Sensitivity Analysis Consider the CrossChek hockey stick production problem: Management believes that CrossChek might only receive $120 profit from the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1.Determine pricing objectives 2.Study costs 3.Estimate consumer demand 4.Study the competitions prices 5.Decide on a pricing strategy 6.Set price.
Advertisements

QingPeng (QP) Zhang  Sensitivity analysis is concerned with how changes in an linear programming’s parameters affect the optimal.
Linear Programming Sensitivity Analysis How will a change in a coefficient of the objective function affect the optimal solution? How will a change in.
Chapter 5 Sensitivity Analysis: An Applied Approach
Copyright (c) 2003 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. 1 Chapter 5 Sensitivity Analysis: An Applied Approach to accompany Introduction to.
Nonlinear Programming
Linear Programming – Sensitivity Analysis How much can the objective function coefficients change before the values of the variables change? How much can.
Skateboard Safety Gear. Objectives To see if target market wears safety gear when doing possibly dangerous activities To see if there is a market to sell.
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS.
Example 3 Financial Model Rate of Return Summation Variable/Constraint
Linear Programming Special Cases Alternate Optimal Solutions No Feasible Solution Unbounded Solutions.
Project 1 Introduction. Monopolies vs. Perfect Competitor Natural Monopoly vs. Temporary Monopoly - price is determined by company - Examples of each?
How Markets Work Supply. If firm supplies a good or a service, the firm: 1.Has the resources and technology to produce it, 2.Can make profit from producing.
Exam Feb 28: sets 1,2 Set 2 due Thurs. LP SENSITIVITY Ch 3.
Sensitivity of the Objective Function Coefficients
Linear Programming Models in Services. Stereo Warehouse Let x = number of receivers to stock y = number of speakers to stock Maximize 50x + 20y gross.
Retail Competition and Electricity Contracts Richard Green University of Hull and CEPR.
Price For Maximizing Profit by Ted Mitchell. Learning Goal Finding the Price that Maximizes the Profit is not necessarily the same as finding the Price.
Optimum Distribution Formula What is the probability of selling the next copy distributed? How much did it cost to distribute/produce that copy?
THE FIRM ’ S BASIC PROFIT MAXIMIZATION PROBLEM Chapter 2 slide 1 What Quantity of Output should the Firm Produce and Sell and at What Price? The Answer.
Linear Programming Sensitivity of the Objective Function Coefficients.
New Vehicle Sales +42%, Gross +49% Used Vehicle Sales +19%, Gross +20% Service RO Count +22%, Gross +33% Parts Gross +24% Total Gross +36% Total Net.
Optimization Models Mathematical optimization models usually contain an objective (what to do) constraints (the rules that must be followed). Also referred.
Review Demand curve, consumer surplus Price elasticity of demand.
CrossChek Sporting Goods CrossChek Sporting Goods is a manufacturer of sporting goods, including golf clubs, hockey equipment, bats, balls and all things.
Performance Ratios Principles of Business and Finance.
Integer Programming Each year CrossChek decides which lines of golf clubs and clothing it will market. Consider that each line of golf clubs is expected.
Sensitivity Analysis Consider the CrossChek hockey stick production problem:   Management believes that CrossChek might only receive $120 profit from the.
Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis Rajendra Desai, XIME, 2009.
Goal Seek and Solver. Goal seeking helps you n Find a specific value for a target cell by adjusting the value of one other cell whose value is allowed.
Professional software packages such as The WinQSB and LINDO provide the following LP information: Information about the objective function: –its optimal.
Sensitivity Analysis Consider the CrossChek hockey stick production problem: Management believes that CrossChek might only receive $120 profit from the.
Integer LP In-class Prob
LINEAR PROGRAMMING 3.4 Learning goals represent constraints by equations or inequalities, and by systems of equations and/or inequalities, and interpret.
LP SENSITIVITY. Graphical Sensitivity Analysis A.Objective Function B.Left-hand side of constraint C.Right-hand side of constraint.
DETERMINANTS OF DEMAND Chapter 3 slide 1 A firm ’ s quantity of sales depends on multiple economic factors. For instance, an airline ’ s seat demand might.
Don Sutton Spring LP Basic Properties Objective Function – maximize/minimize profit/cost Resource Constraints – labor, money Decision.
Water Potential  The free energy per mole of water  Calculated from two components: Solute potential (osmotic pressure) Pressure potential (turgor pressure)
EBM: Control Freaks Model Zero: Two interacting species and a regulator who is informationally challenged.
The analytics of constrained optimal decisions microeco nomics spring 2016 the monopoly model (I): standard pricing ………….1optimal production ………….2 optimal.
Optimization Problems: BoomerangsProjector Resources Optimization Problems: Boomerangs Projector Resources.
Variance Analysis. Within the context of management accounting, variance analysis studies differences between actual and budgeted figures and looks at.
10.6B Best Method. Standard Form: Square Root Method: 1. When b = 0 2. Get x 2 alone 3. Square root both sides 4. plus/minus answer.
Practice: Given the following Sensitivity Analysis Report
SEMINARIE MIDDENKADER VLAAMSE OVERHEID
Chapter 2 Linear Programming Models: Graphical and Computer Methods
Operating Leverage ACG Prepared by Diane Tanner
BACK SOLUTION:
تحليل الحساسية Sensitive Analysis.
Higher Supported Study
السيولة والربحية أدوات الرقابة المالية الوظيفة المالية
Changes In Supply.
Sensitivity Analysis and
بعض النقاط التي تؤخذ في الحسبان عند تقييم الاستثمارات الزراعية
If we increase b2 from 10 to 20 will the optimal basis change?
Modeling and Optimization
US Census Maps What correlations/similarities in patterns can you find in the two maps? Is one map the cause and the other a result? What could be another.
Sound Important words: vibrate pitch (high or low) ...objects vibrate
Supply & Demand # 5 What is Supply?.
Supply & Demand Supply.
6.4 Slope-Intercept Form of the Equation for a Linear Function
Section 3.4 Sensitivity Analysis.
Supply & Demand #9 Supply.
Uncovered failures in MSS
Variable Costing for Management Analysis
Mr. Barnett AP Economics University High
All sales information is derived from the Whistler Listing Service and is believed correct. E&EO
Simplifying Expressions
Supply & Demand Supply.
Linear Optimization using Excel
Presentation transcript:

Sensitivity Analysis Consider the CrossChek hockey stick production problem: Management believes that CrossChek might only receive $120 profit from the sale of each lower-profit hockey stick. Will that affect the optimal solution? What about a (separate) change in the profit from higher-profit sticks to $125? Max 150x x2 s.t x1 + 2/3x2 <= /5x1 + 4/5x2 <= 960 1/2x1 + x2 <= 1000 x1, x2 >= 0 Consider two high-end hockey sticks, A and B. $150 and $200 profit are earned from each sale of A and B, respectively. Each product goes through 3 phases of production. A requires 1 hour of work in phase 1, 48 min in phase 2, and 30 min in phase 3. B requires 40 min, 48 min and 1 hour, respectively. Limited manufacturing capacity: phase total hours phase phase How many of each product should be produced? Maximize profit Satisfy constraints.

CrossChek Manufacturing Problem x1 + 2/3x2 = /5x1 + 4/5x2 = /2x1 + x2 = 1000 Objective line Slope = -3/4

CrossChek Manufacturing Problem x1 + 2/3x2 = /5x1 + 4/5x2 = /2x1 + x2 = 1000 Objective line Slope = -3/4 Extreme points

CrossChek Manufacturing Problem x1 + 2/3x2 = /5x1 + 4/5x2 = /2x1 + x2 = 1000 Objective line Slope = -3/4

CrossChek Manufacturing Problem x1 + 2/3x2 = /5x1 + 4/5x2 = /2x1 + x2 = 1000 Objective line Slope = -3/4 Solution: x1 = 400, x2 = 800

CrossChek Manufacturing Problem x1 + 2/3x2 = /5x1 + 4/5x2 = /2x1 + x2 = 1000 Objective line Slope = -3/5

CrossChek Manufacturing Problem x1 + 2/3x2 = /5x1 + 4/5x2 = /2x1 + x2 = 1000 Objective line Slope = -3/5 Solution: x1 = 400, x2 = 800 Same solution!

Range of Optimality We know that changing the coefficient of x1 in the objective function 150x x2 from 150 to 120 does not change the solution What is the range (i.e. lowest and highest) of values that will not change the solution?

Range of Optimality x1 + 2/3x2 = /5x1 + 4/5x2 = /2x1 + x2 = 1000 Objective line Slope = -3/4

Range of Optimality x1 + 2/3x2 = /5x1 + 4/5x2 = /2x1 + x2 = 1000 Objective line Slope = -1/2

Range of Optimality x1 + 2/3x2 = /5x1 + 4/5x2 = /2x1 + x2 = 1000 Objective line Slope = -1/2

Range of Optimality x1 + 2/3x2 = /5x1 + 4/5x2 = /2x1 + x2 = 1000 Objective line Slope = -1/2 Both points optimal

Range of Optimality x1 + 2/3x2 = /5x1 + 4/5x2 = /2x1 + x2 = 1000 Objective line Slope > -1/2 New optimal solution

Range of Optimality x1 + 2/3x2 = /5x1 + 4/5x2 = /2x1 + x2 = 1000 Objective line Slope = -3/4

Range of Optimality x1 + 2/3x2 = /5x1 + 4/5x2 = /2x1 + x2 = 1000 Objective line Slope = -1

Range of Optimality x1 + 2/3x2 = /5x1 + 4/5x2 = /2x1 + x2 = 1000 Objective line Slope = -1

Range of Optimality x1 + 2/3x2 = /5x1 + 4/5x2 = /2x1 + x2 = 1000 Objective line Slope = -1 Both points optimal

Range of Optimality x1 + 2/3x2 = /5x1 + 4/5x2 = /2x1 + x2 = 1000 Objective line Slope < -1 New optimal solution

Conclusion: Any objective function with slope less than or equal to -½ and greater than or equal to -1 will not change the optimal solution!

Recap x1 + 2/3x2 = /5x1 + 4/5x2 = /2x1 + x2 = 1000 Objective line Slope = -3/4

1. Find Optimal Point x1 + 2/3x2 = /5x1 + 4/5x2 = /2x1 + x2 = 1000 Objective line Slope = -3/4 Solution: x1 = 400, x2 = 800

2. Determine slope of the 2 lines that meet at optimal point x1 + 2/3x2 = /5x1 + 4/5x2 = /2x1 + x2 = 1000 Slope = -1 Slope = -1/2

3. For objective function c1x1 + c2x2 with slope = – c1/c x1 + 2/3x2 = /5x1 + 4/5x2 = /2x1 + x2 = 1000 Slope = -1 Slope = -1/2 Let sL be the lower slope (-1) Let sH be the higher slope (-1/2)

3. For objective function c1x1 + c2x2 with slope = – c1/c x1 + 2/3x2 = /5x1 + 4/5x2 = /2x1 + x2 = 1000 Slope = -1 Slope = -1/2 Let sL be the lower slope (-1) Let sH be the higher slope (-1/2) a) Fix c2 and solve for c1 -c1/c2 >= sL -c1/c2 <= sH

3. For objective function c1x1 + c2x2 with slope = – c1/c x1 + 2/3x2 = /5x1 + 4/5x2 = /2x1 + x2 = 1000 Slope = -1 Slope = -1/2 Let sL be the lower slope (-1) Let sH be the higher slope (-1/2) b) Fix c1 and solve for c2 -c1/c2 >= sL -c1/c2 <= sH

Sensitivity Analysis - LINDO Consider the CrossChek hockey stick production problem: Management believes that CrossChek might only receive $120 profit from the sale of each lower-profit hockey stick. Will that affect the optimal solution? What about a (separate) change in the profit from higher-profit sticks to $125? Max 150x x2 s.t x1 + 2/3x2 <= /5x1 + 4/5x2 <= 960 1/2x1 + x2 <= 1000 x1, x2 >= 0 Consider two high-end hockey sticks, A and B. $150 and $200 profit are earned from each sale of A and B, respectively. Each product goes through 3 phases of production. A requires 1 hour of work in phase 1, 48 min in phase 2, and 30 min in phase 3. B requires 40 min, 48 min and 1 hour, respectively. Limited manufacturing capacity: phase total hours phase phase How many of each product should be produced? Maximize profit Satisfy constraints.

Caveat We know that changing the coefficient of x1 in the objective function 150x x2 from 150 to 120 does not change the solution We know that changing the coefficient of x2 in the objective function 150x x2 from, say 200 to 175 does not change the solution However, these ranges are only valid when the other coefficient remains fixed Changing both simultaneously may or may not change the optimal solution

100% Rule for Objective Function Coefficients To determine whether simultaneous changes will not change solution For each coefficient: Compute change as a percentage of the allowable change Sum all percentage changes If the sum is less than or equal to 100%, the optimal solution will not change If the sum exceeds 100%, the solution may change