1 Guadalupe Watershed Model Year 1 Progress Report SPLWG Meeting May 14 th 2008 John Oram, Lester McKee, Michelle Lent Item #3b.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Item #6b 1 Towards a Bay Area Watershed Model Presented to the SPLWG May 14, 2008 John Oram & Lester McKee.
Advertisements

Slide 1 Item #6 Watershed Modeling at SFEI John J. Oram, Lester J. McKee, Mikolaj Lewicki SPLWG December 2007.
Guadalupe River Hg Monitoring WY 2010 Jen Hunt Sources, Pathway, and Loading Work Group May 27, 2009 Item #3.
1 Hayward Zone 4 Line A Watershed Modeling Item #2a-2.
Concentrations and loads of PCBs and OC pesticides in the Guadalupe River watershed Jon Leatherbarrow 1,2, Lester McKee 1, John Oram 1 1 San Francisco.
Draft Strategy Revised RMP Modeling Strategy John Oram Jay Davis Item #8.
1 PCBs and PBDEs on the Guadalupe River WYs 2003 – 2006 John Oram, Jon Leatherbarrow, and Lester McKee Sources Pathways and Loadings Workgroup November.
1 PCB and PBDE loads at Mallard Island on the Sacramento River: WYs John Oram, Jon Leatherbarrow, and Lester McKee Sources Pathways and Loadings.
1 Guadalupe Watershed Model Year 2 update Presentation to SPLWG May 27, 2009 Michelle Lent, John Oram, Lester McKee Item #7.
Starting a New Small Tributaries Loads Study WY 2007: Zone 4 Line A - Progress to-date Lester McKee and Rand Eads Sources Pathways and Loadings Workgroup.
San Francisco Estuary Institute Small Tributaries Loading Study Zone 4 Line A Sources Pathways and Loadings Workgroup May 2008 Lester McKee 1, Alicia Gilbreath.
PROCESS-BASED, DISTRIBUTED WATERSHED MODELS New generation Source waters and flowpaths Physically based.
LOGO Bangkok, May 2009 Water Resources Management in Ba River Basin under Future Development and Climate Scenarios Presented by: Nguyen Thi Thu Ha Examination.
Unit Hydrograph Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections , 7.5, 7.7,
Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting Model (SAC-SMA)
2 A J B F 5 6 E 8 C G 10 4 I 26 H D N Legend Source drains into the ditch here. Data point directly.
Unit Hydrograph Reading: Sections , 7.5, 7.7,
Hydrologic Simulation Models
Drainage Basins.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model Input
Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering Cven689 – CE Applications of GIS Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Logan Burton April 29, 2003 Application.
WHERE IS ALL THE WORLD’S WATER?. ATMOSPHERE OCEANSCONTINENTS GLOBAL HYDROLOGIC STORES.
Water that remains on Earth’s surface is runoff
Kristie J. Franz Department of Geological & Atmospheric Sciences Iowa State University
Integrated Water Management Modeling Framework in Nebraska Association of Western State Engineers Spring Workshop Salt Lake City, Utah June 9, 2015 Mahesh.
1 Small Tributaries Loading Study #2: Zone 4 Line A, Cabot Blvd. Hayward Year 1 – Draft FINAL report Lester McKee and Alicia Gilbreath Sources Pathways.
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
Application of GIS and Terrain Analysis to Watershed Model Calibration for the CHIA Project Sam Lamont Robert Eli Jerald Fletcher.
Modeling Copper Runoff in San Francisco Bay Area Watersheds Jim Carleton US EPA.
CE 424 HYDROLOGY 1 Instructor: Dr. Saleh A. AlHassoun.
Outline of the training. 6 October 2005, TNMC, Bangkok.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
The Northeast AVGWLF A Watershed Scale Model for New England and New York State Becky Weidman NEIWPCC Barry Evans Penn State University.
Freshwater Resources Chapter 4, Lesson 3. Where do we get our water from?  Running water  Standing water  Reservoirs: man-made lakes used to store.
Surface Water An Erosional-Depositional System. Running Water When running water is confined to a channel, it is called a stream Smaller streams called.
Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Presented by Divya Sharon.
Nam Songkhram model application and field work MRCS WUP-FIN.
WATER SHED REVIEW.
Effects of Rain Water Harvesting on the Hydrograph Tyler Jantzen May 3, 2007 CE 394K.2.
TxRR Model Along the Coast Victoria Samuels May 1, 2001.
1 Dynamic modeling in a representative watershed (Guadalupe) Michelle Lent, John Oram, and Lester McKee Sources Pathways and Loadings Workgroup May 6 th.
1 Optimizing sampling methods for pollutant loads and trends in San Francisco Bay urban stormwater monitoring Aroon Melwani, Michelle Lent, Ben Greenfield,
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 4
Unit D: Energy Flow in Global Systems. The Biosphere.
Modeling Source-water Contributions to Streamflow
Water supply Flood prediction and forecasting. Water quality
WHERE IS ALL THE WORLD’S WATER?
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Water Quality Analysis for Selected Streams in Utah and Idaho
Hydrologic Simulation Models
Image courtesy of NASA/GSFC
Relating Actual Runoff to Potential Runoff
Human dependence Practice questions Human.
Erosion Patterns in Austin Streams
Provo River Watershed Modeling with WMS Ryan Murdock.
مفهوم الموازنة العامة المقدمة
Hyrum Reservoir and how it applies to Flood Control by Nathan Wright
SETAC North America 28th Annual Meeting
From GIS to HMS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center University of Texas at Austin Center for Research in Water Resources Francisco.
Flooding in Flathead County and Kalispell, MT
Rainfall Runoff in the Guadalupe River Basin
Flooding Potential in Bloomington, Idaho
Жирэмслэлт ба тархины харвалт
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Journal #3 Describe your observations in yesterday’s lab
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Unit: Water and the Atmosphere
Assessment of climate change impacts on semi-arid watersheds in Peru
Chapter 13 Running Water Running water means……….
Presentation transcript:

1 Guadalupe Watershed Model Year 1 Progress Report SPLWG Meeting May 14 th 2008 John Oram, Lester McKee, Michelle Lent Item #3b

2 Guadalupe River Watershed Characteristics –Area ~236 km 2 below res. ~178 km 2 above res. –13% industrial –13% commercial –58% residential –486,500 pop. Item #3b

3 Motivation Item #3b

4 Model Development : Streams Item #3b

5 Model Development : Delineation Item #3b

6 Model Development : Delineation Item #3b

7 Model Development : Land Use Item #3b

8 Model Development : Land Use Item #3b

9 Model Inputs Precip (15 min) Evap (daily) Land Use Topography Stream Flow Reservoir Flow Item #3b

10 Uncalibrated Results Model underestimates baseflow (No reservoir flows) Item #3b

11 Uncalibrated Results : Reservoir Flows Item #3b

12 Next Steps Add additional precip stations Add reservoir flows Calibrate & validate Run scenarios –Determine lag times –Long-term water budget –Others? Item #3b