March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Optical Assemblies for Space Environments: Characterization of W.L.Gore Flexlite with Diamond AVIMS for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© DIAMOND Headquarters / F-3000 r & rs / / 1 WERE WELL CONNECTED F-3000 r & F-3000 rs connectors.
Advertisements

Assurance of COTS Fiber Optic Cable Assemblies for Space Flight Melanie N. Ott Swales Aerospace / Goddard Space Flight Center Component Technologies and.
Intermetallic Issues With Wire Joining by Thermocompression & Soldering Dr Henning Leidecker Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 562 Parts, Packaging, and.
© DIAMOND SA / / 1 MU Connector High density optical miniature unit.
© DIAMOND SA / X-BEAM / / 1 X-BEAM Connector Up to 4 channels SM and MM optical connections based on Expanded Beam technology.
Commercial IFOGs.
Session 4: Termination and Splices. 2 FO Connectors Specifications Specifications Loss Repeatability Environment (temp, humidity, vibration, etc.) Reliability.
Experimental studies of low energy proton irradiation of thin vacuum deposited Aluminum layers T. Renger, M. Sznajder, U.R.M.E. Geppert Chart.
© DIAMOND SA / Titan und Krokodil / / 1 © DIAMOND Headquarters / E-2000™ & F-3000™ PS / / 1 DIAMOND Power Solution Fiber optic interface for.
MFS, MPO 4/8/12-Fiber connectors and Fan-Out assemblies.
High Altitude Payload Design – A Mechanical Aspect Kaysha Young and Emily Bishop – Montana State University - Bozeman Advisor: Dr. Brock J. LaMeres Mechanical.
Characterization of Commercial Optical Fiber Cables for Space Flight Environments at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Melanie Ott Sigma Research and Engineering.
© DIAMOND SA / / 1 DMI DIAMOND Micro Interface Detachable miniature optical interface for multiple usage.
HIGH ALTITUDE BALLOON (HAB) SENIOR DESIGN PROJECT Odera Eziolisa Dale Hardacre Kaneisha Wilson Advisors: Joseph C. Slater, PhD, PE J. Mitch Wolff, PhD.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Intermixing of Cells in Nickel-Cadmium Batteries for Aircraft Usage May 11, Intermixing of Cells in Nickel-Cadmium.
Technical studies for the HIE- ISOLDE Frontend upgrade Jacobo Montaño Marie Curie Fellow; CATHI Project * The research project has been supported by a.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Section Mechanical Systems Radiator and X-LAT Assy1 GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Mechanical and fluidic integration of scintillating microfluidic channels into detector system 1 Davy Brouzet 10 th September 2014.
TESTING MULTIMODE FIBER
Dr. Curtis Banks Mentor EV-43 Harvesting Environmental White Noise to Perform Structural Health Monitoring with Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors Justin Colar.
© DIAMOND SA / / 1 Performance & Intermateability Comparison between different ferrule technologies.
© DIAMOND SA / / 1 DIAMOND AVIM Connector Fiber optic connector for aero-space applications.
1 Fiber Optics MULTIMODE VS. SINGLEMODE FIBER. 2 Fiber Optics When we talk about fiber we refer to either multimode or singlemode fiber. We further clarify.
FY12 Optical Fiber Standards (Continuation - Optoelectronics) Continue collaboration with ESA/CNES/AFRL/JEDEC to formulate, lead and provide guidance with.
Defense and Aerospace Screening Flows Joe Fabula
Optical Fiber Classification Can be classified in a number of ways On the basis of manufacturing Single component/Multi component Glass.
STEREO IMPACT SEP Critical Design Review 2002-Nov-20 TvR IMPACT/SEP Thermal Design John Hawk, GSFC (301)
Background Issues: Real Time Radiation Measurement S.M.Yang EPC.IHEP Mini-Workshop on BEPCII Background Study March 2008 Institute of High Energy.
April 1, 2002NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Characterization of a Twelve Channel Optical Fiber, Ribbon Cable and MTP Array Connector Assembly for Space.
Nd:YAG Laser Power Cycling The Direct Detection Doppler Lidar uses a frequency tripled Nd:YAG laser, the same laser technology used in MOLA, GLAS, MLA,
JPL’s Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Program
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW Boom PER 30 June RBSP EFW Spin Plane Booms Greg Dalton Space Sciences.
Performance Testing of a Risk Reduction Space Winds Lidar Laser Transmitter Floyd Hovis, Fibertek, Inc. Jinxue Wang, Raytheon Space and Airborne Systems.
06-032b Optoelectronics for Space Environments Cost There are no procurements to impact Schedule There are no major schedule dependencies Technical Only.
Scanning capacitance microscopy
Working on PIPER Also, MOPS The Varied Summer of Adam Davis at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Code 665.
( McNeese Everest Speed of Sound ) Columbia Scientific Balloon Facility Palestine,Tx May 2008.
Slide 1 5th LHC RADIATION WORKSHOP, CERN, , Jochen Kuhnhenn, Fraunhofer INT Radiation tolerant fibres for LHC controls and communications.
Goddard Space Flight Center Cryogenics and Fluids Branch Status of the AMS-02 Cryocooler January 2007 TIM.
Space Radiation Environment Tests on HOEs Geary Schwemmer* NASA GSFC Work Supported by NASA and IPO *new affiliation: Science and Engineering Services,
ANCIT WORKSHOP Torino, March 1998 Optical Network Construction in Customer Premises by Sadaaki TAKANO NTT Access Network Systems Laboratories.
July 18, SPP-FIELDS Thermal Path to TRL 6 M. Diaz-Aguado.
STATUS ON Optical fiber: Preliminary tests on Optical Fiber and Fiber Optic Feedthrough Massimo Rossella, Marco Prata, Tommaso Cervi INFN, Sezione di Pavia.
Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy UNDULATOR SYSTEMS REVIEW MARCH 3-4, 2004 ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB. 1 LCLS Optical.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 End of Summer Review Kevin Jenkins Mechanical Engineering Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
10-meter Interferometer Results M. Woods (special thanks to Steve Myers and Tim Slaton) Jan. 31, 2000 Commissioning Setup System Noise Monte Carlo simulation.
Optical InterLinks LLC (OIL)----- GuideLink ™ Polymer Waveguide Products Multichannel Monolithic Data Network Monitoring Taps Using OIL’s Polymer Waveguide.
Date of download: 7/6/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Schematic diagram of optical box for modifying high-power and high-frequency clinical.
Solar Probe Plus FIELDS V1234 Mechanical Pre-Ship Review May 26, 2017
Ball Aerospace Scalable Configurable Cryocooler Electronics (SCCE)
Solar Probe Plus FIELDS V1234 Mechanical Pre-Ship Review May 26, 2017
Gayle K. Martin November 14, 2016
General overview Place : Institue of Space Astrophysic (IAS, Orsay)
Overview 3 2 Introduction Design Analysis Fabrication Testing
SPP FIELDS V1234 Thermal PSR
THEMIS Mission Assurance
Capitalization style for Presentation Title is “Title Case”
FIELDS SCM Thermal iPER
INTRODUCTION TO OPTICAL COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY
Pierre-Alexandre Thonet
Space Proximity Atmospheric Research above Tropospheric Altitudes
7E: Tower test plans GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem
Tunable Light Source Tuned LEDs and their Applications
Guidelines for Fiber Optic Design and Installation
Characterizing FOX Demonstrator Test Setups for LArDPS to FEX Modules at CERN RuthAnn Gregory.
Radiation tolerant fibres for LHC controls and communications
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Undulator System Components Status Dean Walters
Fiber End Cap (for high power applications)
100W Fiber Collimator PRODUCT BRIEF Advantages Overview
Presentation transcript:

March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Optical Assemblies for Space Environments: Characterization of W.L.Gore Flexlite with Diamond AVIMS for Space Flight Environments Melanie N. Ott Sigma Research and Engineering/ NASA Goddard Space Flight Center More information: , URL: nepp.nasa.gov/photonics misspiggy.gsfc.nasa.gov/photonics

March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Optical Assemblies for Space Environments: Characterization of W.L.Gore Flexlite with Diamond AVIMS for Space Flight Environments Melanie N. Ott Sigma Research and Engineering/ NASA Goddard Space Flight Center More information: , URL: nepp.nasa.gov/photonics Technical Team: Shawn Macmurphy, Marcellus Proctor, Patricia Friedberg

March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Photonics Manufacturing and Testing Lab Parts, Packaging and Assembly Technologies Office NASA GSFC, Code 562

March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Outline MLA Requirements & Components Characterization plan Materials Study Results Vibration Testing & Results Thermal Testing & Results Radiation Parameters Radiation Testing Results Conclusions

March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center MLA Requirements Large diameter optical fiber, 200 and 300 micron, NA of.22 for use at 1064 nm. High performance assembly; Low insertion loss (< 0.4 dB) Repeatability. Stability in harsh environment - thermal, vibration and radiation. Non-outgassing components. Assemblies 26.1 inches long used for beam delivery system, not interconnected. Parts selection to meet requirements: Diamond AVIMs with custom ferrule drilling, D Part # E VNAS1 Ferrule custom drilled for 220 fiber. Part # E VNAS2 Ferrule custom drilled for 330 fiber. Part # V001, Hytrel boots. W.L.Gore, Flexlite simplex cable, FON1173, FON1174 Polymicro Technologies optical fiber, FIA , 200 micron, acrylate,.22 NA, step index FIA , 300 micron, acrylate,.22 NA, step index Epoxy, Epo-Tek 353ND.

March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center AVIMs and Flexlite Assembly Terminations performed to NASA-STD and procedure 562-WI

March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Mercury Laser Altimeter

March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Characterization Plan All testing conducted: recorded before and after optical performance data as well as in-situ optical data. Vacuum Outgassing, –All materials must pass ASTM-E595. Vibration Induced Effects –Verified survival and operational ability during launch using typical launch parameters for small box components. –3 minutes per axis, 14.1 grms total, 3 assemblies tested. Thermal Induced Effects –-30°C to +50 °C, 90 cycles, last 42 monitored, (tests are conducted at 10°C higher than expected environmental extremes). –25 minute soak, 2 °C/min ramp rates. Radiation Effects –Space flight environments from GSFC are less than 1 rad/min and more typically less than 0.1 rads/min. Two dose rates used to possibly provide a model for extrapolation to lower dose rates rads/min for lower dose rate, 22.7 rads/min for higher dose, Up to 30 Krads while maintaining a cold temperature of –20° C. Actual projected dose rate for MLA: rads/day,.685 rads/hour,.011 rads/min

March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Materials Results, nonmetallic parts Cable - Flexlite passed when tested previously in configuration during development of ICESAT (GLAS) with acrylate coated fiber. - Cable does require preconditioning for thermal stability 8 cycles, 60 60°C, °C, < 2°C/min Connector Boots Hytrel 8068 require de-gas preconditioning, 10 2 to 1 Torr, 140°C, 24 hours. Once preconditioned, ASTM-E595 results were: 0.48 % TML, 0.10% CVCM. Epoxy EpoTek 353ND is contained in GSFC outgassing database.

March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Cable Designations and Initial Visual Inspection Assembly Code Side ASide B MP1 MP2 MP3 Pre-environmental Testing Visual Inspection MPX Test assemblies were made of two AVIMS/AVIMS interconnected with an AVIMS adapter, each ~ 24 inches long. Presented above are end face pictures of the mated sides that were exposed to environmental testing

March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Vibration Testing 3 minutes/axis, 14.1 grms total, 3 axis test X YZ Z axis orientation X axis orientation

March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Vibration Parameters for Test Frequency (Hz)Protoflight Level g 2 /Hz dB/octave g 2 /Hz dB/octave g 2 /Hz Overall14.1 grms Random Vibration Profile Parameters Based on EO-1 and MLA specifications 3 minutes/axis, 14.1 grms total, 3 axis test for mated pair

March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Vibration Test Results: X axis MP1

March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Vibration Test Results: Y axis MP1

March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Vibration Test Results: Z axis MP1

March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Vibration Test Results Summary Assembly Set Vibration Test Axis Max Induced Insertion Loss Final Change in Insertion Loss Post Testing MP1X dB dB MP1Y dB dB MP1Z dB dB MP2X dB* dB * MP2Y dB* dB * MP2Z dB dB MP3X dB* dB * MP3Y dB0.00 dB MP3Z dB* dB * *Indicates an increase in power post vibration testing No endface damage was detected during post vibration visual inspection.

March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Thermal Testing -30°C to +50 °C, 90 cycles, last 42 cycles monitored optically. Program malfunction caused lack of data collected during the first 48 cycles.

March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Thermal Testing Results Insertion loss for MP1 During 68 th to 75 th cycle (Red) with temperature (Black). Insertion loss increases with decreasing temperature. Example of data collected for all assemblies MP1 during 42 cycles (after initial 48 cycles unmonitored)

March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Thermal Testing Results Summary Assembly Set Δ insertion loss during testing Overall Change in loss post testing, 90 cycles Max insertion loss during testing Visual Inspection post test side A Visual Inspection post test side B MP dB dB power increase dB MP dB dB power increase dB MP dB dB power increase dB

March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Radiation Test Parameters Tested up to 30 krads in Cobalt 60 chamber: 10 m of FON1173 (200 micron core fiber) 10 m of FON1174 (300 micron core fiber) High dose rate 22.7 rads/min Low dose rate 11.2 rads/min While maintaining at temperature of -20°C. Monitored optical power at 850 < 1 micro watt of power.

March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Radiation Results for High Dose Test Induced attenuation for both 200 (red), and 300 (blue) micron cable up to 30 krads 22.7 rads/min 10 meters of cable

March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Radiation Results for Low Dose Test Induced attenuation for both 200 (red), and 300 (blue) micron cable up to 30 krads 11.2 rads/min 10 meters of cable Small “glitch” at ~ 20 krads due to fire alarm closing chamber shutter

March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Radiation Results Summary Part #Type OF (microns) Dose 30 krads Ave. temp during testing Expected atten krads FON rads/min1.024 dB-24.1°C0.068 dB FON rads/min0.917dB-24.1°C0.061 dB FON rads/min0.892 dB-18.3°C0.059 dB FON rads/min0.818 dB-18.3°C0.054 dB Results for 200 and 300 micron fiber are ~ identical. Results for high and low dose rate tests for both fibers also ~ identical. Extrapolation model can not be used without further experimentation. Dose rate differences are attributed with difference in thermal environment.

March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Conclusions In general, Flexlite and AVIMs assemblies performed with superiority in comparison to other studies conducted in the past (nepp.nasa.gov/photonics for more information). Vibration and Thermal Conclusions: Final change in insertion loss after both vibration and thermal testing is as follows: - MP1, -.04 dB, resulting power increase - MP2, -.02 dB, resulting power increase - MP3, -.04 dB, resulting power increase Radiation Conclusions: - Since extrapolation method can not be used best assumption is by usage of lower dose rate results. Actual MLA dose rate will be.011 rads/min. -Using 11.2 rads/min results, expected losses will be less than.07 dB for each 26.1 inch assembly at –20ºC at a total dose of 30 krads under “dark conditions” or without power enough to provide photobleaching annealing effects. -Both FON1174 and FON1173 perform identical. Post all environmental testing: MP1, 0.03 dB; MP2, 0.05 dB; MP3, 0.03 dB

March 30, 2004NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Acknowledgements Special thanks to NASA Electronic Parts and Packaging Program & MESSENGER, Mercury Laser Altimeter Program for funding of this work. Additional thanks to Dr. Henning Leidecker (always!) Darryl Lakins Dr. Charles Barnes Phillip Zulueta Luis A Ramos-Izquierdo Arlin Bartels For resources and program management support For more information see the websites: Special thanks to the WebEx team for making this possible Jeannette Plante & Carl Szabo