This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Steering Committee Meeting 1 Budapest November 2010 WELCOME

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Euro Contact Business School

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. The Project Preparatory Meeting January 2010 Introductions (all partners) How we can best work together

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Leonardo – 2010 Call UK – Successful proposals = 29 - Unsuccessful = 48 Germany 13 Spain 11 Finland 11 Hungary 3 Norway 1

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Marny Thompson Centre Manager Norton Radstock College

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Norton Radstock College “…will be recognised for excellent learning & support, inspiring and nurturing success”

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Established 1948 for mining community Vocational training: health & social care, engineering, motor vehicle, horticulture, I.T & business, animal care, art & design –3 learning centres & sixth form centre –800 full time –80% years –5000 part time students -90% adults –300 staff

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. European Focus 150 partners, 24 countries Raising levels of training & vocational education Rural tourism –Trans-Rural, ERTD, City Guides, Tourism for All (TACTALL) Business – MINT Innovation Management, SME focus Teaching skills – LIFE, Good School

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. EfVET European Forum of Technical and Vocational Education and Training Promotes quality & innovation, sharing of good practice, platform of influence Peter Hodgson President

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Meeting objectives Understand project objectives Understand work packages and each partner responsibilities Agreement on Needs Analysis, questionnaires Timescales WP2 and WP3 in particular, responsibilities of partners Reporting requirements; timesheets and financial Valorisation and dissemination plans for each country Communication and collaboration with all partners; identify any potential problems Project evaluation

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Project objectives Target groups Transfer of Innovation –Guiding from School to Work (DE) –MINT Innovation Management (UK) Key milestones, work packages and end products

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

WP1 roles and responsibilities of VET and social partners communication between VET and social partners the entre-coach website ( links with other websites including partner websites communication between meetings and monthly status reports, timesheets

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. WP7 evaluating product and process during the project ensuring cultural suitability of the product ensuring quality of the products/results brief overview of external evaluation and requirements from partners (Tracey Torble)

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

WP6 project approach to dissemination and exploitation (group work) Intellectual Property Rights Valorisation plans and records by country Database of contacts in target groups by country Europe wide dissemination – the role of EfVET project brochure newsletters

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. GROUP WORK How do we raise awareness of the project throughout our own countries and Europe? How do we make it sustainable?

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

WP2 – Needs Analysis Target groups (Teachers and SMEs) Findings from Guiding from School to Work and MINT Innovation Management (BM and NRC) Role of Associate Partners The entre-coach role definition

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Summary of outcomes and agreements from Day 1

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Day 2 - WP2 ( continued ) Combining needs already defined with the needs analysis of WP2 Requirements of country report Timescales of analysis – January 2011 Survey approach by country and sample size

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Defining learning outcomes group work - involving target groups to identify training needs best means of course 1 and 2 delivery definition and agreement of the entre- coach role defining the entre-coach competences

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Learning outcomes ‘A student learning outcome is a defined outcome of a learning process that can be assessed in some way that is measurable’

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

The entre-coach teacher WP3 aims and timescale partner responsibilities creation of course outline and methodology use of existing learning resources (MINT and Lern-coach) creation of learning resources use of moodle (VLE) agree actions required course 1 user guide entre-coach teacher assessment

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. What, when, how? Competences (all) Course structure – teachers (P3) Course timing – 3 participants each P0, P1, P2 and P4; June and September 2011 Use of moodle? Assessment, certificates

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

Overview WP4 Adapt entre-coach teacher (course 1) Feedback from trained entre-coach teachers WP5 Pilot entre-coach course (course 2)

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. WP1 – Financial Overview Contracting Agreement/partner agreements 1st payment 40% National agency monitoring visit & feedback in 1 st year Interim report by Nov 2011 Feedback from interim report 2 nd payment of 40% (must spend 70% of 1 st payment) Final report by Nov 2012 Final payment of 20% on approval of Final Report

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Staff costs Statutory staff, having either a permanent or a temporary employment contract with the partner; Temporary staff, recruited through a specialised external agency; Staff members of project partners are not allowed to operate in a subcontracting capacity for the project.

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Staff costs (2) May not exceed the maximum for country (at all – this is a new rule) May be audited Real daily staff cost rates – –based on average rates corresponding to the applicant's usual policy on remuneration, comprising actual salaries plus social security charges and other statutory costs included in the remuneration –non statutory costs like bonuses, lease car, expense account schemes, incentive payments or profit- sharing schemes are excluded.

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Staff costs (3) Organisations in the UK - salary cost is basic salary plus National Insurance contributions made by the employer plus any pension contribution made by the employer. This should then be divided by the number of working days in a year (Monday to Friday) to give a daily rate. For each individual the total staff costs for the project are calculated by multiplying their daily rate by the number of days spent on the project If the actual salary of an employee increases then this should be reflected in the costs charged to the project from the date the change was made We don’t need to see evidence, you need to keep in case of audit by NA or Commission We do need Timesheets and Daily Rates for each member of staff, staff type (1,2,3,4) plus start and end dates working on the project

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Partners to be aware If the project is audited you will need to show for your own staff: –A list of all personnel employed on the project giving the exact dates of their work plus their position –Employment contracts for both permanent and temporary staff –Official document or internal accounting record displaying National Insurance Numbers (or equivalent) of staff –Payroll/salary slips for the project duration –Calculation of related charges (e.g. pensions) –Bank statements showing payments made to personnel –Evidence of calculation of daily rates –Timesheets

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Timesheets Timesheets should clearly show: Individual staff member’s name; Partner organisation name; The time worked, as days or fractions, not as hours – so.5,.25 or 1 (as this is what the Interim/Final Reports request); The daily rate; Work Package number, and (briefly) the nature of the work undertaken, and Signed by the individual and the legal representative. ed monthly please

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Travel Two ways of paying subsistence: 1.If your organisation’s normal mode of operation is to claim the subsistence daily rate, you must still produce the boarding cards and hotel bill 2.Otherwise, receipts to be kept as evidence of all costs, plus boarding cards Travel by car can be claimed up to € 0.22 per km, or the price for a rail, bus or plane ticket whichever is the cheapest

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Travel tickets and boarding passes for journeys charged to the project (originals for the promoter, copies for partners) When calculating the number of days for which to apply the Daily Subsistence Rate it should be noted that a FULL day normally includes an overnight stay. In duly substantiated cases, where there is no overnight stay, a pro rata reduction of a full day’s allowance may be allowed, resulting in a maximum cost claimed of up to 50% for that day. Receipts and invoices to evidence all expenditure on the project for all partners to be submitted with the Final Report, with the exception of indirect costs for which no supporting evidence is required to be submitted. Indirect costs should however be actual costs, and be able to be substantiated in the event of an audit. (Note the percentage on this project is low and not 7%)

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Next steps summary of outcomes and actions required expected results and any likely problem areas where help required

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Evaluation

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. And before we go next meeting Finland (March 17 & 18) progress required before this meeting key topics for discussion dates for the diary ( Course 1 - June 27-July 1, September 8-9, Project meetings 2011 September 7 (DE), 2012 March (ES), September (UK) )