General Infrastructures Services Department LIU-SPS external beam dump - Internal Review Civil Engineering Aspect for Option B (LSS4) 30/7/2014 Martin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary of the Design Report and Next Steps Edda Gschwendtner for the CERN AWAKE Project Team Edda Gschwendtner, CERN1.
Advertisements

MODULE TRANSPORT CLIC Module Working Group 27 September 2010 Keith Kershaw CERN EN-HE.
CERN TS Department / Civil Engineering Group 8 February 2008 Civil Engineering Layouts & Tunnel Cross Section 1 CLIC/ILC Collaboration Meeting 8 Feb 2008.
Plasma Wakefield (AWAKE) Project Meeting 18 October 2012 Civil Engineering Feasibility Issues for the West Area EDMS : John Osborne GS-SE.
CENF – Civil Engineering Extension B887 CERN: An accelerator complex unique in the world -Prevessin site complex- -EHN1 Extension Area- EHN1 Extension.
John Osborne GS/SE March 2013
Construction and Installation of the CLIC Experimental Area
1 Radiation Safety Aspects of the Linear Collider B. Racky, A. Leuschner, N. Tesch Radiation Protection Group TeV Superconducting Linear Accelerator.
Machine Advisory Committee Review APS Upgrade Installation Plan and Schedule John Noonan November 15, 2006.
CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group.
19 February Summary: Updating on the activities completed (Done) since the last meeting List activities on going (Next steps) and related Actions.
CERN Rüdiger Schmidt Review 30 July 2014page 1 Summary: LIU-SPS external beam dump review SPS external dump review.
1 Discussion for basic options — engineering video conference July 12, 2006 Outline Water pool — advantages — issues, problems, engineering options Aquarium.
Integration of the Experimental Facility in West Area & CNGS 1Ans Pardons, 18/10/2012 Integration of experimental facility in West Area and CNGS With input.
WP2 Superbeam Work Breakdown Structure Version 2 Chris Densham (after Marco Zito version 1 )
Integration, Installation & Infrastructure Ans Pardons, with input from the WP4 members September 2014.
MG - IEFC meeting 22/01/20101 Linac 3 shielding S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, S. Baird, R. Brown, S. Damjanovic, T. Otto, M. Widorski, Acknowledgements:
REQUIREMENTS FOR FCC DILUTION KICKERS AND BEAM DUMP LINE GEOMETRY F. Burkart, W. Bartmann, M. Fraser, B. Goddard, T. Kramer FCC dump meeting 18 th June.
John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 19 May 2009 Report on behalf of CLIC Civil Engineering and Services (CES) WG CTC 19 May 2009 Tunnel Cross Section.
10/2010 IWLC2010 Global Design Effort 1 Brief Overview of Interaction Region Conventional Facilities in RDR Times Presenter Tom Lackowski.
Civil Engineering and Services - drawings for CDR - CDR chapter J.Osborne and M.Gastal for CES WG 1.
CNGS PROJECT STATUS D.Autiero 21/5/2003 General status 2003 Project review CNGS upgrade.
1 Target Station Design Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EuroNu Annual Meeting 2012.
CENF – Civil Engineering Extension B887 Status – 02 October 2014 Done: (1/2) Preliminary civil engineering drawing and Functional specification approved.
LEP3: integration issues at the LHC tunnel M. Koratzinos 2 nd LEP3 day, 23 October 2012.
Beam loads & dump concepts T. Kramer, B. Goddard, M. Benedikt, Hel. Vincke.
First radiological estimates for the HIRADMAT project H. Vincke and N. Conan 1.
Radiation Protection aspects for SHIP Doris Forkel-Wirth, Stefan Roesler, Helmut Vincke, Heinz Vincke CERN Radiation Protection Group 1 st SHIP workshop,
7 November 2003 Status of CNGS NBI presented by K. Elsener 1 Status of CNGS Konrad Elsener CERN – Accelerators+Beams Division.
LIU external beam dump review External beam dump option A: branching off from LSS6 J.L. Abelleira Thanks to: F. Velotti, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi, H. Vincke,
Transport need for SPS external dump to the new dump cavern area LIU-SPS external beam dump JL GRENARD EN-HE
Upgrade projects and APT update DT-LHCb coordination meeting 28 September 2015.
ILC D RAFT P ROJECT S CHEDULE K LYCLUSTER 500GeV K Foraz & M Gastal ILC Mechanical & Electrical Review and CFS Baseline Technical Review Many thanks to.
Design, integration and installation milestones Legend: 2015/Q1= 1 st quarter of 2015 (January-March) Phase 1 = proton & laser beams operation Phase 2.
CENF – Civil Engineering Extension B887 Status – 18 September 2014 Done: (1/2) Preliminary civil engineering drawing and Functional specification approved.
6 April 2006Malika Meddahi 1 CNGS Project: primary beam 1.Project Overview 2. Proton beam line overview and status 3. Target status 4. Commissioning preparation.
General Infrastructures Services Department Civil Engineering planning for LSS4 Option, presented at review workshop 30/7/ months Planning and Resources:
1 Sector Test – Preparation Layout in LSS7 Jan Uythoven (AB/BT) Thanks to Mike Lamont and the other ‘sector testers’
Extraction and beamline progress B.Goddard TE/ABT.
PS/SPS Days Roberto Losito/Oliver Aberle 13th January 2004
MDI 9 th Meeting - 22 nd January 2016 FCC Experimental Caverns - Feasibility and Excavation C. Cook (GS), J. Osborne (GS),
1 CNGS Electrical Services (PBS 5.5) S. AKHTAR - ST/EL.
Survey Meeting John Osborne, CERN 8 February 2016
Radiation Protection Considerations for the CDR Helmut Vincke DGS-RP.
Proton-Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration CERN Project Structure Edda Gschwendtner, CERN Lisbon Meeting, 22 June 2012Edda Gschwendtner, CERN2.
Discussion and preliminary conclusions LIU-SPS dump review.
19 February Extension of Building Neutrino Platform General Meetings N.Lopez – M.Manfredi EHN1 civil engineering project status Summary: Updating.
1 TI 8 LHC SPS LSS6 IR2 TT41 LSS4 IR8 TI 2 TT60 TT40TT20 LSS2 LSS1 TT10 Mobile dump block (TED) Targets T2, T4, T6 Target T40.
Facility to coat the SPS magnets with carbon Objective: coat at least 90% of the SPS with a carbon thin film with low secondary electron emission in order.
Accelerator Tunnel Layout (G01) Nick Gazis Senior Mechanical Engineer Review of ESS Accelerator Conventional Facility Design.
SECONDARY BEAM HANDLING AND INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN STATUS BRUNO FERAL (CERN/EN) DIAMANTO SMARGIANAKI (CERN/EN) Project Leader: I.Efthymiopoulos (Cern/EN)
1 Building Design Progress Dan Wilcox March 2012.
Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility LBNF News and brief overview of Beamline plans for the next few months Vaia Papadimitriou Beamline Technical Board Meeting.
Siting/Conventional Facilities Jonathan Hunt PIP-II Machine Advisory Committee 9 March 2015.
KEK Radiation Related Topics neutrino beam construction subgroup Yuichi Oyama (KEK) and target monitor subgroup for.
Civil Engineering for FCC-eh and LHeC
CLIC Civil Engineering Update
FCC Civil Engineering John Osborne & Jo Stanyard (SMB - Site Engineering - FAS Section) FCC week outline 10th May 2017.
Experimental hall design in Japanese site
Tunnel Cross Section Studies
5th FCC Infrastructure & Operation meeting
FCC Civil Engineering update
FCC-ee MDI Civil Engineering update
News and brief overview of Beamline plans for the next few months
Special LS1 day on 12 June 2012, EDMS:
Accelerator and Experiment Interface Session: LS2, LS3
Civil Engineering for FCC-eh IR
East Hall under construction
Hadron stop Design Features
CMS Gantry for Detector Lowering
Presentation transcript:

General Infrastructures Services Department LIU-SPS external beam dump - Internal Review Civil Engineering Aspect for Option B (LSS4) 30/7/2014 Martin Manfredi GS-SE-FAS 30/7/2014 J. Osborne, M. Manfredi, GS-SE-FAS 1

General Infrastructures Services Department TAG41 TAG42 TT40 TJ8 TT41 SPS ring TI8 MagnetMQID DUMPLINE AREA FORESEEN TAG41 Neutrino access gallery (CNGS) Proton Beam Line SUMMARY: Path foreseen to reach DUMP AREA (TI8): ~300m Different Options developed  Feasibility study Cost estimate and planning for CE work Conclusion 30/7/2014 J. Osborne, M. Manfredi, GS-SE-FAS 2 LIU-SPS external beam dump // Extraction from LSS4

General Infrastructures Services Department ~ 140 m Tunnel TAG41 slope: 2.29% Section view Plan view ECA4 ~ 3.10 m ~ 2.50 m A A A A Section A-A Actual space available for transport: 1.56m (W); 2.05m (H) 30/7/2014 J. Osborne, M. Manfredi, GS-SE-FAS 3 PATH FORESEEN // Access from Shafts PAM4  TI8 Dump Area

General Infrastructures Services Department TAG41 Tunnel TAG42 slope: 7.26% Section view ~ 120 m TT41 TAG41 TI8 Plan view B B B B C C C C Section B-B Section C-C TT41 ~ 3.40 m ~ 2.70 m ~ 2.15 m TAG42 30/7/2014 J. Osborne, M. Manfredi, GS-SE-FAS 4 PATH FORESEEN // Access from Shafts PAM4  TI8 Dump Area

General Infrastructures Services Department Tunnel TAG42 Magnet: MQID Tunnel TT41 Tunnel TI8 slope: 0.4% TJ8 Plan view ~ 30 m ~ 12 m D D Section D-D ~ 6.00 m ~ 2.15 m TT41 New Tunnel foreseen which allows a straight connection between TAG42 --> TI8 30/7/2014 J. Osborne, M. Manfredi, GS-SE-FAS 5 PATH FORESEEN // Access from Shafts PAM4  TI8 Dump Area

General Infrastructures Services Department Existing TI8 tunnel Existing TT41 tunnel TI8 beam line Dump line Plan view Extraction Point before MQID MBSG + 7 MBNH, 12.16m of final drift up to absorber, 93.65m total length TI8 enlargement DUMP Option B1, DUMP LINE characteristics: Magnet: MQID /7/2014 J. Osborne, M. Manfredi, GS-SE-FAS 6 EXTERNAL DUMP DESIGNED // Option B1 (single enlargement) Section F-F Crane 5Ton? Ventilation Unit F F Option B1, CE conditions: TI8 enlargement before the first MBNH At least 4.80m of distance kept from the existing TT41 tunnel (4.92m calculated) Single cross section, allow easy construction works and equipments installation/maintenance CONC+IRON+CONC used as shielding around the absorber ( ) Option B1, Enlargement size: 68.5m long – 10.5m wide

General Infrastructures Services Department Existing TI8 tunnel Existing TT41 tunnel Plan view TI8 enlargement DUMP Magnet: MQID /7/2014 J. Osborne, M. Manfredi, GS-SE-FAS 7 EXTERNAL DUMP DESIGNED // Option B2 (single enlargement) Section F-F Crane 5Ton? Ventilation Unit F F Option B2, Enlargement size: 73.5m long – 10.5m wide Extraction Point before MQID MBSG + 7 MBNH, 17.16m of final drift up to absorber, 98.65m total length Option B2, DUMP LINE characteristics: TI8 enlargement before the first MBNH At least 4.80m of distance kept from the existing TT41 tunnel (4.92m calculated) Single cross section, allow easy construction works and equipments installation/maintenance CONC+IRON+CONC used as shielding around the absorber ( ) TI8 beam line Dump line Option B2, CE conditions:

General Infrastructures Services Department Existing TI8 tunnel Existing TT41 tunnel Plan view TI8 enlargement DUMP Magnet: MQID /7/2014 J. Osborne, M. Manfredi, GS-SE-FAS 8 EXTERNAL DUMP DESIGNED // Option B3 (single enlargement) Section F-F Crane 5Ton? Ventilation Unit F F Option B3, Enlargement size: 91.0m long – 10.5m wide Extraction Point before MQID MBSG + 3 MBNH, 62.57m of final drift up to absorber, m total length Option B3, DUMP LINE characteristics: Option B3, CE conditions: TI8 enlargement before the first MBNH At least 4.80m of distance kept from the existing TT41 tunnel (4.92m calculated) Single cross section, allow easy construction works and equipment installation/maintenance CONC+IRON+CONC used as shielding around the absorber ( ) TI8 beam line Dump line

General Infrastructures Services Department Existing TI8 tunnel Existing TT41 tunnel Plan view TI8 enlargement DUMP Magnet: MQID /7/2014 J. Osborne, M. Manfredi, GS-SE-FAS 9 EXTERNAL DUMP DESIGNED // Option B4 (single enlargement) Section F-F Crane 5Ton? Ventilation Unit F F Option B4, Enlargement size: 83.6m long – 12.5m wide Extraction Point before MQID MBSG + 7 MBNH, 26.26m of final drift up to absorber, m total length Option B4, DUMP LINE characteristics: Option B4, CE conditions: TI8 enlargement before the first MBNH At least 4.80m of distance kept from the existing TT41 tunnel (8.38m calculated) Single cross section, allow easy construction works and equipments installation/maintenance Only CONC used as shielding around the absorber (300cm) TI8 beam line Dump line

General Infrastructures Services Department New Tunnel TAG42  TI8 TI8 Enlargement (+10%) Contingency for unknown/missing items (+12%) Consultancy fees ESTIMATE ACCURACY +/- 50% OPTIONS OVERVIEW AND CE COST ESTIMATE B2 B3 B x x x 12.5 (m) 30/7/2014 J. Osborne, M. Manfredi, GS-SE-FAS 10 Enlargement Size (L x W) MQID MQID Extraction Point Final Drift Length / Total Length17.16 / / / (m) MBNH foreseen73 7 Type of shielding (*) C+I+C C 0.50 (MCHF) Cost Estimate for Civil Engineering work (**) : B2 B3 B (MCHF) (MCHF) (MCHF) (MCHF) (MCHF) TOTAL: Options Overview: (n°) - C+I+C CONCRETE: 50 (cm) IRON: 100 (cm) CONCRETE: 50 (cm) 200 (cm) C CONCRETE: 300 (cm) (*) shielding thickness (**) NOT INCLUDED: GS-SE Resources, Demolition existing TI8 tunnel, Instrumentation for ground stability monitoring, Special works, Services (ventilation, electricity, etc)

General Infrastructures Services Department OPTIONS OVERVIEW AND PLANNING 30/7/2014 J. Osborne, M. Manfredi, GS-SE-FAS 11 Options Overview: Extraction Point before MQID80500 Extraction Point before MQID80600  DUMP LINE shifted 30m downstream Feasible using shielding blocks with CONC+IRON+CONC //Option B2,B3 // Feasible using shielding blocks with ONLY CONC (two enlargement at least are needed  more cost foreseen, ) NOT Feasible using shielding blocks with ONLY CONC (and a single enlargement) Feasible using shielding blocks with ONLY CONC (and a single enlargement) //Option B4// 20 months Planning and Resources: ( * ) The resources given in this table are over and above the existing resources currently in GS-SE Group