All parcels in Howard County Vacant parcels and infill parcels (improvement value of $5,000)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Site Capacity and Natural Resource Protection Relationships in Subdivision Design.
Advertisements

TA Environmentally Sensitive Areas. Current Features: 1.Floodways, 100 yr 2.Floodplain, outside floodway, 100 yr 3.Jurisdictional Wetlands 4.Stream.
8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman The Economics of Growth, Sprawl and Land Use Decisions Jeffrey H. Dorfman The University of Georgia.
Policy Subdivisions Recently Adopted Amendments June 23, 2009 Miccosukee Community Center Open House.
Building Permits. Overview Residential building permits Single Family Multi Family City Boundaries School Districts Sewer Service Areas 2.
Alachua County Plat Review – Southampton Traditional Neighborhood Development – Phase 1 February 24, 2009.
Uneconomic Remnant Valuation Presented By: Gregory G. Johnson, MAI, SR/WA Welcome.
Villa Montanaro Apartments City of Pleasant Hill Troy Fujimoto.
Smith County - Public Hearing TRZ Description & Boundary Based initially from 1-mile off centerline for Toll 49 alignment Included all GIS parcels for.
City of Pittsburgh – Department of City Planning The Pittsburgh and Philadelphia Stories John Carpenter REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY of the CITY OF PHILADELPHIA.
Urban Containment Increasing in Popularity  Most common in fast-growth regions  Intent to contain sprawl, minimize costs  Too much land, urban sprawl.
OVERVIEW Current Ordinance Has to Change Property Owners That Do Not Use The System Should Not Pay Property Owners That Use The System Receive a Benefit.
Scenario Planning with Envision Tomorrow
CPA-02-14/ZOM Parker 26, LLC Small Scale Comp Plan Amendment and Rezoning.
The distribution of redevelopment in the KC region Is there room for 45,000 households in the redevelopment area, according to local land use plans?
 Matt Gates.  Forecast sprawl  Guide long-range population and employment forecasts o For the region o For individual counties  Allocate growth to.
Bend, OR | Eugene, OR | Portland, OR | Salem, OR | Seattle, WA | Vancouver, WA | Washington D.C. “Serving Land for Jobs” Infrastructure.
Residential Real Estate Development. Define a Market Need –Gaps in market Price range Price range Lifestyle Lifestyle –Unique product Location Location.
1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, :30 PM.
Rainwater Catchment Travis County By: Laura Hurd December 1, 2009.
Summit Urban Farming Initiative Land Access for Urban Agriculture.
Homesteads The homestead provisions set out in the Texas Constitution create an exemption that precludes the seizure or forced sale of property. Since.
Alachua County Plat Review – Grand Preserve at Kanapha Planned Development (PD) September 11, 2012.
Land Market Monitoring: Beyond Land Supply Gerrit-Jan Knaap Professor and Director National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education University of.
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
Rural Residential Zoning District & Subdivision Exemptions Southampton County Board of Supervisors Presented by Jay Randolph November 28, 2005.
BRAC RTF CGIA Progress Report July 26, BRAC RTF Task #10 CGIA role Mapping and analysisMapping and analysis Geographic Information SystemsGeographic.
Planning.Maryland.gov The Sustainable Growth and Agricultural Preservation Act of 2012 Arnold Preservation Council March 9, 2015.
MetroGIS Regional Parcel Dataset An Overview. Areal Coverage 7 Counties – Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott and Washington Area : 6,924 km.
 Kevin Behm – Addison County Regional Planning Commission  Kevin Behm – Addison County Regional Planning Commission Community Build-Out.
OVERVIEW Current Ordinance Has to Change Property Owners That Do Not Use The System Should Not Pay Property Owners That Use The System Receive a Benefit.
Jefferson County Agricultural Preservation and Land Use Plan Jefferson County’s Comprehensive Plan: Process and Strategies Presented to: Dane County Officials.
South Meadows Open space # 16 Upgrades Open space # 16 Upgrades.
RVCOG Advisory Committee Meeting Discussion on Draft Interpretation of The Urban Reserve Rule Location Factors And Analysis of RPS Growth Areas February.
Steps to Complete Site Capacity Calculations 1. Base Site Area 2. Net Site Area 3. Density Residential = Dwelling Units Nonresidential = Impervious Surface.
The information presented in these slides is based CamConnect’s calculations using data from the City of Camden and the Camden County Improvement Authority.
Ohio Balanced Growth Program Codes and Ordinances Workshop: Recommendations for Development and Site Layout Kirby Date, AICP, Cleveland State University.
Housing Element Update Workshop #2 January 28, 2009.
“ Grand Landings North” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing March 3, 2015.
DRAFT Sustainable Groundwater Use Through the Lens of Rural Working Lands.
SITE. SW 103 rd Ave SITE R-1A SW 103 rd Ave Zoning: ‘A’ Flu: Rural/Agriculture Zoning: ‘A’ Flu: Rural/Agriculture.
Regional Planning Directors’ Meeting July 22, 2011 Growth Allocation Project Metro Planning & Development Department Research Center REGIONAL GROWTH /
Alachua County Plat Review Process September 9, 2008.
ELSA RODRIGUEZ URBAN PLANNING 206A Proposed Affordable Mixed-Use Housing Projects in the City of Glendale.
Calais Planned Unit Development (PUD) Central Vermont RPC Chris Walsh & Daniel Currier.
Steve Horenstein CASE STUDIES OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSES AND RESULTS : Comprehensive planning as an economic development tool; Striking the right.
“State Road 100 MPC Lots” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing November 17, 2015.
Alachua County Plat Review – Greenbrier Subdivision February 24, 2009.
Alachua County Plat Review Process September 23, 2008.
Land Development in Pierce County ArcGIS for Civil Engineers CEE 424 Joss Gramstad, John Wright, Brynn Carr December 8, 2006.
Infill Master Plan October 23, 2007 Infill Master Plan October 23, 2007 Board of County Commissioners Discussion Item.
How Closely We Live With Each Other
BUILDABLE LANDS ANALYSIS City of Snoqualmie Planning & Buildable Sno-lutions Chris Sungjin Im Ian Garnier Nick Nielson Geography 469.
Island County Comprehensive Plan 2016 Review and Update Buildable Lands Analysis Results 1.
Marin County Local Coastal Program Amendment
Land Use Urban Service Boundary is the framework for managing growth.
How will this play out in your neighborhood?
City Village Owner Occupied Housing: 12.9%
ROSEBURG URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY STUDY
Heritage Square South Development Options
I. OPERATING MILLAGE RENEWAL PROPOSAL
Build Your dream home.
Multifamily Housing Tax Exemption Program
Regulation Amendment AM April 3, 2018.
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 6968, PHASES 1-9, 375 SFR LOTS
Amagansett Union Free School District Making a Difference
Accessory Dwelling Units: Maximum Unit Size and Residential Impact Fee
Impact of Zoning on Affordable Housing February 16, 2018
FOR SALE Auburn Multi Family Land
12B: Scott County CDA Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Zoning Code Amendment City Council June 18, 2018 Laura.
Presentation transcript:

All parcels in Howard County

Vacant parcels and infill parcels (improvement value of $5,000)

Vacant parcels (improvement value < $5,000)

Wetland (red)

No Floodplain No Most Protected No moderately Protected

Developable lots

Non-residential parcels

Residential parcels

Tax-exempt parcels

Taxable parcels

Land value < $2,000

Land Value > $2,000

Single family housing parcels < 0.5 acre under least protected, very low or low density

Buildable parcels

Eliminating sewer zone NP

Sewer zones S1, S4, S5, and S6

Eliminating S6

Sewer zone S1, S4, and S5

Eliminating S5

Sewer zone S1 and S4

Eliminating S4

Sewer zone S1

Infill parcels: sewer zone S1, S4, S5, and S6

Infill Parcels: sewer zone S1, S4 and S5

Infill parcels: sewer zone S1 and S4

Infill parcels: sewer zone S1

Development Capacity Estimation Part art, part science Benefits exceed costs Provide no answers Never finished One of many development indicators Requires on-going commitment