Use, Non-Use, and Satisfaction with Assistive Technology Provided by a Reutilization Program Aimee Duplantis, OTS National AT Reuse Conference September.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities in Development Cooperation Training course Brussels, 29 th & 30 th November 2012 Module 1: Setting the stage: Why.
Advertisements

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY INTRODUCTION. Basic Premise: All students can participate! All students can learn! All students can achieve! ALL students…including.
Assistive Technology Definitions and the Law. Assistive Technology Devices Services Consideration.
R-4: Enhancing Community Participation Washington University in St. Louis David B. Gray, Ph.D. Holly H. Hollingsworth, Ph.D. Jessica L. Dashner, OTD OTR/L.
Evaluation & Sanitization 1/29/2010 Sam Creech MCITP, ATACP-2008 Lindsey Bean-Kampwerth OTD, OTR/L.
Sanitizing and Evaluation of Equipment Lindsey Bean, OTD September 15, 2009.
Barbara M. Altman Emmanuelle Cambois Jean-Marie Robine Extended Questions Sets: Purpose, Characteristics and Topic Areas Fifth Washington group meeting.
Cultural practices and Environment and Participation assessment Classification, Assessment, Surveys and Terminology (CAS/EIP) World Health Organization.
The Role of Home and Community Environment in Fall Prevention Excerpts taken from 2005 Joint Conference of the American Society of Aging and The National.
Mobility Technology A Working Definition Rachel Cowan.
Disability Statistics at NCHS: An Update
The Definition and Measurement of Disability
Assistive Technology in the Educational Setting Ed Computers and Technology in Special Education.
Measuring Disability in a Survey or Census Context: Parallel Work Advancing the Field Barbara M. Altman, Ph.D. Disability Statistics Consultant.
The Influence of Transportation and Access on the Well-Being of Older Adults William A. Satariano, Ph.D., MPH School of Public Health University of California,
Exploring the Washington Group Data from the 2011 U.S. National Health Interview Survey Julie D. Weeks, Ph.D. National Center for Health Statistics, USA.
Jennifer Madans Associate Director for Science
SPECA Regional Workshop on Disability Statistics: Dec 13-15, 2006 Purposes of Disability Statistics Jennifer Madans and Barbara Altman National Center.
INTRODUCTION TO SELF CARE ACTIVITIES
Daniel Mont Disability and Development Team The World Bank
1 Poverty and People with Disabilities A Report to the Legislative Commission to End Poverty by 2020 Joan Willshire Executive Director Minnesota State.
The Role of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) in TR Practice, Research, and Education Chapter 4 HPR 453.
Assistive Technology Clinical Outcomes Research Management System (AT-CORMS) Tool Utilizing the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) Cognitive.
Clinical Use and New Developments Sally Boa Research Speech and Language Therapist University of Stirling Forth Valley NHS.
A comparison of barriers to physical activity faced by older and younger adults with mobility impairments Vijay Vasudevan,
September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Internationally Comparable General Disability Measures Barbara M. Altman National Center for Health Statistics.
Needs, aspirations and supply People with mobility impairments in need of suitable housing  Need 199,402  Supply 26,000 Wheelchair users in need of.
Rehabilitation Teaching & Research Unit, Wellington School of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Otago A Delphi Exercise to Help Determine a Core.
Differences in Participation by Diagnostic or Mobility Device Group Stephanie J. Hayes, OTS April 6, 2006.
An Overview of Assistive Technologies by Terry Menard CAE 6100-GP1 (52375) Classroom & Clinical Applications of Assistive Technologies Nova Southeastern.
Three (3) Bureaus of RSC Bureau of Vocational Rehabilitation Bureau of Services for the Visually Impaired Bureau of Disability Determination.
Matching Persons to Equipment Lindsey Bean, OTD September 15, 2009.
…from Census to Survey: a framework for the development of extended question sets for use on surveys Mitch Loeb USA Washington Group on Disability Statistics.
Development with Disabled Network Mainstreaming Disability into Community Governance System Asitha Weweldeniya, Weweldenige, Development with Disabled.
10/13/2015 Monitoring the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities… … and the work of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics Mitchell.
Universal Design for Public Programs 30 – 31, 2013.
Predictors of the Use of Assistive Devices that Address Physical Impairments Among Community-Based Frail Elders University at Buffalo Machiko R. Tomita,
Los Angeles County Health Survey Department of Health Services, Public Health Assessing Healthy People 2010 Goals for People with Disabilities.
Tamar Heller, Katie Arnold, Lieke van Heumen Elizabeth McBride, & Alan Factor Growing Older with a Disability Toronto, June 6, 2011 Rehabilitation Research.
1.  Assembles the best available scientific information on disability today  Recommends national and international action to improve the lives of people.
Disability Levels and Correlates among Older Mobile Home Dwellers, an NHATS analysis Tala M. Al-Rousan, Linda M. Rubenstein, Robert B. Wallace College.
AT REUSE STRAND Lindsey Kampwerth, OTD OTR/L Joy Kniskern, Principal Investigator Pass It On Center Research on AT Reuse Outcomes and Effectiveness Pass.
Matching Persons with AT for Demo/Loan & Reuse Programs Lindsey Bean Kampwerth, OTD, OTR/L Clayton Guffey MSW, CRC, ATP ATIA 2010.
Printed by Research on Assistive Technology Reuse Outcomes and Effectiveness Lindsey Bean-Kampwerth, OTD, OTR/L, Joy Kniskern, Principal.
Copyright © F.A. Davis Company Part I: General Concepts Chapter 1 Therapeutic Exercise: Foundational Concepts.
O S E R S Proposed Assistive Technology Act Data Collection June 12, 2006 Jeremy Buzzell Program Specialist Rehabilitation Services Administration Office.
F UNCTIONAL L IMITATIONS IN C ANCER S URVIVORS A MONG E LDERLY M EDICARE B ENEFICIARIES Prachi P. Chavan, MD, MPH Epidemiology PhD Student Xinhua Yu MD.
Legal Aspects of Special Education And Social Foundations The Technology-Related Assistance Act (Tech Act)
By: Alma Sanchez. I interviewed Cindy Daniel BSW Case Manager with Aging and Disability Resources Center.
10 FACTS ON DISABILITY SOURCE PREPARE BY Ramesh Baral Ph.D Schoolar Tribhuwan University Kathmandu Nepal FOR COMMENT:
Project CARAT: Coordinating and Assisting the Reuse of Assistive Technology.
Pediatric Evaluation Mok-po Rehabilitation Hospital Lee Su-hyun,PT.
Intake Team. Who are we? We are a team consisting of Social Workers/Social Care Co-Ordinators, Occupational Therapists and Social Care Officers. Sometimes.
Chapter 1 Introduction to Adapted Physical Education and Sport 1 Introduction to Adapted Physical Education and Sport Joseph P. Winnick C H A P T E R.
ALYSSA M. BAMER, MPH KURT L. JOHNSON, PHD BRIAN L. DUDGEON, PHD FRED A. CONNELL, PHD, MPH Costs and utilization of assistive technology in individuals.
Survey of Health Science Oct. 16/ STAT Have your patient safety worksheet on your desk. Hand washing sheet too if still need to complete. Get a.
Application and Benefits of Using ICF Core Set in Vocational Rehabilitation Valentina Brecelj, University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia.
Research Center for Insurance Medicine AMC-UMCG-UWV-VUmc A systematic review of ICF Core Sets Towards an evidence-based assessment of work capacity Authors:
Objective and Subjective Measures of Community Participation Presented by Jacqueline Webel, BS, OTDS Washington University School of Medicine Program in.
Caregiver Stress & Rural America
Chapter 11 Career Development Services for Clients with Disabilities
Disability and Social Safety Nets in Developing Countries
Women and Disability Ursula Barry
Approaches to Health Care
Internationally Comparable General Disability Measures
Exploring the Impact of Assistive Device Use on Disability Measurement
Everything You Need to Know About the ABLE Act (H.R.647/S.313)
Access & Inclusive Rowing Provision
Presentation transcript:

Use, Non-Use, and Satisfaction with Assistive Technology Provided by a Reutilization Program Aimee Duplantis, OTS National AT Reuse Conference September 16, 2009

AT Reutilization Program for Independent Living Funded by: Rehabilitation Services Administration H235V060047

Purpose Determine rates of use and non-use of AT distributed by the AT Reutilization Program. Determine if and how reutilized AT is used. Identify factors that contribute to non-use. Evaluate participant satisfaction with program services.

Presentation Overview Describe the Assistive Technology (AT) Reutilization Program at Paraquad Results of follow-up interviews with past participants

Prevalence, Cost, and Benefits 16.6 million Americans use AT – 7.4 million with mobility impairments use AT Medicare expenditures – $7 billion for durable medical equipment (2007) – $1.5 billion for mobility related AT (2001) The use of AT has many benefits Carlson et al, 2001; Hoenig et al, 2001; Scherer & Glueckauf, 2005; Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, 2001 & 2007; Russell et al, 1994

Barriers to AT Access Funding – Funding for AT acquisition is limited – Expensive and difficult to attain – 5 year interval – Back-up AT is not funded Services – Lack of information and evaluation – Insufficient follow-up – Added expense of repairs Recycling, Refurbishment, & Reutilization Programs Finlayson & Hammel, 2003; O’Day & Corocan, 1994

AT Reutilization Program for Independent Living – Collection of AT – Sanitization – Repair and refurbishment – Stored until sold – Significantly reduced price – Client is evaluated and participates in AT selection process and training

Method: Participants Inclusion Criteria Age 18 years or older Received AT at least 1 year prior – Mobility device Cane, crutch, walker, manual wheelchair, or power wheelchair – Shower chair or shower bench – Raised toilet seat or 3-in-1 commode Could answer survey questions

Demographics (N=40) Gender % Female70.0 Race % White47.5 African American/Black45.0 Other2.5 Income % $0-$14, $15,000-$34, $35,000-$55, Not ascertained15.0 Age at purchase Mean58.0 Range28-91 Primary Impairment* % Mobility90.0 Visual30.0 Mental Health25.5 Cognitive12.5 Hearing12.5 *multiple choice question

Method: Semi-Structured Interview Use – Participation with reutilized AT – Level of difficulty without AT Non-Use – Contributing factors Initial questions to determine use or non-use AT and Reutilization Program satisfaction

AT Acquired from Program Device Type Total N=40 Mobility devicen=24 (60.0%) Shower chair or benchn=11 (27.5%) Raised toilet seat or 3-in-1 commode n=5 (12.5%)

Use and Non-Use at Time of Interview Device Type Use n=32 Non-Use n=8 Mobility devicen=19 (79.2%)n=5 (20.8%) Shower chair or bench n=10 (90.9%)n=1 (.09%) Raised toilet seat or 3-in-1 commode n=3 (60.0%)n=2 (40.0%)

Price Comparison Reutilized AT Cost Mobility devices $3,090 Shower chairs and benches $260 Raised toilet seats and commodes $110 TOTAL$3,460 New AT Cost Mobility devices $34,680 Shower chairs and benches $760 Raised toilet seats and commodes $210 TOTAL$35,650

Data Analysis Procedures: Coding Transcribed interviews Grouped into use and non-use categories Used deductive content analysis Coded using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) Hseih & Shannon, 2005; World Health Organization, 2001

International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Functioning and Disability Body Functions and Structures Activities and Participation Contextual Factors Environmental Factors Personal Factors

ICF Activities and Participation Domains D1: Learning and applying knowledge D2: General tasks and demands D3: Communication D4: Mobility D5: Self-care D6: Domestic life D7: Interpersonal interactions and relationships D8: Major life areas D9: Community, social, and civic life

D4: Mobility Codes d410 changing basic body position d415 maintaining a body position d420 transferring oneself d430 lifting and carrying objects d435 moving objects with lower extremities d440 hand and arm use d450 walking d455 moving around d465 moving around using equipment d470 using transportation d475 driving d465 moving around using equipment Moving the whole body from place to place, or on any surface or space, by using specific devices designed to facilitate movement or create other ways of moving around… or moving down the street in a wheelchair or walker

“[My wheelchair] helps me.. to go from one room to another, to go outside, to go shopping, to go to church and everything.” Power wheelchair user D4: Mobility - moving with AT D6: Domestic life - acquisition of goods and services D9: Community, social and civic life - religion and spirituality What do you use your AT for?

“[My transfer bench] actually helps me transfer over into the tub or to take a shower… I don’t have to have more assistance getting into the tub and out…I don’t worry about falling off, or falling over.” Shower bench D4: Mobility - transferring oneself, maintaining a body position D5: Self-care - washing oneself

“[My raised toilet seat] helps me to be able to use the bathroom when I need to independently… It minimizes me having trying to hop up real far to get back in my chair” Raised toilet seat D4: Mobility - changing basic body position D5: Self-care - toileting

Without AT? Participation Restrictions “[My chair] doesn’t just help me. It makes it possible for me to do tasks.” Power wheelchair D4: Mobility, D6: Domestic life “Well it’s the only way I can bathe, so [the shower bench] is vital.” Transfer bench D5: Self-care

AT Use and Participation ICF Participation Domain Mobility device Shower chair or bench Raised toilet seat or commode D1: Learning and applying knowledge D2: General tasks and demands D3: Communication D4: Mobility D5: Self-care D6: Domestic life D7: Interpersonal interactions and relationships D8: Major life areas D9: Community, social, and civic life

Non-Use Participants Abandonment (n=6) Mobility device breakdown (n=3) Impairment change (n=2) Provision of other AT from family (n=1) Discontinued Use (n=2) Insurance paid for new manual wheelchair (n=1) Impairment change (n=1)

ICF Environmental Factor Facilitator or Barrier E1: Products and technology + E2: Natural environment and human- made changes to environment E3: Support and relationships + E4: Attitudes [of health professionals] + E5: Services, systems, and policies +/- AT Program Evaluation

Discussion and Future Directions Evident need for this type of program – AT being distributed is not always medically necessary, but necessary for participation – Majority still use AT at follow-up Overall program and AT satisfaction Outcome Measures now implemented Policy to support AT reutilization programs

Questions? Comments? Carla Walker, Paraquad CIL – (314) – Lindsey Bean, Paraquad CIL – (314) – Kerri Morgan, Washington University in St. Louis – (314) –