Forecasting Traffic and Toll Revenue for Public-Private Partnerships (P3) vs. Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO): A comparison 14 th TRB National.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
Advertisements

1 Innovative Tools October 27, 2011 Chi Mai. 2 Presentation Overview VISSIM Corridors VISSIM Protocol Hours of Congestion.
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
Performance Measures CTP 2040 Policy Advisory Committee August 19, 2014.
TRB Planning Applications Conference Columbus, OH May 7, 2013 TRAFFIC AND REVENUE FORECASTING FOR THE OHIO TURNPIKE ASSET EVALUATION Presented by: Gregory.
THE PRACTICE OF TOLLING Theory in Motion May 7, 2013 Michael Copeland Yagnesh Jarmarwala Justin Winn.
Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Overview and Considering Greenhouse Gas Emissions in MTC’s 2035 RTP Joan Sollenberger, Chief Lisa Klein Division of.
An Innovative Approach to Communicating Complex Funding Issues Chad Edwards & Elizabeth Whitaker May 18, 2009 TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Policy Overview Hugh Conroy Whatcom Council of Governments (MPO) Bellingham, WA TBWG Data Workshop Detroit Metro, Michigan Crowne Plaza Hotel,
Route 17 Corridor Study Public Workshop II – November 29, 2012 Orange / Sullivan County 1.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
Presented to Transportation Planning Application Conference presented by Feng Liu, John (Jay) Evans, Tom Rossi Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May 8, 2011.
What is the Model??? A Primer on Transportation Demand Forecasting Models Shawn Turner Theo Petritsch Keith Lovan Lisa Aultman-Hall.
Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,
First home-interview survey (1944). Gravity model Where do the trips produced in TAZ 3 go? ? ? ? ?
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Federal Transit Administration New Starts Project Development Process
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
Framework for Model Development General Model Design Highway Network/Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) Development of Synthetic Trip Tables Development of.
13 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 11, 2011 Risk Assessment & Sensitivity Analysis of Traffic and Revenue Projections for Toll.
Analytical Needs SEMCOG Travel Model Improvement Program Donnelly, Davidson, Binkowski & Arens 12-Dec-2011.
Transportation Planning and Modeling Transportation planning is a field involved with the evaluation, assessment, design and siting of transportation facilities.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group presented by Ron West Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
Implementing a Blended Model System to Forecast Transportation and Land Use Changes at Bob Hope Airport 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING. TOPICS 1.ROADS AND PUBLIC GOODS 2.RATIONALE TO JUSTIFY ROAD BUILDING 3.URBAN PLANNING AND TRAFFIC CONGESTION (UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES)
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Regulation & Finance Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
Improving Your World. RS&H tradition began in 1941 Employee-owned company Six programs of client-focused services Multi-disciplined team of planners,
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Planning Process & Alternatives Analysis Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
Rail Investment and Public/Private Partnerships September 2014 David P. Simpson David P. Simpson Consultants LLC.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Ed Christopher Resource Center Planning Team Federal Highway Administration 4749 Lincoln Mall Drive Matteson, IL 60443
Craig O’Riley & Adam Shell Office of Systems Planning Wednesday, December 1,
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. TRB Applications Conference – Freight Committee May 7, 2013.
Lynn Peterson Secretary of Transportation Combining Macro Scopic and Meso Scopic Models in Toll and Traffic Revenue Forecasting SR 167 Corridor Completion.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
National Household Travel Survey Statewide Applications Heather Contrino Travel Surveys Team Lead Federal Highway Administration Office of Highway Policy.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department Summary Presentation January 2004 MOBILITY 2025: THE METROPOLITAN.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
RPS Modeling Results Presentation to RPS Policy Committee Brian Gregor Transportation Planning Analysis Unit June 6,
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Data Requirements to Support Road Pricing Analyses Johanna Zmud, Ph.D. NuStats Partners, LP Expert Forum on Road.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
Overview Freight Modeling Overview Tianjia Tang, PE., Ph.D FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations Phone:
Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
Choosing the Route To Traveler Information Systems Deployment by ITS America ATIS Committee USDOT ITS Joint Program Office Washington State Transportation.
Overview of PPI’s in Georgia April 26, 2006 Earl Mahfuz, Treasurer.
August 29, 2007 Metropolitan Travel Forecasting TRB Special Report 288 Mn/DOT Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee August 29, 2007.
Tri-level freight modeling: A simulation of trucks going near and far Rolf Moeckel Parsons Brinckerhoff Sabya Mishra University of Maryland TRB Planning.
S.H. 121 – Dallas, Texas Case Study Presentation National Summit on Future Transportation Funding and Finance Strategies April 11, 2007 Michael Morris,
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop presented by Krista Jeannotte Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March.
How Does Your Model Measure Up Presented at TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro Frank Spielberg VHB May, 2007.
Presented to Time of Day Subcommittee May 9, 2011 Time of Day Modeling in FSUTMS.
Comparative Analysis of Traffic and Revenue Risks Associated with Priced Facilities 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Phase 2: Data Collection Findings and Future Steps.
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
Transportation Forecasting The Four Step Model. Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 17 Transportation Planning Overview.
INCORPORATING INCOME INTO TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING Brent Spence Bridge Case Study October 13, 2015.
The Current State-of-the-Practice in Modeling Road Pricing Bruce D. Spear Federal Highway Administration.
1 Forecasting Traffic for a Start-Up Toll Road 12 th TRB National Transportation Planning Application Conference May 18, 2009 David Schellinger, P.E. Vice.
Transportation Planning: An Introduction CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Smyrna’s Major Thoroughfare, Bicycle, and Pedestrian Plan TOWN COUNCIL RETREAT APRIL 14, 2015.
SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES, RANKING AND PRIORITIZATION CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLANS INCORPORATION INTO STIP & TIP STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION MONITOR.
Addressing Freight in the Planning and Programming Process presented by Jim Brogan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. July 11, 2001 FHWA Freight Planning Workshop.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
Travel Demand Forecasting: Mode Choice
Presentation transcript:

Forecasting Traffic and Toll Revenue for Public-Private Partnerships (P3) vs. Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO): A comparison 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng. Baez Consulting, LLC May 5-9, 2013 Columbus, Ohio FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

OUTLINE OF THE PRESENTATION Goals of: –MPO process –P3 process Stakeholders and Players Forecasting Process FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

GOALS OF THE MPO AND P3 PROCESS FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

GOALS OF THE MPO PROCESS Identify transportation needs at the regional level: –Highways: Freeways, tollways, and major arterials –Transit: Bus, light rail, high speed, etc. –Freight –Bicycle and Pedestrian FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

GOALS OF THE P3 PROCESS Deliver a infrastructure need identified in the MTP or other Plan –Highway, transit or other Forecasting for: –Public agency (MPO, DOT, Toll Agency) –Private entity (Concessionaire/Proposer; Investor; Rating Agency; etc) FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

GOALS OF THE P3 PROCESS Working for a Public Agency Identify scope of the project Identify Public Agency Equity: –Revenue Positive : Potential Cash Payment –Revenue Neutral : Maybe a small subsidy to attract investors –Revenue Negative : Re-size your project or bring additional public equity FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

GOALS OF THE P3 PROCESS Working for a Private Entity Proposing Team: –Optimize traffic and toll revenue to “win”. No reward for “second place”. Investor/Rating Agency/Financial Advisor: –Due diligence: How much risk do I have? Would I recover my investment? FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

STAKEHOLDERS OF THE MPO AND P3 PROCESS FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

STAKEHOLDERS OF THE MPO PROCESS MPO DOT FHWA Transit Agencies Transit Agencies Public Officials General Public FTA Environ. Organizations FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

STAKEHOLDERS OF THE P3 PROCESS Infrastructure Developers Infrastructure Developers Private Lenders Pension Funds Pension Funds Rating Agencies Rating Agencies TIFIA Office TIFIA Office Bankers Technology Companies Technology Companies Lawyers, lawyers and lawyers FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

FORECASTING PROCESS FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

MPO PROCESS Modeling Land use Model Travel Demand Micro- Simul. Air Quality FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

MPO PROCESS Travel Demand Trip Generation Trip Distribution Mode Choice Multi-modal Assignment FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

MPO PROCESS Validation and Forecast Data Collection Validation Process (Four-Steps; Regional) Forecast Traffic (20-25 years) FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

MPO PROCESS Forecast Evaluation of modal alternatives Once the MTP or MIS has been approved and the project has been constructed: – Do we systematically compare forecasted traffic versus actual traffic? – What are the consequences of missing the forecast? FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

P3 PROCESS Travel Demand Very limited amount of time to complete the study Begin with the MPO Travel Demand Model (usually vehicle trip-tables) Data collection: traffic counts, speed/delay, OD, demographics, SP Surveys Disaggregation of trip tables, post-processing Concentrating on assignment process FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

P3 PROCESS Validation and Forecast Data Collection Validation (Assignment; Corridor level) Forecast Traffic (>35 years) FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

P3 PROCESS Forecast What is the consequence of under forecasting or over forecasting? What is the consequence of under forecasting or over forecasting? FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

P3 PROCESS Forecast Client(s) will check your forecast versus actual traffic and revenue the day after the facility opens!!!!!!! Be Ready!!! Under-forecast consequence: –Leave money on the table, lose the proposal, limit the scope of the project Over-forecast consequence: – Get a bigger project, bankrupt, liabilities, etc. FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

P3 PROCESS Quantification of Risk Sensitivity tests: –Demographics, facility utilization (diversion), competing facilities, VOT, reliability, ramp-up; level of congestion –Recessionary scenarios –Phasing FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

P3 PROCESS Sensitivity Tests (Examples) Demographic modifications (no-growth, growth reduction, postponing growth) Impact of gasoline price increases –Operational costs, land use Confidence in toll sensitivity curves –Pricing flexibility Impact of modifying Mobility Plan (competing routes) Impact of the on-going recession Revenue leakage Toll rate increase implementation policy (base year, frequency, percentage) FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

CONCLUSION Major differences: –MPO: Regional perspective –MPO: Comparison among alternatives –P3: Corridor perspective –P3: Many more players in the game –P3: More sensitivity tests –P3: Potential legal liabilities for the forecast outcome FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

Questions? Gustavo Baez FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs