring 1 Point detector scoring in GEANT4 Pedro Arce, (CIEMAT) Miguel Embid (CIEMAT) Juan Ignacio Lagares (CIEMAT) Geant4 Event.
Prof. Reinisch, EEAS / Simple Collision Parameters (1) There are many different types of collisions taking place in a gas. They can be grouped.
Simulation of a Ring Imaging Cerenkov detector to identify relativistic heavy ions. M.Fernández-Ordóñez, J.Benlliure, E.Casarejos, J.Pereira Universidad.
Counting Cosmic Rays through the passage of matter By Edwin Antillon.
Cross Section. Two-Body Collision  Center of mass R  Neglect external force.  Motion is in a plane Reduced mass applies Compare to CM m2m2 r1r1 F 2.
Electromagnetic Physics I Joseph Perl SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (strongly based on Michel Maire's slides) Geant4 v9.3.p01 Standard EM package.
Particle Interactions
1 Stratified sampling This method involves reducing variance by forcing more order onto the random number stream used as input As the simplest example,
Interaction of Particles with Matter
Stopping Power The linear stopping power S for charged particles in a given absorber is simply defined as the differential energy loss for that particle.
Workshop on Physics on Nuclei at Extremes, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy.
Geant4: Electromagnetic Processes 2 V.Ivanchenko, BINP & CERN
The LiC Detector Toy M. Valentan, M. Regler, R. Frühwirth Austrian Academy of Sciences Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna InputSimulation ReconstructionOutput.
Geology 5640/6640 Introduction to Seismology 10 Apr 2015 © A.R. Lowry 2015 Last time: Reflection Data Processing Source deconvolution (like filtering methods)
Interaction of light charged particles with matter Ionization losses – electron loss energy as it ionizes and excites atoms Scattering – scattering by.
Measurement of through-going particle momentum by means of Multiple Scattering with the T600 TPC Talk given by Antonio Jesús Melgarejo (Universidad de.
St. Petersburg State University. Department of Physics. Division of Computational Physics. COMPUTER SIMULATION OF CURRENT PRODUCED BY PULSE OF HARD RADIATION.
Modelling of Electron Air Showers and Cherenkov Light A.Mishev J. Stamenov Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.
Attenuation by absorption and scattering
Automated Electron Step Size Optimization in EGS5 Scott Wilderman Department of Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences, University of Michigan.
TWIST Measuring the Space-Time Structure of Muon Decay Carl Gagliardi Texas A&M University TWIST Collaboration Physics of TWIST Introduction to the Experiment.
Lecture 1.3: Interaction of Radiation with Matter
Validation and TestEm series Michel Maire for the Standard EM group LAPP (Annecy) July 2006.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
Interactions of Neutrons
Physics Modern Lab1 Electromagnetic interactions Energy loss due to collisions –An important fact: electron mass = 511 keV /c2, proton mass = 940.
Normalisation modelling sources Geant4 tutorial Paris, 4-8 June 2007 Giovanni Santin ESA / ESTEC Rhea System SA.
Material budget, energy losses and multiple scattering.
Radiation Shielding and Reactor Criticality Fall 2012 By Yaohang Li, Ph.D.
Conception of cross section 1) Base conceptions – differential, integral cross section, total cross section, geometric interpretation of cross section.
Alpha and Beta Interactions
1 dE/dx  Let’s next turn our attention to how charged particles lose energy in matter  To start with we’ll consider only heavy charged particles like.
Calorimeters Chapter 21 Chapter 2 Interactions of Charged Particles - With Focus on Electrons and Positrons -
17-19 Oct, 2007Geant4 Japan Oct, 2007Geant4 Japan Oct, 2007Geant4 Japan 2007 Geant4 Collaboration.
What is in my contribution area Nick Sinev, University of Oregon.
1 Photons: X-rays, γ- rays; electrons, positrons Lecture 2 Shell structure of the atoms. Notion of the cross section of the interaction.
Gamma ray interaction with matter A) Primary interactions 1) Coherent scattering (Rayleigh scattering) 2) Incoherent scattering (Compton scattering) 3)
Initial (FLUKA) calculations for synchrotron radiation at TLep April 4 th, 2013 F. Cerutti, A. Ferrari, L. Lari* *BE Dept.
Unit 3: Motion, Forces, & Energy Chapter 9: Motion & Energy
Particle Detectors for Colliders Robert S. Orr University of Toronto.
Resolution and radiative corrections A first order estimate for pbar p  e + e - T. H. IPN Orsay 05/10/2011 GDR PH-QCD meeting on « The nucleon structure.
Event Analysis for the Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Robin Morris, RIACS Johann Cohen-Tanugi SLAC.
MCS: Multiple Coulomb Scattering Sophie Middleton.
Numerical Model of an Internal Pellet Target O. Bezshyyko *, K. Bezshyyko *, A. Dolinskii †,I. Kadenko *, R. Yermolenko *, V. Ziemann ¶ * Nuclear Physics.
MONTE CARLO TRANSPORT SIMULATION Panda Computing Week 2012, Torino.
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
Chapter 2 Radiation Interactions with Matter East China Institute of Technology School of Nuclear Engineering and Technology LIU Yi-Bao Wang Ling.
by students Rozhkov G.V. Khalikov E.V. scientific adviser Iyudin A.F.
M. Sc Physics, 3rd Semester
12th Geant4 Space Users Workshop
Geant4 and Fano cavity : where are we ?
variance reduction techniques to improve efficiency of calculation A
PHY 711 Classical Mechanics and Mathematical Methods
Methods of Experimental Particle Physics
Summary of hadronic tests and benchmarks in ALICE
Introduction Goal: Can we reconstruct the energy depositions of the proton in the brain if we are able to reconstruct the photons produced during this.
Monte Carlo radiation transport codes
Summary of dE/dx studies in silicon and MS in muon system
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Wednesday,March 7, 2012 Dr. Brandt
PHYS 3446, Spring 2012 Andrew Brandt
Lesson 4: Application to transport distributions
Presentation transcript:

The MSC Process in Geant4 Geant4 does not use the detailed algorithm where all the collisions/interaction experienced by the particle are simulated. G4 uses condensed simulation algorithm. The model of MSC used by G4 ( G4UrbanMscModel ) simulates the scattering of the particle after a given step and also computes the path length correction and the lateral displacement. There are few general steps of MSC simulation at G4.

Multiple Scattering (1) zd zd/2 Silvia Pozzi Muon

1/λk = 2πnα∫ [1-Pk(cosχ)] (dσ(χ)/dΩ) d(cosχ) (1) 1) The step length of the particle is determined by the physics process or the geometry of detector. For particle (muon) with E,p the stepping algorithm checks all the step length of possible physical process and takes the minimal one (t)p – ”physics” step length. 2)Has to be compared with the geometrical step length determined by detector geometry (z)d – geometrical step length (values are imposed when cross the volume boundaries). To do this it needs the transformation (t)(z). The properties of MSC completely determined by the transport mean free path: 1/λk = 2πnα∫ [1-Pk(cosχ)] (dσ(χ)/dΩ) d(cosχ) (1) dσ(χ)/dΩ – the differencial cross section of the scattering, nα –number of atoms per volume, Pk(cosχ) – (k) Legandre polinome. Need only λ1 ,λ2, which are tabulated in G4 for 15 materials but only for e- and e+ at low energies, but can be lineary extrapolated in masses and β= v/c of other particles. < z > = λ1 [1-exp(- t/λ1)] - path length correction (t z transformation) (2) but when step small and E loss can be neglected. If not, λ 1 = λ1(t), decreases along the step: λ 1(t) =λ10 (1- αt), α = (λ10 -λ11)/tλ10 (3) λ10 – transport mean.free.p. at the beginning of the step, α – const. But for high energies: (3a)

t(z) = <t> = - λ1log(1-z/λ1) , for small steps or (4) 3) Only after ”physics” step length (t) transformation in (z) we can compare (z)p with (z)g and take min as the actual step length. 4) After the determination of actual step and particle relocation we need to compute the energy loss and scattering parameters ( θ(t) and lateral displacement ), which are functions of true step length (t). So, we need to do the inverse transformation (z) (t): t(z) = <t> = - λ1log(1-z/λ1) , for small steps or (4) t(z) = 1/α[1 - (1 – αwz)]^1/w , for big steps, with E loss taken in account (5), where w = 1 + 1/(αλ10) . 5) The scattering angle θ (t) is computed according to model function: g(u) = pg1(u) + (1-p)g2(u), (6) where u = cos(θ), 0 ≤ p ≤ 1, gi - functions of cos (θ), normalized at -1≤ u ≤ 1, g1(u) = C1 exp [-a(1-u)], g2 (u) = C2 1/(b – 1) ^2 , (7) Ci –normalization constants, a, b>0 – model parameters.

θ0 =(13.6 Mev/ βcp)·Zch√ t/X0 ·[1 + 0.038 ln (t /X0) ] (PDG) (10) 5.1) determination of parameters a,b,p, which are not independent. a = 0.5/(1-cos(θ0))  g1(u), (8) θ0 =(13.6 Mev/ βcp)·Zch√ t/X0 ·[1 + 0.038 ln (t /X0) ] (PDG) (10) t/X0 –is the true path length in the radiation length unit . b = 1/<cos (θ)>  g2(u) (11) <cos (θ)> = exp [- t/λ1] l.e. , h.e. (12) 6) After the simulation of scattering angle θ, G4 computes the lateral displacement and its direction: (13) where k =λ1 /λ2 , τ= t/ λ1 , vx and vy are x and y components of components of the directional unit vector. So, G4 simulates the θ angular distribution from model functions, while for the the lateral displacement and lateral correlations only mean values are used.

7) Step limitation algorithm. In G4 particle doesn’t penetrate in a new volume without stopping at the boundary. It restricts the step size when the particle entering a new volume to a value: fr · max{ r, λ1} (14) r – the range of the particle, fr [0,1] is a parameter (constant for a low energies). For high energies for particles with λ1 >λlim G4 uses the effective value feff = fr · [1 –sc + sc· (λ1 /λlim)] (15) (sc=0.25, λlim = 1mm). In order to prevent a particle from crossing a volume in just one step G4 makes additional limitation: after entering a volume the step size cannot be bigger than dgeom/fg , (16) dgeom is the distance to the next boundary, fg is a constant. At the start of the track the restriction is 2dgeom/fg (17)

8) Boundary crossing algorithm. The new algorithm was implemented (2006) to improve the simulation around interfaces. It doesn’t allow a “big” last step in a volume and “big” first step in the next volume. The s.l. around the boundary crossing s.l. < λelastic (mean free path of elastic scattering in the given material). After this small step the particle scattering according to a single scattering law (no MSC very close to the boundary or at the boundary). The key parameter of algorithm is ‘skin’. When ‘skin’ ≤ 0, algorithm doesn’t work. When ‘skin’ >0, it works in layers of thickness (skin ·λelastic ) before boundary and of thikness (skin-1) ·λelastic after the boundary. In this areas the particle performs step of length ≤ λelastic. For these small steps there are no path length correlations and lateral displasement computation. In other words the program works in this thin layer in “microscopic” mode. The elastic mean free path is estimated as: Λelastic = λ1·rat(Ekin ) rar(Ekin) = (0.001(MeV)^2)/T(T + 10 MeV). (14) The single scattering by angle θis determined by distribution: (15)

u = cos(θ), -screening parameter (16) where Z – atomic number, τ- kinetik energy measured in particle mass unit, α – constant.