Data Comm Proposed DCL Services Deployment Waterfall Presented at DCIT 25 By: Gregg Anderson Date: 7/18/2013

Waterfall Development – Equipage and Airline Overview Key Sites Key Sites selected after analysis of 11 Options Selection Criteria Availability of equipped A/C (Both currently equipped, and high probability of equipage by Key Site timeframe with FANS 1A+ and VDL2) Local Constraints and Considerations Schedule (# Parent ERAMs) ERAM Lab Configurations Remaining Site Waterfall 3 regional deployment teams Deployed by En Route Center Purpose of Brief Level Set (Where We Are Now) Discuss activities that have transpired since the SIR release in 7/2011 that impact the tower roll-out Architecture Overview: brief architecture refresher TO 76 Matrix Overview of the LM TO Transition matrix providing foundation for the model discussion to follow Roll-Out Model Set-Up: Review of terms and acronyms that will be seen in the models Roll-Out Model Overview (8 models) Overview discussion of the 8 models Developed to provide visibility to the potential schedule scenarios based on the TO 76 matrix Roll-Out Model Driving Factors 3 main factors driving schedule that we discovered building these models Roll-Out Model Sequence Detailed, animated review of 3 of the 8 models Conclude Tower Roll-Out Considerations Next Steps

Waterfall Development - Approach Notional Waterfall Anticipated Equipage Profile Implementation Constraints Iterative Development Process Implementation Waterfall

Proposed ISD Configuration Three ERAMs Salt Lake Center -- ZLC Atlanta Center -- ZTL Houston Center -- ZHU Three TDLS Tower Key Sites Salt Lake City Airport -- SLC Houston Intercontinental Airport -- IAH Houston Hobby Airport -- HOU Rationale Key Site 1 selected due to co-location with ZLC National ERAM Site. Few aircraft ops but quickest to set up and lowest technical risk. ZHU center was picked to best match needs of implementation, equipage, and stakeholders Two airports in same center to reduce timeframe to ISD as well as testing constraints Contains a diverse equipage options (United, Southwest, FedEx and UPS) Operations large enough to reduce risk of low equipped flights

DRAFT In Service Decision Milestone Proposed Sites Dates 3 TDLS Towers 2 Nat’l ERAMs 1 Non-National Parent ERAM (3 ERAMs Total) Dates Key Site 1 IOC Salt Lake City (ZLC/SLC) Q3 2015 Key Site 2 IOC Houston Intercontinental (ZLC/ZHU/IAH) Key Site 3 IOC Houston/Hobby (ZLC/ZHU/HOU) ERAM to NAP & NAP to NAP Integration Salt Lake Center/Atlanta Center (ZLC/ZTL) Q4 2015 Independent Operational Assessment (IOA) In Service Decisions (ISD) DRAFT

DRAFT Data Comm Proposed S1P1 Tower Waterfall Key Sites (3 Towers ) Group A (19 Towers ) Group B (17 Towers ) Group C (18 Towers ) Site Name Site ID ARTCC ID IOC   Site ID KS 1: Salt Lake City SLC ZLC Q3 2015 New Orleans MSY ZHU Q1 2016 Louisville SDF ZID Boston BOS ZBW KS 2: Houston Intcl IAH Austin AUS Indianapolis IND Providence PVD KS 3: Houston Hbby HOU San Antonio SAT Cincinnati CVG Bradley BDL NAP – NAP Compl NA ZLC/ZTL Q4 2015 Los Angeles LAX ZLA Memphis MEM ZME Q2 2016 Newark EWR ZNY IOA Compl Las Vegas LAS Nashville BNA J F Kennedy JFK In-Service Decision San Diego SAN Denver DEN ZDV La Guardia LGA John Wayne SNA Atlanta ATL ZTL Philadelphia PHL Bob Hope BUR Charlotte CLT Teterboro TEB Ontario ONT Jacksonville JAX ZJX Westchester HPN San Francisco SFO ZOA Orlando MCO Q3 2016 Detroit DTW ZOB Oakland OAK Miami MIA ZMA Cleveland CLE San Jose SJC Fort Lauderdale FLL Pittsburgh PIT Sacramento SMF Tampa TPA Balt/Wash BWI ZDC Phoenix PHX ZAB Palm Beach PBI Dulles IAD Albuquerque ABQ St Louis STL ZKC Q4 2016 Reagan DCA Seattle SEA ZSE Kansas City MCI Raleigh/Durham RDU Dallas Love DAL ZFW Minn-St Paul MSP ZMP Chicago Midway MDW ZAU Dallas FTW DFW Chicago O’Hare ORD DRAFT