Permanency Practice Initiative: Report to the State Roundtable May 26, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Facilitator Rosa Johnson, MA Compliance and Recruitment Manager Certified Treatment Foster Parent Facilitator The Professional Master Parent.
Advertisements

1 Definitions and Examples of Practices vs. Services in Child Welfare The Service Array Process The National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational.
Children Aged 5 to
Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
Building a Foundation for Community Change Proposed Restructure 2010.
Katie A. Agreement Child Welfare and Mental Health working together will provide:  Intensive home and community based mental health services to children.
Understanding Katie A and the Core Practice Model
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
Treatment Plans and Administrative Case Reviews In a Nutshell.
Permanency Backlog Update As of 4/28/10  Temporary Court Ward (TCW) Baseline: 5,017 children 3,444 closed cases or 69% (65%) 85% by 9/30/10 or 4,264 closed.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
Return to Parent (Reunification) AdoptionPLC Fit and Willing Relative APPLA
Improving Outcomes for Looked After Children, Young People & Care Leavers Moray Paterson Looked After Children Policy Manager.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts Office of Children & Families in The Courts.
How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%
How do Peoria County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Peoria County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement19235%
How do Champaign County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Champaign County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement22548%
State of New Jersey. Quick Context Lawsuit in 2004, revised in 2006 to MSA Reporting on 250 measures, including placement stability Started by “focusing.
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Contents n Definitions n Goals n Target Populations n Categories n Activities.
Family Group Decision Making A Partnership Approach.
Child Welfare Practice Model
The California Child Welfare System: Data Snapshot Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Emily Putnam Hornstein, MSW Joseph Magruder, MSW Center for Social Services.
Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews
Adams County Educational Stability Grant Project Update March 2014.
Formed Families Forward's mission is to improve developmental, educational, social, emotional and post-secondary outcomes for children and youth with disabilities.
Children Looked After and Placement Costs. Looked After Children Population.
Department of Human Services 7 th INTERNATIONAL LAC CONFERENCE, SYDNEY 2006 Looking After Children In Victoria, Australia.
Polk County Family Drug Court The Honorable Karla Fultz Todd Beveridge, M.S.W., M.S.
Individualized Service Plan Who attends the ISP?
Making RBS Happen in the Bay Area Establishing a Regional Child and Family Reconnection Resource.
1 Rapid Re-Housing: An Overview Welcome Home: Addressing Today's Challenges in Homeless Services June 2,
NC Child Welfare Data State Fiscal Year 2012 (7/1/11-6/30/12) 132,031 unique children were assessed for reports of child abuse, neglect & dependency Approximately.
A New Approach to Servicing Families.  Introduction to the practice of kinship care specific to A Second Chance Inc.  An Overview of how kinship care.
Practice Model Elements Theoretical framework Values and principles Casework components Practice elements Practice behaviors.
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
A NEW RESOURCE FOR RECONNECTING CHILDREN AND FAMILIES WITH COMPLEX AND ENDURING NEEDS Residentially Based Services.
 Performance assessments can:  help identify potential problems in the program  help identify areas where streamlining the process could be useful.
Medical Homes For Children in Foster Care: A Proposal for CCNC Consideration Proposal collaboratively developed by: NC Pediatric Society Foundation & Benchmarks.
Care Management/Family Centered Services and Supports Goals Care Management/FCSS focuses on maintaining children and youth in their own homes and communities.
Family Findings: Making Successful Kin Placements and Connections for Children in Care Presenter: Elisa Esh, Diakon Adoption and Foster Care.
Strategic Plan Review Drawing a Picture & Sharing a Story.
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
National Outcome Measures: Using Data to Show the Way Forward Second Canadian Roundtable on Child Welfare Outcomes Fred Wulczyn, Ph.D.
San Francisco Unified School District Student Support Services Department Foster Youth Services Program FYS Liaison Orientation.
Race and Child Welfare: Exits from the Child Welfare System Brenda Jones Harden, Ph.D. University of Maryland College Park Research Synthesis on Child.
November 2015 Common weaknesses in local authorities judged inadequate under the single inspection framework – a summary.
Chatter 13, Parents and Children Over the Life Course Key Terms.
“A half-century of research demonstrates convincingly that children’s well-being builds upon meeting first their primary needs for a stable and lasting.
The Child and Family Services Review (CFSR) February 2008 Update.
Education snapshot of children and young people in out-of-home care in NSW Lo-Shu Wen Association of Childrens Welfare Agencies ACWA Conference 2010.
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
Lilliput Family Finding & Relative Support Efforts Karen Alvord, CEO, Beverly Johnson, CPO,
Case Planning Jeopardy! Tick-Tock The Main Course It’s the Law Practice Paradise GO TO FINAL OUTCOMES JEOPARDY!
Cumberland County Data Panel Presentation A Sense of Urgency for Our Children. What does the data say?
County Name Next Steps Meeting DATE. County Name Welcome!! And…Congratulations on receiving your full licensure!! Give yourselves a round of applause.
703: Data, Outcomes and Practice: Connecting the Dots CWTP Leadership Academy Conference September 29, The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program.
Provincial Permanency Data Results for DFNAs and CFSAs Prepared by Service Analysis Branch May 27, 2009.
Regional Continuum of Care Committee on Homelessness Strategic Planning Retreat April 26, 2003.
Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument.
New Department on Homelessness: The Development Process.
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
Child Welfare Demonstration Project (CWDP)
House Human Services Committee
Case Management Pre-Service Curriculum Specialty Track
NEXT STEPS IN DEVELOPING CULTURALLY-COMPETENT
Overview of Data from the Statewide FGDM Evaluation
A New Approach to Servicing Families
Behavioral Health Crisis Center “A back of the napkin view”
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
Presentation transcript:

Permanency Practice Initiative: Report to the State Roundtable May 26, 2011

2 County A: Model Fidelity and Outcomes PPI Target Population= Children ages 1-4 N= 10 All Other Adjudicated Dependent Children Population: Adjudicated dependent children under age 1 and over age 4 at home and in placement N= 80

3

4

5 All Other Adjudicated Dependent Population and Three Month Court Reviews Q1Q2Q3Q4 Number of Three Month Court ReviewsNumber in All Other Adjudicated Dependent Population

6

7 All Other Adjudicated Dependent Children and Family Group Decision Making Q1Q2Q3Q4 Number of Family Group ConferencesNumber Served by the FGDM Conference Number of New and Updated FSPsNumber of Conferences being Coordinated Number in All Other Adjudicated Dependent Population

8 PPI Target Population and Family Finding Q1Q2Q3Q4 Number of Children that had Family Finding Efforts InitiatedNumber of Children Receiving Ongoing Family Finding Efforts Number of Connections EstablishedNumber of Placements as a Result of Family Finding Number in PPI Target Population

9 All Other Adjudicated Dependent Population and Family Finding Q1Q2Q3Q4 Number of Children that had Family Finding Efforts InitiatedNumber of Children Receiving Ongoing Family Finding Efforts Number of Connections EstablishedNumber of Placements as a Result of Family Finding Number in All Other Adjudicated Dependent Population

10

11 ReunificationAdoptionPLCFit and Willing Relative APPLAOther Exits Q

12 ReunificationAdoptionPLCFit and Willing Relative APPLAOther Exits Q

At HomeRelative Kinship Care Non-Relative Kinship Care Foster Care Shelter Care Group HomeResidential Treatment Q

14 At HomeRelative Kinship Care Non-Relative Kinship Care Foster Care Shelter CareGroup HomeResidential Treatment Q

15 York County: Model Fidelity and Outcomes PPI Target Population= Children in Out of Home Care Adjudicated Dependent on or AFTER 1/1/10 N= 132 All Other Adjudicated Dependent Children Population: Children in Out of Home Care Adjudicated Dependent BEFORE 1/1/10 and All Adjudicated Dependent Children Living at Home N= 175

16

17

18

19 PPI Target Population and Family Group Decision Making Q1Q2Q3Q4 Number of Family Group ConferencesNumber Served by the FGDM ConferenceNumber of New and Updated FSPs Number of Conferences being CoordinatedNumber in PPI Target Population

20

21 PPI Target Population and Family Finding Q1Q2Q3Q4 Number of Children that had Family Finding Efforts InitiatedNumber of Children Receiving Ongoing Family Finding Efforts Number of Connections EstablishedNumber of Placements as a Result of Family Finding Number in PPI Target Population

22 All Other Adjudicated Dependent Children and Family Finding Q1Q2Q3Q4 Number of Children that had Family Finding Efforts InitiatedNumber of Children Receiving Ongoing Family Finding Efforts Number of Connections EstablishedNumber of Placements as a Result of Family Finding Number in All Other Adjudicated Dependent Population

23

24

25 Type of Permanency Achieved PPI Target Population ReunificationAdoptionPLCFit and Willing Relative APPLAOther Exits Q All Other Adjudicated Dependent Population ReunificationAdoptionPLCFit and Willing Relative APPLAOther Exits Q

26 Out Of Home Placement Only on Last Day of Q PPI Target Population vs. All Other Adjudicated Dependent Children 19% 21% 49% 5% 0% 6% 3% 11% 71% 0% 8% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Relative Kinship CareNon-Relative Kinship Care Foster CareShelter CareGroup HomeResidential Treatment PPI Target PopulationAll Other Children Adjudicated Dependent Population

27 PPI Target Population Relative Kinship Care Non-Relative Kinship Care Foster Care Shelter Care Group HomeResidential Treatment Q All Other Adjudicated Dependent Population Relative Kinship Care Non-Relative Kinship Care Foster Care Shelter Care Group HomeResidential Treatment Q Out of Home Placement of Populations

28 Tying It All Together Strong Model Fidelity = Favorable Outcomes Weak Model Fidelity = Less Desirable Outcomes Focus on PPI Model Fidelity first Capture, report, and share accurate data Look at the whole picture and how all of the components COMBINED impact outcomes