A Comparison of topographic effect by Newton’s integral and high degree spherical harmonic expansion – Preliminary Results YM Wang, S. Holmes, J Saleh,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Investigation of the Topographic Effect by Using High Degree Spherical Harmonic Expansion Yan Ming Wang National Geodetic Survey, USA IAG Scientific Meeting.
Advertisements

An estimate of post-seismic gravity change caused by the 1960 Chile earthquake and comparison with GRACE gravity fields Y. Tanaka 1, 2, V. Klemann 2, K.
The general equation for gravity anomaly is: where:  is the gravitational constant  is the density contrast r is the distance to the observation point.
New software for the World Magnetic Model (WMM) Adam Woods (1, 2), Manoj Nair (1,2), Stefan Maus (1,2), Susan McLean (1) 1. NOAA’s National Geophysical.
Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic Survey On the Solutions of.
GRACE GRAVITY FIELD SOLUTIONS USING THE DIFFERENTIAL GRAVIMETRY APPROACH M. Weigelt, W. Keller.
Satellite geophysics. Basic concepts. I1.1a = geocentric latitude φ = geodetic latitude r = radial distance, h = ellipsoidal height a = semi-major axis,
Map Projections (1/2) Francisco Olivera, Ph.D., P.E. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin.
Geographic Datums Y X Z The National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) and the Defense Mapping School Reviewed by:____________ Date:_________ Objective:
Geoid: the actual equipotential surface at sea level.
Dynamic Planet 2005 Cairns, Australia August 2005
Physics 151: Principles of Physics: Mechanics & Heat (Honors) Prof. Stan Zygmunt Neils
Conversion from Latitude/Longitude to Cartesian Coordinates
Geodetic Institute, University of Karlsruhe
J. Ebbing & N. Holzrichter – University of Kiel Johannes Bouman – DGFI Munich Ronny Stolz – IPHT Jena SPP Dynamic EarthPotsdam, 03/04 July 2014 Swarm &
NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey USGG2009 & GEOID09: New geoid height models for surveying/GIS ACSM-MARLS-UCLS-WFPS Conference FEB 2009 Salt Lake.
Using Aerogravity to Produce a Refined Vertical Datum D.R. Roman and X. Li XXV FIG Congress June 2014 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Session TS01A, Paper.
Modeling Airborne Gravimetry with High-Degree Harmonic Expansions Holmes SA, YM Wang, XP Li and DR Roman National Geodetic Survey/NOAA Vienna, Austria,
First question Marks: % 30 First question Marks: % 30.
Use of G99SSS to evaluate the static gravity geopotential derived from the GRACE, CHAMP, and GOCE missions Daniel R. Roman and Dru A. Smith Session: GP52A-02Decade.
Error Analysis of the NGS Gravity Database Jarir Saleh, Xiaopeng Li, Yan Ming Wang, Dan Roman and Dru Smith, NOAA/NGS/ERT Paper: G , 04 July 2011,
Figure and Gravity Figure of a planet (Earth) Geoid Gravity field
Newton ’ s Law of Universal Gravitation Dan Li SUNY-Stony Brook 12/09/2002.
Geography 370 Locating Positions on the Earth
1 Assessment of Geoid Models off Western Australia Using In-Situ Measurements X. Deng School of Engineering, The University of Newcastle, Australia R.
Testing of two variants of the harmonic inversion method on the territory of the eastern part of Slovakia.
Geoid Modeling at NOAA Dru A. Smith, Ph.D. National Geodetic Survey National Ocean Service, NOAA November 13, 2000.
GOCE OBSERVATIONS FOR DETECTING UNKNOWN TECTONIC FEATURES BRAITENBERG C. (1), MARIANI P. (1), REGUZZONI M. (2), USSAMI N. (3) (1)Department of Geosciences,
Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC February 2009.
Last Time: Ground Penetrating Radar Radar reflections image variations in Dielectric constant  r ( = relative permittivity )  3-40 for most Earth materials;
Gravity Methods Gravity is not a “constant” 9.78 m/s 2 Responds to local changes in rock density Widely used in oil and gas, mineral exploration, engineering.
An application of FEM to the geodetic boundary value problem Z. Fašková, R. Čunderlík Faculty of Civil Engineering Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava,
GG 450 Lecture 3 1/22/08 Gravity Corrections Potential Geoid.
Testing of the harmonic inversion method on the territory of the eastern part of Slovakia.
Data Requirements for a 1-cm Accurate Geoid
Satellite geophysics. Basic concepts. I1.1a = geocentric latitude φ = geodetic latitude r = radial distance, h = ellipsoidal height a = semi-major axis,
Shape of the Earth, Geoid, Global Positioning System, Map Coordinate Systems, and Datums Or how you can impress your friend on a hike D. Ravat University.
Numerical aspects of the omission errors due to limited grid size in geoid computations Yan Ming Wang National Geodetic Survey, USA VII Hotine-Marussi.
GEOG 268: Cartography Ohio Northern University Winter Hill 200.
Gravity Summary For a point source or for a homogeneous sphere the solution is easy to compute and are given by the Newton’s law. Gravity Force for the.
Effect of High Resolution Altimetric Gravity Anomalies on the North America Geoid Computations Yan M. Wang and D. Roman National Geodetic Survey NOAA Montreal,
Geography 70  Basic Geodesy  Map Projections  Coordinate Systems  Scale Locating Positions on the Earth.
Gravimetry Geodesy Rotation
Center for Modeling & Simulation.  It is always necessary to unify objects recorded in different coordinate system, into one system using coordinate.
Lecture 21 – The Geoid 2 April 2009 GISC-3325.
A Brief Introduction to Gravity UT Intro to Geophysics Class March 10, 2009 Austin-Bergstrom Airport Theresa Diehl, Ph.D. Research Geodesist NOAA National.
International Symposium on Gravity, Geoid and Height Systems GGHS 2012, Venice, Italy 1 GOCE data for local geoid enhancement Matija Herceg Per Knudsen.
Full Resolution Geoid from GOCE Gradients for Ocean Modeling Matija Herceg & Per Knudsen Department of Geodesy DTU Space living planet symposium 28 June.
C.C.Tscherning, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen. Improvement of Least-Squares Collocation error estimates using local GOCE Tzz signal standard.
Recent Investigations Towards Achieving a One Centimeter Geoid Daniel R. Roman & Dru A. Smith U.S. National Geodetic Survey GGG 2000, Session 9 The Challenge.
Where in the world are we? … A system for describing location on the earth What is the shape of the earth … and how earth’s shape affects the process of.
Catherine LeCocq SLAC USPAS, Cornell University Large Scale Metrology of Accelerators June 27 - July 1, 2005 Height Systems 1 Summary of Last Presentation.
Basic dynamics ●The equations of motion and continuity Scaling Hydrostatic relation Boussinesq approximation ●Geostrophic balance in ocean’s interior.
Lecture 7 – Gravity and Related Issues GISC February 2008.
A comparison of different geoid computation procedures in the US Rocky Mountains YM Wang 1, H Denker 2, J Saleh 3, XP Li 3, DR Roman 1, D Smith 1 1 National.
Investigation of the use of deflections of vertical measured by DIADEM camera in the GSVS11 Survey YM Wang 1, X Li 2, S Holmes 3, DR Roman 1, DA Smith.
Improving Regional Geoid by optimal Combination of GRACE Gravity Model and Surface Gravity Data YM Wang, DR Roman and J Saleh National Geodetic Survey.
Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen Torsten Mayer-Gürr, Annette Eicker, Judith Schall Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation University.
ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway A. Albertella, R. Rummel, R. Savcenko, W. Bosch, T. Janjic, J.Schroeter, T. Gruber, J.
1 NGA Mission - Data – Collaboration 2009 Workshop on Monitoring North American Geoid Change 21 Oct 2009 NGA Mission - Data – Collaboration 2009 Workshop.
1 Least Square Modification of Stokes’ Formula vs. Remove- Compute-Restore Technique Lars E. Sjöberg Royal Institute of Technology Division of Geodesy.
Use of topography in the context of the GOCE satellite mission – some examples Moritz Rexer, Christian Hirt, Sten Claessens, Carla Braitenberg 5 th INTERNATIONAL.
Integration of Gravity Data Into a Seamless Transnational Height Model for North America Daniel Roman, Marc Véronneau, David Avalos, Xiaopeng Li, Simon.
How Do we Estimate Gravity Field? Terrestrial data –Measurements of surface gravity –Fit spherical harmonic coefficients Satellite data –Integrate equations.
Poisson downward continuation of scattered Helmert’s gravity anomalies to mean values on a raster on the geoid using Least Square Ismael Foroughi 1, Petr.
Gravity Data Reduction
Dynamic Planet 2005 Cairns, Australia August 2005
ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2015
Conversion from Latitude/Longitude to Cartesian Coordinates
Geoid Enhancement in the Gulf Coast Region
Presentation transcript:

A Comparison of topographic effect by Newton’s integral and high degree spherical harmonic expansion – Preliminary Results YM Wang, S. Holmes, J Saleh, XP Li and D Roman, National Geodetic Survey June WPGM 2010 Taipei, Taiwan Abstract The spherical harmonic expansion of the topographic gravitational potential has two major advantages over Newtonian integrals: it offers computational efficiency and facilitates spectral analysis of the Earth’s gravity field. The high degree harmonic expansion of the topography helps also in geoid computations. In this paper, the gravitational potential of the topography is expanded into a spherical harmonic series of degree and order As a validation, the vertical derivatives of the topographic potential are computed from the coefficient model and Newton's integral in 1’ grid spacing. Comparisons are made along few selected profiles around the globe. Since the topography generates the anomalous gravity field at resolution 50 km and shorter, it is meaningful to compare the topographic potential to the global gravity model EGM2008. The comparisons are made at medium and high frequency bands, from degree 360 to Spherical harmonic expansion of the topographic potential Topography: masses above the WGS84 reference ellipsoid No spherical approximation. No Taylor expansion. Constant density of the topography assumed Formulation in spherical coordinate system. Topographic potential for the exterior space: where... Radial distance of a point on the reference ellipsoid... Radial distance of a point on the Earth’s physical surface f... flattening of the reference ellipsoid …density of the topographic masses Topographic potential for the interior space: DEM data used 1'x1' block means from the SRTM-derived DEM in 30 arc-seconds grid. All 1'x1'oceanic cells contain a nominal height value of zero. Global Statistics for the 1'x1' DEM are given in the following table. Table 1: Statistics of elevation in 1'x1' mean block values. Units are in meters Summary Statistics Table 2: Cumulative power of the topographic potential on the reference ellipsoid. Units are in meters Height anomaly of the exterior topographic potential on the ref. ellipsoid Height anomaly of the interior topo. potential on the ref. ellipsoid Comparison with EGM2008 Degree variances computed degree by degree on the reference ellipsoid Newtonian Integrals The radial derivatives of the topographic potential can be computed from Newton's integral where Selected profiles for comparisons All computations are over the reference ellipsoid 1’ grid spacing Nagy's’ formula for the innermost cell Discussions and future work The topographic potential (interior and exterior) is expanded into spherical harmonic series to degree and order 2700, without the spherical approximation and Taylor expansion. The radial derivatives of the topographic potential are computed from the coefficient model and Newtonian integral, and agree very well along 5 selected profiles. Though the agreement is good, there are some differences, which may be due to: Different resolution in the coefficient model and Newtonian integral Analytical downward continuation error, especially at polar regions Round-off error in the numerical computations The comparison with EGM2008 from degree 721 to 2160 shows good agreement. In non-proprietary areas such as CONUS where EGM2008 sourced it’s highest frequency information largely from terrestrial gravimetry, the differences possibly reflect the density variation effect in the topographic potential as well as non-topographic (crustal) high-frequency features sensed by gravity measurements. Future work Compute the direct and indirect effect of Helmert’s 2 nd condensation represented by the spherical harmonic series and from Newton’s integrals Investigate the analytical downward continuation error in the use of ultra-high degree and order harmonic series Explore the possibility to expand the topographic potential to higher degree and order. No Mean376 RMS933 Min-416 Max8550 n=2-360n= n= Exterior Interior