First look at mass constraint [How simple can it be?] Two decays: i) pi 0 -> g g ii) K 0 -> pi+ pi- - Mother particle momenta: P = 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 GeV -

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Relativistic mechanics
Advertisements

Transverse momentum of Z bosons in Zee and Zmm decays Daniel Beecher 12 December 2005.
FAWP Fast Analysis With Pythia These notes will be updated as FAWP evolves Current version:
Pi0 Mass recon in the NCC R. Seto Oct 17, What I did Ran pisa – took hits file which gives dedx in each Si layer Partitioned the dedx into cells.
First look of ME study on ttH(  bb) channel Univ. of Tokyo Y.Kataoka
Alessandro Fois Detection of  particles in B meson decay.
EF with simple multi-particle states Vishnu V. Zutshi NIU/NICADD.
Effects of Tracking Limitations On Jet Mass Resolution Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting July 3, 2007.
Why we believe there’s a strong force. Why Colour? –Why not something with no inappropriate mental imagery Probing the Colour Force –The study of simple.
Exclusive D s Semileptonic decays using kinematic fitting.
Using  0 mass constraint to improve particle flow ? Graham W. Wilson, Univ. of Kansas, July 27 th 2005 Study prompted by looking at event displays like.
10/14/20051 Tau reconstruction and H/A →  H/A →  MC events: PYTHIA ⇒ OSCAR ⇒ DIGI (mass 120 GeV ?) 10k events overnight DIGI ⇒ DST: crashes DIGI ⇒
Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.
Discovery of Long-Lived The LHC Bryan Smith West Coast Theory Network University of California, Irvine 4 th May 2007 Work with Jonathan Feng,
First Look at Conversions for Non-Pointing Photons US ATLAS Egamma Meeting March Bruce Schumm, UCSC/SCIPP.
University of Gaziantep Department of Engineering Physics August 2006 Page 1/18 A.Beddall, A.Beddall and A. Bingül Department of Engineering Physics University.
Preliminary Results on Conversions Non-pointing Photon Meeting January Bruce Schumm, UCSC/SCIPP.
Exclusive D s Semileptonic decays using kinematic fitting.
Effects of Tracking Limitations On Jet Mass Resolution Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting July 3, 2007.
Study of the semileptonic decays at 4170 MeV Koloina Randrianarivony Marina Artuso (Syracuse University)
Neutrino Event Reconstruction Andy Blake Cambridge University September 2003.
Analysis work by: Marina Artuso Sheldon Stone Jianchun Wang CBX note available: /homes/cleo/sls/dompi.ps Study of B  D   Jianchun Wang 05/12/00.
January 9, 2001Physics 8411 Space and time form a Lorentz four-vector. The spacetime point which describes an event in one inertial reference frame and.
Conservation of momentum is one of the most fundamental and most useful concepts of elementary physis Does it apply in special relativity? Consider the.
Lecture 10: Inelastic Scattering from the Proton 7/10/2003
Energy Flow and Jet Calibration Mark Hodgkinson Artemis Meeting 27 September 2007 Contains work by R.Duxfield,P.Hodgson, M.Hodgkinson,D.Tovey.
Preliminary comparison of ATLAS Combined test-beam data with G4: pions in calorimetric system Andrea Dotti, Per Johansson Physics Validation of LHC Simulation.
Announcements Homework returned now 9/19 Switching to more lecture-style class starting today Good luck on me getting powerpoint lectures ready every day.
Introduction Miha Zgubič, summer student Scintillating fibre tracker software Analysis of performance of momentum reconstruction 1.
Optimizing DHCAL single particle energy resolution Lei Xia Argonne National Laboratory 1 LCWS 2013, Tokyo, Japan November , 2013.
Optimizing DHCAL single particle energy resolution Lei Xia 1 CALICE Meeting LAPP, Annecy, France September 9 – 11, 2013.
DHCAL - Resolution (S)DHCAL Meeting January 15, 2014 Lyon, France Burak Bilki, José Repond and Lei Xia Argonne National Laboratory.
 Problem : Imagine that somewhere in deep space a rock with mass 12kg is moving in the +x direction with v = 4/5 in some inertial frame. This rock then.
1 Top ID in tt → 6-Jet channel Erik Devetak Edinburgh Collaboration Meeting ( )‏
Sayfa 1 May 2012 Sheffield. Sayfa 2 Content 1.Introduction 2.Particle Reconstruction 3.Mass Constraint 4.Iterative Methods for the Mass Constraint 5.Non-Iterative.
Hadron energy reconstruction in ATLAS Ongoing work (Per, Kerstin and C Santoni and V Giangiobbe from C-F): Analysis of combined test beam data: reconstruction.
V.Patera – KLOE GM – Otranto – 10 June 2002 K  reconstruction status K + K - retracking features New vs Old : resolution New vs Old : efficiencies Conclusion.
Martin White – Cambridge ATLAS UK ATLAS Physics Meeting, May 2004.
FROST: Status of  p -> K +  analysis Liam Casey Catholic University of America Adviser: Dr. Franz Klein.
Λ and Σ photoproduction on the neutron Pawel Nadel-Turonski The George Washington University for the CLAS Collaboration.
Measurement of J/  -> e + e - and  C -> J/  +   in dAu collisions at PHENIX/RHIC A. Lebedev, ISU 1 Fall 2003 DNP Meeting Alexandre Lebedev, Iowa State.
CHARM MIXING and lifetimes on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration XXXVIIth Rencontres de Moriond  March 11th, 2002 at Search for lifetime differences in.
A Comparison Between Different Jet Algorithms for top mass Reconstruction Chris Tevlin University of Manchester (Supervisor - Mike Seymour) Atlas UK top.
Beam Extrapolation Fit Peter Litchfield  An update on the method I described at the September meeting  Objective;  To fit all data, nc and cc combined,
1 Semileptonic physics in FOCUS D  K  0 l form factor measurement –Motivation –Method and Signals D   l form factor measurement –Motivation –Signals.
Physics Society Talk (Sept/20/00): Pg 1 Quantum Mechanical Interference in Charmed Meson Decays TOO BORING.
Neutron Detection in JLab’s Hall B Michael Braverman Tel-Aviv University Data Mining Meeting, MIT, August 9th 2014 In Collaboration With : E. Piasetzky.
SEARCH FOR AN INVISIBLE HIGGS IN tth EVENTS T.L.Cheng, G.Kilvington, R.Goncalo Motivation The search for the Higgs boson is a window on physics beyond.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #9.
Charged and Neutral Kaon correlations in Au-Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV using the solenoidal tracker at RHIC (STAR) Selemon Bekele The Ohio State.
Signatures of lepton-jet production at the LHC Eva Halkiadakis (Rutgers University) with Adam Falkowski, Yuri Gershtein (Rutgers University) Josh Ruderman.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #16.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
Georgie Mbianda 1 for the Baryon (E01-002) Collaboration 1 University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg Exclusive Electroproduction of π + and η mesons.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
VXDBasedReco TRACK RECONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE STUDIES Bruce Schumm University of California at Santa Cruz ALCPG Workshop, Snowmass Colorado August 14-28,
December, Calibration of electromagnetic calorimeter of Hall A DVCS experiment Eric FUCHEY Ph.D Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire.
Search for a 4 th generation t’ quark in p-p collision at ATLAS -Suyog Shrestha, Iowa State University.
1 Bunch length measurement with the luminous region Z distribution : evolution since 03/04 B. VIAUD, C. O’Grady B. VIAUD, C. O’Grady Origin of the discrepancies.
Baryon Spectroscopy and Decays using the Belle Detector John Yelton University of Florida I review recent results on charmed baryon decay,
Progress on Simulation Software Hai-Ping Peng(USTC) Xiao-Shuai Qin(IHEP) Xiao-Rong Zhou(USTC) Yu Hu(IHEP) 2014 STC Workshop (ITP) Hai-Ping Peng.
Photon Selection Algorithm Ming Yang , Mingshui Chen BESIII Meeting
Direct Photon v 2 Study in 200 GeV AuAu Collisions at RHIC Guoji Lin (Yale) For STAR Collaboration RHIC & AGS Users’ Meeting, BNL, June 5-9.
Eric COGNERAS LPC Clermont-Ferrand Prospects for Top pair resonance searches in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics october 2007, Grenoble.
Susanna Costanza - Pavia Group PANDA C.M., Stockholm – June 14, 2010
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
SUSY Particle Mass Measurement with the Contransverse Mass Dan Tovey, University of Sheffield 1.
Individual Particle Reconstruction
I.Larin, PrimEx Analysis meeting
Measurement of
Presentation transcript:

First look at mass constraint [How simple can it be?] Two decays: i) pi 0 -> g g ii) K 0 -> pi+ pi- - Mother particle momenta: P = 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 GeV - Daughter momentum cut: p1, p2 > 0.5 GeV - Simple ATLAS resolution smearing - Very simple refitting of mass: change p1 and p2 by the same scale (angular resolution not considered) Note that a complete treatment involves relatively complex and slow chi-square fitting!

Plots. 1. Mother particle momentum resolution (r) for truth, reconstructed, and refitted daughters r = ( p meas – p true ) / p true This will hopefully improve after refitting 2. Invariant mass for truth, reconstructed, and refitted daughters. After refitting M should equal Mtruth

i) pi 0 -> g g M 2 = (E 1 +E 2 ) 2 – P 2 =>M 2 = 2 E 1 E 2 ( 1 – cos A ) for massless photons =>M 2 = p 1 p 2 k p=E, and we wont change A “Refit”: simply scaling p1 and p2 by M pi0 /M will constrain the invariant mass to M pi0 Here we assume p 1  p 2 (true-ish given that we have a 0.5 GeV momentum cut) and so we don’t care too much about weighting the scale for different resolutions.

P = 1 GeV Truth Recon Refit

P = 2 GeV Truth Recon Refit

P = 4 GeV Truth Recon Refit

P = 8 GeV Truth Recon Refit

P = 16 GeV Truth Recon Refit

ii) K 0 -> pi+ pi- M 2 = (E 1 +E 2 ) 2 – P 2 =>M 2 = 2 E 1 E 2 ( 1 – cos A ) for massless pions!!! =>M 2 = p 1 p 2 k p=E!!, and we wont change A “Refit”: simply scaling p1 and p2 by M K0 /M will constrain the invariant mass to M K0 Here we assume p 1  p 2 (true-ish given that we have a 0.5 GeV momentum cut) and so we don’t care too much about weighting the scale for different resolutions. BUT we assume massless pions! So this will not work so well.

P = 1 GeV Truth Recon Refit

P = 2 GeV Truth Recon Refit

P = 4 GeV Truth Recon Refit

P = 8 GeV Truth Recon Refit

P = 16 GeV Truth Recon Refit

Conclusion Simple scaling works well for the pi0 because E 1 and E 2 are similar (after energy cuts). Weighting the scale seems to be not very important. - But I didnt compare yet with the standard mass constraint method (Ahmet?) - Try a simple weighting scheme? When we have massive daughters this method is not so good (the invariant mass doesn’t constrain properly). - Try adding the mass effects in a simple way? - Ahmet does the scaling in the c.o.m frame, again without weights This works well!