The Left Visual Field Advantage in Asynchronous Dual-Stream RSVP Tasks: An Investigation of Potential Neural Mechanisms Andrew Clement & Nestor Matthews.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Chapter 4: The Visual Cortex and Beyond

Advertisements

All slides © S. J. Luck, except as indicated in the notes sections of individual slides Slides may be used for nonprofit educational purposes if this copyright.

Results and Discussion Logan Pedersen & Dr. Mei-Ching Lien School of Psychological Science, College of Liberal Arts Introduction A classic finding in Psychology.

Word Imagery Effects on Explicit and Implicit Memory Nicholas Bube, Drew Finke, Darcy Lemon, and Meaghan Topper.

Attention-Dependent Hemifield Asymmetries When Judging Numerosity Nestor Matthews & Sarah Theobald Department of Psychology, Denison University, Granville.

Attentionally Dependent Bilateral Advantage on Numerosity Judgments Jenny Ewing & Nestor Matthews Department of Psychology, Denison University, Granville.

Bilateral and Unilateral Orientation Dynamics Nestor Matthews & Kristin M. Reardon Department of Psychology, Denison University, Granville OH USA.

Bilateral Attentional Advantage in Gabor Detection Nestor Matthews & Jenna Kelly Department of Psychology, Denison University, Granville OH USA In.

Psych 216: Movement Attention. What is attention? There is too much information available in the world to process it all. Demonstration: change-detection.

Visual Hemifields and Perceptual Grouping Sarah Theobald & Nestor Matthews Department of Psychology, Denison University, Granville OH USA The human.

Visual attention reveals changing color in moving objects James E. Hoffman and Scott McLean University of Delaware.

The Timecourse of Morphological Processing: Base and surface frequency effects in speed-accuracy tradeoff designs Jennifer Vannest University of Michigan.

Hemispheric asymmetries in the resolution of lexical ambiguity Jeffrey Coney, Kimberly David Evans Presented by Chris Evans May 17, 2006.

Brian White, Karl Gegenfurtner & Dirk Kerzel Remote distractors and an extended.

Read this article for Wednesday: A Neural Basis for Visual Search in Inferior Temporal Cortex Leonardo Chelazzi et al. (1993) Nature.

Attention Orienting System and Associated Disorders Neglect, Extinction and Balint’s Syndrome.

Upcoming Stuff: Finish attention lectures this week No class Tuesday next week – What should you do instead? Start memory Thursday next week – Read Oliver.

Attention Orienting System and Associated Disorders Neglect, Extinction and Balint’s Syndrome.

Word Retrieval in a Stem Completion Task: Influence of Number of Potential Responses Christine Chiarello 1, Laura K. Halderman 1, Cathy S. Robinson 1 &

Features and Object in Visual Processing. The Waterfall Illusion.

Features and Object in Visual Processing. The Waterfall Illusion.

Disorders of Attention Orienting

The ‘when’ pathway of the right parietal lobe L. Battelli A. Pascual - LeoneP. Cavanagh.

The Time Course of the Oblique Effect in Orientation Sensitivity Nestor Matthews, Jennifer Cox & Alana Rojewski Department of Psychology, Denison University,

Hastening Visual Attention with Practice: A Perceptual Learning Study Michael Vawter & Nestor Matthews Department of Psychology, Denison University DiscussionIntroduction.

Localization of Auditory Stimulus in the Presence of an Auditory Cue By Albert Ler.

Previous research has shown performance asymmetries between right and left hemifields on attention-based tasks with a disadvantage for right visual field.

Chapter 8: Perceiving Motion

Reicher (1969): Word Superiority Effect Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State University Springfield, MO

Last Lecture History of disconnection syndromes History of disconnection syndromes The structure of the corpus callosum The structure of the corpus callosum.

Right Hemifield Deficits in Judging Simultaneity: A Perceptual Learning Study Nestor Matthews 1, Michael Vawter 1, Jenna Kelly 2 Psychology, Denison University.

Trading Noise for Stimulus Duration in Orientation Judgments Kei Kurosawa, Kristen Strong & Nestor Matthews Department of Psychology, Denison University,

# Attentional Volleying Across Visual Quadrants Andrew S. Clement 1,2 & Nestor Matthews 1 1 Department of Psychology, Denison University, 2 Department.

The effects of working memory load on negative priming in an N-back task Ewald Neumann Brain-Inspired Cognitive Systems (BICS) July, 2010.

Experimental Psychology PSY 433

Repetition blindness for novel objects 作者： Veronika Cotheart et al. 報告者：李正彥日期： 2006/3/30.

In principle, the neural resources that govern attention to the left visual field (LVF) could be independent of those governing attention to the right.

Development of Basic Indices of Attention to Nonsocial Events Across Infancy: Effects of Unimodal versus Bimodal Stimulation Lorraine E. Bahrick, James.

RIGHT PARIETAL CORTEX PLAYS A CRITICAL ROLE IN CHANGE BLINDNESS by Naser Aljundi.

Korea University User Interface Lab Copyright 2008 by User Interface Lab Human Action Laws in Electronic Virtual Worlds – An Empirical Study of Path Steering.

Orienting Attention to Semantic Categories T Cristescu, JT Devlin, AC Nobre Dept. Experimental Psychology and FMRIB Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford,

Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attention blink? By Raymond, Shapiro, & Arnell JEP:HPP.

Bilateral Superiority in Detecting Gabor Targets Among Gabor Distracters Nestor Matthews Department of Psychology, Denison University, Granville OH

Effect of laterality-specific training on visual learning Jenna Kelly & Nestor Matthews Department of Psychology, Denison University, Granville OH

Laterality-Specific Perceptual Learning on Gabor Detection Nestor Matthews & Jenna Kelly Department of Psychology, Denison University, Granville OH

Early Time Course Hemisphere Differences in Phonological & Orthographic Processes Laura K. Halderman 1, Christine Chiarello 1 & Natalie Kacinik 2 1 University.

Maxlab proprietary information – 5/4/09 – Maximilian Riesenhuber CT2WS at Georgetown: Letting your brain be all that.

Research Question Introduction References Method & Stimuli Results Conclusion Effects of Correlated External Noise on Processing Capacity The ability to.

The Effect of Retro-Cueing on an ERP Marker of VSTM Maintenance Alexandra M Murray, Bo-Cheng Kuo, Mark G Stokes, Anna C Nobre Brain & Cognition Laboratory,

Altered Visual Attention in IBS and IBD Patients Tkalčić M, Rupčić A, Pletikosić S, Domijan D, Šetić M, Hauser G Department of Psychology University of.

Ch. 13 A face in the crowd: which groups of neurons process face stimuli, and how do they interact? KARI L. HOFFMANN 2009/1/13 BI, Population Coding Seminar.

Visual Speed Sensitivity in the Drum Corp Color Guard

Kimron Shapiro & Frances Garrad-Cole The University of Wales, Bangor

Kim Uittenhove, Lina Chaabi, Valérie Camos, Pierre Barrouillet

Jenna Kelly1,2 & Nestor Matthews2

The Effect of Inter-letter Spacing on Reading Yu-Chi Tai, PhD James E

Figure 1. (A) One training trial in the probabilistic selection task

The Effects of Musical Mood and Musical Arousal on Visual Attention

The involvement of visual and verbal representations in a quantitative and a qualitative visual change detection task. Laura Jenkins, and Dr Colin Hamilton.

Evidence of Inhibitory Processing During Visual Search

Experimental Psychology PSY 433

Double Dissociation in Radial & Rotational Motion-Defined Temporal Order Judgments Poster # Leslie Welch1, Nestor Matthews2, Elena Festa1, Kendra.

A Comparison of Radial and Rotational Plaid Speed Judgments

Investigating the Attentional Blink With Predicted Targets

47th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Houston, TX

Perceptual Learning on Simultaneity and Temporal Order Judgments

Normalization Regulates Competition for Visual Awareness

Volume 18, Issue 19, Pages (October 2008)

The Effect of Lineup Structure on Individual Identification

Judging Peripheral Change: Attentional and Stimulus-Driven Effects

Presentation transcript:

The Left Visual Field Advantage in Asynchronous Dual-Stream RSVP Tasks: An Investigation of Potential Neural Mechanisms Andrew Clement & Nestor Matthews – Department of Psychology, Denison University Discussion Experiment 1 yielded a typical pattern of results in which there was an LVF advantage for T2|T1 accuracy but not for T1 accuracy. However, there were no significant differences between the synchronous and asynchronous paradigms, suggesting that the visual system’s speed limit is set locally (separately in the two visual fields) rather than globally (across visual fields). 1,10-11 Experiment 2A also revealed that visual speed limits are set independently in the two visual fields. 1,10-11 In particular, the results indicated that T2|T1 accuracy for the laterally faster triple letter paradigm decreased when targets appeared in the same visual field. T2 accuracy also increased relative to T1 accuracy for the R,L condition in the triple letter paradigm, revealing a focused LVF advantage. 13 The results of Experiments 2B and 2C expanded upon these findings, indicating that neither attention to a salient T1 nor the physical presence of this target are necessary for LVF advantages to occur. 1 Lastly, Experiment 3’s results revealed a cross-over interaction that helps clarify previous findings regarding LVF advantages. In specific, these results suggest that the neural response for RVF stimuli is delayed relative to that for LVF stimuli. 2,5,14 Thus, stimuli presented at close temporal distances may appear simultaneous or non- simultaneous, depending on whether a probe target appeared in the LVF or RVF (see Figure 2). References 1. Scalf et al. (2007). [PubMed ID: ][PubMed ID: ] 2. Verleger et al. (2008). [PubMed ID: ][PubMed ID: ] 3. Śmigasiewicz et al. (2010). [PubMed ID: ][PubMed ID: ] 4. Verleger et al. (2010). [PubMed ID: ][PubMed ID: ] 5. Verleger et al. (2011). [PubMed ID: ][PubMed ID: ] 6. Matthews & Kelly (2011). [PubMed ID: ][PubMed ID: ] 7. Matthews et al. (2012). [PubMed ID: ][PubMed ID: ] 8. VanRullen & Dubois (2011). [PubMed ID: ][PubMed ID: ] 9. Hanslmayr et al. (2011). [PubMed ID: ][PubMed ID: ] 10. Alvarez & Cavanagh (2005). [PubMed ID: ][PubMed ID: ] 11. Alvarez et al. (2012). [PubMed ID: ][PubMed ID: ] 12. Buschman & Miller (2007). [PubMed ID: ][PubMed ID: ] 13. Potter et al. (2002). [PubMed ID: ][PubMed ID: ] 14. Vul et al. (2008). [PubMed ID: ][PubMed ID: ] Methods Synchronous Identification Task Asynchronous Identification TaskTriple Letter Identification TaskSimultaneity Task Results Experiment 1: Synchronous vs. Asynchronous Experiment 2A: Asynchronous vs. Triple Letter (T1 Present, T1 & T2 Identification) Experiment 2B: Asynchronous vs. Triple Letter (T1 Present, T2 Identification) Experiment 2C: Asynchronous vs. Triple Letter (T1 Absent, T2 Identification) Experiment 3: Simultaneity Experiment 1: T1 ANOVAF(1,18)PμP2μP2 Power Paradigm Side Change T2 Side Experiment 1: T2|T1 ANOVAF(1,18)PμP2μP2 Power Paradigm Side Change T2 Side Experiment 2A: T1 ANOVAF(1,15)PμP2μP2 Power Paradigm53.126p< Side Change T2 Side31.226p< Paradigm x Side Change Paradigm x T2 Side Side Change x T2 Side Way Interaction Experiment 2A: T2|T1 ANOVAF(1,15)PμP2μP2 Power Paradigm Side Change T2 Side Paradigm x Side Change Paradigm x T2 Side Side Change x T2 Side Way Interaction Experiment 2B: T2 ANOVAF(1,12)PμP2μP2 Power Paradigm Side Change T2 Side Paradigm x Side Change Paradigm x T2 Side Side Change x T2 Side Way Interaction Experiment 2C: T2 ANOVAF(1,12)PμP2μP2 Power Paradigm51.464p< T2 Side14.48p= Paradigm x T2 Side0.316p= Experiment 3: D' ANOVAWilks ΛFDFPμP2μP2 Power Probe Side (1,15) SOA (9,7) Probe Side x SOA (9,7) Experiment 3: False Alarm ANOVAWilks ΛFDFPμP2μP2 Power L Probe x R Probe (1,15) Figure 2. Introduction The present study investigated the timing of the human visual system, particularly instances when the visual system’s speed limit becomes asymmetrical across the left and right visual fields. Specifically, research reveals that participants perform reliably better in the left visual field (LVF) compared to the right one (RVF). 1-7 This persistent asymmetry has been shown to occur in both high-level identification tasks 1-5 and low-level simultaneity tasks. 6-7 Here, we attempted to synthesize this range of approaches by using a single experimental paradigm. The paradigm in question, known as dual-stream rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP), presents two streams of visual stimuli at relatively high speeds and requires participants to identify two targets (T1 & T2) within the streams. 2-5 However, in the present study we used several novel variations of this paradigm that either modified the synchrony of the stimuli or altered the requirements for identifying the targets. These variations of the RSVP paradigm enabled us to test several hypotheses regarding LVF advantages and the timing of human vision. First of all, by asynchronously presenting stimuli (see Figure 1) 8-9 we investigated whether the visual system’s speed limit is set locally or globally. 1,10-11 Secondly, modifying the identification requirements and presence of T1 enabled us to determine whether salient attentional cues play a role in LVF advantages. 1,12 Lastly, asking participants to judge the simultaneity of targets provided us with more precise information about the timing asymmetries underlying LVF advantages. 6-7 Acknowledgements This study was made possible by contributions from the Reid and Polly Anderson Endowment and the Sigma Xi Grants-In-Aid of Research Program. Figure 1.