Transition to Safer Substitutes n Propyl Bromide Case Study Liz Harriman Massachusetts Toxics Use Reduction Institute University of Massachusetts Lowell.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Toxics Use Reduction Institute Alternatives Assessment: An Overview Pam Eliason Toxics Use Reduction Institute
Advertisements

CHEMICAL MANAGEMENT. Agency Missions: Agency Missions: OSHA – Protection of employees from workplace injury and illness. OSHA – Protection of employees.
Purchasing for Pollution Prevention Project INFORM, Inc. New York Headquarters:
Jim Jones Acting Assistant Administrator Office of Chemical Safety & Pollution Prevention 1.
Objectives Terminal Objective
Pollution Prevention (P2) in Indiana Great Lakes Pollution Prevention Roundtable meeting May 12, 2011.
A program of the National Pollution Prevention Roundtable.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Authorizes EPA to identify hazardous wastes and regulate their generation, transportation, treatment, storage and.
Safe Alternatives Awareness Training Union TUR Capacity Building Initiative Toxic Use Reduction Institute Grant.
Toward a Cancer Free Economy December, Lowell Center for Sustainable Production Premise Our systems of production and consumption are not only root.
Maintenance Aerosols & Liquids Manufactured by Amrep, Inc.
Toxics Use Reduction Institute EH&S Considerations for Drop-In Alternatives to TCE Mary Butow Research Assistant, TURI.
Providing Technical Assistance to Metal Finishers using Trichloroethylene (TCE): Outcomes and Next Steps Linda Darveau & Valerie Rickman Picture courtesy.
Hazardous Materials: Risky Business, Safe Solutions Suzanne Metz, Workers Compensation Program Randy Benson, Rural Healthcare Quality Network.
Clean Production in Action: Assessing Alternatives for Materials and Products Pam Eliason Toxics Use Reduction Institute ;
Alternatives to Chlorinated Solvents in Asphalt Testing Glenn R Webber With special focus on Tech Kleen ®* N Propyl Bromide solvents.
Chapter 9 Unit Operations and Pollution Prevention.
Chemicals Policy Update Regulatory options for pollution prevention and toxics use reduction. Ken Zarker, P2 Section Manager Washington State Department.
The Path Forward: Green Chemistry and Chemicals Policy Reform Ken Zarker, Manager Pollution Prevention & Regulatory Assistance Section
Unit 3 Aqueous Brake Washing. Baseline: Solvent Brake Washing Environmental Concerns Solvent emissions cause smog formation Spent solvents are hazardous.
Shepard Bros., Inc. Committed to the Environment.
Chemicals Policy – A View from the United States Joel Tickner, ScD, Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts.
Guidelines for State School Environmental Health Programs EISA Sec. 504.
Pollution Prevention for Light Industry and the Service Industry P2 Ideas for Urban Environments.
Toxics Use Reduction Institute Wet Cleaning Outreach in Massachusetts NEWMOA Webinar March 4, 2008.
Copyright The Solution Foundry. All rights reserved. WELCOME TO ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS 101.
Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling (GHS)
Welcome to Training on Reporting and Planning Under the Toxics Use Reduction Act.
© Toxics Use Reduction Institute University of Massachusetts Lowell Transitioning from TCE Reality vs Theory Taking the Lab to the Streets Heidi Wilcox.
“ GREEN” FLOOR CARE “ GREEN” FLOOR CARE Resource Center Presentations & Reports Other Helpful Sites.
From Reaction to Prevention: Ensuring that TSCA Reform and Other Chemicals Policies Stimulate the Transition Towards Safer and More Sustainable Chemicals.
ALTERNATIVE AUTOMOTIVE AEROSOL PRODUCTS Katy Wolf Ph.D. Institute for Research and Technical Assistance.
Availability of Low-GWP Alternatives Options for Near Term & Longer Term Transitions OZONACTION NETWORK FOR LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN OCTOBER 6-8.
Solid Waste Laws. Federal Legislation RCRA (1976)- The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) CERCLA (1980) –The Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Sustainability Issues
Elimination of Chlorinated Solvent Use in Cleaning: Barriers to Success Regional Environmental Summit Providence, RI September 28, 2005 Presented by: Massachusetts.
The Toxics Use Reduction Act in Massachusetts: A Successful Model in Toxics Substitution and Reduction Joel A. Tickner, ScD Lowell Center for Sustainable.
The Landscape of State Chemicals Regulation Joel A. Tickner, ScD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts Lowell
Ozone Depletion Reducing the manufacture and release of halogenated organic chemicals.
Chemical & Environment Considerations in Product Safety: Current research, legislation, and the public and industry response Chemical Safety Regulations.
Preventive Emergency Planning Emergency Plans should focus not just on response but on reducing risk Emergency Planning that focuses on risk should consider.
Containing Toxicity with Policy Natural Disaster.
CALIFORNIA proposed SAFER CONSUMER PRODUCT REGULATIONS Marjorie MartzEmerson October 24, 2012.
Healthy Lawns RPI An Initiative By EJ McGlynn Qiao Yu Thomas McGann Samantha Bliss.
WHAT IS THE GC3? The Green Chemistry and Commerce Council (GC3) is a project of the Chemical Policy & Science Initiative at the Lowell Center for Sustainable.
Pollution Prevention in Air Quality A Government Perspective H. Patrick Wong, Chief Air Quality Management Division Miami-Dade County Department of Environmental.
ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP OZONE-DEPLETING SUBSTANCE PHASEOUT ISSUES TED KOSS
Public Health Assessment Process Jack Hanley, M.P.H. Environmental Health Scientist Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Diffusion Film
Chapter 19: Hazardous Chemicals: Pollution & Prevention Sustainability, Stewardship, and Sound Science.
UNIT 9 Hazardous Wastes and Risk Assessment. Major Public Agencies Involved in Environmental Health Risk Assessment and Intervention Consumer Product.
AIR ASBESTOS CLIMATE CHANGE LAND & CLEANUP PESTICIDES TOXIC SUBSTANCES WASTE WATER By Topic (on EPA website)
Design for the Environment Program Overview April 6 th, 2005.
Toxics Use Reduction Institute TURA and Tech Diffusion in the Plating and Food Industry Buenos Aires September 31, 2009 Janet Clark, Senior Associate Director.
DOD P2 WATERSHED ADVISORY BOARD
CHAPTER 44: ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION
RETAP Retired Engineer Technical Assistance Program
Chapter 17 Environmental Laws and Pollution Control.
ENV 320 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
ENV 320 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
ENV 320 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Emilee Scott & Jim Ray May 10, 2018
TURI Laboratory Overview Focus on Objectives and Targets
Purchasing for Pollution Prevention Project
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976
Implementing a Revolution: “Green” Cleaning in Your Facility
Hazardous Waste.
Chemicals of concern Session 3 – looking across product sectors to track and manage chemicals of concerns. A thought starter Sandra Averous and Jacqueline.
EPA Resources for Exporters
Lowell Center for Sustainable Production
Presentation transcript:

Transition to Safer Substitutes n Propyl Bromide Case Study Liz Harriman Massachusetts Toxics Use Reduction Institute University of Massachusetts Lowell

TCE nPB Perc EH&S

Toxics Use Reduction Institute University of Massachusetts Lowell Learning Objectives Explore: Traditional transition from problematic chemicals to new, also problematic chemicals Using n propyl bromide as a case study Understand: n Propyl Bromide, its hazards, its alternatives Massachusetts TURA approach to getting companies to transition to safer substances and learn from each other, more ways to improve the transition

Long-term Objective What Lizzie Grossman said! –Green Chemistry –Biocompatible substances –Less resource intensive –Inherently safer processes

Vendor Chemical Mfr Formulator Equipment Mfr Government Regulator Customer Peer Companies Technical Assistance & information (P2, gov’t, consultants, etc) User mgmt Production workers EH&S Who influences choice of substitutes?

Toxics Use Reduction Institute University of Massachusetts Lowell Massachusetts Toxics Use Reduction Act Works with businesses and communities to reduce their use of toxic substances Right to Know Reporting, Facility Planning, and Assistance

Toxics Use Reduction Institute University of Massachusetts Lowell “In a world without Perc, what alternative will you chose?” “Being “Green” has never been easier with DrySolv. The first environmentally responsible replacement solvent for your dry cleaning machine!” 1 “In January of 2007, I started using DrySolv in my dry cleaning machine due to my total frustration with all the environmental issues with perc. WOW! What a smart move that was! EPA and KDHE have no regulations on DrySolv. Environmentally, it is perfectly okay and not considered hazardous…” Leroy Riedel, Master Cleaners Inc., Hays, KS 1. Enviro Tech International’s DrySolv web site materials, accessed at:

Toxics Use Reduction Institute University of Massachusetts Lowell DrySolv Dry Cleaning Solution 1 DrySolv is non-flammable, showing no flashpoint in multiple tests and test methods. (ASTM D-56 TCC, ASTM D-92 COC, ASTM D-93 TCC). DrySolv is non-chlorinated. DrySolv is non-hazardous. (DOT, OSHA, NESHAP, RCRA, Clean Water Act) DrySolv is not a hazardous air pollutant, is SNAP approved, and does not contribute to global warming. (NESHAP, Significant New Alternative Program-SNAP approved (Federal EPA). The USEPA states that DrySolv’s main ingredient is less persistent in the environment than many other solvents, is of low to moderate concern for movement in soil, does not warrant listing under the Toxics Release Inventory and is not prone to bioaccumulation. (USEPA - Federal Register May 30, 2007) DrySolv does not have a hazardous decomposition or hazardous polymerization. 1. Enviro Tech International’s DrySolv web site materials, accessed at:

How did we get here? Flammable petroleum solvents Chlorinated Solvents Carbon tetrachloride CFCs, TCA TCE nPB, siloxanes, HFCs, aqueous

Vendor Chemical Mfr Formulator Equipment Mfr Government Regulator Customer Peer Companies Technical Assistance & information (P2, gov’t, consultants, etc) User mgmt Production workers EH&S How has the system enabled hazardous substitutes?

Vendor Chemical Mfr Formulator Equipment Mfr Government Regulator Customer Peer Companies Technical Assistance & information (P2, gov’t, consultants, etc) User mgmt Production workers EH&S How do we influence system to promote safer alternatives?

Massachusetts TURA 2006 Amendments –Focus on reducing use of Higher Hazard Substances New addition to process: –Evaluate alternatives to HHS for listing and/or HHS designation

N Propyl Bromide and TURA TCE and Perc designated as HHS Identify Alternatives for primary uses –Dry cleaning, solvent parts degreasing Challenge with number of distinct chemical alternatives – choose representative chemical for each category Science Advisory Board listing review, categorization review TURI policy analysis Listing recommendations, categorization

TURA nPB Action TURA Administrative Council voted to list nPB (1 bromopropane), reporting year 2010 SAB did not categorize nPB as either more or less hazardous Also considering more toxic 2- bromopropane, contaminant in 1- bromopropane

TURA List of Toxic and Hazardous Substances SAB More Hazardous Substances SAB Less Hazardous Substances TURA HHS* TCE, perc TURA LHS** *TURA Higher Hazard Substances have 1000 lb reporting threshold and **Lower Hazard Substances have no per chemical fee TURA Chemical Prioritization N propyl bromide

Questions? Contact Info: Liz Harriman Massachusetts Toxics Use Reduction Institute University of Massachusetts Lowell