What is Take Two?. Take Two is a developmental therapeutic service for Child Protection clients who have suffered trauma and disrupted attachment due.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Thomas Coram Adoption Project:
Advertisements

The Impact and Avoidance of Delay in Decision Making.
Toolbox talk 2 Risk factor identification for young children with trauma.
Dr Laura Davies University of Leeds
Kinship Care – Client Complexity Preliminary Research Findings ACWA Presenters: Marita Scott & Lynne McCrae.
Domestic Abuse & Child Contact Part 1: Understanding the issues (Speaker: Nel Whiting, Scottish Women’s Aid)
Health needs in prison Abby Jones Health and Justice Team North West/ 09/12/13.
Managing the risks and benefits of contact. The Legal Context The Children Act local authorities must promote and support contact between LAC and.
Safeguarding Adults in Bath & North East Somerset Awareness Session
Child Abuse and Neglect
The best option for young people leaving care?. Supported Lodgings Definition. According to Broad (2008), “the term ‘supported lodgings’ has no universal.
Impacts on Children and Young People of Parental Mental Illness 1. The loss of close intimate contact with a parent.
Effects of Domestic Violence on Child Academic Performance Francine Lopez Northern New Mexico College Department of Integrated humanities and Social Sciences;
SOAR: Mental Health Trauma Intervention Program Robert Niezgoda, MPH Taney County Health Department September 2014.
Duty to Report Child Abuse, Neglect, and Dependency in North Carolina Janet Mason Institute of Government The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Resilience and its Relationship with the 5-Step Method Professor Richard Velleman Emeritus Professor of Mental Health Research, University of Bath, UK.
Parental Substance Abuse and Child Welfare: Promising Programs for Early Intervention and Permanency Claire Houston S.J.D. Candidate, Harvard Law School.
Melissa Faulkner Senior Research Officer Child Advocacy Service Royal Children’s Hospital Reflecting on trends in 25 years of child abuse and neglect reports.
What can we learn? -Analysing child deaths and serious injury through abuse and neglect A summary of the biennial analysis of SCRs Brandon et al.
Session 5 Child Abuse and Neglect. 5.1 Overview of Session 5 Learning Objectives   Articulate the legal basis and definitions for child abuse and neglect.
Pathways to care in the absence of a local specialist Forensic Service, what we do in York. By Bekki Whisker.
One Chance at Childhood Every Child Deserves the Best Start.
Posttraumatic stress disorder [note 1] (PTSD) is a severe anxiety disorder that can develop after exposure to any event that results in psychological trauma.
Traumatised children’s view of their social world: The application of the Social Network Map for children who have experienced abuse and neglect Take Two.
How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%
1. 2 BEHAVIORAL HEALTH OF PARENTS/CAREGIVERS: IMPACT ON CHILDREN IN CHILD WELFARE SYSTEM Pamela S. Hyde, J.D. SAMHSA Administrator Regional Partnership.
Responding to Domestic Abuse
Safeguarding in schools
Safeguarding Young People Barbara Williams Independent Chair of North Tyneside Local Safeguarding Children board.
Trauma Informed Care Assisted Living Facility Limited Mental Health Training.
Thresholds & Referring in to Social Care Simon Harrison Group Manager Referral and Assessment Service.
CHILDREN, YOUTH AND WOMEN’S HEALTH SERVICE SCHOOL CONNECTIONS EDCONX INITIATIVE The Second Story Youth Health Service.
APAPDC National Safe Schools Framework Project. Aim of the project To assist schools with no or limited systemic support to align their policies, programs.
DCFS School Readiness Planning Initiative Insure that all young children in the system start school ready to learn –Physically –Socially –Emotionally.
Is all contact between children in care and their birth parents ‘good’ contact? Stephanie Taplin PhD NSW Centre for Parenting & Research 2006 ACWA Conference.
Domestic Violence and Mental Health Judith Fitzsimons Domestic Violence Co-ordinator Hackney Domestic Violence Team.
FOSTER CARE: MODULE #2 Models and Levels of Care.
Individualized Service Plan Who attends the ISP?
CHMDA/CWDA Partnership Series Child Welfare Services “It Takes a Village” Danna Fabella, Interim Director Contra County Employment and Human Services Department.
Early Childhood Mental Health Consultation Early interventions with very young children (birth to 6 years of age) at risk of experiencing serious emotional.
Intensive Therapeutic Service A joint initiative by: Berry Street Victoria & the Austin CAMHS In partnership with La Trobe University Faculty of Health.
Yvonne Onyeka Business Manager Bromley SCB LCPP in Bromley.
Safeguarding Tutorial The Manchester College 1. Aim of session: To raise awareness of Safeguarding Objectives: By the end of the session you will be able.
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Updates.
Domestic Abuse Notification Scheme to Schools. Content Context How the scheme will work Other initiatives Police definitions of risk Available support.
Child Abuse Statistics. More than three children die each day in the United States from child abuse and neglect.
Centre for Research on the Child and Family Social work: experiences of a longitudinal study of children living with significant harm Dr Marian Brandon.
18-1 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Nutrition, Health, and Safety for Young Children: Promoting Wellness, 1e Sorte, Daeschel, Amador.
Child Safeguarding in General Practice for Sessional GPs Dr D W Jones.
WHAT IS PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA?
Care planning and permanence Improving outcomes for looked after children.
How do you address trauma in a busy hospital setting? Mental Health Nursing & Acute Inpatient Mental Health Services. Luke Molloy (University of Tasmania)
Lundy Bancroft. KEY CONCEPTS There are multiple sources of psychological injury to children from exposure to men who batter. Professional responses need.
© CDHS College Relations Group Buffalo State College/SUNY at Buffalo Research Foundation Guiding Framework for Interventions Recommendation 1.
Child and Family Service Child and Family Service Adolescent Team Child and Adolescent Neuro-Developmental Service Carelink (Looked After Children Service)
Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation P28 Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation Understanding cumulative.
Lorraine Sherr, Sarah Skeen, Mark Tomlinson, Ana Macedo Exposure to violence and psychological well-being in children affected by HIV/AIDS in South Africa.
Background Objectives Methods Study Design A program evaluation of WIHD AfterCare families utilizing data collected from self-report measures and demographic.
Change Fund Specialist LAAC Health Visitors. Context  A proposal was submitted from health, social work and education to the Early Years Change fund.
Children and Families Network Routine Enquiry About Adversity in Childhood (REACh) REACh Project Lead Lesley M. Banner.
Not One More Child in Arapahoe County Arapahoe County Department of Human Services Children, Youth and Family Services 2012, 2013 and 2014 Child Abuse.
Caring For Children Roles of different professionals.
Network Name Celebrating Good Practice Louise Burton & Jane Bhatti Safeguarding Health Practitioners 24 January 2012.
The Children’s Aid Society of Brant Preliminary Findings Crown Ward Review 2011 February 28-March 10, 2011.
Categories of Abuse Physical Sexual Neglect Emotional.
“Would this be good enough for my child?”. Why do children become 'looked after'? Affected by distressing and damaging experiences including physical.
Volunteers and Volunteering Organisations:
Safeguarding babies and very young children from abuse and neglect: experiences on entering education Harriet Ward, Georgia Hyde-Dryden, Rebecca Brown,
Adolescent Neglect - 7 Minute Briefing
Aims To introduce the Residential Support Programme model used in Liverpool To discuss some outcomes of the programme.
Presentation transcript:

What is Take Two?

Take Two is a developmental therapeutic service for Child Protection clients who have suffered trauma and disrupted attachment due to their experience of abuse and neglect. T2 provides a statewide, intensive therapeutic service to those clients who have been severely abused or neglected and are at risk of developing or already demonstrate emotional and/or behavioural disturbance. Take Two

Clients of Child Protection who exhibit, or are at risk of developing, severe emotional or behavioural disturbance caused by abuse and/or neglect. Clients of Child Protection who are subjects of substantiated significant and/or very severe harm. Aged 0-18 years. May be living at home, with relatives, or in out of home care. Who is referred to Take Two?

What does Take Two aim to do? The T2 program aims to respond to the child’s needs for: 1.Safety 2.Attachment and connectedness 3.Recovery from trauma 4.Promotion of development, health and wellbeing

Box Hill Bendigo Wangaratta Mildura Ballarat Geelong Secure Welfare Flemington Campbellfield Dandenong Morwell Seymour Take Two Locations Horsham

Partnership Previous research highlighted that placing these children in out of home care was not enough to keep them safe or to enable them to work towards recovery. It was agreed that neither Child Protection, out of home care, nor therapeutic services were enough on their own to achieve the desired outcomes for these children

Partnership T2 is a partnership of the service systems of mental health and child welfare and the academic fields of psychology, psychiatry and social work. Each of these bring different areas and approaches to research, therapy and focus.

What are the experiences of children and young people referred to Take Two?

Number 9% 12% 6% 5% 15% 5% 15% 9% 20% Type of Maltreatment Experienced by T2 Clients AbandonmentPhysical abuseSexual abuseEmotional Abuse Developmental abuse Type of Child Maltreatment Percent

Type of Placement at Time of Referral to Take Two

Parental factors relating to abuse/ neglect Exposure to parental substance abuse 43% Exposure to physical harm from family violence 45% Exposure to family violence59% Forcing child to witness violence12% Exposure to parental psychiatric illness 26%

Other parental /family factors relating to abuse/ neglect 82% had mothers with known trauma histories: examples included 52% with history of child abuse; 40% with experience of rape (other than intrafamilial); 22% experienced significant loss through death of others. 49% had fathers with known trauma histories: examples included 31% with history of child abuse; 9% with experience of rape (other than intrafamilial); 13% experienced significant loss through death of others.

Child experiences of loss/ separation - 36 children (16%) had a parent figure who had died. 16 children (8%) had another significant person in their life die (eg sibling) 36 children (16%) had experienced major loss of contact with parent figure 47 children (20%) had at least one parent figure in gaol during T2 involvement in children (25%) had parent’s relationships change during T2 involvement in children (76%) were living in out of home care at time of referral to T children (89%) had experienced at least one previous placement away from their parents prior to T2 involvement. 100 children (44%) had experienced six or more previous placements prior to T2 involvement.

Other trauma experienced by T2 regional clients not including intrafamilial maltreatment Percent of Cases Trauma related to parent’s difficulties or lifestyle81.4 Trauma related to child protection and care involvement77.0 Parents' separation/divorce14.7 Sexual abuse - not by parent figure8.3 Confirmed / query sexual assault (not clear by whom)4.4 Physically assaulted - not by parent figure or unclear5.9 Trauma related to siblings9.8 Bullied/ rejected by other children5.4 Exposed to general violence6.9 Medical interventions)/serious illness4.9 Fear of injury/accident/life threatening incident3.4 Witnessing of death or overwhelming horrible incident7.4

What are the experiences of those who receive service from Take Two?

Stakeholder feedback Stakeholder surveys were sent to clients, parents, carers and workers of T2 teams regarding their perception of outcomes and of their level of satisfaction with service. Total of 272 surveys have been returned (including

Percentage of feedback surveys received by whom? (n=270)

Stakeholder feedback about Take Two “taking time” There is a clear relationship between the length of time the client had been in the service and percentage of respondents who believed that T2 had helped the child with their life. 60% of respondents who were completing the survey in relation to a client who had been referred to T2 less than 6 months ago agreed T2 had helped the child with their life. This increased to 68% for participants who completed the survey in relation to a child who had been in the service for 6-12 months. There is a further increase to 83% for participants completing the survey in relation to children who have been with the service for a year or more

Percentage of length of time T2 involved (n=270)

Did T2 help the child/young person with their life? (n=265)

Comments in feedback There was no difference between clients, parents and carers in terms of overall rating of T2, with 81, 80 and 80 percent respectively reporting that the service was excellent or good. Workers provided an even higher positive rating, with 92 percent or workers describing the service as excellent or good. Eighty-nine percent of both clients and parents agreed (this refers to both those who responded ‘agree’ and ‘strongly agree’) with the statement “I liked the help Take Two gave me”. An even higher percentage of carers (94%) and workers (92%) agreed with the slightly differently worded statement, “I liked the service received from Take Two”.

Ok, we know you like it; but does it help? Whether T2 helped the child with their life was the area that showed the most variation. 83% of workers agreed with this statement. The results among clients and carers were similar with 76 percent of clients and 73 percent of carers agreeing that T2 had helped. However, among parents this figure was 55%. Importantly though, this lower figure was due to a much larger percentage of parents responding that they were undecided (35%) compared with other respondents rather than a larger percentage who disagreed. Only 10%of parents disagreed, indicating that they found the service had not ‘helped’.