Transverse Mass for pairs of ‘gluinos’ Yeong Gyun Kim (KAIST) In collaboration with W.S.Cho, K.Choi, C.B.Park SUSY 08: June 16-21, 2008, Seoul, Korea.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M.Ball/K.Desch, Experimental Analysis of Neutralino Production in SPS 1a 1 Experimental Study of Neutralino Production in SPS 1a: a First Look Markus Ball.
Advertisements

Measurement of Relic Density at the LHC1 Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University Measurement of Relic Density at the LHC.
Quark Compositeness Search with γ +Jet Final State at the LHC Satyaki Bhattacharya, Sushil S. Chauhan, Brajesh Choudhary, Debajyoti Choudhury Department.
Anomalous Pion Production in High Energy Particle Collisions Alexander Bylinkin, Andrey Rostovtsev XV Moscow School of Physics XXXX ITEP Winter School.
Regina Demina, University of Rochester 02/08/2012 Forward-backward asymmetry in top-antitop production in proton-antiproton collisions.
Relic Density at the LHC B. Dutta In Collaboration With: R. Arnowitt, A. Gurrola, T. Kamon, A. Krislock, D.Toback Phys.Lett.B639:46,2006, hep-ph/
June 8, 2007LPC Early CMS Physics1 Relic Density in MET+Jets+Taus Sample at the LHC Teruki Kamon Texas A&M University [1] Physics Case in MET+Jets+Taus.
1 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory The 13th Annual International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of the Fundamental Interactions Durham, 2005.
Susy05, Durham 21 st July1 Split SUSY at Colliders Peter Richardson Durham University Work done in collaboration with W. Kilian, T. Plehn and E. Schmidt,
1 the LHC Jet & MET Searches Adam Avakian PY898 - Special Topics in LHC Physics 3/23/2009.
Looking for SUSY Dark Matter with ATLAS The Story of a Lonely Lepton Nadia Davidson Supervisor: Elisabetta Barberio.
Jan 17, 2007 Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ P T Slope 1 Measuring Mass Difference at LHC using soft τ P T Slope Alfredo Gurrola in collaboration.
June 8, 2007DSU 2007, Minnesota Relic Density at the LHC B. Dutta In Collaboration With: R. Arnowitt, A. Gurrola, T. Kamon, A. Krislock, D. Toback Phys.
ADR for Massimiliano Chiorboli Universita’ and INFN Catania
Paris 22/4 UED Albert De Roeck (CERN) 1 Identifying Universal Extra Dimensions at CLIC  Minimal UED model  CLIC experimentation  UED signals & Measurements.
12 May 2004 Alan Barr UK ATLAS Physics SUSY Spin Measurements with ATLAS Alan Barr “What else could it possibly be?” “Don’t be so sure … ” hep-ph/
LHC’s Second Run Hyunseok Lee 1. 2 ■ Discovery of the Higgs particle.
1 Jet Energy Studies at  s=1 TeV e + e - Colliders: A First Look C.F. Berger & TGR 05/08.
1Alan Barr PASCOS 09 PASCOS 2009 DESY 9 July 2009 …AT THE LHC DARK MATTER … Alan Barr University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations.
Sung-Won Lee 1 Study of Jets Production Association with a Z boson in pp Collision at 7 and 8 TeV with the CMS Detector Kittikul Kovitanggoon Ph. D. Thesis.
Mass and Spin measurement with mT2 at the LHC Yeong Gyun Kim (KAIST) In collaboration with W.S.Cho, K.Choi, C.B.Park.
Measurements, Model Independence & Monte Carlo Jon Butterworth University College London ICTP/MCnet school São Paulo 27/4/2015.
SUSY at the LHC Yeong Gyun Kim (Sejong U. & KAIST) HPC Asia 2007 (September. 9-12, 2007 Seoul, Korea)
1 Simulation study of e + e -  W H + W H - Introduction Observable to be measured Analysis framework Event selection Results Rei Sasaki (Tohoku University)
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
Top-partner mass reconstruction by using jets Michihisa Takeuchi ( KEK,YITP ) In collaboration with Mihoko M. Nojiri (KEK), Naotoshi Okamura (KEK)
2004 Xmas MeetingSarah Allwood WW Scattering at ATLAS.
Search for Invisible Higgs Decays at the ILC Akimasa Ishikawa (Tohoku University)
Sayfa 1 May 2012 Sheffield. Sayfa 2 Content 1.Introduction 2.Particle Reconstruction 3.Mass Constraint 4.Iterative Methods for the Mass Constraint 5.Non-Iterative.
Probing the Majorana Nature and CP Properties of Neutralinos Yeong Gyun Kim (Korea University) In collaboration with S.Y.Choi, B.C.Chung, J.Kalinoswski.
ATLAS Dan Tovey 1 Measurement of the LSP Mass Dan Tovey University of Sheffield On Behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Martin White – Cambridge ATLAS UK ATLAS Physics Meeting, May 2004.
Report on LHT at the LHC ~ Some results from simulation study ~ Shigeki Matsumoto (Univ. of Toyama) 1.What kinds of LHT signals are expected, and how accurately.
December 3rd, 2009 Search for Gluinos and Squarks in events with missing transverse momentum DIS 2013: XXI. International workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering.
22 December 2006Masters Defense Texas A&M University1 Adam Aurisano In Collaboration with Richard Arnowitt, Bhaskar Dutta, Teruki Kamon, Nikolay Kolev*,
Phenomenlogical Aspects of Mirage Mediation Yeong Gyun Kim (Sejong University) Neutralino Dark Matter in Mirage Mediation (thermal relic density, direct.
Transverse mass kink Yeong Gyun Kim (KAIST) In collaboration with W.S.Cho, K.Choi and C.B. Park (KAIST) Ref) Phys.Rev.Lett.100: (2008), JHEP 0802:035.
Supersymmetry measurements with ATLAS Tommaso Lari (CERN/INFN Milano) On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration After we have discovered New Physics, can we.
Transverse Mass Kink Yeong Gyun Kim (KAIST) In collaboration with W.S.Cho, K.Choi, C.B.Park.
1 TOP MASS MEASUREMENT WITH ATLAS A.-I. Etienvre, for the ATLAS Collaboration.
Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector Seminar talk by Eduardo Garcia-Valdecasas Tenreiro.
October 2011 David Toback, Texas A&M University Research Topics Seminar1 David Toback Texas A&M University For the CDF Collaboration CIPANP, June 2012.
WIN 05, Delphi, Greece, June 2005Filip Moortgat, CERN WIN 05 Inclusive signatures: discovery, fast but not unambiguous Exclusive final states & long term.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
Signatures of lepton-jet production at the LHC Eva Halkiadakis (Rutgers University) with Adam Falkowski, Yuri Gershtein (Rutgers University) Josh Ruderman.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
1 The latest and greatest tricks in studying missing energy events Konstantin Matchev With: M. Burns, P. Konar, K. Kong, F. Moortgat, L. Pape, M. Park.
SPS5 SUSY STUDIES AT ATLAS Iris Borjanovic Institute of Physics, Belgrade.
09/06/06Predrag Krstonosic - CALOR061 Particle flow performance and detector optimization.
Higgs in the Large Hadron Collider Joe Mitchell Advisor: Dr. Chung Kao.
Using Subsystem MT2 for Complete Mass Determinations in Decay Chains with Missing Hadron Colliders. Myeonghun Park University of Florida In collaboration.
Generalized MT2 for mass determinations in decay chains with missing PT at LHC Myeonghun Park University of Florida In collaboration with M.Burns, K.C.Kong,
Developing Model Independent sparticle mass measurements at ATLAS Cambridge SUSY Working Group B.C. Allanach, C.G. Lester, M.A. Parker, B.R. Webber See.
Physics at the LHC M. Guchait DHEP Annual Meeting 7-8 th April, 2016.
The study of q q production at LHC in the l l channel and sensitivity to other models Michihisa Takeuchi ~~ LL ± ± (hep-ph/ ) Kyoto Univ. (YITP),
Phenomenlogical Aspects of Mirage Mediation Yeong Gyun Kim (Sejong U. & KAIST) Neutralino Dark Matter in Mirage Mediation (thermal relic density, direct.
Supersymmetry at LHC and beyond
University of California, Davis
Search for Dark Matter in Jets plus MET final state for Non-therma Dark Matter model Using Data From Proton-Proton Collisions at √s = 13TeV Sonaina Undleeb.
Mass and Spin measurement with mT2 at the LHC
SUSY Particle Mass Measurement with the Contransverse Mass Dan Tovey, University of Sheffield 1.
ATLAS: Missing Transverse Energy in the Search for Supersymmetry
in mass measurements at the LHC Recent developments Yeong Gyun Kim
Measuring masses of semi-invisible decays
Sparticle spins from cascade decays
Prospects for sparticle reconstruction at new SUSY benchmark points
Using Single Photons for WIMP Searches at the ILC
Presentation transcript:

Transverse Mass for pairs of ‘gluinos’ Yeong Gyun Kim (KAIST) In collaboration with W.S.Cho, K.Choi, C.B.Park SUSY 08: June 16-21, 2008, Seoul, Korea

Introduction Cambridge m T2 variable ‘Gluino’ m T2 variable Discussions Contents

Introduction

 Precise measurement of SUSY particle masses  Reconstruction of SUSY theory (SUSY breaking mechanism) Measurement of SUSY masses  Weighing Dark Matter with collider

 SUSY events always contain two invisible LSPs  No masses can be reconstructed directly  Final state momentum in beam direction is unknown a priori, due to our ignorance of initial partonic center of mass frame The Mass measurement is Not an easy task at the LHC !

Several approaches (and variants) of mass measurements proposed  Invariant mass Edge method Hinchliffe, Paige, Shapiro, Soderqvist, Yao ; Allanach, Lester, Parker, Webber  Mass relation method Kawagoe, Nojiri, Polesello ; Cheng, Gunion, Han, Marandellea, McElrath  Transverse mass (M T2 ) kink method Cho, Choi, YGK, Park ; Barr, Lester, Gripaios ; Ross, Serna; Nojiri, Shimizu, Okada, Kawagoe

 Basic idea  Identify a particular long decay chain and measure kinematic endpoints of various invariant mass distributions with visible particles  The endpoints are given by functions of SUSY particle masses The Edge method Hinchliffe, Paige, etal. (1997)

If a long enough decay chain is identified, It would be possible to measure sparticle masses in a model independent way 3 step two-body decays

Mass relation method  Consider the following cascade decay chain (4 step two-body decays) Kawagoe, Nojiri, Polesello (2004)  Completely solve the kinematics of the cascade decay by using mass shell conditions of the sparticles

 One can write five mass shell conditions which contain 4 unknown d.o.f of LSP momentum  Each event describes a 4-dim. hypersurface in 5-dim. mass space, and the hypersurfcae differs event by event  Many events determine a solution for masses through intersections of hypersurfaces

Both of the Edge method and the Mass relation method rely on a long decay chain to determine sparticle masses W hat if we don’t have long enough decay chain but only short one ? In such case, M T2 variable would be useful to get information on sparticle masses

(Stransverse Mass) Cambridge m T2 variable Lester, Summers (1999) Barr, Lester, Stephens (2003)

Cambridge m T2 (Lester and Summers, 1999) Massive particles pair produced Each decays to one visible and one invisible particle. For example, For the decay, ()

( : total MET vector in the event ) However, not knowing the form of the MET vector splitting, the best we can say is that : with minimization over all possible trial LSP momenta

 M T2 distribution for LHC point 5, with 30 fb -1, (Lester and Summers, 1999) Endpoint measurement of m T2 distribution determines the mother particle mass ( with )

The LSP mass is needed as an input for m T2 calculation But it might not be known in advance m T2 depends on a trial LSP mass Maximum of m T2 as a function of the trial LSP mass (Lester and Summers, 1999) The correlation from a numerical calculation can be expressed by an analytic formula in terms of true sparticle masses

Right handed squark mass from the m T2 SPS1a point, with 30 fb -1 m_qR ~ 520 GeV, mLSP ~96 GeV (LHC/ILC Study Group: hep-ph/ )

 Unconstrained minimum of m T We have a global minimum of the transverse mass when Trial LSP momentum

 Solution of m T2 (the balanced solution) m T2 : the minimum of m T (1) subject to the two constraints m T (1) = m T (2), and p T X(1) +p T X(2) = p T miss Trial LSP momenta with (for no ISR)

with (m q = 0 )  The balanced solution of squark m T2 in terms of visible momenta (Lester and Barr )

 In order to get the expression for m T2 max, We only have to consider the case where two mother particles are at rest and all decay products are on the transverse plane w.r.t proton beam direction, for no ISR  In the rest frame of squark, the quark momenta if both quark momenta are along the direction of the transverse plane (Cho, Choi, Kim and Park, 2007)

Well described by the above Analytic expression with true Squark mass and true LSP mass  The maximum of the squark m T2 (occurs at ) (Cho, Choi, Kim and Park, ) Squark and LSP masses are Not determined separately

Some remarks on the effect of squark boost In general, squarks are produced with non-zero p T The m T2 solution is invariant under back-to-back transverse boost of mother squarks (all visible momenta are on the transverse plane)

‘Gluino’ m T2 variable In collaboration with W.S.Cho, K.Choi, C.B.Park Ref) arXiv: , arXiv:

Gluino m T2 (stransverse mass) A new observable, which is an application of m T2 variable to the process Gluinos are pair produced in proton-proton collision Each gluino decays into two quarks and one LSP through three body decay (off-shell squark) or two body cascade decay (on-shell squark)

 For each gluino decay, the following transverse mass can be constructed : mass and transverse momentum of qq system : trial mass and transverse momentum of the LSP  With two such gluino decays in each event, the gluino m T2 is defined as (minimization over all possible trial LSP momenta)

 From the definition of the gluino m T2 Therefore, if the LSP mass is known, one can determine the gluino mass from the endpoint measurement of the gluino m T2 distribution.  However, the LSP mass might not be known in advance and then, can be considered as a function of the trial LSP mass, satisfying

Possible m qq values for three body decays of the gluino : Each mother particle produces one invisible LSP and more than one visible particles

Gluino m T2 ( ) Case : two di-quark invariant masses are equal to each other In the frame of gluinos at rest, the di-quark momentum is (Two sets of decay products are parallel to each other)

The gluino m T2 has a very interesting property This result implies that  The maximum of m T2 occurs when m qq = m qq (max)  The maximum of m T2 occurs when m qq = 0 ( )  m T2 = m_gluino for all m qq ( This conclusion holds also for more general cases where m qq1 is different from m qq2 )

For the red-line momentum configuration, Unbalanced Solution of m T2 appears In some momentum configuration, unconstrained minimum of one m T (2) is larger than the corresponding other m T (1) Then, m T2 is given by the unconstrained minimum of m T (2) m T2 (max) = m qq (max) + m x

 If the function can be constructed from experimental data, which identify the crossing point, one will be able to determine the gluino mass and the LSP mass simultaneously. A numerical example and a few TeV masses for sfermions

Experimental feasibility An example (a point in mAMSB) with a few TeV sfermion masses (gluino undergoes three body decay) Wino LSP We have generated a MC sample of SUSY events, which corresponds to 300 fb -1 by PYTHIA The generated events further processed with PGS detector simulation, which approximates an ATLAS or CMS-like detector

 Experimental selection cuts  At least 4 jets with  Missing transverse energy  Transverse sphericity  No b-jets and no-leptons GeV

 The four leading jets are divided into two groups of dijets by hemisphere analysis Seeding : The leading jet and the other jet which has the largest with respect to the leading jet are chosen as two ‘seed’ jets for the division Association : Each of the remaining jets is associated to the seed jet making a smaller opening angle If this procedure fail to choose two groups of jet pairs, We discarded the event

The gluino m T2 distribution with the trial LSP mass m x = 90 GeV Fitting with a linear function with a linear background, We get the endpoints m T2 (max) = The blue histogram : SM background

 as a function of the trial LSP mass for the benchmark point Fitting the data points with the above two theoretical curves, we obtain The true values are GeV

 The above results DO NOT include systematic uncertainties associated with, for example, fit function, fit range and bin size of the histogram to determine the endpoint of mT2 distribution etc.  SM backgrounds are generated by PYTHIA. It may underestimate the SM backgrounds. Some Remarks

For case of two body cascade decay m 2 qq max = Therefore,,

For three body decayFor two body cascade decay

6-quark m T2 (Work in progress) If m_squark > m_gluino and squark is not decoupled squark  quark + gluino (  q q LSP)  3-quarks + LSP Maximum of the Invariant mass of 3-quarks M_qqq (max) = m_squark – m_LSP, if (m_gluino)^2 > (m_squark * m_LSP)

A mSUGRA point, m_squark ~ 791 GeV, m_gluino ~ 636 GeV, m_LSP ~ 98 GeV P T (7 th -jet) <50 GeV Hemishpere analysis 6-quark m T2 (II)

6-quark m T2 (III)

 Barr, Gripaios and Lester (arXiv: [hep-ph]) Instead of jet-paring with hemisphere analysis, we may calculate m T2 for all possible divisions of a given event into two sets, and then minimize m T2 M TGen vs. Hemisphere analysis M 2C (A Variant of ‘gluino’ mT2)  Ross and Serna (arXiv: [hep-ph]) A Variant of ‘gluino’ m T2 with explicit constraint from the endpoint of ‘diquark’ invariant mass (M 2C )

 Nojiri, Shimizu, Okada and Kawagoe (arXiv: ) Even without specifying the decay channel, m T2 variable still shows a kink structure in some cases. This might help to determine the sparticle masses at the early stage of the LHC experiment Inclusive m T2

(Cho,Choi, YGK, Park, arXiv: )

Conclusions  We introduced a new observable, ‘gluino’ m T2  We showed that the maximum of the gluino m T2 as a function of trial LSP mass has a kink structure at true LSP mass from which gluino mass and LSP mass can be determined simultaneously.

Backup

The balanced m T2 solution where