TM/WSP 5-9 Nov. 20071 Group A4 Issues raised during breakout A Need for more concrete measures and guidance. Can we group similar countries and provide.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Expanding the Socio-economic Potential of Cultural Heritage in the Caribbean.

Advertisements

TVET working group contributions. What are the possible options for obtaining decent living and working conditions without joining the informal economy?

The Enterprise Skills Story

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency EPR-Public Communications L-09 Audiences and Communication Channels.

GSR Part 2 – Why it is different and how to cope!

TM/WSP 5-9 Nov Group C3- Regulatory framework - Nuclear safety - Radiation protection - Security and physical protection QUESTIONS / DIFFICULTIES.

TM/WSP 5-9 Nov Group A3- National position - Stakeholders involvement - Legislative framework - Safeguards QUESTIONS / DIFFICULTIES 1. Difference.

TM/WSP 5-9 Nov Group A1- National position - Stakeholders involvement - Legislative framework - Safeguards QUESTIONS / DIFFICULTIES Can nuclear.

Richard Hibbert RSRL Quality, Assessment and Management Systems Manager Process management Requirements in IAEA Standards and Guides.

Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Goals and Challenges

Infrastructure Development TM/WS Infrastructure Development 9-12 February 2010 Breakout session – Group 2.

INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)

DISTILLATE Appraisal Workshop 21 May 07 Michael Padgett, Regional Transport Advisor, Yorkshire & Humber Assembly.

MSP course 2007 Phase 0 – Setting up Kumasi, Ghana 2008 Wageningen International.

Performance Measurement: Indicators Sara Grainger Statistical Support for Public Bodies Office of the Chief Statistician.

OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS AND PROGRAMMES presented by Faizal Parish Regional/Central Focal Point GEF NGO.

St Petersburg ATOMEXPO-2013 The IAEA recommendations for training of contractor personnel.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Human Resources Development for Nuclear Safety J. Bastos NSNI/RAS.

Facilities Management Category Management Plan Synopsis Version 1.1 (March 2015)

1 Consultation on Funding Reform Reforming care and support: funding adult social care Joseph Levitt.

NESCC Meeting March 28, Topics Accomplishments Since Last Meeting Program Management for NESCC Support to the NESCC Sponsor Committee Review and.

Technical Meeting on Evaluation Methodology for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development December, 2008 Nuclear Safety in Infrastructure Building.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency How do you know how far you have got? How much you still have to do? Are we nearly there yet? What – Who – When.

Introduction to ISO New and modified requirements.

Care Act 2014 Anne Clarke Head of Adult Social Care Sue Alexander Head of Finance & Business Support 23 rd April 2015.

OSF/ISD Project Portfolio Management Framework January 17, 2011.

Workshop 1 – all groups Role of local government Reminder: all discussions will be recorded though non-attributable Local government plays an extremely.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Overview of legal framework Regional Workshop - School for Drafting Regulations 3-14 November 2014 Abdelmadjid.

MCA Learning Pack – Session 3 1 Mental Capacity Act 2005: a practice-based course Supporting older people in care homes and the community as they would.

STRATEGIC DIRECTION UPDATE JANUARY THE VISION AND MISSION THE VISION: ENRICHING LIVES AND CREATING SUCCESSFUL FUTURES. THE MISSION: EDUCATION EXCELLENCE.

Tom MAZOUR IAEA, Division of Nuclear Power

08 October 2015 M. Ammar Mehdi Introduction to Human Resource Management & SSG-16 Actions 4 th Steering Committee on Competence of Human.

Better Evidence for a Better Start the social research unit at dartington.

Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Working Group 3A Self-Evaluation of Infrastructure Development Status Difficulties and Solutions.

Dr Renu Bindra Joint Strategic Needs Assessment. Policy background January 2006 “Strategic Needs Assessment” October 2006 “Joint Strategic Needs Assessment”

Human Resources Development TM/WS Infrastructure Development 9-12 February 2010 Breakout session – Group 1 Moderator: Mr. Biro Lucian (Romania) Reproter:

Visible Communities Richard Bridge and Nadia Denton Visible Standards Team.

Human Resources Development TM/WS Infrastructure Development 9-12 February 2010 Breakout session – Group 2.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Infrastructure Development Bridging the National & International Levels: The Euratom Experience and expertise Sotiris Synetos, Euratom.

Session 3: Suggested Approaches. Introduction India is implementing most of the elements in the FI Not deliberate implementation of FI Suggested approaches.

ADB/ ECA/ PARIS21 – NSDS design seminar, Addis Ababa, 8-11 August 2005 National Strategies for the Development of Statistics Planning for implementation,

International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.

QUALITY ECD FRAMEWORKS OSISA REGIONAL ECD CONFERENCE 3 TO 5 DECEMBER 2013 DR JULIANA SELETI UNICEF SOUTH AFRICA.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency The IAEA Integrated Regulatory Review Service (IRRS) IRRS Missions : Analysis from a Radiation Safety.

INDONESIA NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAMME INFRASTRUCTURE AND STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION Dr. A. Sarwiyana Sastratenaya Director, Center for.

Self Assessment SELF ASSESSMENT FOR YOU Ann Pike 30 th September 2010.

JORDAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (JAEC) Building of National Safeguards Capabilities in Jordan IAEA’s Technical Meeting/Workshop on National Infrastructure.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Working Group 2B Developing a Capable NEPIO Difficulties and Solutions.

Forward Planning The hallmark of an efficient and effective organisation and a requirement for Accreditation.

TM/WSP 5-9 Nov Group D2- Nuclear fuel cycle, nuclear Waste - QUESTIONS / DIFFICULTIES 1. Is it reasonable for a country to build a fuel fabrication.

Role of Self-Assessment V.C. Agarwal, Director (HR) NPCIL,INDIA.

Building Consensus C&S 563. BAD Consensus n Those who oppose do not speak up at meeting. n Everyone nodding in unison but not really agreeing with the.

Short overview of the legal framework of protected sites and status of existing ecological networks in Serbia.

Presentation By L. M. Baird And Scottish Health Council Research & Public Involvement Knowledge Exchange Event 12 th March 2015.

A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE POLICY ISSUES CONCERNING THE RCA PROGRAMME PRINATH DIAS RCA COORDINATOR.

Infrastructure Development TM/WS Infrastructure Development 9-12 February 2010 Breakout session – Group 4.

International Atomic Energy Agency Workshop on Topical Issues on Infrastructure Development: Managing the Development of a National Infrastructure for.

Fostering Social and Emotional Skills through Education Policies and Practices Anna Choi and Koji Miyamoto, OECD.

ISO 37001: Anti-Bribery Management System Standard

Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs

PASAI’s Strategic Planning Experience

ISO 37001: Anti-Bribery Management System Standard

ISO 37001: Anti-Bribery Management System Standard

The role of NEPIO – Operator vs. Government

Working Group 2A Self-Evaluation of Infrastructure Development Status

Group C4. - Regulatory framework. - Nuclear safety

ISO 37001: Anti-Bribery Management System Standard

ISO 37001: Anti-Bribery Management System Standard

Infrastructure Development

Presentation transcript:

TM/WSP 5-9 Nov Group A4 Issues raised during breakout A Need for more concrete measures and guidance. Can we group similar countries and provide some “tailor made” detailed frameworks. Need to score and weight different criteria in the milestones. Provide a document giving history of countries development of nuclear power: successes and failures

Public acceptability – how to deal with anti-nuclear groups and reach consensus? Some anti-nuclear groups are international so should there be guidance on a common approach? How do we measure public acceptance? Surveys, local representatives etc? More guidance on national energy planning, when are the plans robust. How to really establish the potential energy capability of the country? Very important input to stakeholder management – need for nuclear energy drives support. Also how to communicate and inform about nuclear. Need for long term planning not just short term use of limited resources. Guidance on what level of financial support should be given to local communities near to power plants? TM/WSP 5-9 Nov Group A4 Issues raised during breakout A

Legislative framework Laws on nuclear liability will be new to countries without a nuclear programme. Need more guidance on what the country approach should be. Should recognise that signing up to many international agreements takes a lot of time and resource. Is there enough guidance on what is required for different types of projects? Clear for Turnkey but not for BOO or BOOT. Need help to establish nuclear laws: it was suggested IAEA have “model laws” and will provide support. TM/WSP 5-9 Nov Group A4 Issues raised during breakout A

National position Should there be a regional policy on which countries develop a nuclear programme. Will a neighbouring country feel pressurised into developing a nuclear programme because its neighbour has done so? They may not really be ready for milestone 1. Also a country needs to feel confident in its neighbours capability and intentions. TM/WSP 5-9 Nov Group A4 Issues raised during breakout A

TM/WSP 5-9 Nov Safeguards How to prioritise issues that should be monitored when assessing achievement of milestones Group A4 Issues raised during breakout A