INDICATORS FOR PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTING CURRICULUM DELIVERY Clive Smith Department of Education Leadership and Management University of Johannesburg.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -

Advertisements

Session Objectives Begin to understand the goals, purpose and rationale for Program Reviews Learn about the components of implementing Program Reviews.

Primary Strategy Subject Leader Briefing June/July 2008 Leading on learning – making best use of Assessment for learning.

Low-Cost Private Schools Knowledge Framework Research methodology template.

PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.

Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Conclusion 1.

April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.

High Quality High Schools Education Commission of the States 2006 National Forum on Education Policy Dr. Jimmy Neitzel National Center.

1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.

Differentiated Accountability Strategies and Support Dr. Maria P. de Armas Assistant Superintendent Curriculum and Instruction (K-12 Core) Curriculum.

Who or what needs to be ready? Leaders Teachers Classroom support Administration Premises staff Children

English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS) for English Language Learners (ELLs) Pennsylvania Department of Education Bureau of Teaching Learning and.

Using the T-9 Net This resource describes how schools use the T-9 Net to monitor the literacy and numeracy skills of students in Transition, Year 1 and.

Mrs Palesa Tyobeka Deputy Director-General: General Education 26 August 2009.

Assessment in the early years © McLachlan, Edwards, Margrain & McLean 2013.

Adapted from Growing Success (Ontario Schools) by K. Gibson

COMMON CORE Standards and Strategies Flip Chart

1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.

Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.

Individual Program Plan (IPP) Module 3: IPP Implementation.

Middle Leaders’ Role in School Self-Evaluation

General Instructions 1. Save the Power Pt template to your desktop and a flashdrive used only for your portfolio. Using SAVE AS rename the portfolio with.

PUTTING OUR FOOT DOWN TO ACCELERATE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT FROM WITHIN.

Parliamentary Portfolio Committee for Basic Education 4 May 2010 Development of Workbooks.

THE SECONDARY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMME CURRICULUM MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT Prof Raj Mestry.

Improving relevant standards. Aims and objectives Familiarize ourselves with best practice standards of teaching To think about how we can implement the.

 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.

Natalia Junior High Cross Curriculum Education- the key to our success.

EPL 3 – Week 3 Professional Knowledge Domain Knowing learners & learning.

Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.

Effectively Implementing Standards and Research-Based Strategies with L EARNING -F OCUSED Effectively Implementing Standards and Research-Based Strategies.

Introduction to the Framework: Unit 1, Getting Readyhttp://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.

Successfully Implementing High- Level Tasks Based on work by Dr. Margaret S. Smith, University of Pittsburgh.

Evaluating gifted and talented students January 2007.

Introduction to the Framework: Unit 1, Getting Readyhttp://

Role of HODs A Head of Department is responsible for the management of a team of subject teachers in the delivery of the curriculum. The development of.

MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.

Overview Check for Understanding - Activity Collaboration/Discussion WASD Oct RtII is: [Student] Reponse to Instruction and Intervention:

Intervention and Support Inclusion Questions. Early and Strategic  How does the school provide purposeful early intervention and support to lift the.

EMB/REO Making Use of Assessment Results in School Development Planning School Development Division, EMB February 2006.

EDF 2005 Chapter 2 Becoming a Professional Educator.

ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION (seeing through the jargon and figuring out how to use the tools)

 Teaching: Chapter 14. Assessments provide feedback about students’ learning as it is occurring and evaluates students’ learning after instruction has.

1 Superintendent’s “Everybody Teaches” Academy Overview and Implementation Plan.

The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.

Copyright © May 2014, Montessori Centre International.

Joshua Miller Blytheville Middle School 7 th Grade Math Student Engagement.

Liz Newey Merlin Support

ASSESSMENT WITHOUT LEVELS IN THE CULM VALLEY FEDERATION.

The Achievement Chart Mathematics Grades The primary purpose of assessment and evaluation is to improve student learning.

Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.

Secondary National Strategy © Crown copyright 2005 Progression – Role of the subject leader.

Assessment without levels

Classroom teaching observation tools

School Improvement School to Circuit to District.

Data Review Team Time Fall 2013.

Data Review Team Time Winter 2014.

Data Review Team Time Spring 2014.

What to include in your Portfolio؟

Assessment without levels

Jean Scott & Logan Searcy July 22, MEGA

Leveraging DI Through Curriculum Implementation

Student Assessment and Evaluation

The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice

INSTRUCTIONAL DELIVERY

“Laying Foundations for the Future!”

Workshop 4 Planning next steps.

Accessibility Supports Training

Math Information Map and Guide.

Student Assessment and Evaluation

Presentation transcript:

INDICATORS FOR PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTING CURRICULUM DELIVERY Clive Smith Department of Education Leadership and Management University of Johannesburg

Tools to assist with planning and implementing curriculum delivery indicators Curriculum management and support booklet (A5 red) Diagnostic tool to support SMTs (A4 red) - Section 2 – Meso-level diagnostics pp.9-12 Templates to support SMTs (A4 blue) – pp.5- 12, (13-21 in SIP portfolio pp.11-20), 22 Subject improvement plan portfolio of evidence (A4 green) – pp. 7, 8-10, Checklist – Good curriculum management and support practices – x2 carry-cards (B – red)

Process to use planning and implementing curriculum delivery tools Curriculum management and support booklet – read pp.5-10 Curriculum management and support booklet – read about Work schedules pp Templates – Work schedule p.12 Curriculum management and support booklet – read Predictability framework pp Template – Predictability reporting tools pp.6-11 Diagnostic tool – Curriculum management and support practices checklist pp (also Templates p.22) Subject improvement plan portfolio of evidence – Subject improvement plan p Curriculum management and support booklet – read pp.5-10 Curriculum management and support booklet – Lesson plans pp , Template p.5 Templates – Educator consolidation tool p.20

Indicators for planning for curriculum delivery Phase level planning is completed before the start of the new school year. The team of teachers contribute to the planning in a meaningful way. Plans indicate progression across grades for contexts (from familiar to more distant) and levels of challenges. HoDs take an active role in the planning for curriculum delivery. Resources required for curriculum delivery are sourced in good time. A variety of learner activities is planned, that take different learner needs and learning styles into account. Different methods and tools for assessment are planned. Care is taken to plan for realistic time allocations. The work schedule is consistent with the broader phase plans.

Indicators for implementing curriculum delivery Teachers prepare for every lesson carefully A routine of lesson delivery is established. Learners arrive promptly at class and settle down to work. Pace setters (Curriculum management and support booklet pp.13-15) are used to guide curriculum delivery. Teachers use the predictability framework (Curriculum management and support booklet pp.11-13) to report on the pace of delivery. Teachers share their experiences in the classroom to learn from one another. When implementation falls behind, plans are made to catch up. Teachers and HoDs work cooperatively to ensure quality teaching.