SCEC/ITR All-Hands Meeting October 11, 2002 Introduction by Tom Jordan.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Experiences in Middleware Deployment: Teach a man to fish… Mary Fran Yafchak NMI Integration Testbed Manager SURA IT Program Coordinator.

Advertisements

The SCEC Community Stress Model (CSM) Project Jeanne Hardebeck USGS, Menlo Park, CA.

Edward (Ned) Field USGS, Pasadena plus Tom Jordan, Nitin Gupta, Vipin Gupta, Phil Maechling, Allin Cornell, Ken Campbell, Sid Hellman, & Steve Rock OpenSHA.

1 USC INFORMATION SCIENCES INSTITUTE Modeling and Using Simulation Code for SCEC/IT Yolanda Gil Varun Ratnakar Norm Tubman USC/Information Sciences Institute.

10/09/2007CIG/SPICE/IRIS/USAF1 Broadband Ground Motion Simulations for a Mw 7.8 Southern San Andreas Earthquake: ShakeOut Robert W. Graves (URS Corporation)

March 25-27, 2002EarthScope IT Workshop USArray Breakout Group The USArray system: Sensor  Collection point Collection point  Archive Archive  User.

1 High Performance Computing at SCEC Scott Callaghan Southern California Earthquake Center University of Southern California.

USCISIUSCISI SCEC Ontology Development Tom Russ Hans Chalupsky, Stefan Decker, Yolanda Gil, Jihie Kim, Varun Ratnakar University of Southern California.

March 7, 2008NGA-East 2nd Workshop1 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN STRONG MOTION SIMULATIONS FOR CEUS Paul Somerville and Robert Graves URS Pasadena MOTIVATION:

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/021 Numerical Modeling Using Finite Difference Techniques.

11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop1 NUMERICAL GROUND MOTION SIMULATIONS: ASSUMPTIONS, VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION Earthquake Source Velocity Structure.

Southern California Earthquake Center Toward a Collaboratory for System-Level Earthquake Science Tom Jordan Southern California Earthquake Center University.

EPIC Web 3.0 Demonstration United States Department of Agriculture Office of the Chief Financial Officer National Finance Center June 26, 2008.

Jeroen Tromp Computational Seismology. Governing Equations Equation of motion: Boundary condition: Initial conditions: Earthquake source: Constitutive.

1 USC INFORMATION SCIENCES INSTITUTE Modeling and Using Simulation Code for SCEC/IT Yolanda Gil Jihie Kim Varun Ratnakar Marc Spraragen USC/Information.

The Grid is a complex, distributed and heterogeneous execution environment. Running applications requires the knowledge of many grid services: users need.

SCEC Information Technology Overview for 2012 Philip J. Maechling Information Technology Architect Southern California Earthquake Center SCEC Board of.

10/03/ An Overview of the Southern California Earthquake Center Thomas H. Jordan Director.

ShakeOut Earthquake Scenario Ground Motions Kenneth W. Hudnut U. S. Geological Survey Earthquake Research Affiliates Pasadena, California 9 May 2008 U.S.

VISUALIZING EARTHQUAKE SIMULATION DATA Amit Chourasia 1, Steve Cutchin 1, Alex DeCastro 1, Geoffrey Ely 2 1 San Diego Supercomputer Center 2 Scripps Institute.

1 SCEC Broadband Platform Development Using USC HPCC Philip Maechling 12 Nov 2012.

1.UCERF3 development (Field/Milner) 2.Broadband Platform development (Silva/Goulet/Somerville and others) 3.CVM development to support higher frequencies.

Grids USC Case Study Copyright Shelley Henderson This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to.

Southern California Earthquake Center - SCEC SCEC/CME Tom Jordan (USC) Bernard Minster (SIO) Carl Kesselman (ISI) Reagan Moore (SDSC) Phil Maechling (USC)

Simulations of Large Earthquakes on the Southern San Andreas Fault Amit Chourasia Visualization Scientist San Diego Supercomputer Center Presented to:

RPI Master’s Project Proposal Noel A. Modesto-Madera September 28, 2010 Numerical Investigation of Supersonic Flow Over a Blunt Body.

Fig. 1. A wiring diagram for the SCEC computational pathways of earthquake system science (left) and large-scale calculations exemplifying each of the.

P1.85 DEVELOPMENT OF SIMULATED GOES PRODUCTS FOR GFS AND NAM Hui-Ya Chuang and Brad Ferrier Environmental Modeling Center, NCEP, Washington DC Introduction.

On Parallel Time Domain Finite Difference Computation of the Elastic Wave Equation and Perfectly Matched Layers (PML) Absorbing Boundary Conditions (With.

Pegasus: Running Large-Scale Scientific Workflows on the TeraGrid Ewa Deelman USC Information Sciences Institute

SCEC Community Modeling Environment (SCEC/CME): SCEC TeraShake Platform: Dynamic Rupture and Wave Propagation Simulations Seismological Society of America.

Philip Maechling Southern California Earthquake Center

ICCS WSES BOF Discussion. Possible Topics Scientific workflows and Grid infrastructure Utilization of computing resources in scientific workflows; Virtual.

GRIDS Center Middleware Overview Sandra Redman Information Technology and Systems Center and Information Technology Research Center National Space Science.

SIG: Synthetic Seismogram Exchange Standards (formats & metadata) Is it time to establish exchange standards for synthetic seismograms? IRIS Annual Workshop.

Validation of physics-based ground motion earthquake simulations using a velocity model improved by tomographic inversion results 1 Ricardo Taborda, 1.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Earthquake is Inevitable: The Disaster is Not.

3D Rupture Dynamics Code Validation Workshop Ruth Harris and Ralph Archuleta Sept. 11, 2005 SCEC Workshop.

Southern California Earthquake Center SCEC Technical Activity Groups (TAGs) Self-organized to develop and test critical methodologies for solving specific.

06/22/041 Data-Gathering Systems IRIS Stanford/ USGS UNAVCO JPL/UCSD Data Management Organizations PI’s, Groups, Centers, etc. Publications, Presentations,

Phase 1: Comparison of Results at 4Hz Phase 1 Goal: Compare 4Hz ground motion results from different codes to establish whether the codes produce equivalent.

An Overview of Scientific Workflows: Domains & Applications Laboratoire Lorrain de Recherche en Informatique et ses Applications Presented by Khaled Gaaloul.

Super Computing 2000 DOE SCIENCE ON THE GRID Storage Resource Management For the Earth Science Grid Scientific Data Management Research Group NERSC, LBNL.

Unified Structural Representation (USR) The primary mission of the USR Focus Area has been the development of a unified, object-oriented 3-D representation.

Southern California Earthquake Center SCEC Collaboratory for Interseismic Simulation and Modeling (CISM) Infrastructure Philip J. Maechling (SCEC) September.

OWL-S: As a Semantic Mark-up Language for Grid Services By Narendranadh.J.

UCERF3 Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3) 14 Full-3D tomographic model CVM-S4.26 of S. California 2 CyberShake 14.2 seismic hazard.

Programme for “Target 3” – test of alternative bearing materials (from Jason Tarrant) –Drawing updates by 11 th November –Bearings: Material approval –

1 1.Used AWP-ODC-GPU to run 10Hz Wave propagation simulation with rough fault rupture in half-space with and without small scale heterogeneities. 2.Used.

Southern California Earthquake Center SI2-SSI: Community Software for Extreme-Scale Computing in Earthquake System Science (SEISM2) Wrap-up Session Thomas.

OHHI Beach Modeling Group Meeting - October 25, 2006.

Visualizing large scale earthquake simulations Amit Chourasia Visualization Scientist San Diego Supercomputer Center Presented to: Advanced User Support,

Welcome to the CME Project Meeting 2013 Philip J. Maechling Information Technology Architect Southern California Earthquake Center.

1 USC Information Sciences InstituteYolanda Gil AAAI-08 Tutorial July 13, 2008 Part IV Workflow Mapping and Execution in Pegasus (Thanks.

PEER 2003 Meeting 03/08/031 Interdisciplinary Framework Major focus areas Structural Representation Fault Systems Earthquake Source Physics Ground Motions.

SCEC CyberShake on TG & OSG: Options and Experiments Allan Espinosa*°, Daniel S. Katz*, Michael Wilde*, Ian Foster*°,

SCEC Capability Simulations on TeraGrid

Future Directions and Capabilities of Simulators Jim Dieterich

ShakeAlert CISN Testing Center (CTC) Development

Meeting Objectives Discuss proposed CISM structure and activities

Scott Callaghan Southern California Earthquake Center

NEHRP Research: U.S. Geological Survey

SCEC Community Modeling Environment (SCEC/CME)

High-F Project Southern California Earthquake Center

Philip J. Maechling (SCEC) September 13, 2015

2University of Southern California, 3San Diego Supercomputer Center

Physics-based simulation for visual computing applications

High-Performance Computing (HPC) IS Transforming Seismology

CyberShake Study 14.2 Science Readiness Review

Southern California Earthquake Center

Presentation transcript:

SCEC/ITR All-Hands Meeting October 11, 2002 Introduction by Tom Jordan

SCEC/ITR Meeting 10/11/022 February Plan / May Assessment Activities Pathway 1 Pathway 2 Lead 1. Verification SCEC 2. Syntactic IO SCEC/IRIS 3. Semantic IO ISI 4. Curated Collection Y1SDSC 5. Grid Y1ISI 6. Visualization Y1CMU 7. User Interface Y1ISI 8. Integration Y1SCEC  Underway  Begun  Planned Y1 Year-one lead objective

SCEC/ITR Meeting 10/11/023 Meeting Objectives Report on progressReport on progress Identify problemsIdentify problems Make plans for next quarterMake plans for next quarter –project objectives Coordinate with related SCEC activitiesCoordinate with related SCEC activities –SCEC + SCEC/ITR site review scheduled for December 4, 2002 –Site review report due November 1, 2003

SCEC/ITR Meeting 10/11/024 Agenda 9:00 amIntroduction 9:00 amIntroduction –agenda, reports, IT Architect 9:15Pathway 1 9:15Pathway 1 -Ned Field -Tom Russ -Sue Perry 10:00Pathway 2 –Steve Day –Kim Olsen –Linus Kamb/Tim Ahern –Jacobo Bielak/Dave O’Hallaron 10:45General capabilities –Computational Grid testbed: Hongsuda TangmunarunkitCarl Kesselman/David Okaya –Computational Grid testbed: Hongsuda Tangmunarunkit/Carl Kesselman/David Okaya –DOCKER: Yolanda Gil –Data grid testbed: Steve Mock/Bernard Minster –RDF: Stefan Decker 12:00 pmLunch - breakout groups 1:00 Project integration issues 1:00 Project integration issues –data structures and flow –semantics, ontologies 2:00Summary session 2:00Summary session –next-quarter objectives –annual report, site review, next meeting 3:00Adjourn 3:00Adjourn

SCEC/ITR Meeting 10/11/025 Computational Pathways Intensity Measures Earthquake Forecast Model Attenuation Relationship Pathway 1: Standard methodology Empirical relationships

SCEC/ITR Meeting 10/11/026 Computational Pathways AWM Ground Motions SRM Intensity Measures Earthquake Forecast Model Attenuation Relationship Unified Structural Representation Faults Motions Stresses Anelastic model Pathway 2: Ground motion simulation AWM = Anelastic Wave Model SRM = Site Response Model Physics-based  simulations

SCEC/ITR Meeting 10/11/027 Computational Pathways RDM AWM Ground Motions SRMFSM Intensity Measures Earthquake Forecast Model Unified Structural Representation Faults Motions Stresses Anelastic model Pathway 3: Full fault-system dynamics simulation FSM = Fault System Model RDM = Rupture Dynamics Model

SCEC/ITR Meeting 10/11/028 Computational Pathways RDM AWM Ground Motions SRMFSM Invert Other Data Geology Geodesy Intensity Measures Unified Structural Representation Faults Motions Stresses Anelastic model Pathway 4: Data assimilation into the USR

SCEC/ITR Meeting 10/11/029 Objective 5: GRID Testbed USC and SDSC have implemented NMI middlewareUSC and SDSC have implemented NMI middleware ISI and ISD have identified USC GRID manager (supported in part by SCEC/ITR)ISI and ISD have identified USC GRID manager (supported in part by SCEC/ITR) USC/SCEC machine (Sun Enterprise 3800) to be put on GRID by AugustUSC/SCEC machine (Sun Enterprise 3800) to be put on GRID by August Non-USC/SCEC machines will require local middleware supportNon-USC/SCEC machines will require local middleware support

SCEC/ITR Meeting 10/11/0210 Fréchet Kernels for S wave of the 09/04/02 Yorba Linda Earthquake 7.3 km 2.9 km Surface E  N  S R CVM z = 2.2 km Map view