Molecular mechanisms of long-term memory

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Molecular Mechanisms of Learning and Memory
Advertisements

Dynamics of NT release Synaptic Plasticity
Bioinformatics 3 V18 – Kinetic Motifs Mon, Jan 12, 2015.
Some foundations of Cellular Simulation Nathan Addy Scientific Programmer The Molecular Sciences Institute November 19, 2007.
Neural Basis of Cognition Lecture 6 Learning and Memory, Part II.
Multiscale Stochastic Simulation Algorithm with Stochastic Partial Equilibrium Assumption for Chemically Reacting Systems Linda Petzold and Yang Cao University.
Justin Besant BIONB 2220 Final Project
Synaptic Plasticity.
Spatial Stochastic Simulators Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Krasnow Institute of Advanced Studies.
Stochasticity in molecular systems biology
BIPN 148 Lecture 9. How are synaptic changes regulated? Malenka and Nicoll, 1995.
Autophosphorylation at Thr 286 of the  Calcium- Calmodulin Kinase II in LTP and Learning Giese KP, Fedorov NB, Filipkowski RK, Silva AJ., Science Vol.
Long term potentiation (LTP) of an excitatory synaptic inputs is input specific.
Molecular Physiology: Enzymes and Cell Signaling.
CAMP and Calcium Signaling Pathways are Often Interdependent 1. cAMP and PKA regulated calcium channels 2. Calcium regulated adenylyl cyclases and phosphodiesterases.
Copyright © 2007 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain, 3e Chapter 25: Molecular Mechanisms of Learning.
Advanced methods of molecular dynamics Monte Carlo methods
Vertebrate Models of Learning
Slide 1 of 50 Enzymes  Enzymes are biological catalysts  Proteins  Catalyst  Lower activation energy  Increases the rate of the reaction  Affects.
Neural Networks Architecture Baktash Babadi IPM, SCS Fall 2004.
Ch 15 Rates of Chemical Reactions Chemical Kinetics is a study of the rates of chemical reactions. Part 1 macroscopic level what does reaction rate mean?
Chemical Reactions 8 th 5.2 Rates of Chemical Reactions.
Energetic barriers of Ecological Systems
LECTURE 11: SYNAPSES IV: TRANSMITTER SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE REQUIRED READING: Kandel text, Chapters 14, 15 Giant synapse of squid used in classical experiments.
Molecular mechanisms of memory. How does the brain achieve Hebbian plasticity? How is the co-activity of presynaptic and postsynaptic cells registered.
synaptic plasticity is the ability of the connection, or synapse, between two neurons to change in strength in response to either use or disuse of transmission.
From Mechanisms of Memory, second edition By J. David Sweatt, Ph.D. Chapter 9: Biochemical Mechanisms for Information Storage at the Cellular Level.
ECEN 5341/4341 Lecture 15 Feb 17, Noise Sources 2. Minimal levels of signal detection. 3. Some characteristic s of Neurons. An Important Reference.
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks Week 6 Hebbian LEARNING and ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 6.1 Synaptic Plasticity.
A Calcium dependent model of synaptic plasticity (CaDp)
 I can describe the structure and explain the significance and functions of enzymes in biological systems › I can describe why an investment of activation.
Mechanisms for memory: Introduction to LTP Bailey Lorv Psych 3FA3 November 15, 2010.
Quantitative Models of Mammalian Cell Signaling Pathways Ravi Iyengar, Ph.D. Department of Pharmacology and Systems Therapeutics Mount Sinai School of.
Study of Pentacene clustering MAE 715 Project Report By: Krishna Iyengar.
Chapter 6. Modeling and Analysis of Intracellular Signaling Pathways Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
High/Correlated activity HighCalcium LTP Low/uncorrelated activity Moderate Calcium Calcium LTD LTD Magic High NMDA-R activation Moderate NMDA-R activation.
Metabolism Cell Energetics Metabolism = total of all the chemical reactions taking place in an organism.
Synaptic plasticity: Introduction Different induction protocols Basic properties Key elements of the biophysics Site of change: pre or post-synaptic More.
Force vs. Velocity Profiles for Single Molecules of RNAP.
LONG-TERM POTENTIATION (LTP) Introduction LTP as a candidate mechanism for the activity-dependent change in the strength of synaptic connections LTP is.
Slide 1 Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain, 3rd Ed, Bear, Connors, and Paradiso Copyright © 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Bear: Neuroscience: Exploring.
Describing Reaction Rates Kinetics How fast does the reaction go? Reaction Rate : the change in the amount of reactant or product per unit time.
Single Ion Channels.
Trends in Biomedical Science Making Memory. The following slides are mostly derived from The Brain from Top to Bottom, an Interactive Website about the.
Biochemical Reactions: how types of molecules combine. Playing by the Rules + + 2a2a b c.
1 Bi/CNS 150 Lecture 21 Friday November 15, 2012 Learning & Memory 1. Synaptic plasticity Henry Lester Chapter 63 (from p 1258)
Biologically Inspired Computation Ant Colony Optimisation.
Dante R. Chialvo Learning, Memory and Criticality “Most of our entire life is devoted to learn. Although its importance in medicine is tremendous, the.
Keeping the neurons cool Homeostatic Plasticity Processes in the Brain.
APPROACHES TO THE BIOLOGY OF MEMORY Scale of analysis: –Micro: intra, intercellular –Medio: cell assemblies and neural networks –Macro: Coordinated brain.
Ch 8. Synaptic Plasticity 8.9 ~ 8.10 Adaptive Cooperative Systems, Martin Beckerman, Summarized by Kim, S. –J. Biointelligence Laboratory, Seoul.
Memory Network Maintenance Using Spike-Timing Dependent Plasticity David Jangraw, ELE ’07 Advisor: John Hopfield, Department of Molecular Biology 12 T.
Synaptic Plasticity and the NMDA Receptor
Long Term Potentiation
LTP LTD LTP LTD High/Correlated Low/uncorrelated High Calcium Moderate
Metabolism Lecture 5, part 2 Fall 2008
Biological Neural Networks
Enzymes.
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Enzymes.
Volume 96, Issue 1, Pages e2 (September 2017)
NMDA Induces Long-Term Synaptic Depression and Dephosphorylation of the GluR1 Subunit of AMPA Receptors in Hippocampus  Hey-Kyoung Lee, Kimihiko Kameyama,
A Brief History of Long-Term Potentiation
Cascade Models of Synaptically Stored Memories
Volume 98, Issue 1, Pages 1-11 (January 2010)
Switching On Depression and Potentiation in the Cerebellum
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Involvement of a Postsynaptic Protein Kinase A Substrate in the Expression of Homosynaptic Long-Term Depression  Kimihiko Kameyama, Hey-Kyoung Lee, Mark.
Spike timing-dependent plasticity
Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain, 3e
Presentation transcript:

Molecular mechanisms of long-term memory Spine Shaft of Dendrite Axon Presynaptic Postsynaptic Synapse PSD

LTP: an increase in synaptic strength Long-term potentiation (LTP) Time (mins) 60 Postsynaptic current LTP protocol induces postynaptic influx of Ca2+ Bliss and Lomo J Physiol, 1973

LTP: an increase in synaptic strength Long-term potentiation (LTP) LTP protocol induces postynaptic influx of Ca2+ with CaMKII inhibitor or knockout Postsynaptic current Time (mins) 60 Lledo et al PNAS 1995, Giese et al Science 1998

Calcium-calmodulin dependent kinase II (CaMKII) One holoenzyme = 12 subunits Kolodziej et al. J Biol Chem 2000

Model of bistability in the CaMKII-PP1 system: autocatalytic activation and saturating inactivation. a) Autophosphorylation of CaMKII (2 rings per holoenzyme): P0 P1 slow P1 P2 fast Lisman and Zhabotinsky, Neuron 2001

b) Dephosphorylation of CaMKII by PP1 (saturating inactivation) = phosphatase, PP1 k1 k2 k-1 Total rate of dephosphorylation can never exceed k2.[PP1] Leads to cooperativity as rate per subunit goes down Stability in spite of turnover

Bistability in total phosphorylation of CaMKII [Ca2+]=0.1M (basal level) Rate of dephosphoryation Total reaction rate Rate of phosphorylation No. of active subunits 12N

Phosphorylation dominates at high calcium [Ca2+] = 2M (for LTP) Rate of dephosphoryation Rate of phosphorylation Total reaction rate No. of active subunits 12N

The “Normal” State of Affairs (one stable state, no bistability)

How to get bistability 1) Autocatalysis: k+ increases with [C] 2) Saturation: total rate down, (k-)[C], is limited

Reaction pathways 14 configurations of phosphorylated subunits per ring P0 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6

Phosphorylation to clockwise neighbors P0 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6

Phosphorylation to clockwise neighbors P0 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6

Random dephosphorylation by PP1 P0 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6

Random dephosphorylation by PP1 P0 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6

Random turnover included P0 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6

Stability of DOWN state = PP1 enzyme

Stability of DOWN state = PP1 enzyme

Stability of DOWN state = PP1 enzyme

Stability of UP state = PP1 enzyme

Stability of UP state = PP1 enzyme

Stability of UP state = PP1 enzyme

Stability of UP state = PP1 enzyme

Stability of UP state = PP1 enzyme

Protein turnover = PP1 enzyme

Stability of UP state with turnover = PP1 enzyme

Stability of UP state = PP1 enzyme

Stability of UP state = PP1 enzyme

Stability of UP state = PP1 enzyme

Stability of UP state = PP1 enzyme

Stability of UP state = PP1 enzyme

Stability of UP state = PP1 enzyme

Stability of UP state = PP1 enzyme

Stability of UP state = PP1 enzyme

Stability of UP state = PP1 enzyme

Stability of UP state = PP1 enzyme

Small numbers of CaMKII holoenzymes in PSD Petersen et al. J Neurosci 2003

Simulation methods Stochastic implementation of reactions, of rates Ri(t) using small numbers of molecules via Gillespie's algorithm: 1) Variable time-steps, ∆t: P(∆t) = ∑Ri exp(-∆t ∑Ri) 2) Probability of specific reaction: P(Ri) = Ri/∑Ri 3) Update numbers of molecules according to reaction chosen 4) Update reaction rates using new concentrations 5) Repeat step 1)

System of 20 holoenzymes undergoes stable LTP 1 Pulse of high Ca2+ here Fraction of subunits phosphorylated 10 20 Time (yrs)

Slow transient dynamics revealed Fraction of subunits phosphorylated Time (mins)

Spontaneous transitions in system with 16 holoenzymes Fraction of subunits phosphorylated Time (yrs)

Spontaneous transitions in system with 4 holoenzymes Fraction of subunits phosphorylated Time (days)

Average lifetime between transitions increases exponentially with system size

Large-N limit, like hopping over a potential barrier Reaction rates Effective potential No. of active subunits 12N

1) Chemical reactions in biology: x-axis = “reaction coordinate” = amount of protein phosphorylation 2) Networks of neurons that “fire” action potentials: x-axis = average firing rate of a group of neurons

Why is this important? Transition between states = loss of memory Transition times determine memory decay times.

Something like physics Barrier height depends on area between “rate on” and “rate off” curves, which scales with system size.

Physics analogy: barriers with noise ... Inherent noise because reactions take place one molecule at a time. Rate of transition over barrier decreases exponentially with barrier height ... (like thermal physics, with a potential barrier, U and thermal noise energy proportional to kT ) ?

General result for memory systems Time between transitions increases exponentially with scale of the system. Scale = number of molecules in a biochemical system = number of neurons in a network Rolling dice analogy: number of rolls needed, each with with probability, p to get N rolls in row, probability is pN time to wait increases as (1/p)N = exp[N.ln(1/p)]

Change of concentration ratios affects balance between UP and DOWN states. System of 8 CaMKII holoenzymes: 7 PP1 enzymes 9 PP1 enzymes Phosphorylation fraction Time (yrs) Time (yrs)

Optimal system lifetime is a trade-off between lifetimes of UP and DOWN states 10 yrs DOWN state lifetime 1 yr Average lifetime of state UP state lifetime 1 mth 1 day Number of PP1 enzymes

Optimal system lifetime is a trade-off between lifetimes of UP and DOWN states 10 yrs DOWN state lifetime 1 yr Average lifetime of state UP state lifetime 1 mth 1 day Number of PP1 enzymes

Analysis: Separate time-scale for ring switching Preceding a switch down In stable UP state Turnover Turnover No. of active subunits, single ring Total no. of active subunits Time (hrs) Time (hrs)

Analysis: Separate time-scale for ring switching Goal Rapid speed-up by converting system to 1D and solving analytically. Method Essentially a mean-field theory. Justification Changes to and from P0 (unphosphorylated state) are slow.

Analysis: Project system to 1D 1) Number of rings “on” with any activation, n. 2) Assume average number, P, of subunits phosphorylated for all rings “on”. 3) Calculate reaction rates for one ring, assuming contibution of others is (n-1)P. 4) Calculate average time in configurations with these reaction rates. 5) Hence calculate new value of P. 6) Repeat Step 2 until convergence. 7) Calculate rate to switch “on”, r+n, and “off”, r-n. 8) Continue with new value of n.

Analysis: Project system to 1D 1) Number of rings “on” with any activation, n. 2) Assume average number, P, of subunits phosphorylated for all rings “on”. 3) Calculate reaction rates for one ring, assuming contibution of others is (n-1)P. 4) Calculate average time in configurations with these reaction rates. 5) Hence calculate new value of P. 6) Repeat Step 2 until convergence. 7) Calculate rate to switch “on”, r+n, and “off”, r-n. 8) Continue with new value of n.

Analysis: Project system to 1D 1) Number of rings “on” with any activation, n. 2) Assume average number, P, of subunits phosphorylated for all rings “on”. 3) Calculate reaction rates for one ring, assuming contibution of others is (n-1)P. 4) Calculate average time in configurations with these reaction rates. 5) Hence calculate new value of P. 6) Repeat Step 2 until convergence. 7) Calculate rate to switch “on”, r+n, and “off”, r-n. 8) Continue with new value of n.

Analysis: Project system to 1D 1) Number of rings “on” with any activation, n. 2) Assume average number, P, of subunits phosphorylated for all rings “on”. 3) Calculate reaction rates for one ring, assuming contibution of others is (n-1)P. 4) Calculate average time in configurations with these reaction rates. 5) Hence calculate new value of P. 6) Repeat Step 2 until convergence. 7) Calculate rate to switch “on”, r+n, and “off”, r-n. 8) Continue with new value of n.

Analysis: Project system to 1D 1) Number of rings “on” with any activation, n. 2) Assume average number, P, of subunits phosphorylated for all rings “on”. 3) Calculate reaction rates for one ring, assuming contibution of others is (n-1)P. 4) Calculate average time in configurations with these reaction rates. 5) Hence calculate new value of P. 6) Repeat Step 2 until convergence. 7) Calculate rate to switch “on”, r+n, and “off”, r-n. 8) Continue with new value of n.

Analysis: Project system to 1D 1) Number of rings “on” with any activation, n. 2) Assume average number, P, of subunits phosphorylated for all rings “on”. 3) Calculate reaction rates for one ring, assuming contibution of others is (n-1)P. 4) Calculate average time in configurations with these reaction rates. 5) Hence calculate new value of P. 6) Repeat Step 2 until convergence. 7) Calculate rate to switch “on”, r+n, and “off”, r-n. 8) Continue with new value of n.

Analysis: Project system to 1D 1) Number of rings “on” with any activation, n. 2) Assume average number, P, of subunits phosphorylated for all rings “on”. 3) Calculate reaction rates for one ring, assuming contibution of others is (n-1)P. 4) Calculate average time in configurations with these reaction rates. 5) Hence calculate new value of P. 6) Repeat Step 2 until convergence. 7) Calculate rate to switch “on”, r+n, and “off”, r-n. 8) Continue with new value of n.

Analysis: Project system to 1D 1) Number of rings “on” with any activation, n. 2) Assume average number, P, of subunits phosphorylated for all rings “on”. 3) Calculate reaction rates for one ring, assuming contibution of others is (n-1)P. 4) Calculate average time in configurations with these reaction rates. 5) Hence calculate new value of P. 6) Repeat Step 2 until convergence. 7) Calculate rate to switch “on”, r+n, and “off”, r-n. 8) Continue with new value of n.

Analysis: Solve 1D model exactly r+n-1 r+n r+n+1 N0 n-1 n n+1 n+2 N1 r-n+2 r-n r-n+1 Time to hop from N0 to N1 Use: r+n Tn = 1 + r-n+1Tn+1 for N0 ≤ n < N1 r+n Tn = r-n+1Tn+1 for n < N0 Tn = 0 for n ≥ N1 Average total time for transition, Ttot = ∑Tn

Optimal system lifetime is a trade-off between lifetimes of UP and DOWN states 10 yrs DOWN state lifetime 1 yr Average lifetime of state UP state lifetime 1 mth 1 day Number of PP1 enzymes

Optimal system lifetime is a trade-off between lifetimes of UP and DOWN states 10 yrs DOWN state lifetime 1 yr Average lifetime of state UP state lifetime 1 mth 1 day Number of PP1 enzymes