When we simply reduce BC2 energy, Here is a smaller chirper, but with a larger horn (that can be easily reduced with optimization) UNDBEG Energy at BC2=

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. Set up the phase 1 dictionary for this problem and make the first pivot: Maximize X 1 + X X 3 + X 4 subject to -X 1 + X X 4 ≤ -3 -X 1 +
Advertisements

#3224 Sat 17 th November Restored an “AP” set-up with some measurement of Twiss. – The idea was to take some BPM data with a known twiss set-up to see.
Nonlinear Programming
Nominal and no CSR (R 56-1 = 55 mm, R 56-2 = 59 mm, R 56-3 = 0) L1 phase = 21 deg, V 3.9 = 55 MV CSR OFF BC3 OFF Elegant Tracking  z1 = mm (post.
Data analysis BTF 23 e 24 mag 05 T1 T2 500MeV electrons Repetition Rate 50 Hz Pulse Duration 1-10 ns Current/pulse 1 to 8 particles σ XY ~2mm Max Electronic.
P. Emma, SLACLCLS Commissioning – Sep. 22, 2004 Linac Commissioning P. Emma LCLS Commissioning Workshop, SLAC Sep , 2004 LCLS.
Crab cavity location for 2-mrad x-ing December 7, 2004 A.S.
P. Emma, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P. Emma LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
Phase Difference = Phase Difference = 0.05.
RF Systems and Stability Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
DORIS - 2 GeV Experiences in 2011 Olympus Collaboration Meeting April 27th, 2011 F.Brinker.
Simulation studies of the e-beams for Renkai Li and Juhao Wu 5/20/2014 ALD Review.
Beam Dynamic Shifts 2011 C. Behrens, W. Decking, M. Dohlus, H. & D. Edwards, C. Gerth, T. Hellert, T. Limberg, P. Piot, E. Schneidmiller, M. Scholz, M.
LCLS-II Magnet Error Sensitivities. Sensitivities of dipole magnets, from injector output (95 MeV) to SXR undulator input (4 GeV), where each plotted.
S2E in LCLS Linac M. Borland, Lyncean Technologies, P. Emma, C. Limborg, SLAC.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
RF system issues due to pulsed beam in ILC DR October 20, Belomestnykh, RF for pulsed beam ILC DR, IWLC2010 S. Belomestnykh Cornell University.
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
1 Alternative Bunch Compressor 30 th Sep KNU Eun-San Kim.
J. Wu J. Wu working with T.O. Raubenheimer, J. Qiang (LBL), LCLS-II Accelerator Physics meeting April 11, 2012 Study on the BC1 Energy Set Point LCLS-II.
‘S2E’ Study of Linac for TESLA XFEL P. Emma SLAC  Tracking  Comparison to LCLS  Re-optimization  Tolerances  Jitter  CSR Effects.
D. Lipka, V. Vogel, DESY Hamburg, Germany, Oct Optimization cathode design with gun5 D. Lipka, V. Vogel, DESY Hamburg, Germany.
J. Wu J. Wu working with T.O. Raubenheimer LCLS-II Accelerator Physics meeting May 09, 2012 Study on the BC1 Energy Set Point LCLS-II Accel. Phys., J.
Twin bunches at FACET-II Zhen Zhang, Zhirong Huang, Ago Marinelli … FACET-II accelerator physics workshop Oct. 12, 2015.
Optimization of beam envelop at the injection point of PS Chenghui Yu Jan. 30, 2012.
BNL neutrino beam. Optimization and simulations Milind Diwan June 10.
A. Zholents (ANL) and M. Zolotorev (LBNL)
Preliminary Tracking Results through LCLS-II P. Emma et al., Oct. 23, 2013 Thanks to Mark Woodley and Yuri Nosochkov for MAD design work Use Christos Papadopoulos.
NEAR DETECTOR SPECTRA AND FAR NEAR RATIOS Amit Bashyal August 4, 2015 University of Texas at Arlington 1.
Wakefield effect in ATF2 Kiyoshi Kubo
Microbunching Instability and Slice Energy Spread
Harmonic lasing in the LCLSII SXR beamline G. Marcus, Y. Ding, Z. Huang 11/21/2013.
The reading is 7.38 mm. The reading is 7.72 mm.
Harmonic Generation in a Self-Seeded Soft X-Ray LCLS-II J. Wu Feb. 24, 2010.
SABER Longitudinal Tracking Studies P. Emma, K. Bane Mar. 1, 2006
From Beam Dynamics K. Kubo
Cutting Beam Horns in BC1
Short pulse, low charge LCLS operation
Target and Horn status report
Commissioning the Fast Orbit Feedback System at SSRF
Beam-Based Feedback in LCLS-II
SCUs for the LCLS-II HXR FEL P. Emma July 8, 2014
sx* Limitations and Improvements Paths
Add your team’s summary here followed by your initials Add your team’s summary here followed by your initials. Remember to rotate the person on the.
Add your team’s summary here followed by your initials Add your team’s summary here followed by your initials. Remember to rotate the person.
Progress activities in short bunch compressors
E = 4.0 GeV (nominal) PMU g = 5 mm NbTi Nb3Sn g = 4 mm g = 4 mm 145 m
Time-Resolved Images of Coherent Synchrotron Radiation Effects
If we increase b2 from 10 to 20 will the optimal basis change?
Chromatic Corrections in LCLS-II P. Emma, Y. Nosochkov, M. Woodley Mar
LCLS Longitudinal Feedback and Stability Requirements
G. Marcus, Y. Ding, J. Qiang 02/06/2017
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Hall C – this week Time Period Plans 10/24-10/27 Target cool down
7.5 – Constrained Optimization: The Method of Lagrange Multipliers
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
LCLS bunch length monitor utilizing coherent radiation
Z. Huang LCLS Lehman Review May 14, 2009
Comparing integers.
Wake induced voltage in LCLS-II: LTU + undulator
Comparing Unit Fraction
Design of Compression and Acceleration Systems Technical Challenges
Modified Beam Parameter Range
Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P
Linearization of Bunch Compression (2nd order )
> < > < ≥ ≤ Shot at 90% Larger Smaller Larger
setups 7 (low E1) 4 modules 3rd h. L = 8m 12 modules rf = 20 deg
Bunch Compressor Beam Line Optics
Bhawin Dhital Thanks to :
Presentation transcript:

When we simply reduce BC2 energy, Here is a smaller chirper, but with a larger horn (that can be easily reduced with optimization) UNDBEG Energy at BC2= 5GeV; final beam energy=3.5GeV Energy at BC2=3. 5GeV; final beam energy=3.5GeV E-Jitter 0.076% E-Jitter=0.044%

Global optimization for SXR L1 Phase LX Phase -149 L2 Phase -16 R56 BC mm LX Voltage 33.8MV R56BC mm L3 Phase BC2 Energy 3GeV Final beam energy 3.5GeV Solution1: E-jitter 0.021%

optimization with constrains VLX_max=23MV, solution8 L1 Phase LX Phase L2 Phase R56 BC mm LX Voltage 23MV R56BC mm L3 Phase -12 E-Jitter=0.026% 40% reductions compared with BC2 energy change only 0.044% Still larger horn compared with nominal ~zero chirper

Smaller E-jitter with a larger R56 L1 Phase LX Phase L2 Phase -16 R56 BC mm LX Voltage 23MV R56BC mm L3 Phase -5 E-Jitter=0.020% Larger

Energy at BC2 5GeV Ipk=1.7kA L1 Phase -27 LX Phase -160 L2 Phase -22 R56 BC mm LX Voltage 23MV R56BC mm L3 Phase 0 E-Jitter=0.022% LX Voltage 23MV Final Beam energy=5.5GeV L3 Phase=0

Ebeam 4.0GeV R56BC2_new=50mm L3 phase=-180, Jitter=0.03%