Chicken Soup for the Busy Coordinator Aug 2009. Scenario: Aim: Randomised, double-blind, phase III clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Timelines Trust informed June 2007
Advertisements

Chicken Soup for the Busy Coordinator B2B Research Online Portal FAQs
Chicken Soup for the Busy Coordinator
Chicken Soup for the Busy Coordinator
Chicken Soup for the Busy Coordinator September 2009.
The Principal Investigator’s Roles and Responsibilities Chicken Soup for the Busy Coordinator (May 2010)
Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
Safety Reporting IN Clinical Trials
Regulatory Clinical Trials Clinical Trials. Clinical Trials Definition: research studies to find ways to improve health Definition: research studies to.
ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING
Chicken Soup for the Busy Coordinator February 2009.
Good Clinical Practice in Research
Chicken Soup for the Busy Coordinator Dearest colleagues, friends and members of the Clinical Research Coordinator Society, Welcome to the launch of the.
B2B Research Online Portal FAQs Chicken Soup for the Busy Coordinator (February 2010)
Chicken Soup for the Busy Coordinator October 2009.
Chicken Soup for the Busy Coordinator March 2009.
GCP compliance for GenISIS  This presentation is intended for clinical staff involved in recruiting patients to the GenISIS (Genetics of Influenza Susceptibility.
Capturing and Reporting Adverse Events in Clinical Research
Chicken Soup for the Busy Coordinator Nov 2010 PROTOCOL FEASIBILITY.
ROLE OF NURSES IN CLINICAL RESEARCH IN MALAWI OWEN DAIRE BSCN MPH RNM.
Fulfilling the Promise of Medicine Together New FDA Safety Reporting Requirements 2010 John McLane, Ph.D. COO & Vice President Clinical and Regulatory.
Human Research Protection Program Training: Post-Approval Event Reporting March 26, 2008 Lisa Voss, MPH, CIP Assistant Director, QIU Human Research Protection.
Study Team Members and Responsibilities Chicken Soup for the Busy Coordinator (April 2010)
Principal Investigator C hicken S oup for the B usy C oordinator (October 2010]
Clinical Pharmacy’s Role in Research Trials Sheree Miller Pharm.D. Investigational Drug Service University of Washington Medical Center.
Unlocking the Mystery of General Information Reporting Research Compliance Administration Training Presentation Wednesday, June 6, 2007 Presenter:Heather.
Monitoring and Special Considerations for Multi-Center Trials
IRB – Consent Changes 5/29/14. Consent Changes Font = Calibri Clarification and addition to instructions in several sections (Header, Randomization, Voluntary.
Chicken Soup for the Busy Coordinator Chicken Soup for the Busy Coordinator May 2009.
Good Clinical Practice (GCP)- An introduction Dr Noor Ibrahim Mohamed Sakian.
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTING Elizabeth Dayag IRB Administrator Naval Medical Center Portsmouth.
Paula Peyrani, MD Division of Infectious Diseases University of Louisville Performing the Study.
1 Nuts and Bolts of Safety Reporting The Role of the CRO Dr. Noa Lowenton Spier Pharma-Clinical S.A.G.
H. Lundbeck A/S21-Sep-151 Pharmacovigilance during clinical development SAE reporting, ASUR and PSUR IFF Seminar, 21. February 2007.
SAE Reporting Judy Breed, BA, RN June, 2011 CONFIDENTIAL.
New online DSRB Supplementary Report Forms Chicken Soup for the Busy Coordinator (January 2010)
EMORY INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD VERSION Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations and Non-Compliance.
Adverse Event/Unanticipated Problems Policy and Procedures November 2007.
Investigational Drugs in the hospital. + What is Investigational Drug? Investigational or experimental drugs are new drugs that have not yet been approved.
University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.
Monitoring IRB Monitoring of Clinical Trials. Types of Monitoring Internally Internally Externally Externally.
Research Studies GOTCHA’S By Sally Duffy. Failure to follow protocol, investigator agreements and regulations Did not use device/drug in manner specified.
CLINICAL TRIALS – PHASE III. What are phase III trials  Confirmatory phase (Therapeutic confirmatory trial)  Trials are done to obtain sufficient evidence.
UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCP) Investigator and Study Team Responsibilities Miles McFann IRB Administration Training.
Understanding Unanticipated Problems (UPs) Elizabeth Ness, RN, MS Director, Staff Development Office of the Clinical Director Center for Cancer Research,
Summary of Findings Improving the System of Reporting and Interpreting Unexpected Serious Adverse Events to Investigators Conducting Research Under an.
Chicken Soup for the Busy Coordinator April 2009.
Chicken Soup for the Busy Coordinator July Question: My trial has completed and we are preparing for closure of study. How long do we need to archive.
Serious Adverse Event Reporting Start-up Meeting March 25, 2010 Kingston, ON.
Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in the Intensive Care Unit (SUP-ICU) SAR/SUSAR Mette Krag Dept. of Intensive Care 4131 Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet,
Role of Site Investigator Ensure subject safety is protected & well-managed Full compliance with requirements of Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Conduct the.
Using Australian Clinical Sites – Challenges for International Sponsors Prof A J (Tony) Webber Clinical Network Services Pty Ltd Brisbane, Australia.
D3 ) Not Recovered d5) Fatal Was a post-mortem undertaken?YesNo Was the SAE ongoing at time of death from other cause? Yes No d d m m y y y y d1) Recovered.
Main Line Hospitals Institutional Review Board Unanticipated Problems Anne Marie Hobson, BSN, JD, ORA Director Theresa Greaves, ORA Manager.
Bussara Sukpanichnant, Human Subject Protection Office, USAMD-AFRIMS Unanticipated Problems 15 th FERCAP International Conference 24 Nov 15 Nagasaki, Japan.
1 SAE Centralized Report and Review Process April 2012.
Cancer Clinical Trials Office Clinical Trials & Research Training Oct2014.
IRB – Consent Changes 5/29/14
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
Introduction Review and proper registration of Human Gene Transfer protocols is very complex. A protocol goes through rigorous review by multiple Committees.
Dartmouth Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Data Safety Monitoring and Reporting requirements Brown Bag Series: Noon / First Tuesday of the Month.
Reportable Events & Other IRB Updates February 2017
Administering Informed Consent Issues for Discussion
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
REGULATORY PROBLEMS IN CARING OUT PRE- AND POST- AUTHORISATION CLINICAL TRIALS Dr Penka Decheva GCP Inspector, BDA.
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Pharmacovigilance in clinical trials
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
*Continue on SAE supplemental page CTT21 A if more space is required
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTING
Presentation transcript:

Chicken Soup for the Busy Coordinator Aug 2009

Scenario: Aim: Randomised, double-blind, phase III clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of an investigational anti- inflammatory agent and placebo for management of chronic back pain. Problem: Subject ABC was randomised into the clinical trial on 1 Apr 2009 and developed a severe abdominal pain one month after randomisation. He was diagnosed with gastric ulcer and was hospitalised for a week and discharged well. The investigator felt that the gastric ulcer was related to the investigational product. Study Documents: The protocol, investigator’s brochure and informed consent document for the study indicated that the there was a 10% chance of developing mild to moderate abdominal pain. Case Study

Q1. How should the investigator classify this adverse event in terms of diagnosis, onset date, end date, relationship to the investigational product, severity and expectedness? A1. The investigator should classify the adverse event as follows: Diagnosis : Gastric Ulcer Onset Date : 1 May 2009 End Date : 8 May 2009 Relationship to the investigational product : Possible Severity : Severe Expectedness : Unexpected (since it was not mentioned in any of the study documents) Questions & Answers:

Q2. Is this event considered a Serious Adverse Event (SAE)? A2. Yes. The adverse event should be considered as a Serious Adverse Event since the subject was hospitalised. Furthermore, it also meets the criteria for Unanticipated Problems Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRTSO). Questions & Answers:

Q3. Who should the investigator notify about this event and what are the timelines for notification? A3. The event meets the criteria for expedited safety reporting since it is serious, unexpected and related to the investigational product. The investigator must notify the Sponsor, IRB / IEC and Regulatory Authority (HSA) about the event within the required timelines as follows: (a)Sponsor : 24 hrs from becoming aware of the event (b)IRB / IEC : 7 calendar days from becoming aware of the event (c)HSA : 15 calendar days from becoming aware of the event. Questions & Answers:

NB: Please note that only SAEs that meet the expedited safety reporting criteria need to be reported to HSA. If the investigational product is an unregistered drug in Singapore, local and overseas adverse drug reactions that are both serious and unexpected must be reported to HSA (including other protocols of the same study drug). If the investigational product was a locally registered product in Singapore, only local and overseas adverse drug reactions that are both serious and unexpected and arising from the clinical trial protocol that is studied in Singapore must be submitted to HSA. Questions & Answers:

Q4. If the investigator had unblinded the study drug assigned to the subject as part of his medical care, what should the investigator do? A4. The investigator should notify the Sponsor, IRB / IEC and the Regulatory Authority (i.e. HSA) about the unblinding within required timelines as mentioned in the answer for question [3]. The Sponsor should use the online Expedited Safety Reporting (ESR) form or to report the unblinding to HSA. Questions & Answers:

Q5. When does expedited safety reporting start and end? A5. Expedited safety reporting should start upon the submission of CTC application and end upon Last Patient Visit (LPV)*. Questions & Answers: * Please refer to specific study protocol as safety reporting period may vary amongst protocols.

References Please refer to the regulations: Singapore GCP Guidelines: Sections 1.50, 1.60, 4.11, 5.16 and 5.17 ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline E2A Click here  HSA Regulatory Guidance on Safety Reporting Requirements for Clinical Trials – Sep l_trials/guidelines/serious_adverse_events.html Click here 

Contributed By: Ms Sumitra Sachidanandan Clinical Trials Branch Health Products Regulation Health Sciences Authority

Your feedback is important to us. Feel free to write to us through: Snail mail: Clinical Research Coordinator Society (CRCS) c/o Research & Development Office 6 Commonwealth Lane #04-01/02 GMTI Building Singapore For More Information