Reviewing the TESLA-detector costs Massimo Caccia + Paolo Checchia, Marcello Piccolo Roma, 10/XI/2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CALICE Summary of 2006 testbeam for the ECAL
Advertisements

Un percorso realizzato da Mario Malizia
Fill in missing numbers or operations
Name: Date: Read temperatures on a thermometer Independent / Some adult support / A lot of adult support
P. Checchia Como 8th ICATPP1 LCcal * : a Calorimeter prototype for future Linear Colliders Design principles Prototype description Construction.
Image quality and spectroscopic characteristics of different silicon pixel imaging systems M. G. Bisogni, D.Bulajic, M. Boscardin, G. F. Dalla Betta, P.
1 A first design of the PEP-N Calorimeter A first design of the PEP-N Calorimeter Presented by P. Patteri Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati INFN for PEP-N.
X5/GIF Test Beam: High Rate Analysis Manuela Cirilli.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
A FR-1FR-3FR Active nose-poke * *** b DI (%) * ** c Food pellet ** Suppl. Fig. 1 Suppl. Fig. 1 CD-1 mice.
Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.
Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =
/4/2010 Box and Whisker Plots Objective: Learn how to read and draw box and whisker plots Starter: Order these numbers.
Number Theory Click to begin. Click here for Final Jeopardy.
1 1  1 =.
1  1 =.
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt Time Money AdditionSubtraction.
Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?
Decimals 10ths and 100ths.
Learning to show the remainder
I can interpret intervals on partially numbered scales and record readings accurately ? 15 ? 45 ? 25 ? 37 ? 53 ? 64 Each little mark.
Latest Developments from the CCD Front End LCWS 2005 Stanford Joel Goldstein, RAL for the LCFI Collaboration.
SiW ECAL R&D in CALICE Nigel Watson Birmingham University For the CALICE Collab. Motivation CALICE Testbeam Calibration Response/Resolution MAPS Option.
Experimental Particle Physics
LCFI Collaboration Status Report LCWS 2004 Paris Joel Goldstein for the LCFI Collaboration Bristol, Lancaster, Liverpool, Oxford, RAL.
GCSE Higher Revision Starters 11 Module 3 and 5 Revision.
Factorise the following 10x a – 20 36m a + 27b + 9c 9y² - 12y 30ab³ + 35a²b 24x4y³ - 40x²y.
11 aprile 2002 Avvisi: 1 o Esonero: mercoledi 17 aprile ore 11:30 – 14:00 consulta la pag. WEB alla voce esoneri si raccomanda la puntualita!
Alice LV PS Workshop June 26, 2001 Salvatore De Pasquale INFN Bologna 1 Status of the TOF Low Voltage System Salvatore de Pasquale INFN Bologna.
Scintillator Tile Hadronic Calorimeter Prototype (analog or semidigital) M.Danilov ITEP(Moscow) CALICE Collaboration LCWS04, Paris.
Prototype sPHENIX Calorimeters
10 March 2004Erika Garutti - KEK, Japan1 Development of an Hadronic Tile Calorimeter for TESLA New calorimeter concept for linear collider detector The.
The CALICE test beam activities Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London (for the CALICE collaboration) ALCPG07, FNAL, Chicago, 22 nd October.
10-Nov-2005US ATLAS Tracking Upgrade Santa Cruz 1.
The CALICE test beam at CERN Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London (on behalf of the Calice Collaboration) SPSC meeting, CERN, Geneva,
Look at This PowerPoint for help on you times tables
Module design for B-layer replacement V.1. Bare Module dimensions mm Active area mm mm Footprint mm stack 200um chip 20um bumps.
Money Math Review.
Comments on the gas system Issues of scale What gas mix? Summary Karol Lang The University of Texas at Austin NuMI Off-axis Experiment Detector Workshop.
Effects on UK of Eustatic sea Level rise GIS is used to evaluate flood risk. Insurance companies use GIS models to assess likely impact and consequently.
Area of triangles.
Making Landmark or Friendly Numbers (Multiplication)
Adding Up In Chunks.
Comparison of X-ray diffraction patterns of La 2 CuO 4+   from different crystals at room temperature Pia Jensen.
Sets Sets © 2005 Richard A. Medeiros next Patterns.
Least Common Multiples and Greatest Common Factors
Subtraction: Adding UP
X2 TABLE: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, , , … What pattern do you notice? Can you spot a pattern?
Number bonds to 10,
2 x0 0 12/13/2014 Know Your Facts!. 2 x1 2 12/13/2014 Know Your Facts!
Let’s take a 15 minute break Please be back on time.
Fractions Simplify: 36/48 = 36/48 = ¾ 125/225 = 125/225 = 25/45 = 5/9
Partial Products. Category 1 1 x 3-digit problems.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
ATLAS-CMS SLHC Workshop, 20/3/07 Costas Foudas, Imperial College London 1 Results from Studies for a Tracking Trigger for CMS at SLHC Overview of this.
“Reading Measurement Scales”. MNI = marked number interval AMI = adjacent number interval.
1 Individual Particle Reconstruction CHEP07, Victoria, September 6, 2007 Norman Graf (SLAC) Steve Magill (ANL)
Let’s Add! Click the cloud below for a secret question! Get Started!
Graeme Henchel Multiples Graeme Henchel
0 x x2 0 0 x1 0 0 x3 0 1 x7 7 2 x0 0 9 x0 0.
© 2006, François Brouard Case Real Group François Brouard, DBA, CA January 6, 2006.
J-C Brient LLR Progress report on the ECAL prototype 2 - New informations on the cost of the W-Si ECAL 3 - A proposal for a new design of the.
SiD Concept – R&D Needs Andy White U. Texas at Arlington SiD Concept Meeting LCWS06 Bangalore, India March 11, 2006.
The CMS detector as compared to ATLAS CMS Detector Description –Inner detector and comparison with ATLAS –EM detector and comparison with ATLAS –Calorimetric.
J-C Brient-DESY meeting -Jan/ The 2 detector options today …. SiD vs TDR [ * ] [ * ] J.Jaros at ALCPG-SLAC04 ECAL ECAL tungsten-silicon both optionsHCAL.
ILC Detector Activities in Korea
Vishnu V. Zutshi For the NICADD team.
   Calorimetry et al.    SUMMARY 12 contributions Tile HCAL
ILC Detector Technology
Possible types of Si-sensor: SILICON CALORIMETRY FOR A LINEAR COLLIDER G.Bashindzhagyan, Il Park August Silicon sensor.
Presentation transcript:

Reviewing the TESLA-detector costs Massimo Caccia + Paolo Checchia, Marcello Piccolo Roma, 10/XI/2005

A sketch of the detector, as of Spring 2001….

The Vertex Detector 5 layers (16, 25, 35, 50, 60 mm) constant length (  13 cm, 7 o to 25 o ) fixed modularity (18 o sectors, 20 modules) total sensitive area ~ 0.37 m 2 6” wafers (177 cm 2 ) useful area ~ 120 cm 2 (30 large area dies) 30% global yield  Effective area/wafer = 40 cm 2  # wafers ~ 93 production cost in AMIS 0.35 tech (~ AMS 0.35 OPTO): 75 kEUR (10 wafers) kEUR*80 wafers = 187 kEUR (might be short by a factor 2..) [original TESLA detector costs: kEUR] mechanics: 1.2 MEUR repeater electronics: 0.3 MEUR  VD ~ MEUR

The Silicon Intermediate tracker & FWD disks SIT strips ~1.7 m 2 FTD strips ~ 2.0 m 2 FTD pixels ~ 0.56 m 2 cost of Silicon ~ 50 EUR/cm 2 [!!!]  Strips ~ 2.0 MEUR [ATLAS]  pixels ~ 2.2 MEUR [ATLAS] mechanics & auxiliaries ~ 0.5 MEUR  SIT + FTD ~ 4.7 MEUR [cost of Si to be revised! Possibly Xchecked with ATLAS & CMS]

The Time Projection Chamber

Calorimetria

SiW 0.33 €/canale !! ~20 M€ con endcap 3 $/cm 2

Soluzione ibrida: LCCAL 45 strati 25x25x0.3 cm 3 Pb 25x25x0.3 cm 3 Scintill. 25, Celle 5x5 cm 2 3 piani a 2, 6, 12 X x0.9 cm 2 Pad di Si < 1/10 dei canali e del SI rispetto a SIW Stima dei costi (M€) alla TDR: 1)~shashlik (parte scint.)20 2)W 8 3)Si 7 4)Elettronica F.E. Si (1€ /can) Tot37

SiW: Non esiste nuova stima ufficiale dalla collaborazione CALICE J. C. Brient: Fattore 2 piu’ bassa Stime aggiornate Numero di piani di Si (e quindi di canali) fattore 2 piu’ basso  ~80 M€ E’ realistico ? Il dubbio maggiore e’ sul costo effettivo per canale di tutta la catena di read-out. L’approssimazione piu’ vicina (in quanto a canali e nel tempo) e’ data dal Tracker di CMS che e’ costato (tutto incluso) circa 3 CHF (~2€)/canale. Non e’ del tutto evidente scalare il numero di canali di un fattore 10 (LCcal) o di un fattore >>50 (SIW) per cui assegnare una cifra dell’ordine di 1€/canale sembra una stima non certamente conservativa.

The Hadron Calorimeter Tile & analog [ cost of photon detectors to be revised! PM and APD to be possibly replaced by SiPM] RPC & digital

The cost of the field…. [to be Xchecked with the final cost of the CMS system]

The muon system RPC modules: 0.6 MEUR electronics (discri, ADCs, TDCs:0.5 MEUR ancillaries:0.9 MEUR  Muon ~ 2.0 MEUR

… and the cost of every byte Assuming: 10 9 channels multiplexing ratio 10 2 (100 channels/output line) 10 3 output line/readout unit [my guess: # readout units overestimated; a lot of the processing will eventually occurr “on chip”]