Futuros tratamientos de la hepatitis C Maria Buti Hospital Universitario Valle Hebron and Ciberehd del Instituto Carlos III Barcelona Spain IV Curso para.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Future Trials of Hepatitis C Therapy in the HIV Co-infected Stephen D. Shafran, MD, FRCPC, FACP Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases.
Advertisements

Future Directions in HCV Therapy Eric Lawitz, MD, AGAF,CPI Medical Director, The Texas Liver Institute Clinical Professor of Medicine University of Texas.
Towards an End to HCV Epidemic in Egypt
Recent HCV treatment developments: In pursuit of perfectovir Professor Greg Dore Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia; & St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney.
What’s new in HCV genotype 2? Alessandra Mangia S.Giovanni Rotondo,ITALY PARIS HEPATITIS CONFERENCE January 2012.
LIVER CENTRE Toronto Western Site David Wong, MD University of Toronto TWH Francis Family Liver Clinic TGH Immunodeficiency Clinic SM Positive Care Clinic.
Management of Chronic Hepatitis C in 2013
Slide 1 of 8 From DL Wyles, MD, at Atlanta, GA: April 10, 2013, IAS-USA. IAS–USA David L. Wyles, MD Associate Professor of Medicine University of California.
HCV resistance Understanding the mechanism and Prevention
Direct Acting Antivirals: What are they
The new Treatments Dr John F Dillon. Curing one person Curing a population one person at a time.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Simeprevir + PEG + RBV in Treatment-Naïve Genotype 1 QUEST-2 Trial Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Manns M, et al. Lancet.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Simeprevir + PEG + RBV in Treatment-Naïve Genotype 1 QUEST-1 Trial Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Jacobson IM, et al.
Hepatitis web study H EPATITIS W EB S TUDY H EPATITIS C O NLINE Simeprevir (Olysio) Prepared by: David Spach, MD & H. Nina Kim, MD Last Updated: October.
The Future: Is Ribavirin Still Useful? David Nelson, MD Professor of Medicine, Microbiology, and Molecular Genetics Associate Dean, Clinical Research and.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir in Treatment-Experienced GT1 with Cirrhosis SIRIUS Phase 2 Treatment Experienced Bourliere.
Slide 1 of 8 From MG Peters, MD, at Los Angeles, CA: April 22, 2013, IAS-USA. IAS–USA Marion G. Peters, MD John V. Carbone, MD, Endowed Chair Professor.
Future HCV Treatment Paradigms Mark Sulkowski, MD Professor of Medicine Medical Director, Viral Hepatitis Center Divisions of Infectious Diseases and Gastroenterology/
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Telaprevir BID versus q8 in Treatment Naïve GT-1 OPTIMIZE (Study C211) Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Buti M, et al. Gastroenterology.
COSMOS SOF + SMV + RBV SOF + SMV Randomisation 2 : 1 : 2 : 1* Open-label * Randomisation was stratified on genotype (1a or 1b) in both cohorts, IL28B in.
SMV + PEG-IFN + RBV Open-label W12 W24* or W48* N = years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 4 Treatment-naïve or experienced with relapse or partial.
NS5A and polymerase inhibitors Mark Sulkowski, MD Professor of Medicine Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland
Randomisation* 2 : 1 Double blind *Randomisation was stratified on genotype (1a or 1b or other) and IL28B genotype (CC, CT or TT) N = 133 N = 260 W24W48.
How to avoid a resistance issue with the first generation protease inhibitors ? O. Lada PHD Service d’Hépatologie et INSERM CRB3, AP-HP Hopital Beaujon,
Future therapies Massimo Levrero Department of Internal Medicine - DMISM LEA INSERM U785 Life-Nanoscience Laboratory for Functional Genomics Sapienza University.
SMV SOF 400 Open-label OPTIMIST-2 Study: SMV + SOF for genotype 1 and cirrhosis W12  Objective –Superiority of SVR 12 (HCV RNA historical control.
SMV 150 mg QD + SOF 400 mg QD Randomisation 1 : years HCV genotype 1 Naïve or pre-treated with IFN-based regimen No cirrhosis HCV RNA ≥
Reddy KR. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:27-35 ATTAIN SMV + TVR placebo + PEG-IFN + RBV TVR + SMV placebo + PEG-IFN + RBV Randomisation* 1 : 1 Double-blind.
Placebo + PR W48 Placebo + PR Yes Hezode C. Gut 2015;64: COMMAND-1 COMMAND-1 Study: daclatasvir + PEG-IFN + RBV for genotype 1 or 4 DCV60 + PEG-IFN.
SIRIUS Placebo LDV/SOF + placebo Randomisation* 1 : 1 Double-blind SIRIUS Study: LDV/SOF ± RBV for genotype 1 and cirrhosis with non response to prior.
ARV-trial.com C-SWIFT Study: grazoprevir/elbasvir + SOF in genotypes 1 or 3, with or without cirrhosis Randomisation 1 : 1 Open-label Design W4 W6 W8.
HCV Alert: New Data on Resistance to DAAs and Implications for Therapy
SOF + RBV Randomisation* 1 : 1 : 1 Open-label BOSON Study: SOF + RBV + PEG-IFN for genotypes 2 and 3 ≥ 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 2, treatment-
Placebo + PR W24 DCV + PR Placebo + PR Yes Dore GJ. Gastroenterology 2015;148: COMMAND GT2/3 COMMAND GT2/3 Study: daclatasvir + PEG-IFN + RBV for.
C-EDGE TN Study: grazoprevir/elbasvir in genotype 1, 4 or 6 Zeuzem S. Ann Intern Med 2015; 163:1-13 GZR/EBR 100/50 mg qd N = 316 N = 105  Design W12W24.
Dore G. J Hepatol 2016; 64:19-28 MALACHITE TVR + PEG-IFN + RBV Randomisation Open-label years HCV genotype 1 HCV RNA > 10,000 IU/ml Naïve (MALACHITE-I)
 Design Randomisation* 2 : 1 Double blind *Randomisation was stratified on genotype (1a vs 1b) and ILB28 genotype (CC or non-CC) N = 134 N = 257 W24W48.
Hepatitis web study H EPATITIS W EB S TUDY H EPATITIS C O NLINE Simeprevir (Olysio) Prepared by: David Spach, MD & H. Nina Kim, MD Last Updated: July 14,
Massimo Puoti Dept. of Infectious Diseases AO Ospedale Niguarda Cà Granda Milan, Italy ELPA Symposium: COMPASSIONATE USE IN HEPATITIS C What patients populations.
The new Treatments The old problem Dr John F Dillon.
No HBV or HIV co-infection
Paris, 30 & 31 January 2012 Robert Flisiak Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology Medical University of Białystok, Poland Overview of clinical.
eGFR (MDRD) > 50 mL/min
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Design No randomisation Open-label W12 W years HCV genotype 1
Design Randomisation 2 : 1 Double-blind W12 ≥ 18 years, HCV genotype 3
Best Practices in Management of HCV Genotypes 1, 4, 5, and 6 in 2014
April 24-28, 2013 Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
No cirrhosis or compensated cirrhosis** No HBV or HIV co-infection
Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in Non-Cirrhotic Genotype 2 ENDURANCE-2
Future Trials of Hepatitis C Therapy in the HIV Co-infected
DAA’s in the treatment of HCV: The Beginning of the end or the end of the beginning for HCV?
LEAGUE-1 study: daclatasvir + SMV + RBV for genotype 1
Resistance to Direct Acting Antiviral Therapy
Phase 2 Treatment Naïve (unfavorable baseline treatment characteristics) Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir +/- 3rd DAA in HCV Genotype 1 NIAID SYNERGY: Genotype.
Elbasvir + Grazoprevir + Ribavirin in PI-experienced HCV GT1 C-SALVAGE
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Therapeutic Background & Study Rationale
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Obiettivi e strategie di un
Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir +/- Ribavirin in HCV Genotype 1 ION-2
LEPTON Study: SOF/VEL + GS-9857 genotype 1 or 3 Phase II
Phase 2 Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced
Phase 2b Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced
ASPIRE Study: SMV + PEG-IFN + RBV for genotype 1 experienced patients
MAGELLAN-3 Study: GLE/PIB + SOF + RBV in patients who failed GLE/PIB
No HBV or HIV co-infection
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in Non-Cirrhotic Genotype 2 ENDURANCE-2
Presentation transcript:

Futuros tratamientos de la hepatitis C Maria Buti Hospital Universitario Valle Hebron and Ciberehd del Instituto Carlos III Barcelona Spain IV Curso para Residentes “Diagnostico y Tratamiento de las Enfermedades Hepáticas”. Barcelona 2013

Future Treatment Aspirations: Overcoming the Barriers to Increase the Chance of Cure for More Current HCV Care 1 Future of HCV Care North CS, et al. Gen Hosp Psych Epub ahead of print IFN Sparing Regimens Simpler, shorter duration Improved tolerability/ adherence Broadly Efficacious Burden of Advanced Disease Health-Care Costs Increase Screening

Preclinical Phase I Phase II Phase III Filed Boceprevir Telaprevir TMC-435 MK7009ITMN191/R7227 BI BMS GS9256 MK5172 (MSD) ABT450 (ABT) ACH2684 BMS AZD-7295 BMS PPI-1301 EDP-239 GSK IDX719 MSD IFN λ Alisporivir Nitazoxamide Silibinine Vitamine D R7128 GS BI Japan Tobacco R0622 Medivir GLS9393 Biocryst BMS189 BMS Filibuvir GS9190 ANA598 BI Vx222 ABT333 ABT072 IDX 375 IDX 184 SCY-835 PPI-461 VBY-376 VX-985 VX-813 GS9451 RG7348 TMC A VX-916 VX-759 Celgosivir Bavituximab Lots of DAAs in Development AVL-181 AVL-192 ACH-2928 GS-5885 Nucleoside NS5B Polymerase Inhibitors Nucleotide NS5B Polymerase Inhibitors Non Nuc NS5B Polymerase inhibitors NS3/4A Protease inhibitors NS5A inhibitors DAA combinations Others Cyclophilin IDX 077 IDX 079 ABT267 Adapted from Bourliere M, et al. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2011;35(suppl 2):S84-S95.

Farmacos combinados con PegIFN and Ribavirina Pendientes de Aprobacion en Octubre del 2013 ClaseFarmacoDosisActividad Analogo de los Nucleotidos Inhibidor de la SofosbuvirDiarioPangenotipic0 [1,2] Inhibidor Proteasa NS3A FaldaprevirDiarioGT 1, 4, 5, 6 [3] Inhibidor Proteasa NS3A SimeprevirDiarioGT 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 [4] 1. Gane EJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2013;368: Herbst DA. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2013;22: White PW, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54: Moreno C, et al. J Hepatol. 2012;56:

Simeprevir+PR en Genotipo 1 QUEST-2: SVR Manns M, et al. EASL Abstract Reproduced with permission. Brazo SMV Duracion TGR 91% of pts en el brazo de SMV con TGR n/N = SMV + P/R P/R Todos 24 sem48 sem SVR12 (%) /25767/134202/2357/22

QUEST-1: SVR12 by Fibrosis Level, Subtype, and Baseline Resistance Jacobson I, et al. EASL Abstract Reproduced with permission. 18/31 n/N = 5/17188/22960/ SMV + P/R P/R SVR12 (%) No CirrhosisCirrhosis 105/11729/56105/14736/ SVR12 (%) GT 1aGT 1b Differences in SVR12 by Subgroup (95% CIs) GT 1a/other HCV - With baseline Q80K vs Pbo - Without baseline Q80K vs Pbo GT 1b HCV 28.2 ( ) 4.7 (-14.6 to 24.1) 40.3 ( ) 42.1 ( ) SMV (n) Pbo (n) Favors Placebo Favors SMV

STARTVerso1: SVR12 According to ETS, Genotype, and Fibrosis Level 23% of pts with GT 1a HCV had Q80K at baseline; not predictive of SVR12 Ferenci P, et al. EASL Abstract Reproduced with permission. 60/ 87 16/ / / / / 45 9/ 16 FDV 120 mg n/ N = 226/ / / / Patients (%) Achieved ETS SVR12 in ETS Pts SVR12 (%) GT 1aGT 1b FDV 240 mgPlacebo < F3≥ F3F4 ETS defined as HCV RNA < 25 IU/mL at Wk 4 and HCV RNA < 25 IU/mL, target not detected at Wk 8.

NEUTRINO: 12 Wks’ Sofosbuvir + P/R in Treatment-Naive GT 1/4/5/6 HCV Patients Open-label, single-arm study of sofosbuvir 400 mg QD + P/R for 12 wks in treatment-naive patients with GT 1/4/5/6 HCV – 17% had cirrhosis; 89% had GT 1, 9% had GT 4, < 1% had GT 5, 2% had GT 6 HCV Lawitz E, et al. EASL Abstract Reproduced with permission. P/R: pegIFN alfa-2a 180 µg/wk + RBV mg/day HCV RNA < LLOQ (%) Wk 4EOTSVR12 321/325326/ /327 n/N =

NEUTRINO: SVR12 With Sofosbuvir + P/R According to Genotype and Fibrosis Level Lawitz E, et al. EASL Abstract Reproduced with permission. SVR12 (%) No Cirrhosis Cirrhosis 252/27343/54 SVR12 According to Fibrosis Level SVR12 (%) GT 1GT 4GT 5,6 261/29227/28 7/ 7 SVR12 According to Genotype n/N =

Summary of Safety Findings From Phase III Trials Greatly improved Hb profile with simeprevir and faldaprevir vs boceprevir/telaprevir with no significant increase over pegIFN/RBV [5-7] Simeprevir [5,6] – Generally well tolerated; no added safety signals with triple therapy Faldaprevir [7] Generally well tolerated (clinically benign and transient bilirubin increases with 240 mg dose; higher incidence of gastrointestinal events and rash) Sofosbuvir [1-4] – Generally well tolerated; low rates of grade 3/4 AEs, serious AEs, and treatment discontinuation due to AEs; improved profile with SOF/RBV vs pegIFN/RBV 1. Lawitz E, et al. EASL Abstract Nelson D, et al. EASL Abstract Nelson D, et al. EASL Abstract Jacobson I, et al. EASL Abstract Jacobson I, et al. EASL Abstract Manns M, et al. EASL Abstract Ferenci P, et al. EASL Abstract 1416.

Summary of Resistance Findings From Phase III Trials Sofosbuvir [1-4] – No S282T mutations identified; other NS5B genetic variants not associated with change in phenotypic susceptibility Simeprevir [5,6] – Baseline Q80K polymorphism present in 41% of patients with GT 1a HCV and associated with lower SVR12 rate in QUEST-1 [5] – Emergent NS3 protease mutations in > 90% of patients without SVR (GT 1a: R155K alone, with mutations at positions 80 and/or 168; GT 1b: most common mutation D168V, Q80R + D168E) [5,6] Faldaprevir [7] – Baseline Q80K present in 23% of patients with GT 1a HCV but not associated with SVR12 rate 1. Lawitz E, et al. EASL Abstract Nelson D, et al. EASL Abstract Nelson D, et al. EASL Abstract Jacobson I, et al. EASL Abstract Jacobson I, et al. EASL Abstract Manns M, et al. EASL Abstract Ferenci P, et al. EASL Abstract 1416.

E1CE2p7NS2NS3NS4ANS4BNS5ANS5B Viral targets Host targets HCV Drugs in Development in All Oral Regimens * *On clinical hold, Idenix press release; **On clinical hold, Novartis press release NS3NS5ANS5BCyclophilin A PHASE III ABT-450/rABT-267 Non-nucleoside analogue ABT-333

* 8 patients with SVR12 have not returned for >24 weeks and are counted as virologic failures for SVR24; 3 patients relapsed between SVR12 and SVR24. Treatment-naïve ABT-450 ABT-333 RBV ABT-450 ABT-267 ABT-333 RBV ABT-450 ABT-267 ABT-333 ABT-450 ABT-267 RBV N ABT-450 ABT-267 ABT-333 RBV Wk 0 Wk 8 Wk 12Wk Regimen/Duration Null Responder ABT-450 ABT-267 RBV ABT-450 ABT-267 ABT-333 RBV ABT-450 ABT-267 ABT-333 RBV SVR 12 % SVR 24 * % Breakthrough/Rel apse / / / / / / / / / 0 AVIATOR Study: ABT-450/r, ABT-267, ABT-333 +/- RBV in Non- Cirrhotic, Naïve and Null Responders Kowdley K, et al. 48th EASL; Amsterdam, Netherlands; April 24-28, Abst. 3. N = 571

AVIATOR: Safety Grade 3 event, n Pooled (N =247) Treatment-Naïve (N =159) Null Responders (N = 88) ALT >5x – 20x ULN110 AST >5x – 20x ULN000 Alkaline Phosphatase >3x – 20x ULN000 Total bilirubin > 3x – 10xULN642 Hemoglobin < 8.0 – 6.5 g/dL000 Grade 4 event, n ALT > 20x ULN000 AST > 20x ULN000 Alkaline Phosphatase > 20x ULN000 Total bilirubin > 10x ULN000 Hemoglobin < 6.5 g/dL000 Kowdley K, et al. 48th EASL; Amsterdam, Netherlands; April 24-28, Abst. 3. Note: Value must also be more extreme than the baseline value 3 DAAs + RBV

E1CE2p7NS2NS3NS4ANS4BNS5ANS5B Viral targets Host targets HCV Drugs in Development in All Oral Regimens * *On clinical hold, Idenix press release; **On clinical hold, Novartis press release NS3NS5ANS5BCyclophilin A Faldaprevir non-nucleoside analogue BI ,

SOUND-C2: SVR12 by HCV GT-1 subtype and IL28B genotype Zeuzem et al., J Hepatol 2012;56(Suppl.2):S45 (Abstract 101) 1a non-CC1a CC1b non-CC1b CC 6/87/2210/1131/37 SVR12 (%) Faldaprevir 120 mg QD, deleobuvir 600 mg BID and RBV for 28 weeks:

Adverse Events and discontinuations Number (%) of patients TID16W (n=81) TID28W (n=80) TID40W (n=77) BID28W (n=78) TID28W, no RBV (n=46) D/C due to AEs4 ( 4.9)10 ( 12.5)19 ( 24.7)6 ( 7.7)5 ( 10.9) Photosensitivity AEs Moderate4 (5)3 (4)6 (8)00 Severe01 (1)2 (3)00 Jaundice AEs Moderate2 (3)6 (8)3 (4)2 (3)0 Severe00000 Rash AEs Moderate2 (3) 04 (9) Severe1 (1)0 00 Vomiting AEs Moderate4 (5)10 (13)3 (4) 2 (4) ALT/GPT Grade 31 (1)002 (3)0 Bilirubin Grade 333 (41)15 (19)20 (26) 6 (13) Grade 44 (5)10 (13)5 (6)10 (13)0

E1CE2p7NS2NS3NS4ANS4BNS5ANS5B Viral targets Host targets HCV Drugs in Development in All Oral Regimens * *On clinical hold, Idenix press release; **On clinical hold, Novartis press release NS3NS5ANS5BCyclophilin A Ledipasvir (GS-5885) Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Sofosbuvir Non-Nucs GS-9669

ELECTRON Study: Sofosbuvir + Ledipasvir (NS5A )or GS (NonN NS5B) + RBV: 12 week Regimens in GT1 non cirrhotic SOF + RBVSOF + LDV + RBVSOF + GS RBV Naïve (n=25) Null (n=10) Naïve (n=25) Null (n=9) Naïve (n=25) Null (n=10) Week 18/25 (32)1/10 (10)11/25 (44)0/9 (0)3/25 (12)0/10 (0) Week 217/25 (68)7/10 (70)22/25 (88)4/9 (44)15/25 (60)2/10 (20) Week 425/25 (100)10/10 (100)25/25 (100)8/9 (89)23/25 (92)10/10 (100) EOT25/25 (100)10/10 (100)25/25 (100)9/9 (100)25/25 (100)10/10 (100) SVR422/25 (88)1/10 (10)25/25 (100)9/9 (100)23/25 (92)10/10 (100) SVR1221/25 (84)1/10 (10)25/25 (100) † 9/9 (100)23/25 (92)3/3 Patients with HCV RNA <LOD* over time, n/N (%) Gane E, et al. 48th EASL; Amsterdam, Netherlands; April 24-28, Abst. 14. * Analyzed by TaqMan® HCV Test 2.0 with limit of detection (LOD) of 15 IU/mL. † Includes 1 patient who stopped all treatment due to a serious adverse event (AE) at Week 8; this patient subsequently achieved SVR12. EOT, end of treatment; SVR4, sustained virologic response 4 weeks after EOT.

Genotype 2Genotype 3 E. Gane et al, Abstract 5. EASL, April 2013; Lawitz et al., N Engl J Med DOI: /NEJMoa FISSION study SOF+RBV 12 wks SVR12 results by Genotype and Fibrosis

6/105/26 FUSION Study: Treatment-experienced, Genotype 2 or 3 Patients SVR12 by HCV Genotype/Cirrhosis SVR12 (Percentage) 25/267/923/2314/3814/2325/40 No cirrhosis SOF + RBV 12 weeks SOF + RBV 16 weeks No cirrhosisCirrhosis GT 2GT 3 Nelson D, et al. 48th EASL; Amsterdam, Netherlands; April 24-28, Abst. 6. GT3= 62%, Relapse 75%

POSITRON Study: Interferon Ineligible/Intolerant Genotype 2 or 3 Patients SVR12 by Cirrhosis Status GT 2GT 3 SVR12 (Percentage) 85/9216/1757/843/14 No cirrhosisCirrhosis Jacobson I, et al. 48th EASL; Amsterdam, Netherlands; April 24-28, Abst. 61.

Futuro Tratamiento hepatitis C Tratamiento oral Actividad antiviral en todos los genotipos Duracion más corta Problablemente sin ribavirina Seguridad y Eficacia excelente No Resistencias Amplia Aplicabilidad: Coinfeccion, Cirrosis descompensada Trasplantados, Enfermedad renal terminal