Engaging Students in History: Analyzing Sources and Writing Historic Arguments.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

Understanding American Citizenship
Balanced Literacy How our instructional practices will support the implementation of Common Core.
Division of Youth Services Oct 26, 2012 Common Core & the Content Areas.
Session 2: Informational Text Audience: Science, Social Studies, Technical Subject Teachers.
Common Core State Standards Standardizing What We Know Watch this short video.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
How to Write a Critique. What is a critique?  A critique is a paper that gives a critical assessment of a book or article  A critique is a systematic.
Summary-Response Essay
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Nevada Joint Union High School District Nevada Union High School September 23, 2013 Louise Johnson, Ed.D. Superintendent.
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
Teaching American History
Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series
Historical Thinking Skills
Using Primary Sources in the Elementary Classroom.
Session 6: Writing from Sources Audience: 6-12 ELA & Content Area Teachers.
USING STUDENT OUTCOMES WHEN INTEGRATING INFORMATION LITERACY SKILLS INTO COURSES Information Literacy Department Asa H. Gordon Library Savannah State University.
Session 6: Writing from Sources Audience: K-5 Teachers.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Foreign language and English as a Second Language: Getting to the Common Core of Communication. Are we there yet? Marisol Marcin
Saluda County Schools  Will CCSS cause a shift in administrator behaviors?  Will CCSS cause a shift in teacher behaviors?  Will CCSS cause.
Michigan Common Core Standards
HIGHLIGHT THE SHIFTS FROM GRADE TO GRADE: WHAT IS NEW? ELA CCSS for Writing - W.1 Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics.
PRIMARY/SECONDARY SOURCE HISTORY LABS SOCIAL STUDIES CRITICAL THINKING LABS.
Educator’s Guide Using Instructables With Your Students.
Welcome to Implementing the Common Core State Standards
New York State Social Studies Frameworks and the ARC of INQUIRY.
1 Document-based inquiry skills Dutt-Doner, Cook-Cottone, Allen, & Rech-Rockwell (2003) using the Library of Congress’s Primary-Source Documents Part II.
CCSS: Types of Writing.
Language Arts and Social Studies A cross-curricular approach to instruction Session 1.
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
Funded by the Library of Congress.
Historical Thinking Skills
Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano
Common Core National State Standards Math Language Arts Science, Social Studies, and other subject areas. Two foci: Reading and Writing.
Summary-Response Essay Responding to Reading. Reading Critically Not about finding fault with author Rather engaging author in a discussion by asking.
New York State Social Studies Frameworks and the ARC of INQUIRY.
TEACHING WITH PRIMARY SOURCES Level III Training Section One TPS PROGRAM MODULE (2.1.a)
Opposing Viewpoints Teaching American History In Miami-Dade County December 14, 2012 Fran Macko, Ph.D.
Close Reading. AGENDA Demands of complex text on the reader Close reading tools for comprehending complex text Question and answer opportunities with.
Enhancing Literacy through Primary Sources Library of Congress.
Anchor Standards ELA Standards marked with this symbol represent Kansas’s 15%
Writing Informative Grades College and Career Readiness Standards for Writing Text Types and Purposes arguments 1.Write arguments to support a substantive.
1 TEXT-BASED SYNTHESIS WRITING: INFORMATIVE / ARGUMENT OPINION NARRATIVE Silver Shores Elementary.
CREATING AN ACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT Using Inquiry and Primary Sources.
Constructing History: Using Primary Sources to Create Historical Narratives DANIEL A. COWGILL II- UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FLORIDA COUNCIL FOR THE.
ELACC7W1 Write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence.
Argumentative Writing Grades College and Career Readiness Standards for Writing Text Types and Purposes arguments 1.Write arguments to support a.
Greenbush. An informed citizen possesses the knowledge needed to understand contemporary political, economic, and social issues. A thoughtful citizen.
TCH 264: Museum Literacies April 21, Today’s Class Share Writing Crawl Pieces Examine Museum Literacies Describe classroom applications Writer’s.
Funded by the Library of Congress.
Amy Jo Southworth Bay Shore High School Library Common Core wiki: bshscommoncore.wikispaces.com.
READI for History: Yes, they can! National Symposium on Reading for Understanding Alexandria, VA May 18, 2016 Gayle Cribb, History Research Team Member.
Exploring the Literacy Standards: CCSS & Main Idea.
Winston - Salem / Forsyth County Schools ELA Module Two: Writing.
Hitting the Target of Document Analysis
Common Core Strategies with Primary Texts
Historical Research Assessment
Narrative Writing Grades 6-12
Balanced Literacy How our instructional practices will support the implementation of Common Core.
Balanced Literacy How our instructional practices will support the implementation of Common Core.
Creating an Active Learning environment
Creating an Active Learning environment
AVID and The Common Core
Historical Thinking Skills
Historical Thinking Skills
Setting Writing Goals in Science The Living Environment
Duke Johnson West Ridge Middle School
Presentation transcript:

Engaging Students in History: Analyzing Sources and Writing Historic Arguments

In many states and districts, teachers and their students are preparing to meet guidelines and take examinations that require close attention to single documents. The educational benefits from such an approach can be numerous: students learn to read closely, to interpret documents in historical context, to ground argument in concrete evidence, and to explicate large historical meanings from primary sources. But perhaps above all, such documents can be a stimulus to the imagination. They can “humanize” history. And once the imagination is engaged, there is no limit to learning. James G. Basker, Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History. (2004)

Primary sources are the direct evidence of a time and place that you are studying – any material (documents, objects, etc.) that was produced by eyewitnesses or participants in an event or historical moment under investigation Secondary sources, in contrast, are interpretations – often generated by scholars – that are based upon the examination of multiple primary sources.

Primary sources provide a window into the past—unfiltered access to the record of artistic, social, scientific and political thought and achievement during the specific period under study, produced by people who lived during that period. Bringing young people into close contact with these unique, often profoundly personal, documents and objects can give them a very real sense of what it was like to be alive during a past era.

1. Engage students 2. Develop critical thinking skills 3. Construct knowledge 4. Defend a thesis in a historical argument

Primary sources help students relate in a personal way to events of the past and promote a deeper understanding of history as a series of human events. Because primary sources are snippets of history, they encourage students to seek additional evidence through research. First-person accounts of events helps make them more real, fostering active reading and response

Many state standards support teaching with primary sources, which require students to be both critical and analytical as they read and examine documents and objects. Primary sources are often incomplete and have little context. Students must use prior knowledge and work with multiple primary sources to find patterns.

In analyzing primary sources, students move from concrete observations and facts to questioning and making inferences about the materials. Questions of creator bias, purpose, and point of view may challenge students’ assumptions

Inquiry into primary sources encourages students to wrestle with contradictions and compare multiple sources that represent differing points of view, confronting the complexity of the past.

Students construct knowledge as they form reasoned conclusions, base their conclusions on evidence, and connect primary sources to the context in which they were created, synthesizing information from multiple sources.

Integrating what they glean from comparing primary sources with what they already know, and what they learn from research, allows students to construct content knowledge and deepen understanding. (National Archives website)

Reading Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies 6–12 Integration of Knowledge and Ideas: 7. Integrate and evaluate content presented in diverse formats and media, including visually and quantitatively, as well as in words. 8. Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, including the validity of the reasoning as well as the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence. 9. Analyze how two or more texts address similar themes or topics in order to build knowledge or to compare the approaches the authors take.

Anchor Standards for Writing Research to Build and Present Knowledge 7. Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects based on focused questions, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation. 8. Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, assess the credibility and accuracy of each source, and integrate the information while avoiding plagiarism. 9. Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.

6.0 CONTENT STANDARD: SOCIAL STUDIES SKILLS AND PROCESSES Topic A.Read to Learn and Construct Meaning about Social Studies Indicator 1.Use strategies to monitor understanding and derive meaning from text and portions of text Objectives d. Look back through the text to search for connections between and among ideas e.Make, confirm, or adjust predictions about the text f.Periodically summarize or paraphrase important ideas while reading

C3 College, Career & Civic Life for Social Studies State Standards DIMENSION 3 includes the skills students need to analyze information and come to conclusions in an inquiry. These skills focus on gathering and evaluating sources, and then developing claims and using evidence to support those claims.

Dimension 3, Gathering and Evaluating Sources By the End of Grade 8:By the End of Grade 12: Individually and with others, students construct compelling questions, and … D Gather relevant information from multiple sources while using the origin, authority, structure, context, and corroborative value of the sources to guide the selection. D Gather relevant information from multiple sources representing a wide range of views while using the origin, authority, structure, context, and corroborative value of the sources to guide the selection. D Evaluate the credibility of a source by determining its relevance and intended use. D Evaluate the credibility of a source by examining how experts value the source.

D2.His Critique the usefulness of historical sources for a specific historical inquiry based on their maker, date, place of origin, intended audience, and purpose D2.His Integrate evidence from multiple relevant historical sources and interpretations into a reasoned argument about the past. D2.His Critique the central arguments in secondary works of history on related topics in multiple media in terms of their historical accuracy

“Thinking and Acting” Like a Historian When Historians think and act, they…  Construct arguments using claims and evidence from multiple sources  Construct explanations using reasoning, correct sequence, examples, and details with relevant information and data  Present arguments and explanations to others outside the classroom using print and oral technologies and digital technologies  Critique the arguments and explanations for credibility 2012 by Maryland State Department of Education, Modified from C3

 Students sources of information (primary & secondary) to write persuasive arguments.

ENGAGE THE STUDENTS  Provide historic context by reading or sharing a secondary source.  Explain to the students that they will be using several documents to address a compelling question.  Use a map, broadside, poem, political cartoon, or journal entry to hook the students’ attention.  Target the inquiry with a compelling question.

Compelling questions focus on enduring issues and concerns….and unresolved issues that require students to construct arguments in response. “Was the American Revolution revolutionary?” Where is the balance between personal freedoms and the common good?

Focus on descriptions, definitions, and processes that require students to construct arguments in response. They guide the development of an inquiry into a compelling question: “Does the second amendment support ‘stand your ground?“

 Teachers and/or students collect relevant and sometimes conflicting primary sources that provide intrigue.  Students do an initial read and analysis individually and prepare notes and evidence for discussions in small groups.

Sourcing o What is the text? o Who created it and when? Close Reading and Asking Supporting Questions o What does the text say explicitly? o What claim does the author/creator make? o What evidence does the author/creator make? o What is the author’s/creator’s perspective? o What is its purpose? o Does this text seem credible? Why or why not? Contextualizing o What else was going on at the historic time this source was created? o What else was going on during this time (historic setting)? o How did the historic setting influence the creation of the text? Corroborating o Where do the multiple texts agree and disagree? o Which texts are more reliable? o Which are the best texts for answering the compelling question?

 Students will work together in small groups and share their interpretations of the compelling question citing documents as evidence. Supportive questions may be addressed at this time.  Multiple interpretations can emerge and may or may not be accepted by all.

 Formulate an argument/opinion that answers the compelling question citing evidence from the sources: When you write an opinion piece/argument, remember:  Reasoning used in building an argument should be logical and clear.  Arguments should have a beginning, middle, and end; beginning with author’s claim.  Cite evidence from multiple sources.  Some arguments can include an opposing or alternative opinion (younger students will need support to identify this element).

 It engages students  It fosters higher level thinking skills  It cultivates the relevancy of history  It provides another way to assess student understanding  Connects C3 to CCSS