Lecture 3: Common Simple Dynamic Systems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dynamic Behavior of Closed-Loop Control Systems
Advertisements

Dynamic Behavior of Ideal Systems
PID Controllers and PID tuning
Poles and Zeros Chapter 6 The dynamic behavior of a transfer function model can be characterized by the numerical value of its poles and zeros. Two equivalent.
Dynamic Behavior of Closed-Loop Control Systems
H(s) x(t)y(t) 8.b Laplace Transform: Y(s)=X(s) H(s) The Laplace transform can be used in the solution of ordinary linear differential equations. Let’s.
Chapter 4 Modelling and Analysis for Process Control
Chapter 4 Continuous Time Signals Time Response Continuous Time Signals Time Response.
Chapter 10 Stability Analysis and Controller Tuning
Chapter 4: Basic Properties of Feedback
ERT 210 Process Control & dynamics
Modern Control Theory Lecture 5 By Kirsten Mølgaard Nielsen
Multivariable Control
4. System Response This module is concern with the response of LTI system. L.T. is used to investigate the response of first and second order systems.
1 Fifth Lecture Dynamic Characteristics of Measurement System (Reference: Chapter 5, Mechanical Measurements, 5th Edition, Bechwith, Marangoni, and Lienhard,
Review. Please Return Loan Clickers to the MEG office after Class! Today! FINAL EXAM: Wednesday December 8 8:00 AM to 10:00 a.m.
Transfer Functions Convenient representation of a linear, dynamic model. A transfer function (TF) relates one input and one output: The following terminology.
Transfer Functions Convenient representation of a linear, dynamic model. A transfer function (TF) relates one input and one output: The following terminology.
Lecture 171 Higher Order Circuits. Lecture 172 Higher Order Circuits The text has a chapter on 1st order circuits and a chapter on 2nd order circuits.
Transient & Steady State Response Analysis
Review last lectures.
More General Transfer Function Models
Chapter 8. The PID Controller Copyright © Thomas Marlin 2013
CSE 425: Industrial Process Control 1. About the course Lect.TuLabTotal Semester work 80Final 125Total Grading Scheme Course webpage:
Out response, Poles, and Zeros
Feedback Control Systems (FCS) Dr. Imtiaz Hussain URL :
Automatic Control Theory-
1 Dynamic Behavior Chapter 5 In analyzing process dynamic and process control systems, it is important to know how the process responds to changes in the.
Transfer Functions Chapter 4
By Irfan Azhar Time Response. Transient Response After the engineer obtains a mathematical representation of a subsystem, the subsystem is analyzed for.
DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR AND STABILITY OF CLOSED-LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS
DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR OF PROCESSES :
Lecture 4: Important structures of simple systems 1.
Chapter 5 Transient and Steady State Response “I will study and get ready and someday my chance will come” Abraham Lincoln.
Chapter 4 Dynamic Systems: Higher Order Processes Prof. Shi-Shang Jang National Tsing-Hua University Chemical Engineering Dept. Hsin Chu, Taiwan April,
Chapter 4. Modelling and Analysis for Process Control
Process Control: Designing Process and Control Systems for Dynamic Performance Chapter 5. Typical Process Systems Copyright © Thomas Marlin 2013 The copyright.
Lecture 5: Transfer Functions and Block Diagrams
Subsea Control and Communications Systems
Transfer Functions Convenient representation of a linear, dynamic model. A transfer function (TF) relates one input and one output: The following terminology.
Lec 6. Second Order Systems
Discrete Controller Design
Modeling Transient Response So far our analysis has been purely kinematic: The transient response has been ignored The inertia, damping, and elasticity.
CHAPTER VI BLOCK DIAGRAMS AND LINEARIZATION
1 Time Response. CHAPTER Poles and Zeros and System Response. Figure 3.1: (a) System showing input and output; (b) Pole-zero plot of the system;
ERT 210/4 Process Control & Dynamics DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR OF PROCESSES :
TRANSFER FUNCTION Prepared by Mrs. AZDUWIN KHASRI.
Lecture 3: Common Dynamic Systems 1. Identify common dynamic elements:  First order  Integrating (Non self-regulatory)  Second order  Dead time Predict.
1 Chapter 6 Time Delays Time delays occur due to: 1.Fluid flow in a pipe 2.Transport of solid material (e.g., conveyor belt) 3.Chemical analysis -Sampling.
Lecture 2: The Laplace Transform Laplace transform definition Laplace transform properties Relation between time and Laplace domains Initial and Final.
Exercise 1 Suppose we have a simple mass, spring, and damper problem. Find The modeling equation of this system (F input, x output). The transfer function.
Lesson 19: Process Characteristics- 1 st Order Lag & Dead-Time Processes ET 438a Automatic Control Systems Technology lesson19et438a.pptx 1.
Transfer Functions Convenient representation of a linear, dynamic model. A transfer function (TF) relates one input and one output: The following terminology.
Automatic Control Theory CSE 322
Lesson 20: Process Characteristics- 2nd Order Lag Process
Lesson 15: Bode Plots of Transfer Functions
Dynamic Behavior Chapter 5
Laplace Transforms Chapter 3 Standard notation in dynamics and control
Transfer Functions Chapter 4
CHAPTER VI BLOCK DIAGRAMS AND LINEARIZATION
Time Delays Chapter 6 Time delays occur due to: Fluid flow in a pipe
Dynamic Behavior Chapter 5
G1 and G2 are transfer functions and independent of the
UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PERLIS SCHOOL OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEM ENGINEERING
Lecture 6: Time Domain Analysis and State Space Representation
PROCESS DYNAMICS AND CONTROL Fourth Year by Dr. Forat Yasir AlJaberi
Dynamic Behavior Chapter 5
G1 and G2 are transfer functions and independent of the
UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI SALERNO
Exercise 1 For the unit step response shown in the following figure, find the transfer function of the system. Also find rise time and settling time. Solution.
Presentation transcript:

Lecture 3: Common Simple Dynamic Systems

Common simple dynamic systems - First order -Second order Outline of the lesson. Common simple dynamic systems - First order -Second order - Dead time - (Non) Self-regulatory

When I complete this chapter, I want to be able to do the following. Predict output for typical inputs for common dynamic systems

3.1. First-Order Differential Equation Models The model can be rearranged as where τ is the time constant and K is the steady-state gain. The Laplace transform is

3.1.1. Step Response of a First-Order Model In the previous lecture, we have learned about the step response of first order systems.

3.1.2. Impulse Response of a First-Order Model Consider an impulse input, u(t) = δ (t), and U(s) = 1; the output is now The time-domain solution is which implies that the output rises instantaneously to some value at t = 0 and then decays exponentially to zero.

3.1.3. Integrating Process When the coefficient a0 = 0 in the first order differential equation , we get where K = (b / a1). Here, the pole of the transfer function G(s) is at the origin, s = 0.

3.1.3. Integrating Process The solution of the Equation , could be written immediately without any transform as This is called an integrating (also capacitive or non-self-regulating) process. We can associate the name with charging a capacitor or filling up a tank.

SIMPLE PROCESS SYSTEMS: INTEGRATOR pump valve Level sensor Liquid-filled tank Plants have many inventories whose flows in and out do not depend on the inventory (when we apply no control or manual correction). These systems are often termed “pure integrators” because they integrate the difference between in and out flows.

SIMPLE PROCESS SYSTEMS: INTEGRATOR Plot the level for this scenario pump valve Level sensor Liquid-filled tank Plot the level for this scenario Fin Fout time

SIMPLE PROCESS SYSTEMS: INTEGRATOR pump valve Level sensor Liquid-filled tank Level Fin Fout time

SIMPLE PROCESS SYSTEMS: INTEGRATOR pump valve Level sensor Liquid-filled tank Let’s look ahead to when we apply control. Non-self-regulatory variables tend to “drift” far from desired values. We must control these variables.

3.2. Second-Order Differential Equation Models We have not encountered examples with a second-order equation, especially one that exhibits oscillatory behavior. One reason is that processing equipment tends to be self-regulating. An oscillatory behavior is most often the result of implementing a controller. For now, this section provides several important definitions.

3.2. Second-Order Transfer Function Models where ωn is the natural (undamped) frequency, ζ is the damping ratio or coefficient, K is the steady-state gain, and τ is the natural period of oscillation, where τ = 1/ωn. The characteristic equation is Which provides the poles

SIMPLE PROCESS SYSTEMS: 2nd ORDER 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Time Controlled Variable Manipulated Variable 100 120 140 160 180 200 0.5 1.5 overdamped underdamped

WORKSHOP Four systems experienced an impulse input at t=2. Explain what you can learn about each system (dynamic model) from the figures below. 5 10 15 20 25 30 1 2 3 output (a) -1 (b) time (c) 0.5 1.5 2.5 (d)

3.4 Processes with dead time Many chemical processes involve a time delay between the input and the output. This delay may be due to the time required for a slow chemical sensor to respond or for a fluid to travel down a pipe. A time delay is also called dead time or transport lag. In controller design, the measured output will not contain the most current information, and hence systems with dead time can be difficult to control.

Let’s learn a new dynamic response & its Laplace Transform Let’s consider plug flow through a pipe. Plug flow has no backmixing; we can think of this a a hockey puck traveling in a pipe. What is the dynamic response of the outlet fluid property (e.g., concentration) to a step change in the inlet fluid property?

THE FIRST STEP: LAPLACE TRANSFORM  = dead time  What is the value of dead time for plug flow? Xout Xin time

THE FIRST STEP: LAPLACE TRANSFORM Is this a dead time? What is the value? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -0.5 0.5 time Y, outlet from dead time X, inlet to dead time

THE FIRST STEP: LAPLACE TRANSFORM Our plants have pipes. We will use this a lot! The dynamic model for dead time is The Laplace transform for a variable after dead time is

Pade approximation of the time delay There several methods to approximate the dead time as a ratio of two polynomials in s. On such method is the first-order Pade approximation.

Example 3.2 Use the first-order Pade approximation to plot the unit-step response of the first order with a dead-time function: Making use of the dirst order Pade approximation, we can construct a plot with the approximation

Matlab code th = 3; P1 = tf([-th/2 1],[th/2 1]); % First-order Padé approximation t = 0:0.5:50; taup = 10; G1 = tf(1,[taup 1]); y1 = step(G1*P1,t); % y1 is first order with Padé approximation of % dead time y2 = step(G1,t); t2 = t+th; % Shift the time axis for the actual time-delay function plot(t,y1,t2,y2,’r’);

The approximation is very good except near t = 0, where the approximate response dips below. This behavior has to do with the first-order Pade approximation, and we can improve the result with a second-order Pade approximation.