Diplomas Now benefits students, their schools and communities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Grading and Reporting Grade PLUS 4 th and 5 th Grade.
Advertisements

Performance Goals for New Mentoring, Education, and Employment Grants.
School Counseling and Guidance Program Intentional Guidance (Results sample)
Grading and Reporting Grade PLUS 4 th and 5 th Grade.
Using Data to Manage Interventions Managing student supports within City Year and Diplomas Now.
A Review of Literature and Early Warning Indicatory Systems in Road Map School Districts Puget Sound Educational Service District On behalf of the Road.
PATHWAYS ELIGIBILITY PROJECT DARTMOUTH NORTH ASSOCIATION – APRIL, 2012.
A-F School Grading Presentation October 2, History of A to F School Grading System Preliminary grades based on data from SY08-09 through SY10-11.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Board Presentation March 25, 2008.
1 School Designation Detailed Methodology Reward Identify the “highest-performing schools” and “high-progress schools” based in all-students group over.
1 Student Goals and Motivation Accelerated Math  Best Practices.
First Category Second Category Third Category Fourth Category $100$200$300$100 $200 $300.
Needs Assessment Sample Clover School Data Source: ADE, Federal Programs and School Improvement Units
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
DBDM Practice. SAT Report In , 29.5% of our seniors took the SAT. Also, 19.9% of our seniors took the ACT. In , 1215 students.
2014 – 2015 Advisory Council Meeting February 4, st Century.
Dr. Michael Flicek Education Consultant October 8, 2013 Wyoming School Performance Rating Model Report to: Wyoming State Board of Education.
Student Learning targets
End-of-Year Goals Report. The District’s goals for are: 1.100% of Ripon teachers will use a data dashboard to monitor the Response to.
Diplomas Now benefits students, their schools and communities.
WBCSD District Strategic Goals Update August 10, 2015.
W531 Excel Tutorial. To begin, please visit the Indiana Department of Education website at From the menu on the.
Understanding the NRS Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability.
Information for school leaders and teachers regarding the process of creating Student Learning Targets. Student Learning targets.
Leadership Council Retreat August 21, 2014 New Mentor Orientation Anchoring Our Work with DATA.
Partnership Support Organization Preliminary School Report--High School Only July 2007.
Background In , City Year Greater Philadelphia (CYGP) provided academic and behavioral supports for students in grades 6-9. Supports include one-on-one.
Attainment Peter Gorrie, QIO September 2014.
On Track to Graduation: A Profile of Sixth-Grade Participants in May 2014 Analyses Performed by: Mindy Hightower King, Ph.D. Center on Education.
State Test Results MSP/HSPE/EOC Presentation to the Shelton School District Board of Directors September 11, 2012.
Single Plan for Student Achievement. 1. Increase student achievement in reading/writing (ELA). 2. Increase Student Achievement in Math. 3. Improve the.
New Century High School Initiative Progress Report July 2007.
1 School Improvement & Accountability Update for P.S. Jones Middle Presented by: Tracey Nixon Principal.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
C R E S S T / CU University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Measuring Adequate Yearly.
SIP Reading Goal Our Reality: An average of 78% of the students met standard on the state reading assessment in Our SMART Goal: The average.
Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.
2016 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
2017 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Compare to the Risk Thresholds
Teacher SLTs
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Teacher SLTs
State Test Results MSP/HSPE/EOC
Mark P Chisholm September 5, 2018
Columbia High School Quality Assurance Internal Review Benchmark I
Griggs Elementary 1st Quarter ACIP Review Meeting November 2, 2016
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
Campus Comparison Groups and Distinction Designations
Florence Howard Quarterly Review
Teacher SLTs
ESSA for AFESC Schools 2018 Under the reauthorization of ESEA, the federal government required each state to design an accountability system that met.
Ridgefield Public Schools New Jersey School Performance Report
Using Data to Improve Attendance
Florence Howard Quarterly Review
Teacher SLTs
Somerset Primary Data Report/SBG Information Session
PARCC RESULTS: PRESENTATION FAIRVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT OCTOBER 2, 2018
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
Prepared for CHS Leadership Team and SLC Leaders November 26th, 2012
GTMS School Performance Report
Reeds Road School Performance Report
Roland Rogers School Performance Report
Arthur Rann Elementary School Performance Report
Teacher SLTs
Smithville School Performance Report
Standards Based Grading
District and School Accountability System: Recommended Modifications
Mississippi Succeeds Unprecedented Achievement, Unlimited Potential
Presentation transcript:

Diplomas Now benefits students, their schools and communities

How to Read the Q1 Reports

Contents of the Quarter 1 Report Student risk level distributions School progress towards DN goal attainment Student mobility Results are reported for: ◦ overall school level (all DN grades combined) ◦ individual grade level.

ABC Risk Level Criteria Risk CategoryOn TrackSlidingOff Track AttendanceADA ≥ 90%ADA ≥ 85% and <90%ADA < 85% Behavior0 Out-of-School Suspensions N/A1 or more Out-of- School Suspensions English/Language ArtsCourse Grade of A, B, or C Course Grade of DCourse Grade of F or Course Failure MathCourse Grade of A, B, or C Course Grade of DCourse Grade of F or Course Failure

Early Warning Indicators Given to students Off Track in an ABC category Sliding and On-Track students do not receive EWIs Students may have from 0 to 4 IDAttendanceBehaviorELAMathEWI Off Track On Track 2

Distribution Graph The first four bars ◦ distributions of Q1 performance in each ABC category The final bar ◦ distribution of students based on their respective number of EWIs. ABC Categories EWI Score ColorMeaning GreenOn Track in ABC Categories YellowSliding in ABC Categories RedOff Track in ABC Categories Kiwi Green0 Early Warning Indicators Orange1 Early Warning Indicator Light Red2-4 Early Warning Indicators Light GreyMissing Q1 Data Dark GreyWithdrew during Q1

Distribution Percentage Chart Percentages based on distributions Calculated by dividing the total number of students at each risk level by the total number of students who were on-track, sliding, or off-track. Missing and withdrawn students are excluded from these calculations ABC Category Risk Level Percentage

Schools with Data from Last Year Note: This table excludes missing and withdrawn in calculating risk level percentages. 6 th Grade

DN End of Year Goals Overall EWI Distribution: At least 67% (two-thirds) of students within DN focus grades have no EWIs at the end of the school year. Attendance Of students that were sliding/off-track at any data point: 50% or more move on-track Behavior Of students that were sliding/off-track at any data point: 50% or more move on-track ELA/Literacy Of students that were sliding/off-track at any data point: 50% or more move on-track Math Of students that were sliding/off-track at any data point: 50% or more move on-track Off-trackOn-track Attendance: ≤90% average daily attendance >90% average daily attendance Behavior: 1 or more suspensionsno suspensions ELA/Literacy: a “D” or an “F” ELA gradea “C” or higher ELA grade Math: a “D” or an “F” math gradea “C” or higher math grade *Comparative data must be across two data submissions On-track/Off-track Definitions

DN Performance Goals Chart Shows school and grade targets for DN goal attainment based on Q1 performance. Third column ◦ Number of students who were sliding or off track in Q1. Fourth column ◦ Percent of students sliding or off track in Q1 Final column ◦ Number of students who need to move from sliding or off track to on track in order for the school to meet the DN goals for that ABC category

EWI Status Chart Shows ◦ Number and percentage of students with EWIs in Q1 ◦ Number of students needing to improve to meet 67% and 85% goals. EWIs are only given to students who are off track in at least one ABC category DN goal for EWIs is that 67% of students will have 0 EWIs at the end of the year. If a goal is already met, then “0 (On Target)” is written in the chart.

Student Movement Chart Distributions and percentages of students who: ◦ Enrolled the entire quarter ◦ Enrolled late ◦ Withdrew in Marking Period 1 ◦ Both enrolled late and withdrew in Marking Period1 Only present if school submits enrollment and withdrawal data