Mod 232 Anna Taylor Pricing Manager. 1 Mod 232 An alternative methodology for allocating unidentified energy Currently allocated by RbD entirely in SSP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UK Gas Entry Regime – Review of existing Interruptible Arrangements & Potential Reforms for this Winter.
Advertisements

MOD 326 – Allocation of Unidentified Gas Following the Appointment of the AUGE August 2010.
Review of NTS entry charge setting arrangements - IA 1 July 2010.
Third Energy Package for Change of Supplier 2009/73/EC.
1 Project Nexus Modelling costs and benefits Andrew Wallace, Cesar Coelho Ofgem Project Nexus IA Subgroup 25 July 2012.
Non-code User Pays. 2 What we will cover Background Current Services Governance Arrangements What is working well What is not working as well.
© 2007 E.ON Nexus AQ Requirements To support the current business processes We need to maintain performance and enable market operation as is using current.
Individual Meter Point Reconciliation. What? Calculation of actual energy used at meter point level for all supply points Allow sites to be accurately.
Funding UKLink Process changes (User Pays). 2 Purpose of Presentation  Review of User Pays  Principles  Application to date  National Grid NTS observations.
USRV Incentives Review Chris Warner. USRV Resolution Responsibility and Occurrence  E8.1.1  “…the User shall investigate Reconciliation Values that.
SPA Enquiry Process - Additional Requirements for AMR sites ICoSS Presentation.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
21 May 2015 GAZ DE FRANCE ESS Mod 115 An alternative view Phil Broom Gaz de France ESS.
1 Project Nexus Market Differentiation Topic Workgroup 14 th & 15 th July 2009.
The economic regulation of gas processing services Key issues and initial thoughts Ofgem presentation 18 June 2007.
Mod 0445 – Amendment to the Arrangements for Daily Metered Supply Point Capacity Ofgem Direction to Provide Further Evidence National Grid Distribution.
Entry Capacity Release Methodology Statement Transmission Workstream, 4 th May 2006.
Capacity trade and transfer mechanism and the next AMSEC auction Nienke Hendriks Head of Gas Transmission Policy, Enforcement and Compliance 9 May 2007.
Xoserve Services Workgroup. xoserve Funding Arrangements - Model Comparison ModelKey Benefits User Pays Model AUser Pays Model B Baseline Services (Core)
Industry Dialogue on xoserve Services Progress Report for Ofgem 5 th December 2006.
User Pays Funding – Potential Licence Mechanism Simon Trivella – January 21 st 2010 Governance Workstream.
Future Funding Allocation for Change Development  Action came about during discussions on BSC panel  The analysis of change and development of potential.
Project Nexus Workgroup AQ Backstop Date Options 7 th October 2014.
UNC Modification 0213 – User Pays Governance Arrangements Simon Trivella – 19 th June 2008 Governance Workstream.
UNC G7.3.7 Invoicing Read Estimation Proposal Requirement for Read Estimation & Proposed Methodology Dean Johnson Distribution Workstream – 25 th August.
Proposed Agreement For Identification And Administration Of Unregistered Sites Chris Warner Network Code Manager.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
UNC Review Group 0178 National Grid Distribution “Reclassification of SSP to Domestic only” Review Group Meeting – 22 February 2008 Chris Warner.
Project Nexus. 2  Project Nexus is the replacement of the UK Link system in 2012/13  Sites & Meters and Invoicing  Initial Consultation published by.
Performance Assurance 21 st May Value Chain. Value Chain Xoserve would like to propose an approach to further aid the development of the Performance Assurance.
Governance and Charging Methodology for User Pays Services 10 th January 2007.
DNPD04 LDZ Exit Capacity Charges- Discussion Report Denis Aitchison 27 th July 2009.
Mod 270 Potential Options Rob Hill 15/02/2009. Six potential options following discussion at last months Development Workgroup OptionNameDescription 1Elective.
Total xoserve income £(a)m (ASA services – includes element for transporter funded changet) Transporter funded change budget built into service charge.
Modification proposal 0073 ‘Revision to the Notice Period regarding the implementation of changes to Transportation charges’ Transmission Workstream, 2.
Review of Entry Capacity and the Appropriate Allocation of Financial Risk Review Group th Sept 2008.
1 Project Nexus Approach to modelling costs and benefits Cesar Coelho Ofgem Project Nexus UNC Workgroup 15 May 2012.
Billing Operations Forum 24 July 2007 RbD Overview Billing Operations Forum 24 July 2007 RbD Overview Fiona Cottam.
1 v1 iGT CSEP Billing Solution ScottishPower Proposals April 08.
Customer Charge On behalf of all DNs 25 October 2010.
Gas Distribution Transportation Charging What are the Risks to Pricing predictability? Stephen Marland Pricing Manager
© Energy UK April 2012 Modification 435 Workgroup Alternative approaches to NDM Compensation 19 February 2013
Emergency Cashout Prices and Emergency Curtailment Quantity (ECQ) Adjustment Ritchard Hewitt Gas Code Development Manager.
Agency Charging Statement Overview of Consultation 11 th February 2008.
SESSION 19: INSURING Talking Points Insuring 1. Insurance is a product that allows people to pay a fee (called a premium) now to transfer the costs of.
Supply Assumptions for Investment Planning Transmission Planning Code Workshop 1 3rd April 2008.
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement – Interim Report findings 17 th September 2012.
Development Workgroup 0282 Action 018 – impact on RbD 13 September 2010.
ScottishPower, Energy Retail Gas Long Term Vacant (LTV) Proposal February 2010 Karen Kennedy ScottishPower.
MOD Proposal 0224 Facilitating the use of AMR in the Daily Metered Elective Regime 28 May 2009 Code User Pays Services.
Modification 0232 Presentation for Total By Gareth Evans.
Industry Dialogue on xoserve Services 14 th September 2007.
Ofgem’s decision on UNC modification proposal 044 Sonia Brown.
Proposal to modify Standard Special Conditions A4, A5 and D11 of the Gas Transporter licence Distribution Charging Methodology Forum (DCMF) 13 August 2007.
DNPC05 Consultation Paper Balance of Revenue Recovery between LDZ System Charges and Customer Charges Steve Armstrong 27 th July 2009.
IGT and Shipper Workgroup meeting 28 th February 2011.
User Pays Funding – Potential Licence Mechanism
Review Group 178 SSP as Domestic only.
Incentives 26 September 2018.
Modification th July 2008.
MOD 232 Proposal, Richard Dutton 16th December2008
CSEPs Reconciliation Proposals
Chris Warner UNC Modification Panel 21 December 2017
Modification Proposal 115 – ‘Correct Apportionment of NDM Error’
PROJECT NEXUS FUNDING – THE CUSTOMER’S VIEW
Modification Proposal 115 – ‘Correct Apportionment of NDM Error’
Modification 421 – Updates and Benefits Case
User Pays Principles and Governance
Modification Proposal 136
REVIEW GROUP 178 – AN ALTERNATE SOLUTION
Presentation transcript:

Mod 232 Anna Taylor Pricing Manager

1 Mod 232 An alternative methodology for allocating unidentified energy Currently allocated by RbD entirely in SSP market General consensus that current method not equitable 232 one of various proposals 232 moves estimated cost of unidentified energy to DNs and then charges it to all consumers in a manner to be decided by DNs

2 The first hurdle Would require Ofgem approval of a licence change

3 Assuming Licence change made… The DNs are asked to quantify and generate these charges but they are generally post supply point issues. The DNs have no practical drivers on which to allocate these costs and therefore no rationale for cost reflectivity Potential data source from xoserve is not complete – not all shippers report it and so again hard to be cost reflective The industry has already reviewed this issue and been unable to gain evidence of definitive cost levels or drivers Once in the charging methodology, flexibility in the level of charge is reduced

4 Assuming Value quantified… Would need a new charge code and UK Link changes if only to be charged to NDM LSP sites. This could be costly DNs are transporters, not traders. DNs don’t have a gas trader licence and have to buy shrinkage gas through an agent DNs get gas price protection for shrinkage and would probably expect the same here plus an additional fee to cover agency costs and the risk of setting charges on the basis of lower prices. Individual shippers may be able to purchase this gas far more efficiently This is a complicated proposal with ongoing costs, to DNs, xoserve and shippers which need to be weighed against any benefits