Knowledge for business TNO Human Factors User experience sampling Jan Willem Streefkerk, M.Sc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 14: Usability testing and field studies
Advertisements

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH IN MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING RANJANI KRISHNAN HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL & MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY 2008.
Methodology and Explanation XX50125 Lecture 1: Part I. Introduction to Evaluation Methods Part 2. Experiments Dr. Danaë Stanton Fraser.
AFFECT IN WEB INTERFACE: A Study of the Impacts of Web page Visual Complexity and Order By: Nesma Sabrah.
Alina Pommeranz, MSc in Interactive System Engineering supervised by Dr. ir. Pascal Wiggers and Prof. Dr. Catholijn M. Jonker.
Agent-Based Architecture for Intelligence and Collaboration in Virtual Learning Environments Punyanuch Borwarnginn 5 August 2013.
The role of executive function and attachment styles on autobiographical memories of relationships Sezin Oner & Sami Gulgoz Koc University Istanbul.Turkey.
User Interfaces 4 BTECH: IT WIKI PAGE:
1 User experience User interfaces Jaana Holvikivi Metropolia.
Robin L. Donaldson May 5, 2010 Prospectus Defense Florida State University College of Communication and Information.
Web Search Results Visualization: Evaluation of Two Semantic Search Engines Kalliopi Kontiza, Antonis Bikakis,
1 What is usable is usable Master Thesis Presentation Marijn Kampf 26 august :15 – 16:15.
At What Cost Pervasive? A social computing view of mobile computing systems By: D.C.Dryer, C. Eisbach, and W.S. Ark IBM Systems Journal, online Presentation.
Knowledge for business Lost in Ambient Intelligence Jasper Lindenberg +31 (0)
Nanja Smets Evaluation in Virtual Environmen 21 May 2008.
Chapter 14: Usability testing and field studies. Usability Testing Emphasizes the property of being usable Key Components –User Pre-Test –User Test –User.
Services Quality Dimensions of Internet Retailing: An Exploratory Analysis By: Zhilin Yang Robin T. Peterson Shaohan Cai Presented by: Isabel Mosqueda.
Empirical Usability Testing in a Component-Based Environment: Improving Test Efficiency with Component-Specific Usability Measures Willem-Paul Brinkman.
Based on a fine paper byPhilippe Zimmermann
Company LOGO B2C E-commerce Web Site Quality: an Empirical Examination (Cao, et al) Article overview presented by: Karen Bray Emilie Martin Trung (John)
From Controlled to Natural Settings
Usability and Evaluation Dov Te’eni. Figure ‎ 7-2: Attitudes, use, performance and satisfaction AttitudesUsePerformance Satisfaction Perceived usability.
INTRODUCTION. Concepts HCI, CHI Usability User-centered Design (UCD) An approach to design (software, Web, other) that involves the user Interaction Design.
The U in Usability Testing Intro to HCI Week 3. Today’s Agenda 1.MUSIQ 2.Lecture 3.Homework 4.Next Challenges.
Usability Evaluation of Digital Libraries Stacey Greenaway Submitted to University of Wolverhampton module Dec 15 th 2006.
1 What happens if you offer a mobile option to your web panel? Results from a pilot study comparing a desktop and mobile device survey Vera Toepoel (Utrecht.
Chapter 14: Usability testing and field studies
“What a Small World!” ---NaviChat Team 4: Andrew Puchle Arthur Liu Yi-Jen Lai.
Human Factor Evaluation for Marine Education by using Neuroscience Tools N. Νikitakos D. Papachristos Professor Ph.d. candidate Dept. Shipping, Trade and.
Ch 14. Testing & modeling users
Usability. Definition of Usability Usability is a quality attribute that assesses how easy user interfaces are to use. The word "usability" also refers.
This slide presentation is Confidential and Proprietary to ProtoTest LLC.
Usability testing. Goals & questions focus on how well users perform tasks with the product. – typical users – doing typical tasks. Comparison of products.
Evaluation approaches Text p Text p
Critical Review on a Working Paper : Effects of background music, voice cues, earcons and gender on psychological ratings and heart rates during product.
SWE 4324 UCD - WEB A FINAL VERSION Evaluation of a feature Note about Webs – Webs are the interactive class you must participate for a satisfactory understanding.
Testing & modeling users. The aims Describe how to do user testing. Discuss the differences between user testing, usability testing and research experiments.
Emotional Control and IZOF.
Chapter 13 The Subjective and Physiological Nature of Emotions.
IT 와 인간의 만남 KAIST 지식서비스공학과 Experimental Research KSE966/986 Seminar Uichin Lee Sept. 21, 2012.
Neurobiological Research in Prevention Science Lisa Gatzke-Kopp, Ph.D.
Welcome to the Usability Center Tour Since 1995, the Usability Center has been a learning environment that supports and educates in the process of usability.
©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 2 Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction Chapter 2- Experimental Research.
Working Memory and Learning Underlying Website Structure
Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning Presenter: Jenny Tseng Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: April 12, 2008 Liaw, S., Huang, H.,
TNO Defence, Security and Safety Human Factors Usability engineering for mobile maps Rosemarijn Looije Guido te Brake Mark Neerincx.
Consistency: A Factor that Links the Usability of Individual Interaction Components Together Willem-Paul Brinkman Brunel University Reinder Haakma Philips.
Experiment 2: N = Factor Repeated Measures ANCOVA  Span Factor Score Covariate: Shortened Complex Span Tasks. 8  Conditions: Negative-Arousing.
MERIL: On-Site Accessibility Assessments Research Conducted By: Jenny Stanhope and Todd Ries.
Introduction to System Evaluation IS 588 Dania Bilal & Lorraine Normore Spring 2007.
Expectation Confirmation Theory 期望確認理論
Reading, Processing and Interacting with Hypertext on the Web
CK121 Psychology & Computing BA (Hons)
Web-Based Virtual Learning Environments:
Protective Effects of Positive Emotions
Interaction qualities
Impacts of workload on trust in imperfect automated systems
Project Red Talon Assistant/
HCI in the curriculum The human The computer The interaction
From Controlled to Natural Settings
Toward a Reliable Evaluation of Mixed-Initiative Systems
The User Interface Design Process
Indented Tree or Graph? A Usability Study of Ontology Visualization Techniques in the Context of Class Mapping Evaluation 本体可视化技术在类型匹配评估中的可用性研究 Qingxia.
Human Computer Interaction
From Controlled to Natural Settings
Testing & modeling users
Measuring and Improving the Quality of Haptic-Audio-Visual Experience
Introduction to Human Computer Interaction
Professional Development Session: Development of online Fun learning games for Classroom Assessments in Chemistry.
Presentation transcript:

Knowledge for business TNO Human Factors User experience sampling Jan Willem Streefkerk, M.Sc.

2005 Mark A. Neerincx and Jan Willem Streefkerk (2003). Interacting in Desktop and Mobile Context: Emotion, Trust and Task Performance. Proceedings of EUSAI 2003, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. Springer-Verlag. 2 User experience Usability: not only performance or process measures What is user experience? “Satisfaction” = classical measure “Fun” “Emotion” “Trust” “Frustration” Dependent on task context device

2005 Mark A. Neerincx and Jan Willem Streefkerk (2003). Interacting in Desktop and Mobile Context: Emotion, Trust and Task Performance. Proceedings of EUSAI 2003, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. Springer-Verlag. 3 PALS project Personal Assistant for onLine Services Research questions: TrustEmotional state PerformanceDevice

2005 Mark A. Neerincx and Jan Willem Streefkerk (2003). Interacting in Desktop and Mobile Context: Emotion, Trust and Task Performance. Proceedings of EUSAI 2003, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. Springer-Verlag. 4 Research model Dimensions of emotion Arousal (the “quantity”): High or low Valence (the “quality”): Positive or negative Example: Anger: high arousal, negative valence Trust based on predictable, competent system behavior servitude: system serves the user (Muir, 1994)

2005 Mark A. Neerincx and Jan Willem Streefkerk (2003). Interacting in Desktop and Mobile Context: Emotion, Trust and Task Performance. Proceedings of EUSAI 2003, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. Springer-Verlag. 5 Method Eliciting emotions by watching short films with music Tasks retrieving information (financial, entertainment) transactions (buying stocks) Device Compaq iPaq handheld Sony Vaio Laptop

2005 Mark A. Neerincx and Jan Willem Streefkerk (2003). Interacting in Desktop and Mobile Context: Emotion, Trust and Task Performance. Proceedings of EUSAI 2003, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. Springer-Verlag. 6 Dependent variables Emotional state (= manipulation check) Physiological measures (HR, HRV) Self Assessment Manikin: arousal & valence Trust questionnaire Effectiveness & Efficiency time on task errors Mental Effort Rating Scale Mental Effort (BSMI)

2005 Mark A. Neerincx and Jan Willem Streefkerk (2003). Interacting in Desktop and Mobile Context: Emotion, Trust and Task Performance. Proceedings of EUSAI 2003, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. Springer-Verlag. 7 Results I Manipulation not (entirely) successful. No main effects of emotional state. Performance with mobile device was worse after high arousal, positive valence condition. Device: Performance worse and mental effort higher for mobile device. Trust in web service lower when using mobile device.

2005 Mark A. Neerincx and Jan Willem Streefkerk (2003). Interacting in Desktop and Mobile Context: Emotion, Trust and Task Performance. Proceedings of EUSAI 2003, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. Springer-Verlag. 8 Results II Relation between trust and performance when performance went well, trust in web service was higher. Trust in device: mobile device vs. laptop pre vs. post

2005 Mark A. Neerincx and Jan Willem Streefkerk (2003). Interacting in Desktop and Mobile Context: Emotion, Trust and Task Performance. Proceedings of EUSAI 2003, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. Springer-Verlag. 9 Conclusions Difficult to elicit emotional responses in test participants Trust in device & trust in website User experience influences HCI Thank you for your attention J.W. Streefkerk – TNO Human Factors