Mayukh Das 1Louisiana Tech University For the 2004 D0SAR Workshop Activities with L3 and the Higgs By : Mayukh Das.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Freiburg Seminar, Sept Sascha Caron Finding the Higgs or something else ideas to improve the discovery ideas to improve the discovery potential at.
Advertisements

1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.
Top Physics Validation: Reconstruction, Simulation and Bytestream Paul S Miyagawa The University of Manchester.
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ Beauty 2005 in Assisi, June 2005 Sascha Caron for the DØ collaboration Tag beauty fast …
1  trigger optimization in CMS Tracker Giuseppe Bagliesi On behalf of  tracking group Workshop on B/tau Physics at LHC Helsinki, May 30 - June 1, 2002.
Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 21 May Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting 21 May 2007 Patrick Ryan.
HiT – Higgs and Top (Thursday, June 22, 2000) 1.News - Boaz/Meenakshi 2.Trigger Simulator Status – who?? 3.Proposal for a HiT workshop – Meenakshi/Boaz.
Level 1 Trigger system design specifications 1MHz Tevatron Collisions Level 2 Level 3 Tape 10kHz1kHz20-50Hz Time budget for Level3 i/o, event building,
Top Physics at the Tevatron Mike Arov (Louisiana Tech University) for D0 and CDF Collaborations 1.
The new Silicon detector at RunIIb Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 High-level Trigger Algorithm Development Ignacio Aracena for the SLAC ATLAS group.
Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 6 June Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting 4 June 2007 Patrick Ryan.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Optimizing Higgs Analysis at DØ John Sandy – SULI Intern (Texas Tech University) Mentors: Michael P Cooke and Ryuji Yamada (Fermilab National Accelerator.
L3 Filtering: status and plans D  Computing Review Meeting: 9 th May 2002 Terry Wyatt, on behalf of the L3 Algorithms group. For more details of current.
BEACH Conference 2006 Leah Welty Indiana University BEACH /7/06.
L3 Muon Trigger at D0 Status Report Thomas Hebbeker for Martin Wegner, RWTH Aachen, April 2002 The D0 muon system Functionality of the L3 muon trigger.
Hadron Calorimeter Readout Electronics Calibration, Hadron Calorimeter Scintillator Upgrade, and Missing Transverse Momentum Resolution due to Pileup Zishuo.
H->ZZ->4l Update Trying to re-do CSC note: MC Sample Trigger Eff. Electron Selection Eff. Muon Selection Eff.
Level 3 Muon Software Paul Balm Muon Vertical Review May 22, 2000.
Precise Measurements of SM Higgs at the ILC Simulation and Analysis V.Saveliev, Obninsk State University, Russia /DESY, Hamburg ECFA Study Workshop, Valencia.
Lepton efficiency & fake rate Yousuke Kataoka University of Tokyo Content definitions of leptons p2 efficiency and fake rate for SU3 ( ) p3, p4.
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.
Study of the to Dilepton Channel with the Total Transverse Energy Kinematic Variable Athens, April 17 th 2003 Victoria Giakoumopoulou University of Athens,
Selection cuts on Bs→ with FTK F. Crescioli, P. Giannetti, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G. Volpi 2/5/2006.
F. Ahmadov Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia Institute of Physics, ANAS, Baku, Azerbaijan 41th ITEP Winter School of Physics February.
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
1 Silke Duensing DØ Analysis Status NIKHEF Annual Scientific Meeting Analysing first D0 data  Real Data with:  Jets  Missing Et  Electrons 
Normal text - click to edit HLT tracking in TPC Off-line week Gaute Øvrebekk.
FIMCMS, 26 May, 2008 S. Lehti HIP Charged Higgs Project Preparative Analysis for Background Measurements with Data R.Kinnunen, M. Kortelainen, S. Lehti,
Status of RPC trigger analysis and Muon Trigger efficiencies for W-> μν study By Archana Sharma, Suman B. Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS Meeting.
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
W/Z Plan For Winter Conferences Tom Diehl Saclay 12/2001.
Feasibility of Detecting Leptoquarks With the CDF Detector Althea Moorhead Mentor: Darin Acosta.
UTA MC Production Farm & Grid Computing Activities Jae Yu UT Arlington DØRACE Workshop Feb. 12, 2002 UTA DØMC Farm MCFARM Job control and packaging software.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Thibault Guillemin LAPP, Annecy, France W and Z total cross sections measurements ATLAS-LAPP & LAPTH – Japan meeting, 21/01/08.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
Multi-strange Baryon Correlations in p+p and d+Au Collisions at √s NN = 200 GeV Betty Bezverkhny Yale University For the Collaboration Hot Quarks ’04,
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
24/08/2009 LOMONOSOV09, MSU, Moscow 1 Study of jet transverse structure with CMS experiment at 10 TeV Natalia Ilina (ITEP, Moscow) for the CMS collaboration.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
B-Tagging Algorithms at the CMS Experiment Gavril Giurgiu (for the CMS Collaboration) Johns Hopkins University DPF-APS Meeting, August 10, 2011 Brown University,
Run 2 Jets at the Tevatron Iain Bertram Lancaster University/DØ Experiment PIC2003  Inclusive Cross Section  Dijet Mass  Structure.
10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.
Processing large data sets Brad Abbott. Now J/Psi Starting with root-tuples Add 4-momentum to look for candidates Pick events (raw) -> reconstruct event.
University of Iowa Study of qq->qqH  qq ZZ Alexi Mestvirishvili November 2004, CMS PRS Workshop at FNAL.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Thursday, March 13th Z   had Z  had Preselection Efficiencies (muon) Backgrounds + Cuts Trigger Back to the Tau..and what remains to.
Aug _5071 Top stop by charm channel analysis using D0 runI data OUTLINE physics process of top to stop Monte Carlo simulation for signal data.
DOE REVIEW AUGUST 2006: CDF GROUP AT HARVARD MELISSA FRANKLIN - PROF JOAO GUIMARAES DA COSTA---PROF 25% SEBASTIAN GRINSTEIN - POST-DOC DANIEL SHERMAN -
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
Using direct photons for L1Calo monitoring + looking at data09 Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting February 18, 2010.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
ATLAS Upgrade Program Sarah Demers, US ATLAS Fellow with BNL
Introduction to hands-on Exercise
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
J/Y Simulations for Trigger
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
Presentation transcript:

Mayukh Das 1Louisiana Tech University For the 2004 D0SAR Workshop Activities with L3 and the Higgs By : Mayukh Das

Mayukh Das 2Louisiana Tech University For the 2004 D0SAR Workshop The need and the relevance Online vs Offline data comparison for Level3 The scope of it happening locally Towards a new algorithm searching the Higgs

Mayukh Das 3Louisiana Tech University For the 2004 D0SAR Workshop The flow of data at DØ Detector Front Ends Level 2 Accept Level3 Processor Nodes Event tag Generator Reconstruction

Mayukh Das 4Louisiana Tech University For the 2004 D0SAR Workshop Trigger Simulations and Purpose Collection of Triggers maintained by a highly efficient group. The package Trigsim checks the trigger algorithms and their respective efficiencies Working with L1L2, L3 and L3Debug chunks. Upgraded and revised very frequently.

Mayukh Das 5Louisiana Tech University For the 2004 D0SAR Workshop Activities conducted Running Trigsim successfully on monitor stream data and plotting the end distributions using ROOT. Different simulations needed for online and offline root files. Macro written to support interactive comparison of the correlated branches. Thorough analysis with specific triggers conducted. Link atamon/trig_inst.html atamon/trig_inst.html

Mayukh Das 6Louisiana Tech University For the 2004 D0SAR Workshop Observed comparisons Online Generally lesser events picked up The less number of tracks attributed towards fewer jets Making conditions more stringent helps in showing visible change Offline Generally higher events picked up Normally picks up all the jets available for tracks Not too much of difference while making conditions stringent.

Mayukh Das 7Louisiana Tech University For the 2004 D0SAR Workshop

Mayukh Das 8Louisiana Tech University For the 2004 D0SAR Workshop

Mayukh Das 9Louisiana Tech University For the 2004 D0SAR Workshop

Mayukh Das 10Louisiana Tech University For the 2004 D0SAR Workshop TrigSim and Local Simulations While running on site the main problem is sharing resources. Running batch mode on SAM creates problems attributed to memory leaks Once queued, if the dataset is long, one might have to wait for a day to get a simple result out. GOAL : run TrigSim on CAPS cluster.

Mayukh Das 11Louisiana Tech University For the 2004 D0SAR Workshop Setting up the environment for running the package has been accomplished Linking the library ‘lCHistoB’ for TrigSimana_x and ScriptRunner_x is under process. While running initially detection of D0race cluster was successful. It shall be interesting to see whether running SAM interactively from CAPS is less time consuming. TrigSim and Local Simulations

Mayukh Das 12Louisiana Tech University For the 2004 D0SAR Workshop Searching for the Higgs The last linking puzzle of the standard model Origin of mass attributed towards Higgs Boson If the Higgs exists it possibly plays a role in unifying various forces. Proving the Higgs does not exist would be scientifically every bit as valuable as proving it does

Mayukh Das 13Louisiana Tech University For the 2004 D0SAR Workshop Pointers for the new algorithm The tagging of the b-quarks efficiently is the key. Secondary Vertexing, Impact parameters and Decay lengths were followed before. Efficient tagging of soft muons shall be used in the present scope. PYTHIA and HERWIG usage for MC event generators shall be used.

Mayukh Das 14Louisiana Tech University For the 2004 D0SAR Workshop Tagging with soft Muons b c s μ+μ+ ע μע μ

Mayukh Das 15Louisiana Tech University For the 2004 D0SAR Workshop Presently…… The packages named l3fbtagip and l3fbtagip_results are being analyzed for possible improvements before writing ones own program.

Mayukh Das 16Louisiana Tech University For the 2004 D0SAR Workshop MUW_W_L2M3_TRK10 / 4 L1: NOT Cal unsuppressed readout and 'w' region (CFT) muon with tight scintillator and loose wire requirements. L2: Medium quality muon candidate with pt>3 GeV. L3: mark and pass 1 event in 2000 and set the trigger bit on if a global track with pt>10 GeV is found. MU_JT15_L2M0 / 3 L1: require a region=a (all muon) MUON scintillator trigger and one Calorimeter JET trigger tower with Et>3 GeV and NOT Cal unsuppressed readout. L2: require a MUON candidate with Medium quality and one jet with Et>10 GeV. L3: require at least one JET with Et>15 GeV be found using a simple cone algorithm. One in 40 events will be recorded and marked as unbiased. MU_JT20_MET10 L1: require a region=a (all muon) MUON scintillator trigger and one Calorimeter JET trigger tower with Et>3 GeV and NOT Cal unsuppressed readout. L2: require a MUON candidate with Medium quality and one jet with Et>10 GeV. L3: require at least one JET with Et>20 GeV be found using a simple cone algorithm. The event also must have missing Et>10 GeV.