Six-week project Lauren Villemaire MBP 3970Z Department of Medical Biophysics University of Western Ontario.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lorenz Mitschang Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, 23 rd February 2009 I. Basic Concepts.
Advertisements

BOLD Imaging at 7T Mark Elliott CfN Symposium 4/9/2008.
Principles of the MRI Signal Contrast Mechanisms MR Image Formation John VanMeter, Ph.D. Center for Functional and Molecular Imaging Georgetown University.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Sequences part I
Introduction to MRI Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Proton Spin In absence of a magnetic field, protons spin at random
MRI Phillip W Patton, Ph.D..
Richard Wise FMRI Director +44(0)
M R I Pulse Sequences Jerry Allison Ph.D..
BE 581 Lecture 3- Intro to MRI.
MR TRACKING METHODS Dr. Dan Gamliel, Dept. of Medical Physics,
Fund BioImag : MRI contrast mechanisms 1.What is the mechanism of T 2 * weighted MRI ? BOLD fMRI 2.How are spin echoes generated ? 3.What are.
The importance of MRI, a few numbers  MRI units worldwide in 2003  75 millions scans per year performed  Constant need for over 1000 MRI technologists.
Parameters and Trade-offs
The Basics of MRI The Basics of MRI. Current MRI technology displays images as multiple sets of gray tone images. Visualization and interpretation of.
Cellular imaging at 3 T: Detecting Cells in Inflammation using Active Labeling with Super paramagnetic Iron oxide Azhar Hosein Faraz Medical Biophysics.
Terry M. Button, Ph.D. Principals of Magnetic Resonance Image Formation.
Magnetic Resonance Imagining (MRI) Magnetic Fields
Diffusion Tensor MRI And Fiber Tacking Presented By: Eng. Inas Yassine.
Medical Imaging Mohammad Dawood Department of Computer Science University of Münster Germany.
Volumetric Analysis of Brain Structures Using MR Imaging Lilach Shay, Shira Nehemia Bio-Medical Engineering Dr. Alon Friedman and Dr. Akiva Feintuch Department.
Basics of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Multimodal Visualization for neurosurgical planning CMPS 261 June 8 th 2010 Uliana Popov.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Basic principles of MRI This lecture was taken from “Simply Physics” Click here to link to this site.
Magnetic Resonance Imagining (MRI) Magnetic Fields Protons in atomic nuclei spin on axes –Axes point in random directions across atoms In externally applied.
Gd-DTPA as an MRI Contrast Agent Lindsay Dods April 6, 2010 Supervisors: Robert Ta, Masters Student Robert Bartha, Ph.D.
MRI: an Introduction By Mohammad Ali Ahmadi Pajouh Amirkabir University of Technology Biomedical Eng. Dep.
Physics of Magnetic Resonance Chapter 12
대구가톨릭대학병원 영상의학과 이 영 환 M M R R Basic Physics. MR Signal T1-, T2-weighted TR, TE MR Signal T1-, T2-weighted TR, TE.
Advanced Biomedical Imaging Dr. Azza Helal A. Prof. of Medical Physics Faculty of Medicine Alexandria University.
Imaging Sequences part II
The comparison of MRI imaging In 3.0 T & 1.5T By a.r.shoaie.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Prof. Dr. Moustafa. M. Mohamed Dr. Eng. Safa Ahmed El-Askary
Seminar October, 2008 j. brnjas-kraljević. Imaging (MRI)  tomography technique  tomography technique – the volume image is built up by images of thin.
MRI DRAFT Principles of MRI ► Sectional Anatomy ► Provides anatomic and physiologic info ► Non- invasive ► No radiation  Magnetic fields and.
1 Introduction to Magnetic Resonance Imaging درس مقدمه ای بر فیزیک پزشکی Sahand University of Technology Faculty of Electrical Engineering M. Shamsi.
MRI image validation using MRI simulation Emily Koch CIS II April 10, 2001.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging – Basic Principles –
MRI Physics Dr Mohamed El Safwany, MD.. MRI Magnetic Resonance Imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Beyond FLAIR: Expanding the Role of Inversion Recovery in MR Imaging of the Brain Ali Batouli 1 Michael Spearman 1 Michael Goldberg 1 Emmanuel Kanal 2.
Protons (hydrogen nuclei act like little magnets) MRI Collective Magnetic Moment of Protons (M 0 ) Each pixel is a glass of protons B 0 = 3T (not to scale)
Conclusions Simulated fMRI phantoms with real motion and realistic susceptibility artifacts have been generated and tested using SPM2. Image distortion.
University of Western Ontario
MRI Physics: Spatial Encoding Anna Beaumont FRCR Part I Physics.
Spinning Nucleus Produces Magnetic Moment
MRI Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Definition A non-ionizing technique with full three dimensional capabilities, excellent soft-tissue contrast, and high.
 This depends on a property of nuclei called spin.  Gyroscope: Principle: As long as its disc remains spinning rapidly the direction of the spin axis.
Real time shimming (RTS) for compensation of respiratory induced field changes P van Gelderen, JA de Zwart, P Starewicz, RS Hinks, JH Duyn Introduction.
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING by PRADEEP V.EPAKAYAL. Mem.no L.
Imaging of Small Vessels in the Brain using MRI
Melanie Martin University of Winnipeg
FMRI data acquisition.
The strength of the flux density at the Earth’s surface ranges from less than 30μT in an area including most of South America and South Africa to over.
Sunday Case of the Day Physics
MRI Physics in a Nutshell Christian Schwarzbauer
Where Mt is the magnetization at time = t, the time after the 90o pulse, Mmax is the maximum magnetization at full recovery. At a time = one T1, the signal.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles
Physics of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Medical Imaging Imagining Modalities.
Bioengineering 280A Principles of Biomedical Imaging Fall Quarter 2005 MRI Lecture 5 Thomas Liu, BE280A, UCSD, Fall 2005.
conflicts of interest to report.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging [MRI]
Introduction to MR Robert Frost
(4)ELECTRONIC SUPPORT SYSTEM
T2 Relaxation Time T2 relaxation time is defined as the time needed to dephase up to 37% of the original value. T2 relaxation refers to the progressive.
Introduction to MR Robert Frost
Presentation transcript:

Six-week project Lauren Villemaire MBP 3970Z Department of Medical Biophysics University of Western Ontario

Outline Introduction MRI Imaging at high magnetic fields Phantoms Objective Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Acknowledgements References 2

Introduction to MRI Uses nuclear magnetic resonance of protons to produce proton density images Magnetism - proton spin Larmor Frequency - rate of precession The 7T MRI at Robarts Research Institute. 3

The primary magnet - main magnetic field - the tesla The gradient magnet - alters magnetic field - focuses magnetic field The RF coil - alters direction of proton spin - detects precession energy T1 and T2 relaxation times - characteristic of tissues - image contrast 4

Imaging at ultra high magnetic fields Advantages SNR Spatial Resolution Tissue Contrast Disadvantages RF heterogeneities Magnetic susceptibility artifacts Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) 5

Brain images at 7T have shading and bright spots that compromise image homogeneity. 6 Human hippocampus 1.5 T 7 T Images at 7T have much higher spatial resolution and SNR than at 1.5T

What are phantoms? An artificial object of known size and composition that is imaged to test, adjust or monitor an MRI system’s - homogeneity - imaging performance - orientation aspects. 7

Objective To develop a brain-mimicking phantom for use in the 7T MRI with the following characteristics in common with the brain: - Grey matter/white matter T1 and T2 relaxation times - Electrical and wave properties - Anatomical structure and size (not symmetrical) 8

Method The relaxivity of varying concentrations of GdCl3 and agarose were measured A concentric phantom was fabricated Coil loading was measured and B1+ effects were empirically determined 9 T1 and T2 values that match average human grey matter and white matter values were determined via measurements done by MRI CSF was mimicked by a 50-mM NaCl solution Grey matterWhite matter CSF

Axial images of brain slices were obtained from Brain Web – Simulated Brain Database. These images represent the standard size and structure of the human brain. Number of slices  36 Modality  T1 Slice thickness  5mm Noise  0% Intensity non-uniformity (RF)  0% 10

14 brain slices, each 1cm apart, were selected Images were, then, modified using Image J to sharpen and enhance contrast between grey matter, white matter, and CSF. 11

Each image was manually outlined to distinguish between the different compartments. 12

Tracings were scanned and made binary using ImageJ and then converted to SAT using Solid Works. 13 jpg pdf dxf  sat

Images were then formatted to open in the MasterCam Mill 9 program where they were modified. 14

Results An agarose gel and saline solution phantom was developed to mimic properties of the human brain for imaging at 7T. Tissue Target T1 (ms) Target T2 (ms) % agarose [GdCl3] (uM) Grey matter %8 White matter %22 15

T1W MP RAGE images of the same slice of the phantom with different inversion times. 16 TI = 500ms T1 = 1400ms to null GM T1 = 900ms to null WM

Comparison of RF interference patterns. Single element transmitting (located at back of head) All elements transmitting with random phases to produce interferences. 17

Now that each brain slice is compartmentalized into MasterCam, they can be milled out of plastic and eventually filled with the appropriate brain mimicking substances. 18

Discussion The phantom exhibits very similar dielectric properties (conductivity and permittivity) to the human brain The phantom is the same size and shape of the average brain The phantom has similar anatomical structure to the average brain The phantom has grey matter/ white matter contrast with the same T1 and T2 relaxation times as human brain tissue imaged at 7T I’ve successfully designed a head-mimicking phantom for use in the 7T MRI. 19

Conclusion Such a phantom is unique. It would... (1) allow the ability to instrument the phantom and measure RF power deposition (SAR) and (2) optimize RF shimming techniques using multiple transmitters. Both of these are major challenges currently. 20

Acknowledgements Supervisor: Dr. Ravi S. Menon Post-doctoral student: Kyle Gilbert Graduate student: Andrew Curtis 21

References Brain Web: Simulated Brain Database Rooney WD, et al. Magn Reson Med 2007; 57: Wright PJ et al. MAGMA 2008; 21: Yoshida A et al. Int J Hyperthermia 2004; 20: