ETISEO, Nice, May 11-12 2005 PETS International Workshops on Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance James Ferryman Computational Vision Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INRETS, Villeneuve dAscq, December 15 th -16 th 2005 Project Overview Video Understanding Evaluation David CHER R&D department R&D department SILOGIC S.A.,
Advertisements

Cong Ye 1, Steve Maddock 1 and Frances Babbage 2 1 Department of Computer Science 2 School of English Literature, Language and Linguistics The University.
SoLSTiCe Similarity of locally structured data in computer vision Université-Jean Monnet (Saint-Etienne) LIRIS (Lyon) (1/02/ ) Elisa Fromont,
PETS’05, Beijing, October 16 th 2005 ETISEO Project Ground Truth & Video annotation.
Patch to the Future: Unsupervised Visual Prediction
INRETS, Villeneuve d’Ascq, December 15 th -16 th 2005 ETISEO Annotation rules Data structure Annotation tool and format Ground truth creation rules Reference.
Real-Time Accurate Stereo Matching using Modified Two-Pass Aggregation and Winner- Take-All Guided Dynamic Programming Xuefeng Chang, Zhong Zhou, Yingjie.
Robust Object Tracking via Sparsity-based Collaborative Model
Computer and Robot Vision I
International Conference on Image Analysis and Recognition (ICIAR’09). Halifax, Canada, 6-8 July Video Compression and Retrieval of Moving Object.
Computer Vision & Biomimetic Object Recognition Bruce A. Draper Department of Computer Science January 28, 2008.
4EyesFace-Realtime face detection, tracking, alignment and recognition Changbo Hu, Rogerio Feris and Matthew Turk.
Domenico Bloisi, Luca Iocchi, Dorothy Monekosso, Paolo Remagnino
Effective Gaussian mixture learning for video background subtraction Dar-Shyang Lee, Member, IEEE.
Trinity College Dublin PixelGT: A new Ground Truth specification for video surveillance Dr. Kenneth Dawson-Howe, Graphics, Vision and Visualisation Group.
Agenda The Subspace Clustering Problem Computer Vision Applications
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, VOL. 20, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 2011 Qian Zhang, King Ngi Ngan Department of Electronic Engineering, the Chinese university.
Jacinto C. Nascimento, Member, IEEE, and Jorge S. Marques
Performance Evaluation of Grouping Algorithms Vida Movahedi Elder Lab - Centre for Vision Research York University Spring 2009.
Face Alignment Using Cascaded Boosted Regression Active Shape Models
Object detection, tracking and event recognition: the ETISEO experience Andrea Cavallaro Multimedia and Vision Lab Queen Mary, University of London
INRIA, Nice. December 7 th -8 th 2006 Evaluation protocol Evaluation process.
Visual Object Tracking Xu Yan Quantitative Imaging Laboratory 1 Xu Yan Advisor: Shishir K. Shah Quantitative Imaging Laboratory Computer Science Department.
GESTURE ANALYSIS SHESHADRI M. (07MCMC02) JAGADEESHWAR CH. (07MCMC07) Under the guidance of Prof. Bapi Raju.
A General Framework for Tracking Multiple People from a Moving Camera
1 Automatic Classification of Bookmarked Web Pages Chris Staff First Talk February 2007.
Ontology-Driven Automatic Entity Disambiguation in Unstructured Text Jed Hassell.
DTI Management of Information LINK Project: ICONS Incident reCOgnitioN for surveillance and Security funded by DTI, EPSRC, Home Office (March March.
1 Lucia Maddalena and Alfredo Petrosino, Senior Member, IEEE A Self-Organizing Approach to Background Subtraction for Visual Surveillance Applications.
Video Event Recognition Algorithm Assessment Evaluation Workshop VERAAE ETISEO – NICE, May Dr. Sadiye Guler Sadiye Guler - Northrop Grumman.
Dynamic 3D Scene Analysis from a Moving Vehicle Young Ki Baik (CV Lab.) (Wed)
An Information Fusion Approach for Multiview Feature Tracking Esra Ataer-Cansizoglu and Margrit Betke ) Image and.
Beauty is Here! Evaluating Aesthetics in Videos Using Multimodal Features and Free Training Data Yanran Wang, Qi Dai, Rui Feng, Yu-Gang Jiang School of.
ETISEO Benoît GEORIS, François BREMOND and Monique THONNAT ORION Team, INRIA Sophia Antipolis, France Nice, May th 2005.
Pedestrian Detection and Localization
1 ETISEO: Video Understanding Performance Evaluation Francois BREMOND, A.T. Nghiem, M. Thonnat, V. Valentin, R. Ma Orion project-team, INRIA Sophia Antipolis,
ETISEO Evaluation Nice, May th 2005 Evaluation Cycles.
BAGGING ALGORITHM, ONLINE BOOSTING AND VISION Se – Hoon Park.
U NIVERSITEIT VAN A MSTERDAM IAS INTELLIGENT AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS 1 M. Hofmann Prof. Dr. D. M. Gavrila Intelligent Systems Laboratory Informatics Institute,
ECE 172A SIMPLE OBJECT DETECTOR WITH INDICATOR WHEN A NEW OBJECT HAS BEEN ADDED TO OR MISSING IN A ROOM Presented by by Hugo Groening.
Evaluation of Research Theme CogB. Objectives LEAR: LEArning and Recognition in vision Visual recognition and scene understanding –Particular objects.
Vehicle Segmentation and Tracking From a Low-Angle Off-Axis Camera Neeraj K. Kanhere Committee members Dr. Stanley Birchfield Dr. Robert Schalkoff Dr.
Stable Multi-Target Tracking in Real-Time Surveillance Video
Tracking and event recognition – the Etiseo experience Son Tran, Nagia Ghanem, David Harwood and Larry Davis UMIACS, University of Maryland.
Expectation-Maximization (EM) Case Studies
ETISEO Benoît GEORIS and François BREMOND ORION Team, INRIA Sophia Antipolis, France Lille, December th 2005.
ETISEO Project Evaluation for video understanding Nice, May th 2005 Evaluation du Traitement et de l’Interprétation de Séquences vidEO.
VIP: Finding Important People in Images Clint Solomon Mathialagan Andrew C. Gallagher Dhruv Batra CVPR
Human Activity Recognition at Mid and Near Range Ram Nevatia University of Southern California Based on work of several collaborators: F. Lv, P. Natarajan,
Dept. of Mobile Systems Engineering Junghoon Kim.
INRETS, Villeneuve d’Ascq, December 15 th -16 th 2005 ETISEO Project Evaluation process.
Department of Computer Science,
Visual Odometry for Ground Vehicle Applications David Nistér, Oleg Naroditsky, and James Bergen Sarnoff Corporation CN5300 Princeton, New Jersey
Using decision trees to build an a framework for multivariate time- series classification 1 Present By Xiayi Kuang.
Target Tracking In a Scene By Saurabh Mahajan Supervisor Dr. R. Srivastava B.E. Project.
ETISEO François BREMOND ORION Team, INRIA Sophia Antipolis, France.
PETS’05, Beijing, October 16 th 2005 ETISEO Project Video Providers Corpus Data Video contents.
Max-Confidence Boosting With Uncertainty for Visual tracking WEN GUO, LIANGLIANG CAO, TONY X. HAN, SHUICHENG YAN AND CHANGSHENG XU IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON.
Portable Camera-Based Assistive Text and Product Label Reading From Hand-Held Objects for Blind Persons.
TRECVID IES Lab. Intelligent E-commerce Systems Lab. 1 Presented by: Thay Setha 05-Jul-2012.
Learning Image Statistics for Bayesian Tracking Hedvig Sidenbladh KTH, Sweden Michael Black Brown University, RI, USA
A. M. R. R. Bandara & L. Ranathunga
Vehicle Segmentation and Tracking in the Presence of Occlusions
SILOGIC S.A. , Toulouse, France
Progress Report Meng-Ting Zhong 2015/5/6.
Liyuan Li, Jerry Kah Eng Hoe, Xinguo Yu, Li Dong, and Xinqi Chu
AHED Automatic Human Emotion Detection
Related Work in Camera Network Tracking
Report 2 Brandon Silva.
Presentation transcript:

ETISEO, Nice, May PETS International Workshops on Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance James Ferryman Computational Vision Group Department of Computer Science The University of Reading, UK

ETISEO, Nice, May Supported by PETS International Workshops on Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance

ETISEO, Nice, May Introduction Theme - Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance Successful tracking of object motions key to visual surveillance PETS started in Grenoble, France in 2000 as satellite workshop of FG2000 Not a competition ftp://pets.rdg.ac.uk

ETISEO, Nice, May PETS - History PETS’2000 was held at FG’2000, 31 March 2000, Grenoble, France. PETS’2001 at CVPR’01. PETS’2002 at ECCV, Copenhagen, Denmark, June PETS2003 at ICVS, Graz; VS-PETS at ICCV2003 PETS2004 at ECCV04 WAMOP-PETS, CO, USA (Jan 05) as part of IEEE Winter Workshop Series 2005: VS-PETS at ICCV’05

ETISEO, Nice, May Datasets – Example – PETS2001 Five separate sets of training and test sequences. All datasets are multiview (frame sychronised). Datasets were significantly more challenging than PETS2000 (significant lighting variation, occlusion, scene activity and use of multiview data)

ETISEO, Nice, May Datasets Dataset 2 Dataset 1 Dataset 3

ETISEO, Nice, May Dataset 1

ETISEO, Nice, May Dataset 2

ETISEO, Nice, May Dataset 4

ETISEO, Nice, May PETS - Prerequisites Tracking results reported –should be performed using the test sequences, but the training sequences may optionally be used if the algorithms require it (for learning etc.) –may be based on a single camera view of the scene, or using multiple view data. –can be based on the entire test sequence, or a portion of it; the images may be converted to any other format and/or subsampled. –results must be submitted in XML format.

ETISEO, Nice, May PETS – Workshop Overview XX contributed papers ~3 sessions: e.g. appearance-based tracking, people and vehicle tracking, multiview tracking Y invited speakers Demonstration session Overall evaluation and discussion

ETISEO, Nice, May Quantitative PE - XML XML provides mechanism of setting up “syntax” file in form of schema Schema used to automatically validate object tracking results For PETS’2001, two schemas were used: –low-level tracking results –high-level surveillance (understanding object motions and interactions)

ETISEO, Nice, May Quantitative PE - XML scene understanding with multiple cameras. --> <people_tracker xmlns=" xmlns:xsi=" xsi:schemaLocation= "

ETISEO, Nice, May Quantitative PE - XML <software name="Reading People Tracker" platform="Linux" version="0.03" run_date="12/07/00"> <object_detector name="Reading People Tracker" platform="Linux" version="0.03" run_date="08/06/01"/>

Quantitative PE - XML <!-- a "target" is any object which moves or may move, usually a person, group of people, or a vehicle. The target's id is GLOBAL to all the cameras defined in "list_cameras" --> <!-- start_frame and end_frame indicate when the target has been tracked. end_frame may be unknown because it is in the future; in this case the longest known time where the object was tracked will be given --> <!-- the status of a graph node explains how the node of current target has been created or tracked. The following values may be used and added together as appropriate: 0 : default value, already tracked 1 : new track (id did not exist before) 2 : re-appearing object (id copied from last occurrence) 4 : merging (more than one parent in graph) 8 : splitting (at least one parent in graph has more than 1 child) 16 : lost (object NOT found in current image, given position etc are estimates (if available) or previous values) 32 : out of field of view (tracked object not "visible" as per definition (see elsewhere)) --> <!-- location values are defined as the sum of the following: 0 : undefined 1 : roadway 2 : in close proximity to vehicle (parking lot) 4 : on grass/verge 8 : other -->

ETISEO, Nice, May D1C1: XML output

ETISEO, Nice, May D1 C1 - 1

ETISEO, Nice, May D1 C1 - 1

ETISEO, Nice, May D1 C1 - 1

ETISEO, Nice, May D1 C1 - 1

ETISEO, Nice, May D1 C1 - 1

ETISEO, Nice, May D1 C1 - 1

ETISEO, Nice, May D1 C1 - 2

ETISEO, Nice, May D1 C1 - 2

ETISEO, Nice, May D1 C1 - 2

ETISEO, Nice, May D1 C1 - 2

ETISEO, Nice, May D1 C1 - 2

ETISEO, Nice, May D1 C1- 3

ETISEO, Nice, May D1 C1- 3

ETISEO, Nice, May D1 C1- 3

ETISEO, Nice, May D1 C1- 3

ETISEO, Nice, May D1 C1- 3

ETISEO, Nice, May D1 C1- 3

ETISEO, Nice, May D1C1: XML output 1

ETISEO, Nice, May D1C1: XML output 2

ETISEO, Nice, May D1C1: XML output 3

ETISEO, Nice, May D1C1: XML output 4

ETISEO, Nice, May D1C1: XML output 5

ETISEO, Nice, May Performance Evaluation Evaluation of surveillance system can be judged in a number of ways: –object detection lag –object centroid position error –object area error –track incompleteness factor –accuracy of semantics of interaction –object identity error maintenance of identity through occlusion …

ETISEO, Nice, May x 288 (JPEG) 10 fps 384 x fps600 MHz Dual PIII 850 MHz 384 x 288 (AVI) 384 x 2885 fps 768 x 5765 fps 384 x fps800 MHz PIII 320 x fps1 GHz PIV 5fps1.7 GHz PIV 768 X 5765fps Image Format Processing Speed Processor

ETISEO, Nice, May Discussion Evaluation criteria are application dependent Training data – required or not? representative examples how much? Semantics of XML schema Ground truth difficult to obtain automatic evaluation - how?

ETISEO, Nice, May PETS Evaluation +ve: “Mindset” – engaging the community – change of culture +ve: Repository of data (PETS01 most frequently accessed) +ve: Discussion/presentation of methodologies, metrics, tools … +ve: Filters through to conferences/published literature -ve: For workshop, choice of dataset(s) + annotation -ve: More quantitative evaluation needed

ETISEO, Nice, May PETS, ETISEO and the future … Online web-based evaluation service (Semi-)automatic validation of XML against ground truth Repository of algorithms (incl. “strawman”), and tabulated results (rank?) Methodology for evaluation Metrics More challenging datasets (e.g. multiview) Live workshop sessions on “unseen” data Expectation that ETISEO will support PETS

ETISEO, Nice, May PETS’05 ICCV ’05, Beijing, China October VS-PETS