GOSAT Calibration Activities in 2 Years Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency 1 10th GSICS Executive Panel - Global Space-based Inter-Calibration System,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluating Calibration of MODIS Thermal Emissive Bands Using Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer Measurements Yonghong Li a, Aisheng Wu a, Xiaoxiong.
Advertisements

Summary of Terra and Aqua MODIS Long-term Performance Jack Xiong 1, Brian Wenny 2, Sri Madhaven 2, Amit Angal 3, William Barnes 4, and Vincent Salomonson.
Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite Observing SATellite 29 March 2011 Hyper Spectral Workshop The ACOS/GOSAT Experience David Crisp JPL/CALTECH.
VIIRS Reflective Solar On-orbit Calibration and Performance Jack Xiong and Jim Butler Code 618.0, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD CLARREO SDT Meeting, NASA.
NCEO Carbon Land Meeting 2012 Greenhouse Gas Satellite Remote Sensing from GOSAT Robert Parker, Austin Cogan and Hartmut Boesch EOS Group, University of.
A U R A Satellite Mission T E S
A 21 F A 21 F Parameterization of Aerosol and Cirrus Cloud Effects on Reflected Sunlight Spectra Measured From Space: Application of the.
Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite Observing SATellite 29 March 2011 Hyper Spectral Workshop Henry L Buijs, ABB/BOMEM David Crisp JPL/CALTECH.
Page 1 1 of 20, EGU General Assembly, Apr 21, 2009 Vijay Natraj (Caltech), Hartmut Bösch (University of Leicester), Rob Spurr (RT Solutions), Yuk Yung.
Lunar Observations of Changes in the Earth’s Albedo (LOCEA) Alexander Ruzmaikin Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology in collaboration.
MODIS Regional and Global Cloud Variability Brent C. Maddux 1,2 Steve Platnick 3, Steven A. Ackerman 1,2, Paul Menzel 1, Kathy Strabala 1, Richard Frey.
A-SCOPE Advanced Space Carbon and Climate Observation of Planet Earth MAG: F.M. Breon, H. Dolman, G. Ehret, P. Flamant, N. Gruber, S. Houweling, M. Scholze,
Recent activities on utilization of microwave imager data in the JMA NWP system - Preparation for AMSR2 data assimilation - Masahiro Kazumori Japan Meteorological.
1 D. Crisp for the ACOS/OCO-2 Team Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology OCO-2 Science Lead 7 June 2011 Copyright 2011 California.
S T O A Avoiding Ash Disruptions
Diagnosing Climate Change from Satellite Sounding Measurements – From Filter Radiometers to Spectrometers William L. Smith Sr 1,2., Elisabeth Weisz 1,
Orbit Characteristics and View Angle Effects on the Global Cloud Field
1 Applications of Remote Sensing: SeaWiFS and MODIS Ocean Color Outline  Physical principles behind the remote sensing of ocean color parameters  Satellite.
NASA, CGMS-41, July 2013 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Calibration/validation of Operational Instruments at NASA Langley Research.
Terra Launched December 18, 1999
COST 723 Training School - Cargese October 2005 OBS 3 Radiative transfer for thermal radiation. Instruments Bruno Carli.
POLAR MULTI-SENSOR AEROSOL PROPERTIES OVER LAND Michael Grzegorski, Rosemary Munro, Gabriele Poli, Andriy Holdak and Ruediger Lang.
The Second TEMPO Science Team Meeting Physical Basis of the Near-UV Aerosol Algorithm Omar Torres NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Atmospheric Chemistry.
VIIRS Product Evaluation at the Ocean PEATE Frederick S. Patt Gene C. Feldman IGARSS 2010 July 27, 2010.
Retrieval of biomass burning aerosols with combination of near-UV radiance and near -IR polarimetry I.Sano, S.Mukai, M. Nakata (Kinki University, Japan),
Radiative transfer in the thermal infrared and the surface source term
Polarization analysis in MODIS Gerhard Meister, Ewa Kwiatkowska, Bryan Franz, Chuck McClain Ocean Biology Processing Group 18 June 2008 Polarization Technology.
Use of the Moon as a calibration reference for NPP VIIRS Frederick S. Patt, Robert E. Eplee, Robert A. Barnes, Gerhard Meister(*) and James J. Butler NASA.
Data acquisition From satellites with the MODIS instrument.
GCOM-W1 Status Keizo Nakagawa 1, Norimasa Ito 1, Marehito Kasahara 1, and Keiji Imaoka 2 1 GCOM Project Team 2 Earth Observation Research Center (EORC)
Methane Retrievals in the Thermal Infrared from IASI AGU Fall Meeting, 14 th -18 th December, San Francisco, USA. Diane.
Japan Meteorological Agency, June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Non-Meteorological Application for Himawari-8 Presented.
AGU 2008 Highlight Le Kuai Lunch seminar 12/30/2008.
Calibration Activities of GOSAT and GOSAT-2
JMA GPRC report Arata OKUYAMA Meteorological Satellite Center,
Goal meeting : to inform each other about on-going/up-coming work related to CO TROPOMI to see if more/stronger collaboration is possible/needed to plan.
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
The Lodore Falls Hotel, Borrowdale
Carbon products: Calibration and validation approaches
GSICS Web Meeting, 17 November 2011
Pre-launch Characteristics and Calibration
NOAA VIIRS Team GIRO Implementation Updates
METimage Calibration Pepe Phillips GSICS Data & Research Working
JAXA Himawari-8 Ocean Color and Aerosol
Contents GSICS activities Visible channel calibration
Surface Pressure Measurements from the NASA Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) Presented to CGMS-43 Working Group II, agenda item WGII/10 David Crisp.
Lunar observation data set preparation
V2.0 minus V2.5 RSAS Tangent Height Difference Orbit 3761
Meteorological Satellite Center Japan Meteorological Agency
Vicarious calibration by liquid cloud target
On the use of Ray-Matching to transfer calibration
Calibration and Performance MODIS Characterization Support Team (MCST)
MODIS Lunar Calibration Data Preparation and Results for GIRO Testing
Need for TEMPO-ABI Synergy
Toru Kouyama Supported by SELENE/SP Team HISUI calibration WG
Data Preparation for ASTER
Using the Moon for Sensor Calibration Inter- comparisons
Manik Bali Jonathan Mittaz
The Successor of the TOU
Lunar reflectance model based on SELENE/SP data
Cal & VAL for Greenhouse Gases Observation Spectrometers
Cal & VAL for Greenhouse gases observation spectrometers
Himawari-8 Launch and its calibration approaches
IR hyperspectral comparisons
Early calibration results of FY-4A/GIIRS during in-orbit testing
Consistent calibration of VIRR onboard FY-3A to FY-3C
Radiometric inter-comparison of IASI
Strawman Plan for Inter-Calibration of Solar Channels
JAXA Agency Report 2019 Hiroshi Murakami, Misako Kachi, Takashi Maeda,
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
Presentation transcript:

GOSAT Calibration Activities in 2 Years Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency 1 10th GSICS Executive Panel - Global Space-based Inter-Calibration System, 10th Session of the Executive Panel WMO, Geneva, Room: 8 JURA (8th Floor), 6 to 8 June 2011

GOSAT full-scale model at EXPO2005 (Aichi, Japan) GOSAT satellite at the launch site of Tanegashima Introduction of GOSAT Mission GOSAT is Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite. Monitoring global distribution of Greenhouse Gases from space Target for Carbon dioxide and Methane at km spatial scale with relative accuracy of 1% (4ppm) for CO2 and 2% (34ppb) for CH4 Joint project by JAXA (Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency), NIES (National Institute for Environmental Studies) MOE (Ministry of the Environment) Launch: 23 January 2009 by H2A launch vehicle Mission lifetime: 5 years to

TANSO=Thermal And Near infrared Sensor for carbon Observation GOSAT Satellite and Sensors SizeMain body 3.7 m x 1.8 m x 2.0 m ( Wing Span 13.7m ) MassTotal1750kg PowerTotal3.8 KW (EOL) Life Time5 years Orbitsun synchronous orbit Local time13:00+/-0:15 Altitude666km Inclination98deg Repeat3 days LaunchVehicleH-IIA ScheduleJan TANSO-FTS (Fourier Transform Spectrometer) TANSO-CAI (Cloud and Aerosol Imager)

TANSO-FTS Spectral Coverage 4

TANSO-FTS Specification 5 Ground Pointing Mechanism and Fore optics Configuration2-axes pointing mirror (fully redundant) for ground pointing, calibration and IMC Pointing Cross Track (+/-35 deg ) Along Track (+/-20 deg) Field of viewIFOV =10.5 km FOV=790 km (scan width) (latitude of 30 deg) Fourier Transform Spectrometer Speed4, 2, 1.1 sec/ 1 Interferogram Spectral ch1P, 1S2P, 2S3P, 3S4 Obs. Band[  m] Target gasO2O2 CO 2, CH 4 CO 2 CO 2, CH 4, O 3 Resolution[cm -1 ]0.2 DetectorSiInGaAs PC-MCT CalibrationSolar Irradiance, Deep Space, Moon, Diode Laser (1.55 micron, ILS) Blackbody, Deep space

TANSO-CAI Cloud and Aerosol Image 6 The plume of erupting Grimsvotn volcano in Iceland R=678nm(Band2) G=870nm(Band3) B=380nm(Band1) UV channel of 380nm is useful for aerosol detection colored in yellow. May 22, 2011, at 15:09

Band Observation Band (nm) Center Wavelength (nm) IFOV (km) FOV (km) Num. of Pixels (cross track) TANSO-CAI is operated together with TANSO-FTS to - detect aerosol spatial distribution and - cloud coverage TANSO-CAI Specifications 7 Onboard calibration: Lunar calibration (/year), Nighttime observation (/month)

TANSO operation with FTS and CAI 8 FTS observation pattern with CAI browse image on Jun. 5, 2010 in dayside Grid observationSunglint observation Target observation The GOSAT is in normal operation from April 2009 over 2 years. The CAI observation swath covers the FTS observation points for cloud screening and aerosol correction.

9 L2 (column abundance obtained by each scan) L3 (spatial and temporal average of column abundances) L1A L1B L4A L4B GOSAT Data Processing JAXA -> Sensor, Level1, Calibration NIES -> Level2, 3, 4, Validation

Launch Critical phase Jan. 23 Level 2 (SWIR CO 2 and CH 4 of column averaged density global distribution) to public Level 1 (Observation spectra) to public Initial Checkout Mission life Initial Cal. and Val. Initial function check Normal observation operation ~ Extra Operati on ~ 2014 GOSAT Mission Schedule - : Nov. 2010Level 3 (SWIR CO 2 and CH 4 column averaged density global distribution in monthly mean) to public May 2011Level2 (TIR CO 2 and CH 4 density profile global distribution) to RA PI mid -2011Level 4A (CO 2 and CH 4 flux in 64 global regions) Level 4B (CO 2 and CH 4 global distribution by 3D model) to RA PI 10

GOSAT L2 and L3 Products (FTS SWIR XCO 2, XCH 4, CAI R min ) 11 XCO 2 Apr 2009 XCO 2 Jul 2009 XCO 2 Oct 2009 XCO 2 Jan 2010 XCH 4 Apr 2009 XCH 4 Jul 2009 XCH 4 Oct 2009 XCH 4 Jan 2010 CAI R min Jun 2009 CAI R min Dec 2009

12 CAI Radiometric Accuracy Land, Clear-sky Ocean, Clear-sky Ocean, Cloud Hawaii ocean B1○ B2○○ B3○ B4○○ Land, Clear-sky Ocean, Clear-sky Ocean, Cloud Hawaii ocean B1○ B2○○○○ B3○○○ B4○○ Initial calibration without zero-level correction L+9M calibration with zero-level correction slopeoffset B B B B Vicarious calibration coefficient Results Vicarious calibrated radiance = slope*(radiance after zero-level correction) + offset B2, B3, B4 calibration B1 relative to B3 B2, B3 ・ Ocean, Cloud ・ Land, Clear-sky ・ Ocean, Clear-sky Combined calibration Results by CAI calibration team

CAI Radiometric Sensitivity Trend at Desert Sites 13 Comparison with MODIS reflectance Annual trend at 9 sites Band1Band2Band3Band4 meanstdevmeanstdevmeanstdevmeanstdev Ref2010/Ref Annual change-1.6%-4.0%-1.2%-1.1% Sahara and Rub Al Khali desert sites CAI annual trends Jun.-Dec. at Sahara_6

FTS-SWIR Radiometric Sensitivity Trend at Desert Sites 14 Band 1 degradation is estimated in 2 %. No degradations in Band 2 and 3. Annual trend

ALOS/AVNIR-2 (R/G/B=3/2/1) 0 10 km ©JAXA Railroad Valley field - Nevada/USA –Base-camp: N; W –Height : about 1435m path37 path36 Vicarious Calibration at Railroad Valley 15

Path 37 from West Path 36 from East 19.9deg 19deg 33.0deg 25deg Surface and Profile of Pressure, Temperature, Humidity Surface Spectral Reflectance Surface CO 2 CH 4 BRDF Aerosol Optical Thickness TOA Spectral radiance RRV Field Experiments Deployment 16

Summary of Radiometric Calibrations for FTS-SWIR and CAI in Days from the launch TANSO-FTSCAI B1B2B3B1B2B3B4 Vicarious calibration (vs. pre-launch calibration) June 23-July 4, ±7%-3±7%-4±7%-17%+4%0%-18% June ±7%-2±5%-6±5%-21%-4% -20% Solar diffuser plate (back side) (vs. onboard initial calibration) June %-0.9%-0.4%N/A June % %N/A Sahara %0% -1.6%-4.0%-1.2%-1.1% April-September June-Sep RRV: Absolute Solar diffuser plate: relative (monitoring change with time) Sahara Data: relative (monitoring change with time)

IASI-GOSAT Simultaneous Nadir Overpasses 18 TANSO-FTS/GOSATIASI/METOP-A Spectral range micron micron Spectral resolution0.2 cm cm -1 Local time13:00 Descending09:30 Descending FOV10 km12 km Spacing interval km65 km Launch22 Jan Oct Time: +/- 20 min Location:+/- 50 km Coincidence is restricted to +/ deg. Match-ups are 65 cases in 3 days.

FTS-TIR Correction Derived from IASI SNOs 19 Collaboration with Univ. Wisconsin cm cm cm cm cm -1 Deep space obscuration correction rate is estimated from IASI-GOSAT SNOs. Significant improvement is confirmed in the 15 micron CO 2 region. Coincidences with IASI are located at high latitude, while AIRS at low-middle latitude.

Conclusions GOSAT is normally operated over 2 years and acquires fine absorption spectra in SWIR to TIR regions with cloud/aerosol imager. Radiometric calibration on orbit in 2 years MODIS reflectance for absolute radiance of SWIR and CAI Inter-comparison attempt with other TIR sensors of IASI Vicarious calibration field campaign with in-situ measurements and aircraft over-flight collaborated with NASA OCO-2 research Annual degradation monitoring at uniform desert sites On-going activities Long-term inter-comparison with IASI and AIRS (collaboration with CNES and RA PIs) Long-term trend monitoring at uniform desert sites Continuous operations of lunar calibration and solar diffuser 20