Contributions of Prof. Tokuji Utsu to Statistical Seismology and Recent Developments Ogata, Yosihiko The Institute of Statistical Mathematics , Tokyo and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The rate of aftershock density decay with distance Karen Felzer 1 and Emily Brodsky 2 1. U.S. Geological Survey 2. University of California, Los Angeles.
Advertisements

Review of Catalogs and Rate Determination in UCERF2 and Plans for UCERF3 Andy Michael.
Detecting Aseismic Fault Slip and Magmatic Intrusion From Seismicity Data A. L. Llenos 1, J. J. McGuire 2 1 MIT/WHOI Joint Program in Oceanography 2 Woods.
Smoothed Seismicity Rates Karen Felzer USGS. Decision points #1: Which smoothing algorithm to use? National Hazard Map smoothing method (Frankel, 1996)?
Stress- and State-Dependence of Earthquake Occurrence: Tutorial 2 Jim Dieterich University of California, Riverside.
1 – Stress contributions 2 – Probabilistic approach 3 – Deformation transients Small earthquakes contribute as much as large earthquakes do to stress changes.
Modeling swarms: A path toward determining short- term probabilities Andrea Llenos USGS Menlo Park Workshop on Time-Dependent Models in UCERF3 8 June 2011.
Christine Smyth and Jim Mori Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , EARTHQUAKE.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , EARTHQUAKE PREDICTABILITY.
Yan Y. Kagan, David D. Jackson Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA ,
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Statistical.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Statistical.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Full.
Epidemic Type Earthquake Sequence (ETES) model  Seismicity rate = "background" + "aftershocks":  Magnitude distribution: uniform G.R. law with b=1 (Fig.
Omori law Students present their assignments The modified Omori law Omori law for foreshocks Aftershocks of aftershocks Physical aspects of temporal clustering.
Yan Y. Kagan, David D. Jackson Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA ,
1 Some Current Problems in Point Process Research: 1. Prototype point processes 2. Non-simple point processes 3. Voronoi diagrams.
Yan Y. Kagan, David D. Jackson Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA ,
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Global.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Rules of the Western.
Omori law The modified Omori law Omori law for foreshocks Aftershocks of aftershocks Physical aspects of temporal clustering.
AGU fall meeting, December 5-9, 2011, San Francisco INGV Spatial organization of foreshocks as a tool for forecasting large earthquakes E. Lippiello 1,
If we build an ETAS model based primarily on information from smaller earthquakes, will it work for forecasting the larger (M≥6.5) potentially damaging.
Statistics of Seismicity and Uncertainties in Earthquake Catalogs Forecasting Based on Data Assimilation Maximilian J. Werner Swiss Seismological Service.
Seismogenesis, scaling and the EEPAS model David Rhoades GNS Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand 4 th International Workshop on Statistical Seismology, Shonan.
The use of earthquake rate changes as a stress meter at Kilauea volcano Nature, V. 408, 2000 By J. Dietrich, V. Cayol, and P. Okubo Presented by Celia.
FULL EARTH HIGH-RESOLUTION EARTHQUAKE FORECASTS Yan Y. Kagan and David D. Jackson Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California Los.
Analysis of complex seismicity pattern generated by fluid diffusion and aftershock triggering Sebastian Hainzl Toni Kraft System Statsei4.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA ,
Agnès Helmstetter 1 and Bruce Shaw 2 1,2 LDEO, Columbia University 1 now at LGIT, Univ Grenoble, France Relation between stress heterogeneity and aftershock.
Toward urgent forecasting of aftershock hazard: Simultaneous estimation of b-value of the Gutenberg-Richter ’ s law of the magnitude frequency and changing.
Random stress and Omori's law Yan Y. Kagan Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California Los Angeles Abstract We consider two statistical.
Constraints on Seismogenesis of Small Earthquakes from the Natural Earthquake Laboratory in South African Mines (NELSAM) Margaret S. Boettcher (USGS Mendenhall.
Karen Felzer & Emily Brodsky Testing Stress Shadows.
Some Properties of “aftershocks” Some properties of Aftershocks Dave Jackson UCLA Oct 25, 2011 UC BERKELEY.
Foreshocks, Aftershocks, and Characteristic Earthquakes or Reconciling the Agnew & Jones Model with the Reasenberg and Jones Model Andrew J. Michael.
2. MOTIVATION The distribution of interevent times of aftershocks suggests that they obey a Self Organized process (Bak et al, 2002). Numerical models.
GLOBAL EARTHQUAKE FORECASTS Yan Y. Kagan and David D. Jackson Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California Los Angeles Abstract We.
Relative quiescence reported before the occurrence of the largest aftershock (M5.8) with likely scenarios of precursory slips considered for the stress-shadow.
Earthquake size distribution: power-law with exponent ? Yan Y. Kagan Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California Los Angeles Abstract.
1 Producing Omori’s law from stochastic stress transfer and release Mark Bebbington, Massey University (joint work with Kostya Borovkov, University of.
Earthquake Statistics Gutenberg-Richter relation
The Snowball Effect: Statistical Evidence that Big Earthquakes are Rapid Cascades of Small Aftershocks Karen Felzer U.S. Geological Survey.
A proposed triggering/clustering model for the current WGCEP Karen Felzer USGS, Pasadena Seismogram from Peng et al., in press.
California Earthquake Rupture Model Satisfying Accepted Scaling Laws (SCEC 2010, 1-129) David Jackson, Yan Kagan and Qi Wang Department of Earth and Space.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , SHORT-TERM PROPERTIES.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , STATISTICAL SEISMOLOGY–
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA ,
GNS Science Testing by hybridization – a practical approach to testing earthquake forecasting models David Rhoades, Annemarie Christophersen & Matt Gerstenberger.
Jiancang Zhuang Inst. Statist. Math. Detecting spatial variations of earthquake clustering parameters via maximum weighted likelihood.
Abstract The space-time epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model is a stochastic process in which seismicity is classified into background and clustering.
2010/11/01 Workshop on "Earthquake Forecast Systems Based on Seismicity of Japan: Toward Constructing Base-line Models of Earthquake Forecasting" Seismicity.
Triggered Earthquakes at Koyna, India
Global smoothed seismicity models and test results
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , NEGATIVE.
From Randomness to Probability
RECENT SEISMIC MONITORING RESULTS FROM THE CENTRAL
Rick Paik Schoenberg, UCLA Statistics
Review earthquake basics
R. Console, M. Murru, F. Catalli
K. Maeda and F. Hirose (MRI)
Short-term foreshocks and their predictive value
Earthquake Machine, part 2
Kenji MAEDA Meteorological Research Institute, JMA
Statistical Models Based on the Gutenberg-Richter a and b values for Estimating Probabilities of Moderate Earthquakes  in Kanto, Japan M. Imoto (
K. Z. Nanjo (ERI, Univ. Tokyo)
Time-dependent b value for aftershock sequences
by Naoki Uchida, Takeshi Iinuma, Robert M
HAZARDS Seismic hazards
Presentation transcript:

Contributions of Prof. Tokuji Utsu to Statistical Seismology and Recent Developments Ogata, Yosihiko The Institute of Statistical Mathematics , Tokyo and Graduate University for Advanced Studies 1

Utsu (1975) 2

Ogata et al. (1982,86) Intermediate Shallow Seismicity rate = Trend + Clustering + Exogeneous effect deep Shallow seismicity Intermediate + deep seismicity 3

Seismicity rate = trend + seasonality + cluster effect Ma Li & Vere-Jones (1997) SEASONALITY CLUSTERING 4

Matsumura (1986) 5

Utsu (1965) b-value estimation Magnitude Frequency: Aki (1965) MLE & Error assesment Utsu (1967) b-value test Utsu (1971, 1978) modified G-R Law Utsu (1978)  -value estimation  = E[(M-M c ) 2 ] / E[M-M c ] 2 6

Bath Law (Richter, 1958) o D 1 := M main -M 1 = 1.2 Magnitude Frequency: Utsu (1957) D 1 = 1.4 ~ Median based on 90 Japanese M main >6.5 Shallow earthquakes = 7

Bath Law (Richter, 1958) o D 1 =M main -M 1 = 1.2 Utsu (1961, 1969) Mainshock Magnitude Magnitude difference Magnitude Frequency: 8

o D 1 =M main -M 1 = 1.2 Bath Law (Richter, 1958) Utsu (1961, 1969) D 1 = 5.0 – 0.5M main ~ Mainshock Magnitude for 6 < M main < 8 D 1 = 2.0 ~ for M main <6 == Magnitude difference Magnitude Frequency: 9

Aftershocks 10

The Omori-Utsu formula for aftershock decay rate t :t : Elapsed time from the mainshock K,c,p : constant parameters Utsu (1961) 11

1981 Nobi (M8) Aftershock freq. Utsu (1961, 1969) Data from Omori (1895) 12

Mogi (1962) 13

Mogi (1967) 14

Mogi (1962) Utsu (1957) (t > t 0 )  (t ) = Kt -p t > t 0 = 1.0 day 15

Mogi (1962) Utsu (1957) (t > t 0 )  (t ) = Kt -p Utsu (1961) 16

Mogi (1962) Utsu (1957) (t > t 0 ) Kagan & Knopoff Models (e.g., 1981, 1987)  (t ) = Kt -p Utsu (1961) 17

1957 Aleutian 1958 Central Araska 1958 Southeastern Araska Utsu (1962, BSSA) 18

Ogata (1983, J. Phys. Earth) 19

Relative Quiescence in the Nobi aftershocks preceding the 1909 Anegawa earthquake of Ms7.0 20

 i =  (t i ) Ogata & Shimazaki (1984, BSSA) Aftershocks of the1965 Rat Islands Earthquake of M w 8.7 (s) 21

Utsu (1969) Utsu & Seki (1954) log S = M – 3.9 log L = 0.5M – 1.8 log S = 1.02M –

Utsu (1970) Aftershocks Nov Apr …AABACBCBBBAA… B vs C&A … … A B C Tokachi-Oki earthquake May M J =7.9 Count runs 23

Utsu (1970) Standard aftershock activity: Occurrence rate of aftershock of M s is p=1.3, c=0.3 and b=0.85 are median estimates. The constant 1.83 is the best fit to 66 aftershock sequences in Japan during during 1 =5.5), where cf., Reasenberg and Jones (1989) 24

Utsu (1970) Secondary Aftershocks 25

Omori-Utsu formula: 26 (Ogata, 1986, 1988)

Omori-Utsu formula: Kagan & Knopoff model (1987) = 0, t < 10 a+1.5M j  ( t ) = Kt –3/2, t > 10 a+1.5M j = (Ogata, 1986, 1988) 27

Omori-Utsu formula: Kagan & Knopoff model (1987) = 0, t < t M  ( M ).  ( t ) = 10 (2/3)(M-Mc) Kt –3/2, t > t M = (Ogata, 1986, 1988) 27

28

29

30

31

32

1926 – 1995, M >= 5.0, depth < 100km 33

1926 – 1995, M >= 5.0, depth < 100km 34

35

36

37

38

39

Asperities Yamanaka & Kikuchi (2001) 40

41

42

43

LONGITUDE Cooler color shows quiescence relative to the HIST-ETAS model 44

Probability Forecastin g 45

Multiple Prediction Formula(Utsu,1977,78) P 0 : Empirical occurrence probability of a large earthquake. P m : Occurrence probability conditional on a precursory anomaly m; m = 1, 2, …, M, where probabilities are assumed mutually independent. Then, the occurrence probability based on all precursory anomalies is: 46

P 0 : Empirical occurrence probability of a large earthquake. P m : Occurrence probability conditional on a precursory anomaly m; m = 1, 2, …, M, where probabilities are assumed mutually independent. Then, the occurrence probability based on all precursory anomalies is: 47 Multiple Prediction Formula(Utsu,1977,78)

Aki (1981) P 0 : Empirical occurrence probability of a large earthquake. P m : Occurrence probability conditional on a precursory anomaly m; m = 1, 2, …, M, where probabilities are assumed mutually independent. Then, the occurrence probability based on all precursory anomalies is: 48 Multiple Prediction Formula(Utsu,1977,78)

where P 0 : Empirical occurrence probability of a large earthquake. P m : Occurrence probability conditional on a precursory anomaly m; m = 1, 2, …, M, where probabilities are assumed mutually independent. Then, the occurrence probability based on all precursory anomalies is: 49 Multiple Prediction Formula(Utsu,1977,78)

logit Prob{ F | location, magnitude, time, space } = … F := { Ongoing events will be FORESHOCKS } Utsu (1978), Ogata, Utsu & Katsura (1995, 96, GJI ) 50 Multiple Prediction Formula

logit Prob{ F | location, magnitude, time, space } = logit Prob{ F | location of the first event } Multiple Prediction Formula F := { Ongoing events will be FORESHOCKS } Utsu (1978), Ogata, Utsu & Katsura (1995, 96, GJI ) + …+ … 51

logit Prob{ F | location, magnitude, time, space } = logit Prob{ F | location of the first event } Multiple Prediction Formula F := { Ongoing events will be FORESHOCKS } + logit Prob{ F | magnitude sequential feature } Utsu (1978), Ogata, Utsu & Katsura (1995, 96, GJI ) + …+ … Utsu(1978) 52

logit Prob{ F | location, magnitude, time, space } = logit Prob{ F | location of the first event } Multiple Prediction Formula F := { Ongoing events will be FORESHOCKS } + logit Prob{ F | temporal feature of a cluster } + logit Prob{ F | magnitude sequential feature } Utsu (1978), Ogata, Utsu & Katsura (1995, 96, GJI ) + …+ … 53

logit Prob{ F | location, magnitude, time, space } = logit Prob{ F | location of the first event } Multiple Prediction Formula F := { Ongoing events will be FORESHOCKS } + logit Prob{ F | temporal feature of a cluster } + logit Prob{ F | spatial feature of a cluster } + logit Prob{ F | magnitude sequential feature } - 3 x logit Prob{ F } Utsu (1978), Ogata, Utsu & Katsura (1995, 96, GJI ) 54

55

56

TIMSAC84-SASE version 2 (Statistical Analysis of Series of Events) SASeis Windows Visual Basic SASeis 2006 SASeis DOS version with R graphical devices and Manuals 57

Thank you very much for listening 58