Representative Agricultural Pathways and Scenarios: A Trans-Disciplinary Approach to Agricultural Model Inter- comparison, Improvement and Climate Impact.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Farmers Voice at the World Level La Voz de Los Agricultores al Nivel Mundial La Voix des Agriculteurs au Niveau Mondial.
Advertisements

DROUGHT MONITORING CENTRE - NAIROBI WHAT COULD BE DONE ON DROUGHT WITHIN ISDR PLATFORM?
1. 2 Why are Result & Impact Indicators Needed? To better understand the positive/negative results of EC aid. The main questions are: 1.What change is.
Natural Resources and Environment Thematic Thrust Node Common Visioning Workshop 1-2 April Pretoria Sithembile Ndema
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop March 22 – 24, 2011 Kyiv, Ukraine.
Gap Analysis >> Next Steps
Regional Impact Assessment AgMIP SSA Kickoff Workshop John Antle AgMIP Regional Econ Team Leader 1 Accra, Ghana Sept
WP7: Environmental impact assessment of present and potential future lifestyle and economic alternatives
Climate Change and Food Security in Southern Africa Adopting a multi-level research approach John Ingram GECAFS Executive Officer Natural Environment Research.
Natural Resources & Environment Thematic Thrust FANRPAN Partners’ Meeting 13 June 2011 Pretoria, South Africa.
Southern Africa Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (SAAMIIP)
1 Antonio Soria Head of Unit Economics of Energy, Climate Change and Transport Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Joint Research Centre European.
NIORO case study Amy Faye ISRA-BAME. Objectives Climate change impact assessment Objectives : Assess the distributional impact of climate change in the.
Minimum-Data Analysis of Technology Adoption and Impact Assessment for Agriculture-Aquaculture Systems John Antle Oregon State University Roberto Valdivia.
Global warming: temperature and precipitation observations and predictions.
AgMIP: Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project Cynthia Rosenzweig, James W. Jones, and Jerry Hatfield NASA Goddard Institute for Space.
Economic Potential for Soil Carbon Sequestration in the Nioro Region of Senegal’s Peanut Basin by John Antle, Bocar Diagana, Jetse Stoorvogel and Kara.
Development or Environment? Tradeoff Analysis Framework Jetse Stoorvogel, John Antle, Andre de Jager, Alejandra Mora Valleja, Gerdien Meijerink.
Cynthia Rosenzweig 1, Jim Jones 3, Jerry Hatfield 4, Alex Ruane 1, and Jonathan Winter 2 1 NASA GISS, 2 Columbia University, 3 University of Florida, 4.
East Africa Tradeoff Analysis Workshop. Workshop goals and strategy Strategy Monday Introduction to TOA approach Tuesday AM Conceptual framework Tuesday.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) WG III AR4 Outline Ogunlade Davidson Co-chair Working Group III PRE-SBTA Session, Milan, Italy November.
What is the TOA-MD Model? Basic Concepts and an Example John Antle Roberto Valdivia Agricultural and Resource Economics Oregon State University
Modeling and Forecasting Climate Change, Biophysical Impacts, and Ecological and Economic Implications: Discussion John Antle Agricultural and Resource.
Bram Moeskops Scientific Coordinator CORE Organic Research seminar 1 October 2014, Stockholm New Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda for Organic Food.
RegIS2: Regional Climate Change Impact & Response Studies RegIS2: Regional Climate Change Impact & Response Studies
New Methods to Assess Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation for Poor Agricultural Households John M. Antle Roberto Valdivia Agricultural and Resource Economics.
Off the Shelf: Innovation in family farming for sustainable agriculture Terri Raney, Editor The State of Food and Agriculture Food and Agriculture Organization.
Global Futures and Strategic Foresight and the IMPACT Model Keith Wiebe International Food Policy Research Institute Workshop on Integrating Biodiversity.
Center for International Climate and Environmental Research-Oslo: Research Priorities and Interest in China Lin Gan SINCIERE Member Workshop October 19,
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Importance and Uses of Agricultural Statistics Section A 1.
FAO NAMA learning tool to support NAMA preparation in agriculture
Report of the Outcome of the Workshop on emissions projections from Annex I Parties Bonn, 6-8 September 2004 Micheal Young Department of Environment, Heritage.
A New Trans-Disciplinary Approach to Regional Integrated Assessment of Climate Impact and Adaptation in Agricultural Systems John Antle & Roberto Valdivia.
SRP: IMPROVED MANAGEMENT OF MAJOR AGRICULTURAL RIVER BASINS - OVERVIEW Vladimir Smakhtin SRP River Basin Workshop Addis, May 28, 2012.
Adaptation knowledge needs and response under the UNFCCC process Adaptation Knowledge Day V Session 1: Knowledge Gaps Bonn, Germany 09 June 2014 Rojina.
Global Environmental Change and Food Systems GECAFS IGP Kick-Off Meeting - Kathmandu 29/30 June 2006 Scenario Development and Analysis Thomas Henrichs.
SESSION 2 Identifying Synergies Among MEAs Using IEA Tools.
Policy Issues Facing the Food, Agriculture and Rural Sectors and Implications for Agricultural Statistics Mary Bohman and Mary Ahearn Economic Research.
Biofuels, Food Security and Environmental Sustainability: Global Challenges and Opportunities Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte The Politics of Food Conference.
Tradeoff Analysis and Minimum-Data Modeling John Antle Jetse Stoorvogel Workshop on Adaptation to Climate Change, Nairobi September
FAOCGIARWMO. How will Global Environmental Change affect the vulnerability of food systems in different regions? How might food systems be adapted to.
Global Environmental Change Changes in the biophysical environment caused or strongly influenced by human activities Land cover & soils Atmospheric.
Adaptation to Climate Change Actions in Mongolia Adaptation Workshop IFAD, Rome May 2007.
Country CBA Project :Sri Lanka A study to economically evaluate possible adaptation measures for climate vulnerabilities in paddy and Other Field Crops.
Role of Integrated Assessment Modelling (IAM) in climate change policy analysis The Global Integrated Assessment Model (GIAM) An ABARE-CSIRO joint initiative.
CAPRI EC4MACS Kick Off meeting, Laxenburg, Peter Witzke, EuroCARE The role of EuroCARE and Bonn University in EC4MACS The role of EuroCARE.
Presentation Title Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of Adaptation Supporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action Adaptation.
Principal Investigator: Dr. Amir Muhammed, Director Asianics Agro. Dev. International, Islamabad, Pakistan Countries Involved: Pakistan, India, Nepal,
What is Global Environmental Change? Changes in the biogeophysical environment caused or strongly influenced by human activities Land cover & soils Atmospheric.
Capacity Building in Analytical Tools for Estimating and Comparing Costs and Benefits of Adaptation Projects in Africa.
Geoshare Workshop Purdue, 11 Sep 2014 What Geoshare may do for us Hermann Lotze-Campen.
Climate Change – Defra’s Strategy & Priorities Dr Steven Hill Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs 22 nd May 2007 FLOODING DESTRUCTION AT.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) The IPCC is the leading international body for the assessment of climate change. It was established by.
AF 42 1 IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE, VULNERABILITY AND ADAPTATION CAPACITY IN THE LIMPOPO BASIN OF SEMI-ARID LAND SOUTHERN AFRICA: THE CASE OF EASTERN BOTSWANA.
FAOCGIARWMO. How will Global Environmental Change affect the vulnerability of food systems in different regions? How might food systems be adapted to.
Scenario process Next steps. New scenarios (Share Socio-economic Pathways)
| Paul Lucas 1 Future energy system challenges for Africa: Insights from Integrated Assessment Models 1 st Africa Sustainable Development Forum.
Ibrahima Hathie Initiative Prospective Agricole et Rurale (IPAR) & AgMIP CIWARA CO-PI Dakar - June 1, 2016 A New Trans-Disciplinary Approach to Regional.
Achieving Sustainable Development with Low Carbon Action Asia Pacific Carbon Forum Rakshya Thapa Regional Technical Specialist, UNDP Global Environment.
Towards transforming mixed farming systems in Southern Africa:
Integrated Planning and Monitoring for Climate-Smart Agriculture
Climate Change Elements of the SADC Regional Agricultural Policy (RAP)
AgMIP 6, Seeking Sustainable Solutions June, Montpellier, France
Predicted Adoption rate (%) Discussion, conclusions & implications
CGIAR Research Program Dryland Systems
Strategic Foresight Analysis in the CRP-GLDC
Macroeconomic Reforms and Agriculture Policies in Developing Countries: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ON FAMILIAR AGRICULTURE (Cases from Mexico and Argentina)
Assessing the inclusion of the agriculture sector in NSDSs
Climate Change Elements of the SADC Regional Agricultural Policy (RAP)
Climate-Smart Agriculture in the Near East North Africa Region
Presentation transcript:

Representative Agricultural Pathways and Scenarios: A Trans-Disciplinary Approach to Agricultural Model Inter- comparison, Improvement and Climate Impact Assessment Roberto Valdivia 1, John Antle 1, Lieven Claessens 2, Gerald Nelson 3, Cynthia Rosenzweig 4, Alex Ruane 4, and Joost Vervoort 5 1 Oregon State University; 2 International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, ICRISAT; 3 Professor Emeritus, University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign; 4 NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies; 5 University of Oxford/CCAFS 1 AAEA Meeting Minneapolis, MN July 28, 2014

The global change research community has recognized that new pathway and scenario concepts are needed to implement impact and vulnerability assessment ◦ Earlier version: “Special Report on Emissions Scenarios” (SRES) linked emissions to socio-economic development narratives and assumptions IPCC process for new “pathway” concepts ◦ RCPs: Representative Concentration Pathways -> Global climate models ◦ SSPs: Shared Socio-Economic Pathways -> impact and vulnerability assessment However, we need pathways specific to the agricultural sector: ◦AgMIP: Developing and implementing Representative Agricultural Pathways and Scenarios (RAPS) – Cross cutting theme Pathways and Scenarios

RCPs, SSPs and RAPs Representative Ag Pathways economic & social development narratives soil & water resource trends agricultural technology trends prices and costs of production ag, mitigation & other policy

Linking Agriculture-Specific Pathways to SSPs: Representative Agricultural Pathways (RAPs) Global RAPs: Global Economic Models and other non-modeled global socio-economic conditions: ◦ GDP, population & policy and trade, etc Regional RAPs: Allow us to include key drivers are likely to affect future bio-physical and socio- economic conditions: ◦ ag productivity trends, land use, policy, regional development ◦ farm size, system-specific productivity & management, infrastructure, etc -> Hierarchical structure (nested approach). SSPs: Framework for development of sectoral (e.g. agricultural) global and regional scenarios. AgMIP: Developing and implementing Representative Agricultural Pathways and Scenarios (RAPS)

Yield or value time current future Q1 Q3 Q2 Yield or value time current future Q1 Q3 Q2 Q1: What is the sensitivity of current agricultural production systems to climate change? This question addresses the isolated impacts of climate changes assuming that the production system does not change from its current state. Q2: What is the impact of climate change on future agricultural production systems? Assessment of climate impacts on the future production system, which will differ from the current production system due to development in the agricultural sector Q3: What are the benefits of climate change adaptations? Assessment of the benefits of potential adaptation options in the future production system RAPS Why do we need RAPs? : The AgMIP RIA Core Research Questions:

Development of Representative Agricultural Pathways RAPs narratives provide a framework in which qualitative and quantitative information can be translated into model parameters These “pathways” are combinations of bio-physical, economic, technology and policy drivers that represent a plausible range of possible futures. They are not meant to be predictions, but rather provide researchers with a range of plausible scenarios that can be used to simulate possible future outcomes in a consistent and transparent way. Need a Multi- disciplinary team!

First meeting: 1.Start with a “Business as usual” (BAU) RAP 2.Team members identify key parameters that will likely be affected by higher level pathways and draft RAP narrative 3.Team members are assigned variables for research 4.Team members conduct research –use of templates for reporting and supporting documentation 5.Templates can be distributed to experts for feedback First meeting: 1.Start with a “Business as usual” (BAU) RAP 2.Team members identify key parameters that will likely be affected by higher level pathways and draft RAP narrative 3.Team members are assigned variables for research 4.Team members conduct research –use of templates for reporting and supporting documentation 5.Templates can be distributed to experts for feedback Second meeting: 5.Team members report findings and discuss storylines for each variable 6.BAU RAP is finalized 7.Additional RAPs are identified 8.Process similar to BAU is carried out 9.Additional background research Second meeting: 5.Team members report findings and discuss storylines for each variable 6.BAU RAP is finalized 7.Additional RAPs are identified 8.Process similar to BAU is carried out 9.Additional background research Create Additional RAPs RAPs distributed to stakeholders and outside experts Modelers develop scenarios RAPs Development Process

Tools for RAPs development: -DevRAP matrix and software: Construct RAPs narratives and quantify scenarios parameters for TOA- MD. Template to parameterize TOA-MD and document model scenarios -Reporting Templates: Help team members document background information specific to drivers under research -Pathways summary trends table: Helps to visually inform users about trends and magnitudes of key driver changes included in RAP narratives

AgMIP Regional Teams – RAPS development Sub-Saharan AfricaSouth Asia

AgMIP Regional Teams – RAPS development Period of analysis: Mid-century Higher level Pathways:  SSP2  No Global RAPs. Data from IMPACT model (productivity and price trends)  Some teams have used information from CCAFS multi- country scenarios Types of RAPs : Business as Usual (BAU)  Pessimistic  Optimistic

Example: RAPs development: CLIP: Zimbabwe

Indicators Pessimistic RAP1.1 If there is no change of mindset and way of doing business, food security situation will continue to worsen Optimistic RAP 1.2 Favorable conditions for private and public investments in the agricultural sector will be created Degradation+++Extractive land use- Investments in NRM, secure ownership Size of cultivated land - Lack of labor, limited investment options - Intensified production on less land Herd size- Shift towards goats+ Improved feed and management Input prices+ + +Lack of local manufacturing and raw material + More players in processing industry against higher demand for inputs Input use- - -Lack of affordability and returns+ Market incentives, investment security, appropriate support Crop income- - -Low local production and competition with cheap imports ++Increased income from higher production Livestock income- - -Competition with cheap imports++High and unmet demand for livestock products Improved quality production Crop – livestock product imports + + +While national production is declining, the demand actually increases +/-Large potential to produce vs climatic risks (droughts, no national reserves) Off-farm income- - -Alternative income options are also limited - High farm productivity will keep more people in agriculture

AgMIP Regional Research Teams RAPs Trends Table: SSA BAU Pessimistic

AgMIP Regional Research Teams RAPs Trends Table: SA

Issues found in the process of developing RAPs: Identification of indicators Need a comprehensive list of indicators with definitions Data availability Finding reliable data (e.g. trends) at regional or local level, in particular for non-modeled activities Agreement on trends direction and magnitude Disciplinary bias “predictions” vs “plausible projections” Interaction with Stakeholders Policy or personal agendas, non-scientific description of RAPs Uncertainty Productivity and price trends, production costs

Way forward Revise current RAP narratives and corresponding model parameters Develop more RAPs for the same region but also cover additional regions Revise the RAPS development process (learning by doing!) Link regional RAPs to Global RAPs How? Methodological issues With Global RAPS, regional RAPS developed by AgMIP RRTs may need to be revised. RAPS for other regions (e.g. Latin America, East Asia, etc)

Thank You! Reminder: Session 2089 A New Transdisciplinary Approach to Regional Integrated Assessment of Climate Impact and Adaptation in Africa and South Asia Track Session Int'l Tuesday, July 29, :30 pm – 6:00 pm Hyatt Regency; Second Level Acknowledgment: Thanks to AgMIP Research Teams for providing their RAPs information

DEVRAP Matrix Research and Reporting template