PROTEORED Multicentric Study QUANTITATIVE PROTEOMICS METHOD SPECTRAL COUNT 2010 UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA Salamanca 16 th March.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protein Quantitation II: Multiple Reaction Monitoring
Advertisements

The Proteomics Core at Wayne State University
16 Marzo 2010WG1&WG2 Meeting - CIC Salamanca 1 Proteored Multilab Experiment 5 QUANTITATIVE PROTEOMICS 4 proteins spiked in E. coli protein matrix Progenesis.
MN-B-C 2 Analysis of High Dimensional (-omics) Data Kay Hofmann – Protein Evolution Group Week 5: Proteomics.
Proteored Multicentric Experiment 8 (PME8) Quantitative Targeted Analysis in Proteomics. An Assesment Study (QTAPAS) ProteoRed WG1-WG2 Meeting Pamplona,
Proteomics: A Challenge for Technology and Information Science CBCB Seminar, November 21, 2005 Tim Griffin Dept. Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics.
Proteomics Informatics – Protein identification II: search engines and protein sequence databases (Week 5)
Previous Lecture: Regression and Correlation
FIGURE 5. Plot of peptide charge state ratios. Quality Control Concept Figure 6 shows a concept for the implementation of quality control as system suitability.
Scaffold Download free viewer:
Proteomics Informatics (BMSC-GA 4437) Course Director David Fenyö Contact information
MRMPilot ™ Software © 2008 Applera Corporation and MDS Inc.
Proteomics Informatics Workshop Part III: Protein Quantitation
Fa 05CSE182 CSE182-L9 Mass Spectrometry Quantitation and other applications.
Proteome.
1 Quantitative Proteomic Sample Set Amounts displayed as fmols per µg of digested yeast lysate Each sample theoretically contains 15 µg of digested yeast.
A highly abbreviated introduction to proteomics
Karl Clauser Proteomics and Biomarker Discovery Taming Errors for Peptides with Post-Translational Modifications Bioinformatics for MS Interest Group ASMS.
Proteomics Informatics – Data Analysis and Visualization (Week 13)
Comparison of chicken light and dark meat using LC MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry as a model system for biomarker discovery WP 651 Jie Du; Stephen J. Hattan.
The following minimum specified ranges should be considered: Drug substance or a finished (drug) product 80 to 120 % of the test concentration Content.
ProteoRed Multicentric Experiment 5 2D electrophoresis analysis Salamanca, March, 2010.
HPP Preliminary Results La Cristalera, August 2012 Montserrat Carrascal, Joan Villanueva, Joaquín Abián LP-CSIC/UAB.
© 2010 SRI International - Company Confidential and Proprietary Information Quantitative Proteomics: Approaches and Current Capabilities Pathway Tools.
How to assure MIAPE compliance of the data using the ProteoRed MIAPE Extractor tool HUPO-PSI meeting - Liverpool (15th April 2013) Salvador Martínez-Bartolomé.
PROTEIN QUANTIFICATION AND PTM JUN SIN HSS.I. PROJECT 1.
ProteoRed Multicentric Experiment 5: Intensity-based Label-free quantification results Kerman Aloria (University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU) WG1-WG2.
Common parameters At the beginning one need to set up the parameters.
Analysis of Complex Proteomic Datasets Using Scaffold Free Scaffold Viewer can be downloaded at:
Laxman Yetukuri T : Modeling of Proteomics Data
Novel Algorithms for the Quantification Confidence in Quantitative Proteomics with Stable Isotope Labeling* Novel Algorithms for the Quantification Confidence.
Quantification of Membrane and Membrane- Bound Proteins in Normal and Malignant Breast Cancer Cells Isolated from the Same Patient with Primary Breast.
自動化蛋白質定量系統 Automatic Protein Quantitation System 生物資訊實驗室 計畫主持人 許聞廉 特聘研究員 宋定懿 研究員 Relative quantitative proteomics Labeling Label-free MS MS/MS 14 N / 15.
June 9th, 2013 Matthew J. Rardin June 9th, 2013 Matthew J. Rardin MS1 and MS2 crosstalk in label free quantitation of mass spectrometry data independent.
ProteoRed WG1-WG2 Meeting Salamanca, March,16th 2010 PME5: Quantitative LC-MS differential analysis F. Canals.
Multiple flavors of mass analyzers Single MS (peptide fingerprinting): Identifies m/z of peptide only Peptide id’d by comparison to database, of predicted.
EBI is an Outstation of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory. In silico analysis of accurate proteomics, complemented by selective isolation of peptides.
Proteomics Informatics (BMSC-GA 4437) Instructor David Fenyö Contact information
ProteoRed WG1-WG2 Meeting Salamanca, March,16th 2010 PME5: Quantitative LC-MS differential analysis F. Canals.
Peptide-assisted annotation of the Mlp genome Philippe Tanguay Nicolas Feau David Joly Richard Hamelin.
Salamanca, March 16th 2010 Participants: Laboratori de Proteomica-HUVH Servicio de Proteómica-CNB-CSIC Participants: Laboratori de Proteomica-HUVH Servicio.
Oct 2011 SDMBT1 Lecture 11 Some quantitation methods with LC-MS a.ICAT b.iTRAQ c.Proteolytic 18 O labelling d.SILAC e.AQUA f.Label Free quantitation.
Proteomics Informatics (BMSC-GA 4437) Course Directors David Fenyö Kelly Ruggles Beatrix Ueberheide Contact information
Protein quantitation I: Overview (Week 5). Fractionation Digestion LC-MS Lysis MS Sample i Protein j Peptide k Proteomic Bioinformatics – Quantitation.
Using Scaffold OHRI Proteomics Core Facility. This presentation is intended for Core Facility internal training purposes only.
Quantitation using Pseudo-Isobaric Tags (QuPIT) and Quantitation using Pseudo-isobaric Amino acids in Cell culture (QuPAC) Parimal Samir Andrew J. Link.
Ho-Tak Lau, Hyong Won Suh, Martin Golkowski, and Shao-En Ong
Finding the unexpected in SWATH™ Data Sets – Implications for Protein Quantification Ron Bonner; Stephen Tate; Adam Lau AB SCIEX, 71 Four Valley Drive,
Custom peptide synthesis services In the quantitative proteomics research, several MS-based methodologies for relative quantification have been introduced.
PRG2007 Research Study Advanced Quantitative Proteomics
Table 1. Quality Parameters Being Considered for Evaluation
Agenda Welcome from the Skyline team!
2 Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis
Pinpointing phosphorylation sites using Selected Reaction Monitoring and Skyline Christina Ludwig group of Ruedi Aebersold, ETH Zürich.
MCB test 2 Review M. Alex Miranda 11/5/16.
Quantitative proteomics reveals daf‐16‐mediated reduction in protein metabolism in long‐lived daf‐2(e1370) mutants. Quantitative proteomics reveals daf‐16‐mediated.
Proteomics Informatics David Fenyő
Volume 138, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
Metabolomics: Preanalytical Variables
A perspective on proteomics in cell biology
Volume 24, Issue 13, Pages (July 2014)
Skyline MS1 filtering graphical user interface.
Standard concentration curves for stable isotope-labeled and acetyllysine containing peptides. Standard concentration curves for stable isotope-labeled.
Is Proteomics the New Genomics?
The principle of the immuno-SILAC method.
Shotgun Proteomics in Neuroscience
Proteomics Informatics David Fenyő
Kuen-Pin Wu Institute of Information Science Academia Sinica
Presentation transcript:

PROTEORED Multicentric Study QUANTITATIVE PROTEOMICS METHOD SPECTRAL COUNT 2010 UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA Salamanca 16 th March

Objectives: Test each laboratory abilities to perform quantitative proteomic analysis. Comparison of methodologies for relative quantitative analysis of proteomes. The study should provide data to assess and compare performance of different methodologies and intra- and inter-lab reproducibility of these. Evaluation of data reporting and data sharing tools (MIAPE documents, standard formats, public repositories).MIAPE

Samples: Each participant laboratory will receive two protein mixture samples, labeled A and B, containing each 100 µg of total protein. 100 micrograms of each protein mixture A and B dissolved in 6M Urea /1% CHAPS, at 6 micrograms/microliter concentration. Samples contain: A mixture of around 150 E. Coli proteins (identical in each sample). This mixture has been prepared by fractionation of the cytoplasmatic proteome of E.Coli. It contains soluble proteins, of a wide range of pI and Mw. Four spiked mammalian proteins: CYC_HORSE (Cytochrome C, Mw 12362), added at the ~ 1 pmol/ 1 mg total protein level. CYC_HORSE MYG_HORSE (Apomyoglobin, Mw 16952), at ~ 200 fmol / 1 mg total protein MYG_HORSE ALDOA_RABIT (Aldolase, Mw 39212), at ~ 25 fmol / 1 mg total protein ALDOA_RABIT ALBU_BOVIN (Serum albumin, Mw 66430), at ~ 1 fmol / 1 mg total protein ALBU_BOVIN These four proteins have been spiked in different amounts in samples A and B, with ratios ranging from 1.5:1 to 5:1 between the two samples.

Purpose of the analysis: The intended purpose of the analysis is to measure the ratios between samples A and B for the four spiked proteins. The “matrix” E. Coli proteins, which should be unchanged, will provide a measure of dispersion for the method used. The samples can be also used to test methods for absolute quantitation, if desired. In order to evaluate reproducibility in an homogenous dataset, we ask to perform a minimum of 4 replicate analysis of the samples. (Depending on the method of choice this would demand a maximum of LC-MS runs).LC-MS

Methods: Sample complexity has been chosen to allow for the analysis of the mixture on single LC-MS runs. In principle, there is no need for pre-fractionation. A long enough gradient ( min) gradient is suggested, but this of course will strongly depend on the MS instrument available for analysis.LC-MS 1-2 micrograms of total protein per run should be enough to cover the range of abundances of the spiked proteins in the samples. Again, this will depend a lot on the instrument used, and should be adjusted by each Lab. according to their expertise. The sample is primarily intended to test non-targeted relative quantitation methodologies. Both label-based methods (ICPL, iTRAQ, TMT, O18,...) and label-free methods (based on spectral counts, Hi3, “LCMS Image analysis”...) can be performed and tested to analyze the samples. Some of them will require LC-MS runs, while others (i.e. 8-plex iTRAQ) could require a single run to provide comparable measurements of reproducibility. Try to choose the number of replicate analysis in a way that 4 independent measurements of each A:B ratio are obtained, so that comparable statistics can be calculated.iTRAQTMTlabel-freeLC-MSiTRAQ The sample can be also used if desired to test targeted methods, such MRM methods for relative or absolute quantitation. The concentration of the spiked proteins is probably too high to provide a real challenge for those methods, but it can still be useful for test purposes (one can test accuracy, sensitivity on serial dilutions of the sample...) The amount of sample provided, as well as the concentration of the spiked proteins, should allow also a 2D-DIGE analysis of the samples, although this is not the main purpose of the experiment.2D-DIGE

Quantitative Proteomic Approaches Label free – Spectral counting – Ion current based (Extracted ion chromatograms) – Other Stable isotope labeling – Stable isotope label reagent as ICAT and ITRAQ – Metabolic labeling (SILAC, 15N) – Others Shotgun Proteomics Digestion of proteins and separation of peptides – Extensive chromatographic separation (one or mutliple dimensional separations, columns,..) Data acquisition – Data-dependent acquisition (Automated acquisition of MS/MS spectra from as many precursor ions as possible) Data analysis – Automated interpretation of the MS/MS spectra (DB search)

Spectral Counting Summary Spectral count correlates well with protein abundance Fold change can be calculated and statistically evaluated Simple and straightforward implementation Sensitive to protein abundance changes – for abundant proteins 2 fold change easily detected with high confidence Limitations The response to increasing protein amount is saturable Noisy data at low spectral counts – large difference in spectral count necessary to determine significant change Fu et al, 2006

Spectral count reflects relative abundance of a protein (r2 ≥0.99) Issues to address: - Variability of Spectral counts - Sensitivity of Spectral count to protein abundance changes - How to determine relative changes between two samples Variability of Spectral counting LCMSMS analysis of replicate SCX fractions of K562 cell lysates, G-test Old W. et al, MCP 2005 How to determine relative changes between two samples Fold change determination Old W. et al, MCP 2005 Practical issue – no peptides found in one of the compared samples Data discontinuity (spectral count – integers) – not amenable to Student t-test Differences in sampling depth Fold change determination. RSC = log2[(n2 + f)/(n1 + f)] + log2[(t1 - n1 + f)/(t2 - n2 + f)] n1, n2 - spectral counts for sample 1 and 2 t1, t2 – total spectral count (sampling depth) for samples 1 and 2 f – correction factor 1.25 (Beissbarth et al – Bioinformatics 2004) Observed RSC correlates well with expected RSC for standard proteins spiked into complex samples (Old W. et al, MCP 2005)

100 micrograms of each protein mixture A and B are dissolved in 6M Urea /1% CHAPS, at 6 micrograms/microliter concentration. Samples were kept at -20ºC. Precipitation with TCA/ACETONE Re suspended in 100 uL 0.3 % SDS/50 mM Tris HCl pH 8.0/200 mM DTT 5 uL(5ug) Sample digested with trypsin O/N at 1/100 ratio Separate with nanoHPLC (4 replicas 1uL) MS/MS LTQ VelosOrbitrap

Analysis Spectra analyzed Proteored A Proteored A Proteored A Proteored A Proteored B Proteored B Proteored B Proteored B TOTAL SEQUEST PARAMS peptide_mass_tolerance = 0.07 fragment_ion_tolerance = 0.6 diff_search_options = M C X

ItemLC-MS runA-1A-2A-3A-4B-1B-2B-3B-4 Total Sample A-B (Combined AB1- 4 runs)** 1Number of MS/MS spectra acquired Number of total assigned peptides id Number of unique peptides id Number of E Coli proteins id. (total) Number of E Coli single hit- proteins id Number of Spiked proteins id FDR* Total Number of proteins quantitated5 9Number of proteins quantitated > 3 peptides2 10Number of proteins quantitated > 2 peptides3 11Number of proteins quantitated 1 peptide A/B ratio 12Average of A/B ratios for E Coli proteins 13Standard deviation A/B ratios 14% CV A/B ratios E Coli proteins

The Normalized Spectrum Counts bar chart shows a protein's relative abundance across different samples. The y-axis is the normalized count of the spectra matching any of the peptides in the protein. This count depends upon the protein, peptide, required mods and search filters set on the Samples page. Each bar along the x-axis is for a different biological sample. The bars are color coded. Each sample category is colored a different color. The bar chart can be used as a visual confirmation of a differential expression flagged by the Quantitative Analysis in the Samples view.

FDR= Proteins

SAMPLE A1 SAMPLE A2 SAMPLE A3 SAMPLE A4 SAMPLE B1 SAMPLE B2 SAMPLE B3 SAMPLE B4Av ASTD AAv BSTD BA/BB/A ALDOA_RABIT ALBU_BOVIN MYG_HORSE CIC_HORSE

ALBUMIN_BOVIN SAMPLE A2 Xcorr 0.88 DeltaCn 0.46 SAMPLE A1 Xcorr 3.16 DeltaCn 0.43 SAMPLE A1 Xcorr 3.23 DeltaCn 0.64 SAMPLE B2 Xcorr 2.9 DeltaCn 0.57 P-value=0.52

ALDOA_RABIT SAMPLE A2 Xcorr 2.12 DeltaCn 0.5 SAMPLE A3 Xcorr 5.33 DeltaCn 0.78 SAMPLE B3 Xcorr 5.35 DeltaCn 0.77 P-value=

CYC_HORSE SAMPLE A1 Xcorr 4.78 DeltaCn 0.66 SAMPLE B3 Xcorr 5.46 DeltaCn 0.66 P-value=

MYG_HORSE SAMPLE B1 Xcorr 3.87 DeltaCn 0.55 SAMPLE A3 Xcorr 4.66 DeltaCn 0.72 P-value=

FDR= 0 219

CIC_HORSE MYG_HORSE ALDOA_RABIT

Conclusions: Spectral count can be an easy way to try to perform quantitative proteome analysis, but : Needs the ability to perform different LC runs with very low dispersion. The response to increasing protein amount is saturable. Noisy data at low spectral counts – large difference in spectral count necessary to determine significant change.

M José Fidalgo Eva Olmedo Francisco Fernández Josep M Estanyol Oriol Bachs Proteomic Facility University of Barcelona

SAMPLE A1 SAMPLE A2 SAMPLE A3 SAMPLE A4 SAMPLE B1 SAMPLE B2 SAMPLE B3 SAMPLE B4M ADES AM BDES BA/BB/A ALDOA_RABIT ALBU_BOVIN MYG_HORSE CIC_HORSE fmol/microgram E. Coli protein MWABB/AA/B ALDOA_RABIT BSA_BOVIN MYG_HORSE CYC_HORSE