Southeastern Region Transmission Planning 2009 SERTP Economic Studies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Central California Clean Energy Transmission Project PCC Meeting Vancouver, BC October 24, 2007.
Advertisements

NREL Wind Integration Workshop By Electric Power Systems, Inc. June 28-29, 2010.
Big Stone II Study Update SPG Meeting October 19, 2006.
March 26, 2014 Transmission Coordination and Planning Committee 2014 Q1 Stakeholder Meeting.
October 16, 2009 RPG Meeting ERCOT RPG Project Review Update Jeff Billo.
Power Grid Reinforcement Fall Presentation Team 9b: – Jon Brown – Kyle Reininger – Alan Myers – Karl Homburg – Dan Sinnott.
SPP Priority Projects Nebraska Area FCITC Sensitivity Analysis.
Regional Planning Group Project
Ola 230 / 115 kV Project 2010 ITS-1. North Americus Series Reactors 2010 ITS-2a.
Northwest Quadrant Joint Security Study Southern Company Headquarters Birmingham, Alabama August 12, 2002 Presented by Saeed Arabi.
Southeastern Region Transmission Planning Preliminary 2010 Base Case Assumptions.
Houston Import Evaluation Cross Texas Transmission & Garland Power & Light ERCOT RPG Meeting August 27th, 2013.
Houston Region Import Capacity Project August 27, 2013 Regional Planning Group Meeting.
Navarro to Houston Presentation to ERCOT RPG August 27, 2013.
NOVEMBER 11, 2014 PUBLIC VERSION Maine 2014 Outage Coordination CONTAINS CRITICAL ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE INFORMATION – DO NOT RELEASE.
2001 South First Street Champaign, Illinois (217) Davis Power Consultants Strategic Location of Renewable Generation Based on Grid Reliability.
IMPERIAL VALLEY CONFERENCE July 21, SOLICITATION RENEWABLES PORTFOLIO STANDARD.
SPP.org 1. 2 Aggregate Transmission Service Study (ATSS)
Transmission planning in Vermont Past, present and future Docket 7081 workshop By Dean LaForest 9/19/05.
111 TAG Meeting June 8, 2015 Teleconference / Webinar FINAL.
FRCC Seasonal Transmission Assessment & Operational Seasonal Study Winter 2012.
George Bartlett Director, Transmission Operations Economic Transmission Projects Entergy Transmission Planning Summit New Orleans, LA July 8, 2004.
ICT Strategic Transmission Plan (ISTEP) Review and Status Update Entergy Transmission Summit July 29, 2008 Astor Crown Plaza New Orleans, Louisiana Douglas.
Report on the NCTPC 2006 Collaborative Transmission Plan Mark Byrd, Manager – Transmission Planning Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc January 25, 2007.
Increasing Access to the Grid NIPPC September 8, 2005 Brian Silverstein VP, Operations and Planning Bonneville Power Administration.
Southeastern Region Transmission Planning 2008 / 09 SIRPP Economic Study Results.
2006 Reliability Study Scope Name Date. DRAFT 2 Purpose of Study Assess the PEC and Duke transmission systems’ reliability Develop a single reliability.
1 Transmission Advisory Group Meeting January 25, 2007 Raleigh, NC.
Black Sea Regional Transmission Planning Project By Predrag Mikša EKC - Electricity Coordinating Center Istanbul, March 2011.
Rocky Mountain Power Five Year Study Findings and Kick Off Meeting December 2013.
1 WMS Report To TAC September In Brief Four Working Group Reports Four Working Group Reports One Task Force Report One Task Force Report Three.
West to North CSC Location Scenario 3b WMS August 20, 2008.
Application and Implementation of State Estimator at Idaho Power Company S. Kincic and M. Papic.
VRT Study Update José Conto ERCOT System Planning.
Proposed North – South Congestion Mitigation Plan Luminant Energy July 2008.
SM April Peak Week Operations Review Presentation to ISO Business Issues Committee May 22, 2002.
Presentation to House Regulated Industries Committee Chairman Phil King Trip Doggett Chief Operating Officer The Electric Reliability Council of Texas.
MISO Northwest Exploratory Study Presented to National Wind Coordinating Committee Participants in study – MISO, Various utilities in Minnesota, North.
SPP.org 1. Southeastern Inter-Regional Planning Update (SIRPP) Entergy Transmission Summit August 11, 2009 Astor Crown Plaza New Orleans, Louisiana.
East Texas Export Limit ERCOT Operations Planning ERCOT Market Presentation
1 Stability Issues in Entergy System Entergy Transmission Planning Summit New Orleans, LA July 10, 2003.
Current Export Initiatives Jerry Mossing Exports Workshop February, 16,2006, Metropolitan Center, Calgary.
Southwest Renewable Energy Transmission Conference May 21, 2010 This report contains transmission planning data that may be conceptual in nature and is.
OFFSHORE WIND CONNECTION & COSTS Mary Doswell Alternative Energy Solutions December 7 th, 2010.
SPP.org 1. Status Update for Reliability and Economic Assessments Stakeholder Meeting September 16, 2008 Austin, TX.
SPP.org 1. Final Report: Reliability and Economic Assessments Stakeholder Meeting December 1, 2008 Austin, TX.
SPP.org 1. Status Update for Reliability and Economic Assessments Stakeholder Meeting June 20 th, 2008 Austin, TX.
TRANSMISSION INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS — Current Projects — The Center for the New West “ The Sun Valley Energy Roundtables 2006” November 30 – December.
ESI Alternate Economic Study Process E-RSC Meeting October 21, 2010.
Coordinated Planning Concept (For Discussion Only) revised 11/30/04 07/01/04.
September 1, 2011 TAC Lower Rio Grande Valley Regional Planning Group Project Jeff Billo Manager, Mid-Term Planning.
Update on the North Carolina Transmission Planning Collaborative January 30, 2007 For the North Carolina Utilities Commission and the North Carolina Public.
May14, 2010 RPG Meeting Houston Import Study Update Jeff Billo.
THE POWER OF POSSIBILITY AESO current limits for Alberta-BC transfers Jeff Palermo – KEMA/AESO.
2006 Reliability Study James Manning Bryan Guy May 12, 2006.
1 Entergy Arkansas, Inc. Proposed Transmission Projects Entergy Transmission Planning Summit New Orleans, LA July 29, 2008.
1 Entergy Arkansas, Inc. Proposed Transmission Projects Entergy Transmission Planning Summit New Orleans, LA July 31, 2007.
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY © 2013 New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. EIPC Roll-Up Powerflow Model Zach Smith Director,
ERCOT – LP&L Study Status Update For Regional Planning Group Ben Richardson March 22, 2016.
2016 RTP Update November, 2016 RPG Meeting.
Barrilla Junction Area Transmission Improvements Project
Compliance Report to ERCOT TAC February 2007
ISO New England System R&D Needs
I-5 Corridor Reinforcement Project
Transmission and Sub-Transmission Network India – Present and Future Rajesh Suri GE (T&D) India Ltd 8 November 2018.
TVA RC 2017 Summer Outlook TVA RC July 27, 2017.
Southeastern Regional Transmission Planning Process
Excelsior Energy’s Mesaba Energy Project
Big Stone II Study Update
Presentation transcript:

Southeastern Region Transmission Planning 2009 SERTP Economic Studies

2009 SERTP Economic Planning Studies

2009 SERTP Five Economic Planning Studies  North Georgia to FRCC 650 MW650 MW  SCE&G to Georgia 1000 MW1000 MW  Gulfport, MS to Georgia 1000 MW1000 MW  Washington County, GA to Georgia 5000 MW5000 MW  Savannah, GA to Southern Balancing Authority 400 MW Summer Peak400 MW Summer Peak 1000 MW Off Peak1000 MW Off Peak

2009 SERTP Power Flow Cases Utilized  Study year: 2014  Load Flow Cases: 2009 Series Version 2A2009 Series Version 2A Summer Peak with 2250 MW Interchange to FRCC, 3600 MW to FRCC, and ShoulderSummer Peak with 2250 MW Interchange to FRCC, 3600 MW to FRCC, and Shoulder

2009 SERTP Five Economic Planning Studies  Final Report Components: Thermal AnalysisThermal Analysis DC contingency analysis to attain monitored/contingency pairs with Siemens PSS MUSTDC contingency analysis to attain monitored/contingency pairs with Siemens PSS MUST AC verified with Siemens PTI PSS/EAC verified with Siemens PTI PSS/E Interface Transfer Capability ImpactsInterface Transfer Capability Impacts Stability ImpactsStability Impacts Potential SolutionsPotential Solutions Transmission Projects and Cost EstimatesTransmission Projects and Cost Estimates

2009 SERTP The following information does not represent a commitment to proceed with the recommended enhancements nor implies that the recommended enhancements could be implemented by the study date of 2014.The following information does not represent a commitment to proceed with the recommended enhancements nor implies that the recommended enhancements could be implemented by the study date of These potential solutions only address constraints identified within the Southern Balancing Area that are associated with the proposed transfers. Other Balancing Areas were not monitored which could result in additional limitations and required system enhancements.

North Georgia toFRCC 650 MW

North Georgia to FRCC: 650 MW Transfer Type: Generation to LoadTransfer Type: Generation to Load Source: 500 kV, Murray County, GASource: 500 kV, Murray County, GA Sink: 650 MW of FRCC load scaled upSink: 650 MW of FRCC load scaled up 488 MW Florida Power & Light488 MW Florida Power & Light 162 MW Progress Energy Florida162 MW Progress Energy Florida Source Sink

North Georgia to FRCC: 650 MW Transfer Type: Generation to LoadTransfer Type: Generation to Load Source: 500 kV, Murray County, GASource: 500 kV, Murray County, GA Sink: 650 MW of FRCC load scaled upSink: 650 MW of FRCC load scaled up 488 MW Florida Power & Light488 MW Florida Power & Light 162 MW Progress Energy Florida162 MW Progress Energy Florida 650 MW

North Georgia to FRCC: 650 MW Transmission System Impacts  Thermal Constraints Identified: One (1) 500kV LineOne (1) 500kV Line One (1) 230 kV LineOne (1) 230 kV Line Six (6) 115 kV LinesSix (6) 115 kV Lines  Interface Constraints Identified: One (1) 500 / 230 kV TransformerOne (1) 500 / 230 kV Transformer One (1) 230 kV LineOne (1) 230 kV Line  Stability Constraints Identified: None IdentifiedNone Identified

Thermal Constraints

Interface Constraints

North Georgia to FRCC: 650 MW 1 Limiting element is within FRCC Item Potential Project Cost P1 North Americus – North Tifton 115 kV TL $1,350,000 P2 Douglas – Kettle Creek 115 kV TL $900,000 P3 Thalmann – Duval 500 kV TL N/A 1 P4 Lloyd Shoals – South Griffin 115 kV TL $500,000 P5 Barneyville – Pine Grove 115 kV TL $250,000 P6 Mitchell – Moultrie 115 kV TL $3,000,000 P7 Jasper – Pine Grove 115 kV TL $11,000,000 I1 North Tifton 500 / 230 kV Substation $36,000,000 I2 Woodstock 230 kV Substation $100,000 Total Cost: $53,100,000 Transmission Project Estimates

Potential Enhancements P1 P6 P2 P5 P7

Potential Enhancements I1

Potential Enhancements I2

SCE&GtoGeorgia 1000 MW

SCE&G to Georgia: 1000 MW Transfer Type: Load to GenerationTransfer Type: Load to Generation Source: SCE&G LoadSource: SCE&G Load Sink: Georgia GenerationSink: Georgia Generation Source Sink

SCE&G to Georgia: 1000 MW Transmission System Impacts  Thermal Constraints Identified: One (1) 230 / 115 kV TransformerOne (1) 230 / 115 kV Transformer One (1) 115 kV LineOne (1) 115 kV Line  Interface Constraints Identified: One (1) 500 / 230 kV TransformerOne (1) 500 / 230 kV Transformer Two (2) 230 kV LinesTwo (2) 230 kV Lines One (1) 230 / 115 kV TransformerOne (1) 230 / 115 kV Transformer Four (4) 115 kV LinesFour (4) 115 kV Lines  Stability Constraints Identified: None IdentifiedNone Identified

Thermal Constraints CENTER

Interface Constraints

SCE&G to Georgia: 1000 MW Item Potential Project Cost P1 Avalon Junction – Bio 115 kV TL $3,800,000 P2 Gainesville #2 115 kV Substation $200,000 I1 Athena – Hartwell 230 kV TL $44,000,000 I2 Center Primary 230 kV Substation $300,000 Athena 230 kV Substation Total Cost: $48,300,000 Transmission Project Estimates

SCE&G to Georgia: 1000 MW Item Potential Project Cost P1 Avalon Junction – Bio 115 kV TL $3,800,000 P2 Gainesville #2 115 kV Substation $200,000 I1 Athena – Hartwell 230 kV TL 1 $44,000,000 I2 Center Primary 230 kV Substation $300,000 Athena 230 kV Substation Total Cost: $44,500,000 Transmission Project Estimates 1 Project I1 alleviates the need for Project P1

Potential Enhancements CENTER P1 P2

Potential Enhancements I1 I2 P1 P2

Gulfport, MS toGeorgia 1000 MW

Source Sink Gulfport, MS to Georgia: 1000 MW Transfer Type: Generation to GenerationTransfer Type: Generation to Generation Source: 500 kV, Harrison County, MSSource: 500 kV, Harrison County, MS Sink: Georgia GenerationSink: Georgia Generation

Gulfport, MS to Georgia: 1000 MW Transfer Type: Generation to GenerationTransfer Type: Generation to Generation Source: 500 kV, Harrison County, MSSource: 500 kV, Harrison County, MS Sink: Georgia GenerationSink: Georgia Generation 1000 MW

Stability Enhancements P1

Gulfport, MS to Georgia: 1000 MW Transmission System Impacts  Thermal Constraints Identified 1 : Six (6) 230 kV LinesSix (6) 230 kV Lines Nine (9) 115 kV LinesNine (9) 115 kV Lines  Interface Constraints Identified 2 : Two (2) 230 kV LinesTwo (2) 230 kV Lines 1 Constraints remaining after implementing stability enhancement 2 Constraints remaining after implementing all thermal enhancements

Gulfport, MS to Georgia: 1000 MW Transmission System Impacts Continued  Stability Constraints Identified: With the additional transfer of 1000 MW from Gulfport, MS to the Georgia ITS, a fault on the Daniel – McKnight 500 kV transmission line could result in all of the units within the local area to pull out of synchronism with the rest of the Eastern Interconnect.With the additional transfer of 1000 MW from Gulfport, MS to the Georgia ITS, a fault on the Daniel – McKnight 500 kV transmission line could result in all of the units within the local area to pull out of synchronism with the rest of the Eastern Interconnect.

Constraints After Stability Enhancements

Interface Constraints

Gulfport, MS to Georgia: 1000 MW Item Potential Project Cost P1 Daniel – Snowdoun 500 kV TL $340,000,000 P2 Daniel – Bennett 230 kV TL $23,000,000 P3 Barry - Crist 230 kV TL $2,200,000 P4 South Montgomery – Union Spring 115 kV TL $3,500,000 P5 Pike County – Snowdoun 230 kV TL $18,300,000 P6 Farley – South Bainbridge 230 kV TL $2,500,000 P7 Anniston – Bynum 230 kV TL $10,000,000 P8 Bull Creek – Victory Drive 115 kV TL $2,500,000 P9 Crooked Creek – Martin Dam 115 kV TL $8,500,000 P10 Madison Park – Thurlow Dam 115 kV TL $750,000 ……Continued…… Transmission Project Estimates

Gulfport, MS to Georgia: 1000 MW Item Potential Project Cost …...Continued……. P11 South Bainbridge 230 kV Substation $20,000,000 P12 Bainbridge Area 115 kV Network Enhancements $5,000,000 I1 Bennett – North Theodore 230 kV TL $760,000 I2 Goat Rock – Fortson 230 kV TL $20,000,000 Transmission Project Estimates Total Cost: $457,010,000

Potential Enhancements P1 P2 P3 P6 P9 P5 P8 P4 P10 P11 P12 I1

Potential Enhancements I2

Washington County toGeorgia 5000 MW

Source Sink Washington Co. to Georgia: 5000 MW Transfer Type: Generation to GenerationTransfer Type: Generation to Generation Source: Washington County, GASource: Washington County, GA Sink: Georgia GenerationSink: Georgia Generation

Washington Co. to Georgia: 5000 MW Transfer Type: Generation to GenerationTransfer Type: Generation to Generation Source: Washington County, GASource: Washington County, GA Sink: Georgia GenerationSink: Georgia Generation 5000 MW

Washington Co. to Georgia: 5000 MW Transmission System Impacts  Thermal Constraints Identified: Ten (10) 500 kV LinesTen (10) 500 kV Lines Four (4) 500 / 230 kV TransformersFour (4) 500 / 230 kV Transformers Thirty (30) 230 kV LinesThirty (30) 230 kV Lines Six (6) 230kV / 115 kV TransformersSix (6) 230kV / 115 kV Transformers Twenty-three (23) 115 kV LinesTwenty-three (23) 115 kV Lines  Interface Constraints Identified: Three (3) 230 kV LinesThree (3) 230 kV Lines  Stability Constraints Identified: None IdentifiedNone Identified

Thermal Constraints

Potential Enhancements (P1) P1

Thermal Constraints After P1

Potential Enhancements (P1 through P3) P3 P2 P1

Thermal Constraints After P3

Interface Constraints

Washington Co. to Georgia: 5000 MW Item Potential Project Cost P1 1 Yr. Advancement of Bethabara 230 / 115 kV Project from 2015 $3,200,000 1 Yr. Advancement of East Walton 500 / 230 kV Project from 2015 $13,300,000 P2 East Walton – South Hall 500 kV TL $54,500,000 P3 Rockville – ECO2 500 kV TL $81,700,000 P4 3 Yr. Advancement of the Middlefork – Thomson 500 kV TL $47,300,000 P5 Wilson 230 kV Substation $300,000 P6 Vogtle 500 / 230 kV Substation $35,300,000 P7 Waynesboro 230 / 115 kV Substation $50,000 P8 Jesup – Ludowici Primary 115 kV TL $1,750,000 ……Continued…… Transmission Project Estimates

Washington Co. to Georgia: 5000 MW Item Potential Project Cost ……Continued…… I1 Wadley Primary – Waynesboro Primary 230 kV TL $500,000 I2 Dum Jon – Goshen 230 kV TL $500,000 I3 Goat Rock – Fortson 230 kV TL $20,000,000 Total Cost: $258,400,000 Transmission Project Estimates

Potential Enhancements (P1 through P8) P4 P5 P6 P7 P3 P2 P1

Potential Enhancements I1 I2

Potential Enhancements I3

Savannah, GA to Southern Balancing Authority 400 MW – Summer Peak 1000 MW – Off Peak

Source Sink Savannah, GA to Southern Balancing Authority Transfer Type: Generation to GenerationTransfer Type: Generation to Generation Source: Savannah, GASource: Savannah, GA Sink: Southern Balancing AuthoritySink: Southern Balancing Authority

Savannah, GA to Southern Balancing Authority Transfer Type: Generation to GenerationTransfer Type: Generation to Generation Source: Savannah, GASource: Savannah, GA Sink: Southern Balancing AuthoritySink: Southern Balancing Authority 400 MW Summer 1000 MW Off Peak

Savannah, GA to SBA 400 MW Summer Peak Transmission System Impacts  Constraints Identified: Two (2) 230kV LinesTwo (2) 230kV Lines One (1) 115kV LineOne (1) 115kV Line  Interface Constraints Identified: None IdentifiedNone Identified  Stability Constraints Identified: None IdentifiedNone Identified

Thermal Constraints

Savannah, GA to SBA 400 MW Summer Peak Item Potential Project Cost P1 1 Yr. Advancement of the Bethabara 230/115kV Project from 2015 $3,200,000 1 Yr. Advancement of the East Walton 500/230 kV Project from 2015 $13,300,000 P2 Athena – Union Point 115kV TL $11,300,000 Total Cost: $27,800,000 Transmission Project Estimates

Potential Enhancements P2 P1

Savannah, GA to SBA 1000 MW Off Peak Transmission System Impacts  Thermal Constraints Identified: One (1) 115kV LineOne (1) 115kV Line  Interface Constraints Identified: None IdentifiedNone Identified  Stability Constraints Identified: None IdentifiedNone Identified

Thermal Constraints

Savannah, GA to SBA 1000 MW Off Peak Item Potential Project Cost P1 McIntosh – Yemassee 115kV TL $675,000 Total Cost: $675,000 Transmission Project Estimates

Potential Enhancements P1

2009 SERTP Project Cost Summary  North Georgia to FRCC $53,100,000$53,100,000  SCE&G to Georgia $44,500,000$44,500,000  Gulfport, MS to Georgia $457,010,000$457,010,000  Washington County to Georgia $258,400,000$258,400,000  Savannah, GA to Southern Balancing Authority $28,475,000$28,475,000 $27,800,000 for Summer Peak$27,800,000 for Summer Peak $675,000 for Off Peak$675,000 for Off Peak

Questions?