1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1April, UKNF09 - Lancaster1 MICE Beamline m. apollonio.
Advertisements

Progress in the construction of the MICE cooling channel and first measurements Adam Dobbs, EPS-HEP, 23 rd July 2011.
January 14, 2004 TJR - - UPDATED 1/25/04 1 MICE Beamline Analysis Using g4beamline Including Jan 25 Updates for Kevin’s JAN04 Beamline Design Tom Roberts.
1 Acceptance & Scraping Chris Rogers Analysis PC
MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
M.apollonioMICE Analysis meeting 23/1/20071 M. Apollonio – University of Oxford Radius of diffuser and sizes for PID.
Paul drumm, mutac jan MICE Beamline Optics Design Kevin Tilley, RAL, 12th June MICE Needs Generic Solution Pion Injection & Decay Section (a) Inputs.
SLIDE Beam measurements using the MICE TOF counters Analysis meeting, 23 September 2008 Mark Rayner.
March 30, 2004 TJR1 MICE Upstream Particle Identification Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology March 30, 2004.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 MOM Update Linda R. Coney 21 September, 2009.
1 PID Detectors & Emittance Resolution Chris Rogers Rutherford Appleton Laboratory MICE CM17.
1 G4MICE studies of PID transverse acceptance MICE video conference Rikard Sandström.
Beam line summary paul drumm for beam line group.
M.apollonioMICE Funding Agency Committee Meeting - RAL 18/4/ M. Apollonio – MICE Operations Manager University of Oxford MICE beam line commissioning.
K.Walaron Fermilab, Batavia, Chicago 12/6/ Simulation and performance of beamline K.Walaron T.J. Roberts.
Beam line characterization with the TOFs1 Demonstrating the emittance-momentum matrix Mark Rayner, CM26 California, 24 March Initial.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 MOM Update Linda R. Coney 14 September, 2009.
Diffuser in G4MICE Victoria Blackmore 09/03/10 Analysis Meeting 1/8.
1 Losses in the Cooling Channel Malcolm Ellis PID Meeting 1 st March 2005.
Simulated real beam into simulated MICE1 Mark Rayner CM26.
TJR August 2, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis1 MICE Beamline Analysis JUNE04 Including a proposal for a JUNE04A Configuration Tom Roberts Illinois Institute.
Beamline-to-MICE Matching Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 2 August 2004 MICE performance with ideal Gaussian beam JUNE04 beam from ISIS beamline (Kevin.
Paul drumm, mutac jan K. Tilley, MICE-VC, 10/05/07 Status of Beamline Design / Commissioning MICE-VC.
1June 1 st 2009MICE CM24 - RAL1 MICE Beamline m. apollonio.
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
1 MICE Beamline Design: General principles & expected capabilities Kevin Tilley, 16 th November Charge to beamline & desirable beam General principles.
Critical Issues for MICE Chris Rogers MICE CM 15.
MICE Video meeting Alain Blondel 7 December MICE -- what running strategy? reflections on steps I and II.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices iteratively to determine trace.
Physics Program and Runs: Autumn 2011 & Step IV V. Blackmore MICE Project Board, 08/03/12.
MICE CM18 RAL Alain Blondel 14 June MICE run plan -- steps I and II 1.Establishing the detailed run plan will be one of the mission of the MICE.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices to map  path Assume straight.
(+) session, PAC09 Vancouver – TH6PFP056 Introduction The Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment (MICE, fig. 1c) at RAL[1]
Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.
MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
MICE Step 1: First Emittance Results with Particle Physics Detectors Linda R. Coney EuCARD Meeting – 10 May 2011.
M. apollonio MICE Beamline summary. - Beamline parallel session (June 1 st ): - envisaged goals (Alain) - assess readiness of the line magnet status (Ken)
1 Beamline 1. Beamline Target/Misalignment problem 2. Magnet measurements 3. Everything that’ critical and outstanding – eg d/str beamline monitors final.
Beam line commissioning Preparations for Phase1 Kevin Tilley For Paul Drumm & the beam line group.
MICE input beam weighting Dr Chris Rogers Analysis PC 05/09/2007.
Plans (& ideas) for beamline commissioning The beamline Magnet field tests Source characterisation Optics (& model) commissioning K. Tilley CM18, 14/06/07.
Particle Production in the MICE Beamline IPAC10 Linda Coney, UC Riverside, Adam Dobbs, Imperial College London, Yordan Karadzhov, Sofia University The.
RAL Muon Beam Line Properties. ISIS 70 MeV H- injection Ring accelerates up to 800 MeV in about 10 ms 50 Hz cycle - Dual Harmonic System ~ 2 x 1.5 MHz;
MICE TARGET OPERATION C. Booth, P. Hodgson, P. J. Smith, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy University of Sheffield, England. 1 – The MICE Experiment2 - The.
Alain Blondel MICE VC 12 March 2009 Brief MICE news 1. Decay solenoid: operations will restart in early July. Criteria for acceptance have been specified.
Paul drumm, mutac jan Precursor: - Resources since cm16. Beamline Review Response. Optics related work: the major threads: -Current (ε,p) status.
Mark Rayner 14/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Emittance measurement using the TOFs The question: can we use position measurements.
1M. Ellis - NFMCC - 31st January 2007 MICE Analysis.
Geant4 Simulation of the Beam Line for the HARP Experiment M.Gostkin, A.Jemtchougov, E.Rogalev (JINR, Dubna)
March 18, 2008 TJRMICE Beamline Status1 MICE Beamline Status (March 18, 2008) Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. Illinois Institute of Technology.
3 June 2009J. H. Cobb 1 ANALYSIS SUMMARY CM24 Agenda for Analysis parallel session at CM Sunday 31 May 14:00.
KEK Test Beam Phase I (May 2005) Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE-FT Daresbury Aug 30th, 2005.
PID Detector Requirements for Emittance Measurement Chris Rogers, MICE PID Review, Thursday Oct 12.
Progress in the construction of the MICE cooling channel and first measurements Adam Dobbs, EPS-HEP, 23 rd July 2011.
Design options for emittance measurement systems for the CLIC RTML R Apsimon.
1June 2 nd 2009MICE CM24 - RAL1 m. apollonio Beamline+( ,P) matrix.
1 Updated Run Plans. K.Tilley, MICO, 07/02/08 - pre-commissioning - Target, - beamline functionality - detectors, particle production - decay solenoid.
Monte Carlo simulation of the particle identification (PID) system of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) Mice is mainly an accelerator physics.
Paul drumm, mutac jan Status of Muon Beamline design work Kevin Tilley, RAL, 9th Feb Including Beamline Materials in new revision Reference ('True')
1June 1 st 2009MICE CM24 - RAL1 Beamline Optics m. apollonio.
MEASUREMENT OF EMITTANCE AND OTHER OPTICS QUANTITIES V. Blackmore 01/19.
MICE. Outline Experimental methods and goals Beam line Diagnostics – In HEP parlance – the detectors Magnet system 2MICE Optics Review January 14, 2016.
1 1 Optics related work: the major threads: -Current (ε,p) status - G4BL/TTL Simulation comparisons - Beam steering/correction -Collimation d/stream &
M.apollonioNuFact??1 ABSTRACT In the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) at RAL, muons are pro­duced and transported in a dedicated beam line connecting.
MICE Analysis Status and Plans
MICE Beamline Status m. apollonio 17 December 2009 MICE VC
Effect of Reduced Focus Coil Current on Step IV and Step VI
A BeamLine update m. apollonio 7/7/2010 CM27 - RAL 1.
How to turn on MICE Step IV
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
Presentation transcript:

1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream beamline Downstream beamline: Step 1 Jan 20 - March, Step 2 April – June. Summary (& 9hours)

2 2 Charge. Meaning in commissioning…. Optics goals: Step1 (Jan-March): Verify can achieve approximately right beamsizes & waists at MICE. Ensure reasonable transmission & flux. Measure alignment. Optics goals: Step 2 (April–June): Match beam with diffuser. Find & demonstrate (ε,p) beam cases. Demonstrate purity.

3 3 Beamline layout & diagnostic devices

4 4 First things first – target, detectors, particle production Target Has the target got the required acceleration? Insert target shallow dip depth, measure reproducibility/flux/loss reproducibility Insert target into towards 38mm if ISIS beam loss ok, or else acceptable loss. MICE & Beamline Detectors Target in, only dipoles on, P(B1=B2)=350MeV/c. Negative polarity (pi-) Calibrate detectors Particle production with only dipoles on, P(B1=B2), characterise pion flux versus momentum relatively simple with MICE PIDs. ….useful for extrapolating to expected rates.

5 5 Step1:- Beamline optics commissioning Optics goals: Step1 (Jan-March): Verify can achieve approximately right beamsizes & waists at MICE. Ensure reasonable transmission & flux. Measure alignment.

6 6 Step1:- Upstream beamline optics Upstream goal:- Maximum pion flux at detector D1, on axis & aligned pion beam. (=max muon flux, on axis & aligned muon beam. Slightly open question = to confirm this equivalence?) Minimum pion spot size to aid collimation.

7 7 Step1:- Upstream beamline optics Basic optics checks … … (1/2) Set P(B1=B2) = design setting 444.7MeV/c. Check basic optics of Q1-Q3. (compare to model) –Individual quads fields scanned:- - measure beamsize changes at U1,D1 - fit to Q1 effective length? - measure beam centroid changes at U1,D1 - fit to any residual target misalignment -Alternatively fields fixed, Target dip change. -- measure beam centroid changes at U1,D1 - refit to any residual target misalignment Open question:- can beamsize changes & centre changes be seen U1/D1 (strong vert focussing B1, distance to D1)

8 8 Step1:- Upstream beamline optics Basic optics checks………. (2/2) Set Q1,Q2,Q3, Decay solenoid design optic. Set P(B1=B2) Check basic optics of Decay Solenoid:- –Ramp field (beam phase advance), measure beamsize at D1

9 9 Step1:- Upstream beamline optics Optimise:- Set all fields to design settings. P(B2=B1) Optimisation methods:- 1. Scale (Q1,Q2,Q3) as a single unit, & decay solenoid as a single unit. example:-scaling Q1-Q3 single unit:- 2. Decouple & optimise eg Q1. Optimise 3 parameters:-((Q1,(Q2,Q3),Decay solenoid) 3. Further free up parameters & optimise. Goal:- Maximum pion flux at detector D1, on axis & aligned pion beam. Minimum pion spot size to aid collimation.

10 Step1:- Downstream beamline optics Downstream Goal:- (Goal of Step1) Verify can achieve approximately right beamsizes & waists at MICE. Ensure reasonable transmission & flux. Measure alignment. Suggest aim at just one case initially ~(6pi,200MeV/c) Open question: is setting up the downstream beamline with pions of benefit to us? Advantages, but in extreme: are optics for pions suitable for muons? (simulation question) Default is currently to setup beamline with muons until understood.

11 Step 1:- Downstream beamline optics Basic optics checks:- (1/1) B2 scan – backward/forward muon momentum edges. Basic quadrupole optics – quads in triplets Open question: has TOF0, TOF1 or Tracker sufficient resolution – with sensible rates? Use beam monitor as a fallback if not. Beam misalignment check, by scanning quads fields (near reasonable focus)

12 Step 1:- Downstream beamline optics Measurements:- Set downstream beamline to have design optics. Confirm beamsizes at MICE approximately correct. Measure misalignment at Tracker Measure transmission efficiency D1- Tracker. Measure natural emittance of beamline : (for feeding back to calculate required alpha/beta). Use 3 tracker planes & TOF assuming muons form 97%, to make offline momentum cuts. Recalculate desired beamsizes/waists. Attempt to obtain desired beamsizes/waist… (PTO) Goal: Verify can achieve approximately right beamsizes & waists at MICE. Ensure reasonable transmission & flux. Measure alignment

13 Step1:- Downstream beamline optics Optimise :- (Attempting to obtain desired beamsizes/waist) Optimisation techniques for optimising beamsize/waist in Tracker:- (some are open questions to answer efficacy) By hand single lens scaling of (Q456) / (Q789), then decouple in stages. TRANSPORT envelope fitting: measure beam at Tracker, use known Q789 settings,TOF0 beamsize -> determine input beam at TOF0 -> solve for Q789 for 3-rqd parameters at MICE. Construct empirical response matrix (in quantites to be determined) and solve for Q4-Q6. Optimiser. Goal: Verify can achieve approximately right beamsizes & waists at MICE. Ensure reasonable transmission & flux. Measure alignment

14 Step2 – Downstream optics Similar optimisation techniques to previous slide.. Optics goals: Step 2 (April–June): Match beam with diffuser. Find & demonstrate (ε,p) beam cases. Demonstrate purity.

15 Summary Goals for Step 1 commissioning: proposed –Do upstream optics separately. Sub-goal proposed. Basic optics Optimisation –Do downstream separately. Sub-goal proposed. Basic optics Optimisation Goals for Step 2: proposed Goal:- Match beam with diffuser. Find & demonstrate (ε,p) beam cases. Demonstrate purity. Optimisation of downstream section uses similar techniques to Step1. Goal: Verify can achieve approximately right beamsizes & waists at MICE. Ensure reasonable transmission & flux. Measure alignment