1 AOA Performance Based Oversight Jon Round - Safety Programme Manager Graeme Ritchie - Manager Aerodromes CAA 24 June 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ICT Services Suppliers Briefing Thursday, 17 September 2009.
Advertisements

Module N° 5 – State ALoS. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 3 ICAO.
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
1 Safety Policy April Safety Policy National Level Regulator Service Provider Service Provider.
Module N° 3 – ICAO SARPs related to safety management
Session No. 4 Implementing the State’s Safety Programme Implementing Service Providers SMS
Session No. 3 ICAO Safety Management Standards. The Big Picture Two audience groups Two audience groups States States Service providers Service providers.
Safety and Security in Air Traffic Management Rod Graff Agenda Item 2.
1 Vince Galotti Chief/ATMICAO 27 March 2007 REGULATING THROUGH SAFETY PERFORMANCE TARGETS.
NZ’s STATE SAFETY PLAN W hat the CAA has to do to implement its SMS CAA/AIA/GAPAN South Pacific Aviation Symposium on SMS Simon Clegg General Manager -
Business Critical Rules March 2015
Aviation Safety, Security & the Environment: The Way Forward Vince Galotti Chief/Air Traffic Management ICAO Safety and Efficiency An ICAO Perspective.
Total System, Safety Management Systems and Performance Based Oversight; How do all these concepts fit together to deliver safety? Michael Gadd Continued.
1 Safety Management Systems A Transport Canada Civil Aviation Program Update.
Aust. AM Collaborative Group (AAMCOG) An introduction to ISO “What to do” guide 20th October 2014.
APAC PBN Seminar F.LECAT (ICAO)
What SMS means for an Operator’s relationship with the CAA
Safety Management Simon Roberts SMS Programme Manager UK CAA.
AUDITS AND INSPECTIONS
1 Chief Executive UK CAA Andrew Haines. 2 Agenda Where business aviation fits in the regulatory world Particularly in respect of Part NCC And what opportunities.
International Services The UK Civil Aviation Authority - working in partnership all around the world Tony Roome General Manager International Services.
SMS Implications for Education Jim Dow Chief, Flight Training & Examinations Transport Canada Presentation to National Training Aircraft Symposium
Health and Safety Executive Health and Safety Executive Discretion and Judgement: HSE’s approach Mike Cross 3 June 2014.
Session No. 3 ICAO Safety Management Standards ICAO SMS Framework
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
Ship Recycling Facility Management System IMO Guideline A.962
EuropeAid/131555/C/SER/RS Major Accident Prevention Policy Safety Management System Ernst SIMON, Styrian Regional Government, Austria Belgrade, December.
FASVIG Introductory Meeting
1 Report of the Controller and Auditor-General Civil Aviation Authority: Certification and Surveillance Functions CAA Progress Report To Select Committee.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
WORKSHOP, Nicosia 2-3rd July 2008 “Extension of SAFETY & QUALITY Common Requirements to the EMAC States” Item 3 : Regulatory Context Peter Stastny EUROCONTROL.
1 CAA Offshore Helicopter Review Mark Swan Group Director, Safety and Airspace Regulation.
Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment
SMS Planning.  Safety management addresses all of the operational activities of the entire organization.  The four (4) components of an SMS are: 1)
Safety Management in Europe European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Dr. Erik Merckx EUROCONTROL Directorate ATM Programmes Head of Business.
1 Overview of Sector-Led Improvement Models SERVICES FOR CHILDREN Polly Reed Programme Manager, Children’s Services, IEWM – on behalf of the Children’s.
Victor Kourenkov ICAO EUR/NAT Regional Officer Almaty, 5 to 9 September 2005 LEGISLATION AND ORGANISATION CONSIDERATIONS.
Stephanie Shaw: Civil Aviation Authority
1 The Future Role of the Food and Veterinary Office M.C. Gaynor, Director, FVO EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate.
Win Win Win: can we have regulation that protects people, supports business and costs less? Graham Russell Director Better Regulation Delivery Office.
Trusted to deliver excellence © 2015 Rolls-Royce plc and/or its subsidiaries The information in this document is the property of Rolls-Royce plc and/or.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Remodelling COMAH \\ Changing the way we regulate major hazards Sarah Shore Programme Manager the Competent Authority.
Ensuring the Safety of Future Developments
Improving Purchasing of Clinical Services* 21 st October 2005 *connectedthinking 
Module N° 6 – SMS regulation
Revision N° 11ICAO Safety Management Systems (SMS) Course01/01/08 Module N° 9 – SMS operation.
Gdansk International Air & Space Law Conference November 2013 Authority and Organisation Requirements “effective management systems for authorities and.
Current risk and compliance priorities for law firms PETER SCOTT CONSULTING.
Fire & Rescue Service CAA and Improvement Sharon Gernon-Booth Fire and rescue services PIN 23 March 2009.
ICAJ/PAB - Improving Compliance with International Standards on Auditing Planning an audit of financial statements 19 July 2014.
Bringing an SMS Manual to Life Simon Roberts SMS Programme Lead UK CAA.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
WORKSHOP, Nicosia 2-3rd July 2008 “Extension of SAFETY & QUALITY Common Requirements to the EMAC States” Item 6 : Towards the Implementation of Quality.
Authority Requirements Margit Markus Tallinn, 7 May 2009.
02 March 2016 Defence Aviation Safety Regulation DASR Education Continuum.
Agency Briefing - Overview
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
Module 02 Essential Requirements for ATCOs. Training Objectives  Appreciate the content of the essential requirements for ATCOs as described within EASA.
Pipeline Safety Management Systems
IFATSEA General Assembly Keynote address Berlin, Germany November 2015
The move from a rule based system to a risk based system Challenges for the competent authorities October 2017.
Safety Management in Europe
Rotorcraft Industry Seminar Rotorcraft Risks and Issues 7 September 2017 OFFICIAL SENSITIVE.
Air Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS)
Secured Mail Road Traffic Charter
GA Flight Examiners Seminar
National Airspace and Noise Policy
SAFETY PERFORMANCE TARGETS
Presentation transcript:

1 AOA Performance Based Oversight Jon Round - Safety Programme Manager Graeme Ritchie - Manager Aerodromes CAA 24 June 2014

2 Agenda  PBR transformation  SARG reorganisation  Performance Based Oversight – the essentials  Phase 1Rollout Plan and process  Phase 2 – moving towards full PBO  Value to industry

3 Transformation Programme  We need to:  Concentrate our resources and efforts where they will have the greatest effect.  Get better at identifying emerging risks  Put the right amount of effort into each risk, or reduce effort where the risk is less.  It means:  Reorganised structure  Moving to a more performance-based approach  The ESP transformation programme will deliver the capabilities we need to achieve this.  Using the best data and evidence available to highlight the most serious risks and then put in place action plans to address them.

4 Reorganised Structure Safety and Airspace Regulation Group (SARG)  Intelligence, Strategy and Policy - centralised team to provide data and intelligence to identify key risks and drive more coherent and consistent policy.  Capability teams - (flight operations, airworthiness and airspace, air traffic management and aerodromes)  General Aviation - a new dedicated unit to ensure we take a more proportionate view on GA regulation  Business Management - centralised team to work is managed efficiently and properly prioritised  The Hub - one stop shop for stakeholder engagement – through modernised services, online transactions and new way to engage

5 SARG Organisation

6 Page 1ESP Briefing, December 2013 EASA Pivot to Performance Based Regulation OR*.GEN.200 (a) 3: The identification of aviation safety hazards entailed by the activities of the operator, their evaluation and management of associated risks, including the actions to mitigate the risk and verify the effectiveness EASA ARA/ARO.GEN.305 The oversight programme ….must be developed taking into account the specific nature of the organisation, the complexity of its activities, the results of past certification and/or oversight activities required by ARO.GEN and ARO.RAMP and shall be based on the assessment of associated risks. The ESP Programme and associated IT deployments are designed to support and implement the provide the requirements placed on National Authorities to ensure PBR ADR.AR.C.010 Oversight programme (a) The Competent Authority shall for each aerodrome operator and provider of apron management services declaring their activity to the Competent Authority: (1) establish and maintain an oversight programme covering the oversight activities required by ADR.AR.C.005; (2) apply an appropriate oversight planning cycle, not exceeding 48 months. (b) The oversight programme shall include within each oversight planning cycle, audits and inspections, including unannounced inspections, as appropriate. (c) The oversight programme and planning cycle shall reflect the safety performance of the aerodrome operator and risk exposure of the aerodrome.

7 Performance Based Regulation

8  Transformation program until March 2016  What have we done In the last 12 months?  CAA Reorganisation  SARG  Pathfinders  Live trials  Team of 20, working to change the organisation  Performance Based Oversight  + CAA internal SMS

9 PBO – The Process Feedback (Sharing knowledge and lessons learnt – Internally & Externally) INTELLIGENCE RISK OUTCOME ACTION CHECK FEEDBACK CAA view Our Actions Entity Actions Entity Actions Entity view Risk List (current & future) Agreed Desired Outcomes Identify Options for Action (cost/benefit) Agreed Desired Outcomes Identify Options for Action (cost/benefit) Compliance and Performance Proactive Leading Indicators Assessment Actions Delivered & Measured Compliance and Performance Proactive Leading Indicators Assessment Actions Delivered & Measured Total System Actions Data Intelligence Rules Risks/Issues: What CAA knows What others know Planned changes Incidents & Accidents Performance Based Oversight – Core Regulatory Decision Making CAA Risk List Performance Comparison CAA Governance of Safety International influence Unregulated Sectors

10 PBO - Rollout Plan Jan 14Apr 14Jul 14Oct 14Q1 (’15) Q2 (’15)Q3 (’15)Q4 (’15) Q2 (’15) Q3 (’15) Q4 (’15 Q1 (’16)Q2 (’16) 90 AOC led Entities Fixed: Phase 1 60 Helicopter Led Entities: Phase 1 Flight Ops led Entities 50 EASA Aerodromes and 30 additional to be rolled out over 15 months ANSP led entities (numbers/schedule to be determined in Feb) AW led entities (numbers/schedule to be determined in Feb) 90 AOC led Entities Fixed: Phase 2 60 Helicopter Led Entities: Phase 2 Planning Proportionate involvement; e.g. adoption of ESP principles Entity Groups Aerodrome led Entities ANSP led Entities Airworthiness led Entities Other (GA, CPG, PPT). Two year Deployment Schedule Business change driven by ESP Programme Enabling Tool development & deployment (PPI) Project Priority #1 for Q1/ is Q-Pulse roll-out to Flight Ops (and ASSI), then wider Project Priority #2 for Q2/Q is to develop the next generation of the tools to enable PBO ways of working Influence tech roadmap, planning IT Tools Project Enabling the above rollout…

11 PBO Process Periodic (currently annual) Audit Out brief (Aerodrome specific) Following audit (within 4 weeks ) CAA Internal Review Meeting (IRM) including all entity inspectors: ADR Ops, RFFS, ANSP Ops, Engineer Within 4 weeks of IRM Accountable manager meeting OM + AM + additional specialists as required Phase 2 Oversight consciously planned in accordance with the above

12 PBO Process Accountable manager meeting  Risk based discussion  Taking clear account of ANSP and other key stakeholder risks  Cross organisation risks  No surprises  Agenda + record of discussions/actions agreed

13 PBO – Phase 2  Base lining data which ultimately will lead us to PBO  Data = Compliance, MORS, SMS, Changes, Risks = Performance  Standard format using ARMs methodology  This time next year beginnings of PBO based on Performance + Complexity  Remember this builds on the regulatory compliance obligation

14 Value to industry  Joined up regulator  Focus on substantive risks Vs merely compliance  Sharing of best practice  Ability to see and share sector trends (Data protection)  Focus on poor performing organisations will improve safety in UK  Oversight regime more tailored to the organisation's complexity & performance  An ability to influence EASA and their view of PBO

15 Questions?