The Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences AIPLA S PRING M EETING 2012 James Donald Smith Chief Administrative Patent Judge Board of Patent Appeals.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Part of the Judicial Branch
Advertisements

America Invents Act What to Expect from Patent Reform.
Daphne C. Lainson Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh Overview of USPTO Patent Statistics.
Webinar: Request for Comments on AIA Trial Proceedings Before the PTAB July 29, Scott Boalick, Vice Chief Judge (Acting) Patent Trial and Appeal.
An Inside Look at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board Scott Boalick Administrative Patent Judge Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Representative Rejections (two minor suggestions) Matthew A. Smith Foley & Lardner LLP at the United States Patent & Trademark Office.
Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Meeting October 8, 2002 William F. Smith Administrative Patent Judge Board of Patent Appeals.
ARGUING YOUR APPEAL BEFORE A PANEL OF THE BPAI IN AN INTER PARTES REEXAMINATION Kevin F. Turner Administrative Patent Judge Board of Patent Appeals & Interferences.
PROSECUTION APPEALS Presented at: Webb & Co. Rehovot, Israel Date: February 14, 2013 Presented by: Roy D. Gross Associate St. Onge Steward Johnston & Reens.
1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association RCE Practice: Pilot Programs and Delays in Examination Chris Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. IP.
Appeal Practice Before Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
The Office of Licensing and Review. Licensing and Review Located within Technology Center The L&R staff consists of: Licensing and Review adminstrative.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Update October 22, Chief Judge James Donald Smith Patent Trial and Appeal Board United States Patent and Trademark.
John J. Calvert Administrator, Inventor Assistance Program John J. Calvert Administrator, Inventor Assistance Program Patents – Past, Present and Future.
USPTO Implementation of the America Invents Act Teresa Stanek Rea Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the.
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences Michael R. Fleming Chief Administrative Patent Judge United States Patent and Trademark Office.
David S. Langdon Senior Economist U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration Intellectual Property and the U.S. Economy: Industries.
February 19, Recent Changes and Developments in USPTO Practice Prepared by: Office of Patent Legal Administration (OPLA) Robert J. Spar, DirectorJoni.
United States Government Basics
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2pt 3 pt 4pt 5 pt 1pt 2pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4pt 5 pt 1pt Vocabulary Executive Branch Judicial.
Post-Grant Proceedings Under The America Invents Act Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association “Washington in the West” Conference January 29,
Administrative Law Jody Blanke Professor of Computer Information Systems and Law.
NARUC Energy Regulatory Partnership Program The Georgian National Energy Regulatory Commission and The Vermont Public Service Board by John D. Burke, Board.
Investing in research, making a difference. Patent Basics for UW Researchers Leah Haman Intellectual Property Associate WARF 1.
Christopher J. Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. Derivation Proceedings and Prior User Rights.
Careers in High Tech High Tech Law Institute and Law Career Services.
PRESENTATION BY THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR CORRECTIONAL SERVICES PRESENTER: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SIRAJ DESAI DATE: 4 NOVEMBER 2009.
United States Government Basics. Legislative Branch Bicameral Legislature Congress Senate House of Representatives.
1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association Updates on the USPTO Chris Fildes AIPLA-JPAA Joint Meeting April 9, 2013.
September 23, 2011 Maury M. Tepper, III Tepper & Eyster, PLLC © Tepper & Eyster 2011.
November 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of Special Education 1 Special Education.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Part 190 NPRM: Administrative Procedures - 1 -
USPTO Updated Strategic Plan in Brief March 3 rd, 2010.
Patent Prosecution May PCT- RCE Zombie 371 National Stage PCT Applications –Not Allowed to file an RCE until signed inventor oath/declaration is.
New Ex Parte Appeal Rules Patent and Trademark Practice Group Meeting January 26, 2012.
Christian Chace Patent Process Reengineering Team September 8, 2010 Patent Process Reengineering Team as part of the Patent End-To-End Processing Team.
The New Tool for Patent Defendants - Inter Partes Review Daniel W. McDonald George C. Lewis, P.E. Merchant & Gould, P.C. April 16, 2014 © 2014 Merchant.
OCFO - Financial Status of USPTO May 7, FY 2010 Status Authorized level of $1,887.0 million Mid-year Budget Execution Review currently underway.
U.S. Department of Commerce International Trade Administration Freight Policy and Movement Subcommittee Recommendation Improving U.S. Supply Chain Competitiveness.
Chris Fildes FILDES & OUTLAND, P.C. IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting AIPLA Annual Meeting, October 20, 2015 USPTO PILOT PROGRAMS 1 © AIPLA 2015.
James Toupin – General Counsel February 1, Summary of Proposed Rule Changes to Continuations, Double Patenting, and Claims.
Takeo Nasu JPAA International Activities Center AIPLA 2015 Mid-Winter Institute IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting Seminar Updates of Post Grant.
McDermott Will & Emery Roundtable Updates from the PTAB February 25, 2013 James Donald Smith Chief Administrative Patent Judge Patent Trial and Appeal.
Derivation Proceedings Gene Quinn Patent Attorney IPWatchdog.com March 27 th, 2012.
Prosecution Group Luncheon Patent October PTO News Backlog of applications continues to decrease –623,000 now, decreasing about 5,000/ month –Expected.
FY 2010 and FY 2011 Budget and Fee Collection Update March 3, 2010.
FY 2010 and FY 2011 USPTO Financial Report Trademark Public Advisory Committee Meeting February 25, 2010.
Report to the AIPLA’s IP Practice in Japan Committee January 22, 2012 USPTO Appeal Process: Appeal Strategies and New Rules Presented by: Stephen S. Wentsler.
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Division of Immigration Health Services FY 2010.
1) Congress 2) The Department of Justice does not have a Secretary as the head of the department. 3) Speaker of the House 4) Two or Bicameral Legislature.
1 PPAC Patents Operations Update Peggy Focarino Deputy Commissioner for Patents July 8, 2010.
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences May 15, Interference Practice Q&A James T. Moore Administrative Patent Judge
1 TOPIC III - PATENT INVALIDATION PROCEDURES EU-CHINA WORKSHOP ON THE CHINESE PATENT LAW HARBIN, SEPTEMBER 2008 Dr. Gillian Davies.
 Constitution – body of fundamental laws which say how a government is to operate  It is the supreme law of the land  It explains how the government.
United states travel & tourism advisory board
TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD OVERVIEW
Cleantech to Market Technology Transfer at Berkeley Lab
EFFECTIVELY NAVIGATING ELECTED OFFICIAL – DEPARTMENT RELATIONS
United States - Software
Consideration of Final Rulemaking
What Small Businesses Need to Know About Intellectual Property (IP)
USPTO Appeal Process: Appeal Strategies and New Rules
American Intellectual Property Lawyers Association 2015 Spring Meeting Los Angeles, California April 29 – May 2, 2015 John Cabeca Director of the.
Legislative Response on Recruitment/ Retention and
Jody Blanke Professor of Computer Information Systems and Law
Jody Blanke Professor of Computer Information Systems and Law
Unit #4 Test Review Congress
Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association
PRESENTATION BY THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR CORRECTIONAL SERVICES
Supreme Court at Work.
Presentation transcript:

The Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences AIPLA S PRING M EETING 2012 James Donald Smith Chief Administrative Patent Judge Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences United States Patent and Trademark Office 5/10/2012

Size of Backlog for the Past 10 Quarters

Pendency Time for the Past 10 Quarters

Reaching the Inflection Point

Per Curiam Decisions Allow the Board to issue decisions based on arguments presented by Examiners or Applicants –Shorter decisions; disposed sooner Arguments must sufficiently explain the decision Working with offices of the Under-Secretary and Solicitor to finalize rules

Per Curiam Decisions as of 5/8/2012

Patent Corps Collaboration Continuing to explore collaboration opportunities Additional Examiner interviews? Examiner review of after-final amendments before coming to the Board?

Hiring Selectees from: –USPTO Patent Corps, Office of the General Counsel, and the BPAI –International Trade Commission and Department of Justice –Private Practice –Industry

Members of the Board (as of 5/7/2012)

List of Judges Pre-Funding Post-Funding

USPTO Detroit Satellite Office Opens on July 13, IP-experienced professionals have been hired as patent examiners 8 of the 44 judges confirmed to date by the Secretary of Commerce will reside in Detroit

Rules Committee Four new proceedings under America Invents Act – September 2012 Final rules under development Rules committee comprised of Board Judges Work proceeding smoothly Already incorporating public comment, where appropriate