Patrick MARCELLIN. THE CHALLENGE OF TREATING NON RESPONDERS Patrick Marcellin Service d’Hépatologie and INSERM CRB3 Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Traitement de l’Hépatite C Sans Interféron Patrick Marcellin.
Advertisements

Hepatitis C & HIV in 2011 Vincent Soriano Infectious Diseases Department Hospital Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy
1 FALDAPREVIR PLUS PEGYLATED INTERFERON ALFA-2A AND RIBAVIRIN IN CHRONIC HCV GENOTYPE-1 TREATMENT-NAÏVE PATIENTS FERENCI P 1, ASSELAH T 2, FOSTER GR 3,
Slide 1 of 8 From DL Wyles, MD, at Atlanta, GA: April 10, 2013, IAS-USA. IAS–USA David L. Wyles, MD Associate Professor of Medicine University of California.
Protease and Polymerase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Hepatitis C
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Simeprevir in Genotype 1 (Viral Relapsers) PROMISE Trial Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Forns X, et al. Gastroenterology.
The effect of improved HCV diagnosis and treatment on public health The effect of improved HCV diagnosis and treatment on public health P Mathurin Hôpital.
Edited by Morris Sherman MD BCh PhD FRCP(C) Associate Professor of Medicine University of Toronto Protease Inhibitors in Chronic Hepatitis C: An Update.
Patrizia FARCI. Hepatitis Delta Virus Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) HDV RNA genome Hepatitis delta antigen (HDAg) 36 nm From HDV: From HBV: From.
How to manage non responders Lawrence Serfaty Service d’Hépatologie, UMR S 893 Hôpital Saint-Antoine, UPMC, Paris Clinical case 1.
Liver Disease and Thalassaemia George Constantinou.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ombitasvir-Paritaprevir-Ritonavir and Dasabuvir + RBV in GT1 SAPPHIRE-II.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Telaprevir in Treatment Experienced GT-1 REALIZE (Study 216) Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Zeuzem S, et al. N Engl.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Telaprevir in Treatment Naïve GT-1 ADVANCE (Study 108) Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Jacobson IM, et. al. N Engl J Med.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir for 8 or 12 weeks in HCV GT1 ION-3 Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Kowdley K, et al. N Engl J Med.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Simeprevir + Sofosbuvir +/- Ribavirin in Genotype 1 COSMOS Trial Phase 2a, Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Peginterferon alfa-2b + RBV versus Interferon alfa-2b RIBAVIC STUDY Phase 3 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV and HIV.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Peginterferon alfa-2a + RBV versus Interferon alfa-2a + RBV ACTG 5071 Phase 2 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV and.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study 3D (Paritaprevir-Ritonavir-Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir) +/- RBV in GT1b PEARL-II Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Andreone.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study 3D (Paritaprevir-Ritonavir-Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir) + RBV in GT1 SAPPHIRE-II Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Zeuzem.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Simeprevir in HIV Coinfection, GT-1 C212 Trial Phase 3 Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced Dieterich D, et.
ALAN FRANCISCUS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, HEPATITIS C SUPPORT PROJECT EDITOR-IN-CHIEF, HCV ADVOCATE WEBSITE JOIN ME ON TWITTER & FACEBOOK – HCVADVOCATE BLOG:
Controversies: Lead in or no lead in ? PRO Controversies: Lead in or no lead in ? PRO Lawrence Serfaty Hôpital Saint-Antoine Paris 5th Paris Hepatitis.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Interferon alfa-2b +/- Ribavirin for 24 or 48 weeks Phase 3 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV McHutchison JG, et al.
Module 6: Treatment options. Module goal To enable participants understand the best current treatment options, factors that influence outcomes and potential.
Stefan ZEUZEM.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Boceprevir in Treatment Experienced RESPOND-2 Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Bacon BR, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:
ALAN FRANCISCUS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, HEPATITIS C SUPPORT PROJECT EDITOR-IN-CHIEF, HCV ADVOCATE WEBSITE JOIN ME ON TWITTER & FACEBOOK – HCVADVOCATE BLOG:
Triple Therapy Today: Phase III Results in G1 Relapsers and Nonresponders Bruce R. Bacon, M.D. James F. King MD Endowed Chair in Gastroenterology Professor.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Telaprevir BID versus q8 in Treatment Naïve GT-1 OPTIMIZE (Study C211) Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Buti M, et al. Gastroenterology.
LDV/SOF 90/400 mg qd Non-randomised Open-label N = 21 W12 SVR 12 NIAID SYNERGY GT4 Kohli A. Lancet Infect Dis 2015; Juky 15, ePub ahead of print ≥ 18 years.
Response Guided Therapy Fabien Zoulim Hepatology Department & INSERM Unit 1052, Lyon University Lyon, France.
COSMOS SOF + SMV + RBV SOF + SMV Randomisation 2 : 1 : 2 : 1* Open-label * Randomisation was stratified on genotype (1a or 1b) in both cohorts, IL28B in.
Maria Buti Hospital General Universitario Vall Hebron Barcelona-. Spain Relapser or Non Responder? Chronic Hepatitis C.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Simeprevir with Peginterferon and Ribavirin in GT-4 RESTORE Phase 3 Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced Moreno.
How to optimize treatment of G1 patients? Prof. G. K. K. Lau 2012.
Randomisation* 2 : 1 Double blind *Randomisation was stratified on genotype (1a or 1b or other) and IL28B genotype (CC, CT or TT) N = 133 N = 260 W24W48.
How to manage G1 relapsers and non-responders George V. Papatheodoridis, MD Associate Professor in Medicine & Gastroenterology 2nd Department of Internal.
How to avoid a resistance issue with the first generation protease inhibitors ? O. Lada PHD Service d’Hépatologie et INSERM CRB3, AP-HP Hopital Beaujon,
Response Guided Vs.Response Unguided Therapy K.Rajender Reddy M.D Professor of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, USA.
Reddy KR. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:27-35 ATTAIN SMV + TVR placebo + PEG-IFN + RBV TVR + SMV placebo + PEG-IFN + RBV Randomisation* 1 : 1 Double-blind.
Clinical case Laurent CASTERA 5th PHC, Paris, January Service d’Hépatologie Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris-7, Clichy, France.
Hepatitis C Nonresponders
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir in HCV Genotype 4 NIAID SYNERGY (Genotype 4) Phase 2 Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced.
36 year old HCV+ woman, Risk factor: occasional IVDU 15 years ago First treatment with PEG-IFN/RBV in 2002 –only qualitative PCR available : positive at.
Hadziyannis SJ et al. EASL Peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) (PEGASYS ® ) in combination with ribavirin (RBV): efficacy and safety results from a phase.
R2. 임형석 / Pf. 김병호. I NTRODUCTION Chronic hepatitis C infection 130~150 million worldwide 7 genotypes genotype 1 predominates(about 70% in USA): most difficult.
Classification of virologic responses based on outcomes during and after a 48-week course of pegylated interferon (PEG IFN) plus ribavirin antiviral therapy.
CONCERTO-2 Study: SMV + PEG-IFNa-2a + RBV for genotype 1
Classification of virologic responses based on outcomes during and after a 48-week course of pegylated interferon (PEG IFN) plus ribavirin antiviral therapy.
Which patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C can benefit from prolonged treatment with the ‘accordion’ regimen?  Patrick Marcellin, E. Jenny Heathcote,
DAA’s in the treatment of HCV: The Beginning of the end or the end of the beginning for HCV?
Hisashi Moriguchi, Makoto Kobayashi, Raymond T. Chung, Chifumi Sato 
Resistance to Direct Acting Antiviral Therapy
Mathematical modeling of viral kinetics:
Boceprevir in Treatment Naive SPRINT-2
Simeprevir in HIV Coinfection, GT-1 C212 Trial
Ombitasvir + Paritaprevir + Ritonavir +/- Ribavirin in HCV GT4 PEARL-I
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 142, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir +/- Ribavirin in HCV Genotype 1 ION-2
ASPIRE Study: SMV + PEG-IFN + RBV for genotype 1 experienced patients
A Real Life Study on Treatment of Egyptian Patients with HCV Genotype IV with Simeprevir and Sofosbuvir Prof.dr.Abdel fattah hanno Dr. Doaa al wazzan.
Acute hepatitis C: Current status and remaining challenges
What Does the Future Hold and What Will It Mean for Patients?
Hepatitis C treatment in patients with kidney disease
CONCERTO-4 Study: SMV + PEG-IFNa-2b + RBV for genotype 1
Hisashi Moriguchi, Makoto Kobayashi, Raymond T. Chung, Chifumi Sato 
The Results of Phase III Clinical Trials With Telaprevir and Boceprevir Presented at the Liver Meeting 2010: A New Standard of Care for Hepatitis C Virus.
Presentation transcript:

Patrick MARCELLIN

THE CHALLENGE OF TREATING NON RESPONDERS Patrick Marcellin Service d’Hépatologie and INSERM CRB3 Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy University of Paris

WHO TO RETREAT? SIDE EFFECTS TOLERANCE COST FIBROSIS 0-1 PROSCONS SYMPTOMS GENOTYPE MOTIVATION FIBROSIS 2-4

HOW TO TREAT A NON RESPONDER? Two strategies - Viral eradication - Maintenance therapy

HOW TO TREAT A NON RESPONDER? Two strategies - Viral eradication - Maintenance therapy

The probability of viral eradication depends on: - Type of non response - Previous therapy - Cause(s) of non response

The probability of viral eradication depends on: - Type of non response - Previous therapy - Cause(s) of non response

Limit of detection Days Serum HCV RNA 1 st phase 2 nd phase Partial non responder Slow responder Rapid responder Null non responder Neumann et al Type of non response

Limit of detection Days Serum HCV RNA 1 st phase 2 nd phase Partial non responder Slow responder Rapid responder Null non responder Neumann et al Type of non response

The probability of viral eradication depends on: - Type of non response - Previous therapy - Cause(s) of non response

Previous therapy - Conventional interferon - Standard combination - Pegylated combination

HALT-C SVR according to previous therapy 28% 12% % IFN (n=219) IFN + RBV (n=385) p< Schiffman. Gastroenterology 2005

BEAUJON SVR according to previous therapy 35% 10% % IFN (n=49) IFN + RBV (n=50) Ripault et al. DDW 2003

SVR to PEG IFN+RBV in NRs to IFN+RBV According to Genotype 0% 37% SVR % Genotype 2-3 Genotype 1 Moucari et al. J Hepatol in press

SVR to PEG IFN+RBV in NRs to IFN+RBV According to Cirrhosis 0% 32% SVR % No cirrhosis Cirrhosis Moucari et al. J Hepatol in press

HCV RNA (log 10 copies/ml) Treatment Week RETREATMENT BY PEGYLATED COMBINATION OF 154 NON RESPONDERS TO STANDARD COMBINATION Moucari et al. J Hepatol, in press

RETREATMENT FOR ERADICATION Partial response Non response Genotype 2-3 Genotype 1 No cirrhosisCirrhosis PROSCONS

PROBABILITY OF SVR TO RETREATMENT P = P2 - P1 P is the probability of response to retreatment according to the probability of response to the new treatment (P2) minus the probability of response to the prior treatment (P1)

The probability of viral eradication depends on: - Type of non response - Previous therapy - Cause(s) of non response

Cause(s) of non response related to the patient: To manage before retreatment - Alcool:stop - Overweight:weight loss - Insulin resistancetreatment? - Iron overload:phlebotomy - Psychologic:prepare

Cause(s) of non response related to reduced dosing: To manage during retreatment - Anemia: EPO - Neutropenia: GCSF - Depression: anti-depressive - Others …

PERSPECTIVES - Optimise current therapy - New drugs

PERSPECTIVES - Optimize current therapy - New drugs

OPTIMIZE CURRENT THERAPY - Increase dose of PEG IFN - Increase duration of therapy - Better adjust dose of RBV according to body weight - Improve PEG IFN pharmacokinetic (2 injections/week for PEG IFN a2b?)

REPEAT Background Initial retreatment studies have suggested a benefit of induction doses and/or prolonged duration of treatment in previous non- responders Jacobson. Hepatology 2005 Strader. Hepatology 2004 Diago. Hepatology 2003

REPEAT Patients Non-responders to ≥12 weeks’ treatment with standard-dose PEG IFN alfa-2b plus ribavirin

Follow-up Study Week Follow-up 360  g Peg-IFN alpha2a + RBV Follow-up 360  g Peg-IFN alpha2a + RBV 180  g Peg-IFN alpha2a + RBV Follow-up REPEAT study design 950 patients randomized 2:1:1:2 A B C D 180  g Peg-IFN alpha2a + RBV Marcellin et al. AASLD 2005

Virological Response at Week 12 Patients (%) <600 IU/mL<50 IU/mL≥2-log 10 drop * * * p<  g (n=469) 360  g (n=473) HCV RNA p< p= Marcellin et al. AASLD 2005

PERSPECTIVES - Optimise current therapy - New drugs

NEW DRUGS New “IFN”: Albuferon Gene shuffled interferon New “ribavirins”: Levovirine Merimepodib Viramidine Enzyme inhibitors: Anti-polymerase Anti-protease

Merimepodib (VX 497) in non responders (IFN+RBV) Weeks Median HCV RNA (log 10) PEG IFN + Riba PEG IFN + Riba + 25 mg VX 497 PEG IFN + Riba + 50 mg VX 497 Marcellin et al. EASL 2004

Viramidine Anemia Viramidine Hemoglobine <10 g/dL % 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 400 mg600 mg800 mg Ribavirin 1000/1200 mg 0% 2% 11% 27%

Viramidine Phase 3 VISER 1 SVR Viramidine 800mg Ribavirin 1000/1200 mg 52% 38%. 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% %

ENZYME INHIBITORS Anti-polymerase NM 283 (Idenix/Novartis) R1626 (Roche) HCV 796 (Wyeth)… Anti-protease VX 950 (Vertex) Schering Others...

Valopicitabine (NM283) HCV RNA JDays Placebo 50 mg x 1/j 100 mg x 1/j 200 mg x 1/j 400 mg x 1/j 200 mg x 2/j Doses croissantes mg Doses croissantes mg + anti-émetique Traitement 24 (Godofsky et al., DDW 2004)

R1626 (Roche) (Roberts et al, AASLD 2006) Placebo 500 mg x 2/j 1500 mg x 2/j 3000 mg x 2/j 4500 mg x 2/j Treatment F-U Days HCV RNA HCV RNA ,6 log 10 -3,7 log 10 -1,2 log 10

HCV 796 (Wyeth) (Chandra et al, DDW 2006) Placebo 50 mg 100 mg 250 mg 500 mg 1000 mg 1500 mg Days HCV RNA HCV RNA Treatment F-U

PegIFN-Ribavirine-VX 950 Study Time (in Days) media n Limit of Quantitation Limit of Detection Lawitz et al., DDW 2006

SCH ± IFN PEG a2b 1.5  g/kg HCV 1, IFN Non-Responders

MAINTENANCE THERAPY

Reduce necro-inflam. Tolerability Reduce HCC?Cost Improve survival? Not proven F3-F4F1-F2 ALT decreaseNo ALT decrease PROSCONS

- The probability of SVR to ReTX depends on type of non response, previous therapy and characteristics of patients (genotype, cirrhosis) -Viral eradication is rarely obtained (10%) with pegylated combination in NRs to optimal standard combination - Viral eradication may be obtained in NRs to sub-optimal combination (correct causes of NR) TREATMENT OF NON RESPONDERS

- The efficacy of new drugs (anti-protease, anti-polymerase…) remains to be demonstrated. Triple or double TX? - Maintenance therapy is justified In patients with severe liver disease, if it induces a biochemical response (ALT<2N) - Its modalities and the patients who benefit need to be precised TREATMENT OF NON RESPONDERS

IN PRACTICAL

Non Responder

False non Responder

Non Responder False non Responder Cause of non response? Treat the cause

Non Responder False non Responder Cause of non response? Treat the cause ReTX Response Eradication

Non Responder False non Responder Cause of non response? Treat the cause ReTX Response Maintenance therapy - if F3 or F4 - if biochemical response - if tolerance OK Eradication Non response

Non Responder False non Responder True non Responder Cause of non response? Treat the cause ReTX Response Maintenance therapy - if F3 or F4 - if biochemical response - if tolerance OK Eradication Non response

Non Responder False non Responder True non Responder Cause of non response? Treat the cause ReTX Response Maintenance therapy - if F3 or F4 - if biochemical response - if tolerance OK Eradication Non response Trial